>Michael Mann has never made a bad movi-
Michael Mann has never made a bad movi-
manhunter is literally his third best film.
manhunter is great fuck you
better than silence of the lambs
Miami Vice > public enemies >>> Manhunter
fuck you op i know this is bait but still fuck you
check my 65
t. discord tranny
Manhunter is the best Red Dragon adaptation
Clearly not
Manhunter is literally the best adaptation of a Thomas Harris book, and it's pure 80s kino.
>That fucking soundtrack.
why do you try and defend Miami Vice so much?
Why the FUCK do people hate red dragon for
>Inb4 the director
what are you taking about? it's superior in every aspect.
>Why the FUCK do people hate red dragon for
Edward Norton is a shit actor, and a massive douche IRL (according to anyone who has ever had the displeasure of working with him)
Miami Vice was good. Weird how he reuses the whole "time is luck" romance thing word for word though.
Because it's a better Mann film
He might be a prick but still done good movies. Pride and glory is underrated
STRONG AS I AM
wow faggot, how many threads about you hating this movie are you gonna make today? ok we get it you don't like it, get over it ffs
>Edward Norton is a shit actor
Primal Fear begs to differ.
public enemies is great, way better than Miami vice
Mann has never made a good film though.
I actually like red dragon. Manhunter is amazeballs though and a better adaptation.
>What's collateral
It's actually good
lmao imagine forgetting the keep
>and a massive douche IRL
Since when does this matter about anything? Plenty of talented people are dicks but that doesn't make their work worse.
...
I've heard people go on about how the director's cut of this movie supposedly makes this shitheap good. Is this true or are people just memeing
Buffalo Bill is more horrific
>Michael Mann has never made a bad movi-
Literally nobody said that, his movies get worse and worse every year. Public Enemies and that hacker film were unwatchable
>amazeballs
don't cosplay as a 17 yr old girl from six years ago
>that means it's better
lmao
Even were we to grant that it's a bad film (which it's not) it's one if the most beautifully photographed films of the eighties.
No, not good, but acceptable. I think it has only been shown once