Why is classic Hollywood so much more beautiful? People still romanticize this era but we've never come close again

J

I'm pretty sure Bergman had plastic surgery early into her career.

>every ethnicity, every race.
Except blacks and Abbos. Ewwww.

Because everything's in black and white you mongoloid

didnt even exist

Yes it did. It was also way more common to be done early in your career, because that's how you molded people into stars.

The studios went to enormous lengths to present movie stars as these glamorous, ethereal beings who lived far above the drudgery of real life, not just on-screen but off

It's interesting that nowadays the opposite is more true: movie stars cultivate the image of being just like us regular folks (except hotter and with a lot more money)

Personally I prefer how it is now. There is a wider range of pretty actresses when back then they kinda all had a similar look. There still are current actresses with that old hollywood quality imo.

Attached: Elizabeth_Debicki.jpg (1000x1708, 1.16M)

Blacks can definitely have model ideal looks.

Sidney Portier, OJ Simpson, Denzel Washington, Donna Summer, Taraji P. Henson, Lupita Nyong’o, etc.

To be fair, I've never seen a model ideal Abbo, but I'm sure at least one exists.

nigger culture took over.
Bow it's cool to do drugs and wear sneakers in public

Don't know about her, but 'Marilyn' (Norma Jeane Mortenson) definitely had work done, namely her nose.

Attached: teenaged-norma-jeane-baker.jpg (600x856, 47K)

>Bergmann

pure swedish girls look way better than ingrid. hollywood has always been owned and controlled by jews

And she hated white boy dick lmfao

Current hollywood > boomer hollywood

Attached: 1551791311242.jpg (1024x1820, 201K)

GOAT

Her and her dyky haircut is why I'll skip charlies Angels despite cutie naomi being in it

They weren't. All you see is heavily retouched pictures instead of 6K pixel digital photos that show every single crack and pore on someone's face.

>this is good
>Classic Hollywood was the Boomer Generation

Where do I even begin?

I hope this is a troll. Most of the pictures on the Internet/around the world are not in 4K, let alone 6K

Photoshop didn't exist back then, so the editing techniques would've been very crude, not the level of 'take an average or slightly above average person an BAM now they're hot' level you're implying.

>All you see is heavily retouched pictures

Attached: ingrid bergman.webm (960x720, 530K)

What is the obsession here? Bland
Jewish shovelface

I just fell in love and jizzed my pants at the exact same time.

Ewwww!

hang yourself

>being this idiotic

Red carpet photos are just resized versions of huge originals

All photoshop is a digitized versions of mechanical means, like vaseline on the lens, vibrating the neg and literally using erasers on the plates.

If you want to pretend to be a boomer, you pathetic fuck, at least learn a bit about it instead of posting bullshit. All those celebs had bad diets, smoked like chimneys and wore makeup thicker than hell.

test

She also has that old hollywood quality imo.

Attached: cate blanchett.jpg (1400x2655, 665K)

GIVE ME JEW GF NOW

>Red carpet photos are just resized versions of huge originals

Therefore, what I said still stands and most pictures on the Internet/out in the world are lower rez versions of pics only the original photographers have seen.

I'm not pretending to be anything. You, on the other hand, are pretending to be knowledgeable.

>All those celebs had bad diets, smoked like chimneys and wore makeup thicker than hell.

This I can agree with, but even with this, they were hotter and classier on average than what we've got today. And more talented as actors.

And Naomi Watts.

Attached: naomi watts.jpg (1392x1877, 598K)

And Sersh.

Attached: sersh.jpg (2193x2500, 312K)

Hey, guys. Am I 'Classic Hollywood' tier?

Attached: Margot Robbie.jpg (900x760, 125K)

And Rebecca Ferguson imo.

Attached: rebecca ferguson.jpg (1250x1686, 1.47M)