SW

Ot: 9/10
Pt: 4/10
St: 2/10

Attached: 1504821964271.png (609x714, 99K)

>Ot: 8.5/10
>Pt: 6.5/10
>St: 3/10

I have and they are miles better than the ST, by every possible metric bar SFX (but the visual design more than compensates for that)

PT : 8/10
OT: 9/10
ST : 0/10

ANH: 7/10
SWHS: 8/10
ESB: 8/10
RotJ: 7/10
CoC: 7/10
BfE: 8/10
TPM: 5/10
AotC: 2/10
RotS: 2/10
ST: n/a (did not see)

Attached: ewok2-1536x864-572581160208.jpg (1536x864, 246K)

OT: 8
PT: 8
ST: 1

Attached: 1551243060615.jpg (1819x1080, 236K)

Putting the ST into one category is kind of unfair as you have TFA which I'd put at a 6 or 7/10 and TLJ which I'd put at 0/10 for single handedly killing star wars.

Also The Rise of Skywalker hasn't even come out yet.

Attached: 1505679685600.png (640x913, 266K)

OT 8/10
PT 6/10

Force awakens 7/10
Last Jedi 1.5/10

OT: 6/10
PT: 9/10
ST: 0/10

based and agree

you have to be really stupid or shallow if you honestly think this

the prequels does so many things better than the sequels, some things even better than OT. perhaps try not being a retard with only surface-level critical analysis and try to see the whole picture.

OT: 6/10
PT: 2/10
ST: 2.5/10

Funny how people on Yea Forums are laughing because JJ is trying to make this more like the OG again, but also complained when the last jedi went the other direction. There's no winning with, you autists. You bitch either way

Objectively?
OT: 7/10
PT: 5/10
ST 6/10

My tastes?
OT: 8/10
PT: 8/10
ST: 2/10

Attached: 1554814578595.gif (978x827, 1.29M)

have you ever considered they didn't bitch because it went somewhere new but that because the place they went was objectively terrible

absolute retard

This. Hated the Prequels. Saw the Force Awakens. Suddenly I'm madly in love with Prequels.

OT: 3/3
PT: 3/3
ST: 2/3
>rating a movie that's not out yet

OT: 7/10
PT: 3/10
ST: so trash I didn't even bother watching /10

Attached: AC490CDB0F6F4B95A6FE14E9AFEF40C9.jpg (234x215, 5K)

Let's try this instead.

OT: 8/10, 9/10, 8/10

PT: 5/10, 4/10, 7/10

ST: 6/10, 5/10 ??/10

Attached: yoda pepe.png (500x473, 263K)

anyone rating the prequels lower than 5 is a dishonest faggot. there are objectively good things about them, like visual design, general concepts, worldbuilding, sound design, SOME of the effects and CGI and some performances. plus the fact that they established the universe more and brought 100x more new things to them than the old trilogy.

anyone rating it lower than the sequel trilogy.. yikes, you're just retarded

OT: 9/10 9/10 7/10
PT: 3/10 1/10 6/10
ST: 5/10 2/10

So you personally wouldn't retcon episode 9? You would double down? How would you correct the franchise?

>OT
5/10
>PT
2/10
>TFA
4/10
Didn't take an interest in 8 after that.

Today I will remind them.

Attached: 1544656113345.png (3099x1777, 3.9M)

the only option is to try more new things but go take a look at the writer for this movie and tell me you have any hope it will be good

>the guy who wrote Batman v Superman and Justice League
Yikes

OT: 9/10
PT: 510
ST: 5/10

>Ot: 8/10
>Pt: 9/10
>St: -10/10

OT 8/10
PT 10/10
ST 0/10

People rating the prequels higher than the OT...Just now i'm realizing I'm way too old to be here, goodbye.

OT: 6/10 kinda boring and slow paced but okay
PT: 2/10 forced romance, bad acting, bad CGI
ST: 8/10 subverted expectations, better cinematography, cool action sequences, more money at box office as well, nice call backs to the OG

I think nostalgia is clouding your judgement

you should've mass-replied, it would've helped your weak bait

Phantom Menace is the most boring movie ever made, any trilogy that has it should be ranked the lowest.

OT: 9/10
PT: 7.5/10
ST: 4/10

>the prequels does so many things better than the sequels, some things even better than OT.

like what

OT: 7.5/10
PT: 7/10
ST: 0/10

IT'S A NEW LAP RECORRRD

Attached: whisper.png (261x200, 21K)

Ot: 7.5/10
Pt: 7.5/10
Dt: N/A (It's not Star Wars, George didn't write it. If I was forced to rate it, I'd give it 1.5/10 for the few fleeting good moments in it).

Yep. This gave me cancer

I targeted you because you are the contrarians building the prequels up. Nobody liked those movies until it got so much hate that it became edgy to like em

worldbuilding for one, the sequel trilogy has next to no worldbuilding at all, and what you do get is really mediocre. TLJ has almost none and might as well not even be set in the Star Wars universe for how lazily written and hyper-focused it is. overall aesthetics and just new fucking shit to the universe too, even in just the Phantom Menace there's massive amounts of new additions to universe, in just that one movie, that outweigh pretty much anything the entirety of both TFA and TLJ 'additions'. you also get a lot more variety in things like sound effects, new aliens, plot themes, all kinds of new locations (a lot of which Lucas was dying to do for the OT but couldn't due to technology limits). and not to mention the fact that the music in the prequel trilogy is the greatest out of all three.

meanwhile the OT, while good, is just what we all know it as, just plain old Star Wars. yet the prequels added so much more to that. what have the sequels added? OT 2.0, but worse in every way. OT with worse characters, worse aliens, worse locations, worse themes, etc. it's just the same fucking era with a slightly altered look and sprayed to be made more safe and bland. there is literally nothing good about the sequel trilogy whatsoever beyond just competent things like acting and visual effects, which at this point is a given when you're talking about a company like Disney.

Truth hurts, user.

Attached: 1555089388418.jpg (340x340, 13K)

OT: 6/10
PT: 4/10
ST: 7/10

sequelfags BTFO

Attached: smug pepe.png (1280x1233, 147K)

The acting isn't good at all, but the special effects are good, you're right about that.

OT: 9/10
PT: 7/10
ST: 1/10

That looks about right.
I would separate the "a Star Wars story" from the ST though. Just to give R1 a tiny bit more credit.
R1: 6/10
Solo: 4/10

and this is the problem with the prequels, execution. George can write a good story, but he isn't very good at directing actors or writing dialogue. he's even said himself that if it was up to him, he would just make silent films that let the visuals do all the storytelling, and it shows. the prequels have a lot of really gorgeous looking shots in them. and with the special effects, while at times they can look pretty shitty, they still did go through a lot of effort to use practical effects, it's just that they also used a little too much CG and in the end the execution of it fell flat in some places, but we're still left with a lot of really great looking designs and setpieces. like Geonosis and Kashyyk, for instance, look better than anything that's come out of either sequel trilogy films despite having vastly inferior CG, and it's all because of the superior aesthetic and visual style choices. without Lucas or a person like him to keep things on track, there's no vision. and without a vision, there's nothing to keep things truly Star Wars.

This, the prequels only true fault is dialogue desu. The actors themselves are great but they were given poor direction and poor material, even then though Ewan Macgregor and Ian Mcdiarmid still did phenomenal jobs.

Attached: prequelfagging8.jpg (625x348, 45K)

I think the dialogue is shat on overly just because of Anakin's lines, he tended to get the cheesy ones. But in all honesty it isn't the end of the world, the dialogue in the OT wasn't a masterpiece by any means either.

Better than OT is arguable but virtually everything about the prequels is better than the sequels. They actually feel like Star Wars movies, for one. To me they're just as memorable as the OT and they actually expanded the IP and universe for the better. With the disney movies they just did the safe thing and retreaded OT material under a new name. We're two movies in now and have barely gotten so much as a peep at what the universe is like now, let alone a reason to be invested in any of the characters or the story. And the third film doesn't seem to change either of those things.

OT: 8/10
PT: 6/10
ST: 0/10

>You bitch either way
There is a third option: a good story that doesn't shit on the original characters. Too bad your brain is too small to realize this. Do yourself a favor and GTFO, shill.

The ultimate sequelfag response, just shitpost while making no argument and pretend like you accomplished something. Gosh, imagine being so dumb you actually like the factory-manufactured garbage Disney puts out. Lol.

>ask for examples of prequels being better than sequels
>get them in spades
>proceed to make no argument in return and cry "p-p-p-p-prequelfag ;("
Yikes

Ot: 7/10
Pt: 5/10
St: 2/10

Attached: prequelfagging9.jpg (600x337, 33K)

OT: 10/10
PT: 8.5-9/10
ST: 3/10 if that

I don't think the dialogue thing is that big of a deal. None of the movies are that great writing-wise when it comes to dialogue, you're here for a cool space opera, and the prequels deliver.

Attached: forecast2.jpg (500x333, 34K)

imagine being this angry

OT 9/10
PT 5/10
ST 2/10
4=5>6>R1>1>2=3>7>8
Didn't see Basedlo, won't see 9.

OT: 9.5/10
PT: 3/10
ST: 6/10

Attached: 1542235360420.jpg (328x404, 69K)

Attached: 1534577175920.jpg (640x480, 18K)

I have no doubt at all that after Disney bought Lucasfilm they realised they had to do something with the Prequels. They had two choices: ignore them and say they are no longer canon, or hype them up and pay off internet blogs to call them "underrated".

They chose the 2nd option, and it worked really well. Ask anyone in 2010 and they'd tell you how fucking awful the prequels were. Ask now and you get basedboys from Reddit spouting memes, and Yea Forumsfags saying that actually they were really deep.

Attached: 1548863145003.jpg (533x492, 62K)

You're a retard, they barely even touch the prequels because they are afraid that people still don't like them. The reality is that the kids who grew up watching them like them, it really isn't that deep.

You sound kind of stupid. No one thinks the prequels are deep, people are just acknowledging now that it's autistic and retarded to act like they're wholly terrible and without any value when in fact there's many good things in them and they added a lot to the franchise and universe overall. There were many fans of the films even as they were being shit on, and they went on to continue being fans when that Clone Wars show came out, and that show still to this day remains one of the mostly highly praised things in the entire franchise, despite being closely tied to the prequels.

You should probably not talk about things you have very little experience with. Makes you look like a retard.

like being fun and having ideas

Kinda hard to say with a rating like that. Both the sequel trilogy and prequel trilogy are so unbelievably hit or miss.

I'd say

6 > 8 > 3 > 5 > 4 > 7 > 2 > 1

Rogue One > Solo

Attached: Telltale_Games.jpg (960x1280, 100K)

It would've worked had they not made sequel movies that were so bad that they made the prequels look good.

>filename

Attached: 1250259270770.jpg (635x467, 34K)

OT: 9/10, 9/10, 9/10
PT: 6/10, 5/10, 8/10
ST: 5/10, 4/10

OT 8/10
PT 7/10
ST -10/10

Attached: forecast4.png (1920x1080, 1.47M)

OT:8/10, 9/10, 7.5/10
PT:5/10, 6/10, 7.5/10
ST:4/10, -2/10

Haven’t seen solo and rogue one is an absolute snoozefest fuck em both

Attached: 59EBD902-2F94-41C6-96F1-8ECEA0382A67.gif (664x550, 1.37M)

these rankings are unbelievably bad

Attached: 1483937587729.jpg (900x1200, 111K)

>You should probably not talk about things you have very little experience with.

Imagine making a post passionately defending the Star Wars prequels that ends with this sentence. The mythos of Jar Jar Binks and the Nimoydians require great experience before jumping to a conclusion on.

>TLJ over anything, let alone over ESB
>ROTS over ESB
>ROTJ being better than ESB or ANH
>AOTC being better than TPM
>TFA being better than either
Absolute cringe. Your taste is so unfathomably shit.

imagine being so deluded into your insecure worldview of me vs them that your lack of reading comprehension and sub-50 iq chimp brain registered that as anything other than an explanation of why you were wrong. we get it bro, you go on reddit and think plinkett is really funny. you should probably move on from that and get some nuance, it could help you think more like an adult

OT: 8/10, 9/10, 8/10
PT: 5/10, 3/10, 4/10
ST: 3/10, 4/10

Lol yikes, why are you so seething? In which part of my post did I "passionately" defend the prequels. I guess the retarded side of your brain doesn't want the other side to know that it's actually okay to say things aren't 100% bad. It's almost as if you came into the thread with an autistic bias and didn't even read to post you replied to. Oh wait...

But yeah, apparently me saying Star War isn't deep right at the start wasn't enough for you. Enjoy living your shill fantasies I guess? Pretend that no one actually likes things or that the Clone Wars series doesn't exist lol. It just got revived for its last season for no reason, apparently.

OT: 7/10, 8/10, 4/10
PT: 0/10, 0/10, 0/10
ST: 6/10, 8/10

Didn't see Solo. Rogue One sucked.

It's odd to me that people call movies that established the previously-referenced "clones" to just be a bunch of Boba Fetts and that Anakin is in fact actually the "Chosen One" of a pointless prophecy contributed great world-building. The prequels did do a good job introducing new planets and aliens but they dropped the ball so hard on such important stuff I can hardly call its world-building a net positive.

Attached: 1512498415316.png (300x300, 9K)

Anh and esb: 7/10
The rest: 3/10

>TLJ
>8/10
Explain.

The PT is a retread of the OT practically beat for beat except the third installment is inverted

Dropped it at TFA. Wish this franchise could just die, it's become capeshit-tier now.

yikes, imagine being this stupid

I hope I piss someone off.

OT: 10/10, 10/10, 8/10
PT: 5/10, 2/10, 2/10
ST: 7/10, 1/10
R1: 7/10
Solo: 4/10

Only genuinely retarded people claim the prequels are 100% worthless. Then again you unironically like the sequels and give TLJ a 8/10 so "retarded" definitely seems to fit you.

are you me?
drop TLJ down a couple of notches and you're pretty much there.

how is phantom menace in any way better than revenge of the sith

or solo, for that matter

Ot 8/10
Pt 7/10 (3 9/10)
7 (7/10)
8 (-3/10)

Easily the most interesting Star Wars movie since Empire and the first to actually put any new ideas forth or take any risks, also the first to actually get the force right since Empire. I don't even have much in the way of criticisms... there's forced sentimentality and bad jokes but that's true about every Star Wars film ever made. The subplot with Finn and Rose is pretty much a waste of time but it's nowhere near the worst one we've had, see for reference Ewoks and podracing

I agree but change the ST to a 3/10

Yeah, new ideas like "none of this shit matters, have sex"

You thought AotC was better than PM?

The Maul fight elevates it above most of the rest all by its self. Without that fight and Qui'gon, it would get 1/10

>implying it does
>implying you shouldn't

OT: 8/10 // 10/10 // 6/10

PT: 2/10 // 1/10 // 5/10

ST: 6/10 // 2/10 // I'll wait for the rental/10

I kinda suspect the love of the prequels in this is mostly by the same guy.

OT: 8.5/10, 9/10, 7.5/10 (the opening and ending are the best of the entire trilogy)
PT: 5/10, 4/10, 6.5/10
ST: 4/10, 2/10

>and the first to actually put any new ideas forth
Like what?
>to actually get the force right since Empire
How do you figure? What did the other movies get wrong? If anything TLJ continued the flippant attitude TFA established.

Only genuinely retarded people defend the prequels unless they're trolling, which pretty much makes them retarded anyway

TLJ is probably more deserving of a 7, maybe a 7.5 but I wanted to rustle some jimmies

>unironically giving something a 0/10 like a youtube eceleb pissbaby would
>giving ROTJ a 4/10, undoubtedly because of childish reasons like "duhhh muh ewoks" or death star 2 even though you give TFA a higher rating
>giving TLJ that high of a rating
Cringe. Can't imagine having taste so shit.

PT: 8/10
OT: 9.5/10
ST: 2/10

Only genuine retards defend the sequels

>I DON'T LIKE YOUR OPINIONS
Ok.

OT: 5/10
PT: 3/10
ST: 2/10

Fuck Star Wars.

I might bump TLJ up to a 2.5

I really wanna like tlj, but I can‘t. Just because of all this nonsense. Like character development reseting, reys wannabe training, snoke is nothing, reys parents are no one. Also the honda or whatever her name was bullshit. Also dark side is a mirror place which does what exactly? That‘s right nothing

Why so many prequel fans on the internet, but none in real life?

lol imagine unironically thinking that the sequels feel more star wars than the prequels despite the fact that the prequels added like 500x more shit to the universe

what have the sequels added other than a casino full of ugly things that don't even look like they're from a star wars movie?

TLJ needs a massive edit. Cut out casino planet. Cut out literally every attempt at humour. I'm sure there's a cut of it that salvageable.

So you think that everything about the prequels is unsalvageable and, rather than explaining your extremely childish case, you'll just say "duhh u stupid". Yikes.

>snoke is nothing
>reys parents are no one
Shit was brilliant and shows why TLJ is such a pleb filter, only brainlet retards are flummoxed because Rey wasn't Obi Wan's second cousin twice removed, thus getting back to the whole fucking point of Star Wars as an escapist fantasy, that anyone can be a great hero regardless of their size or age or genetic linkage or background. Snoke was a shitty idea for a shitty character and no backstory for a cackling beta-Palpatine would have redeemed it any, you can blame JJ for that one and RJ threw it in the dumpster where it belongs. RJ took a giant plate of shit and turned it to gold and it's all downhill from here. But ten to twenty years from now TLJ will be viewed very fondly even though it was received with such mixed reception just like Empire was. Mark my words.

what have the prequels added other than terrible ideas like midichlorians, racist cartoons, and a 1950's retro diner that looks like something from a shitty PS1 game? You're just a zoomer with rose colored glasses.

>I've resorted to name calling and shitposts right out the gate now HAVE A PAINSTAKING DEBATE WITH ME ABOUT A SPACE WIZARD FRANCHISE FOR BABIES
No thanks

It didn't go into a direction, it just stomped on JJ's mystery boxes.
The only new thing is that the Force dispenses itself onto random people to make it balanced again, but that wasn't properly developed and is retarded and also invalidates other 6 movies completely.

I don‘t mind the jokes. It‘s just the underwhelming of everything. Finn beeing sidestory as fuck instead of playing an active role, same with this poe shit, it wasn‘t bad, but it would been better if this would have ended like in anime shit where the protag goes berserk mode. this could have made it much better.

Lol

Love how you can act like a franchise for babies is high art and deepthroat it like its solid gold but then you have a heart attack when its criticized. Don't dare criticize the franchise for babies, you can't do that! Pathetic.

>it should have ended more like my animes
really this explains prequelfags in one fell swoop

As someone else that likes TPM the most of the prequels, I think it feels more like an adventure, with a sad undercurrent that reflects the fact shit will soon be hitting the fan. AotC and RotS have more bombast and spectacle but most of it feels hollow to me. The way it sets up Anakin's attachments and problems is more interesting left unelaborated on given how AotC and RotS would go about exploring it. The prequels in general were unnecessary and TPM has a lot of dumb shit in it (Chosen One nonsense, Jar Jar's antics, poor Jake Lloyd's dialogue) but it's the closest any post-RotJ movie has come to capturing the fun and imagination of the OT for me. I also quite like Neeson as Qui-Gon.

OT: 8/10, Had some great talents working on it.
PT: 3/10, Some good ideas, but horrible execution except for the sound track and maybe a scene or two.
ST: ?/10, I've only seen Rogue One, which was pointless but not that bad. I had and have no intention seeing any movie with Daisy Ridley in the lead; girl can't act and looks like she should be doing some Hegre Art porn.

>act like a franchise for babies is high art and deepthroat it like its solid gold
Please, point out where any of that shit happened, I'll wait

The jokes should come from characters, not at the expense of characters

OT: c3po is dummy, Han Solo is snarky
PT: Jar Jar Binks is stupid and annoying, Qui Gon tells him to shut the fuck up

Both absent from serious and tense scenes (I don't count the droid battle where JJ threw blue balls as serious or tense)

ST: everyone is Jar Jar Binks, no one is Qui Gon, you can't take a single character seriously, bathos bathos bathos

OT: 4/10
PT:7/10
ST: 9/10

I wish I could think that way user. But I can‘t. Tfa, gave some good plot points to be explored on, tlj destroyed it because muh subversion. Reys training is a fucking joke, the whole casino thing doesn‘t make remotely sense. Haha let‘s fly to another planet while the others trying to flee and fly back to see they didn‘t move an inch. Only good things:
>rey and kylo connection
>rey and kylo fight
>luke vs kylo
>rey meets fin
Everything else was shit.

OT: 8/10
Editor Strikes Back: 7/10
ST: Mystery Box/10

they expanded lightsabers and lightsaber dueling enormously, as well as the force beyond just the cringey midichlorians. they added countless new alien species with varied designs that actually look like they belong in star wars rather than the same fat dull-toned wrinkled monsters that have come out of the sequels. they added several new beautiful locations that are just as memorable as any from the OT. they expanded the overall history and lore of the franchise far beyond what even the OT did, and certainly more than what the sequels have even bothered to attempt.

please tell me though, what did the sequels do? what did the movies that literally just ripped off the OT for its era, for its characters, for its designs, weapons, vehicles, planets, etc.. what did this soulless trash bring to the franchise? i'd love to hear

OT:9/10
PT:5/10
ST:5/10

You literally came to a Star Wars ranking thread with TLJ as one of your highest and then posted this Genuinely love the gay "b-b-b-but it's just kid shit bro i don't even lol" when you deliberately go out of your way to prove the opposite. Good job clowning yourself though faggot lol

>unironically using the cringey patrik willems defense
when you have to say that something is for kids as a defense you know you've lost

Attached: 1504274538576.jpg (250x206, 7K)

Have sex

You're just mad that it subverted your expectations and it was too good for you to like it

>BUT IT'S FOR KIDS
So it's okay to gush about kids' films like they're real films, but you can't criticize them like they're real films? That's quite curious.

>subverted expectations
Rian please, don't you have some nazis to go punch on Twitter?

OT: 10/10
PT: 10/10
ST: 10/10

Solo: 10/10

Rogue One: 10/10

Attached: ahhhhhh.png (645x729, 96K)

>TLJ: "Let the pat die"
>JJ: "Lmao here's fucking Sheev"
Where were you when JJ btfo'd pissbaby johnson?

Attached: jj_dab_on_em.png (1080x1440, 1.98M)

OT: 8/10
PT: 5/10
ST: FAN-MADE NON-CANON FILLER

Phantom Menace is a good Star Wars movie. Episode 2 and 3 are fucking soap operas, and not very good ones. Oh, and of course there was the brilliant idea to shoot everything in front of a green screen, instead of on a set or on location. Awful.

>shoot everything in front of a green screen
Half of OT is show in front of a blue screen, big fucking difference
youtube.com/watch?v=jhpFsO8wUoI

OT: 9/10
PT: 7.5/10
ST: 5/10
Rogue One: 6/10
Solo: didn't watch
Christmas Special: 10/10

lol what a contrived meme

The Prequels are veritable kino

youtube.com/watch?v=8ODI04FWyQI

Attached: 1554776772064.png (1920x816, 800K)

For me personally as it stands now
OT: 5/10
PT: 7/10
ST: 2/10 - now this one has a handful of moments that i find good but it's oveall influence on SW and how it feels like it chips away my soul every time i think about it it makes it "-6/10", it's not the end of the world but i do get bummed out thinking about it. so yeah 2/10 as movies but -6/10 as "information entities"

Not a bad action scene, but Jango Fett represents some of the worst impulses of the prequel trilogy (and Star Wars in general post-OT).

OT: 8/10
PT: 4/10
ST: 3/10

Attached: 1483034304785.png (981x1061, 489K)

>OT
10/10
>PT
6.5/10
>ST
2/10

OT: 9/10
PT: 8/10
ST: 2/10
R1: 8/10

Solo: Didn't watch lol

OT: 0/10
PT: 0/10
ST: 0/10

ST is 10/10 because of what Rian did with TLJ

Right, his aesthetic is too cool. Something less colorful with inferior sound effects is more fitting for your poor vision and 20th century mindset.

youtube.com/watch?v=DvKUiJkNyT8

For my based zoomers and young millenials:
youtube.com/watch?v=W7oFYfxWsFg

Attached: 1529611531917.jpg (970x545, 325K)

ANH: 7/10
ESB: 9/10
ROTJ: 7/10

PM: 6/10
AOTC: 4/10
ROTS: 7/10

TFA: 5/10
TLJ: 4/10

RO: 6/10
Solo: Haven't seen

>watching WEATHER on TELEVISION as in CABLE TELEVISION
Please don't tell me old people actually do this.

Ot: 9/10
Pt: 4/10
St: 6/10

The only reason the sequels are that low is because of how bad episode 8 was. If only Rian Johnson wasn't given a chance we would have had a great episode 8.

OT: 9/10
PT: 8/10
ST: 2.5/10

You must suffer through being unthinking

>his aesthetic is too cool.
He's just Boba Fett but blue. That's not my issue with it. My issue is how the prequels inflated the significance of Boba Fett. He was just a cool bounty hunter guy that dies in a goofy way; his father didn't need to be the progenitor of the "clones" of the Clone Wars. Lucas made the clones a bunch of Boba Fetts because people thought Boba Fett was cool. It's dumb.

>He's just Boba Fett but blue.
Boba Fett is one of the best characters in the OT.

>Lucas made the clones a bunch of Boba Fetts because people thought Boba Fett was cool. It's dumb.
lmao unartistic pleb. Make sure to dispose of your opinion on your way out of the theater.

>He was just a cool bounty hunter guy
Retard, out of the top bounty hunters in the galaxy hired by Imperial command he's the only one clever enough to track Han Solo. In your dinky little version of the Star Wars universe the preceding events are different. Your fantasies are irrelevant. Now bow down to the kino, plebeian.

youtube.com/watch?v=_hoXNXSpmng

Attached: 1551902231746.jpg (1140x516, 94K)

OT 8/10
PT 7/10
ST 4/10

/thread