Did Stanley Kubrick fake the moon landing? Why do you or why do you not believe it?
Did Stanley Kubrick fake the moon landing? Why do you or why do you not believe it?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
twitter.com
if US faked the landing, Russians would surely notice it
to see if he could
>People honestly believe the Soviet Union was competent at anything
I DON'T SING MY MOTHER TONGUE
Would be cool if they actually landed on the moon, but still faked it. Just to try out how powerful their propaganda machine was.
It would have been easier to actually go to the moon than it would have been to fake the moon landing as flawlessly as they did with the technology they had
Then decades later, rival nations put robots on the moon, and took video that looks identical to the moon landing pictures. Why would china be in on it?
>apollo 11 launches to the moon
>nasa realizes none of their cameras are working
>scrambles to create a fake moon landing set so they have some video of something while the actual mission goes on
I don't believe any of this shit. But wouldn't a more entertaining moon conspiracy theory be that they actually landed on the moon and filmed everything, but they didn't actually return.
Stanley Kubrick may or may not have been involved but it was definitely fake, yes.
>It would have been easier to actually go to the moon than it would have been to fake the moon landing
This has to be THE stupidest argument people have come up with to defend the moon landings.
>niggas forgetting about 5 other Moon landing missions
You even had an actual camera failure on Apollo 12.
Moon hoax conspiracy is honestly number one most boring space-related topic.
>doesn't rebut it
yeah i'm thinking user's retarded
He did, but he was unsatisfied with how the props were looking so he filmed it on the Moone
en.wikipedia.org
It does look like a wasteland.
He did fake it. There's a documentary all about it called Dark Side of the Moon (2002) that has interviews with all the government figures involved.
Are fake moon landing people as crazy as Bigfoot people?
There's no air on the moon to dissipate like on Earth. How did the astronauts not boil to death in their suits while they were in the sunlight?
it was only the color camera for 12, they still had the same shitty kind as on 11 that they could use
Still too much of a risk- plus Soviets got first animal, satellite and man in space so must have been pretty on the ball
You know it’s a parody right?
Reminder: fake footage doesn't mean we didn't go.
Americans put first animals in space. Flies and even monkeys. First dogs in space were sent to space by the Soviets (Dezik and Tsygan). But space race wasn't about arbitrary list of "firsts" but about technological supremacy and ability to work in space. In that Americans overtook the Soviets by late 1965.
I don't get why its "crazy" to see its fake. It clearly didnt happen. Every scientist has said how impossible it is to go to the moon. The idea that its crazy to say its fake was started by the media to try to keep people believing its real. Kubrick's movies give way too many hints it was faked and we have access to all the information now to show how impossible going there is
The suits are specifically insulated against the heat and have liquid cooling tubes that take heat away from the body. But the temperature on the moon during the day is very high, you are correct.
You're at the Bargaining stage. "Sure the footage is fake, b-but we still went right?"
Depression is the is the next stage, followed by Acceptance.
>all these retards
Do you believe in flat earth too?
So, yes?
They don't. Or rather it's impossible to determine over the internet but generally it's more likely that those who claim to believe in flat earth or faked moon landings only pretend for attention so it should be our first guess not that they actually believe in something that dumb.
Easier to just laugh than provide an argument how it is real, I guess.
>it's more likely that those who claim to believe in flat earth or faked moon landings only pretend for attention
Why can we not see the flag, and landing site and shit yet? We can see black holes far as fuck from us though?
Why no stars?
The hardest parts are attaining low earth orbit and keeping men alive during re-entry. Everything in between is relatively easy.
You're asking the wrong questions in the wrong places. Delete this user. Trying to save a life.
With most cameras, if something is in focus in the foreground, the background will be out of focus.
it's pretty ucanny how much it looks like something out of an Operation Flashpoint map
I don't know, there are quite a few people in the west who might not be THAT stupid, but are brought up thinking they are smarter than everyone else, so they end up falling for flat Earth/faked Moon landings conspiracy theory type things to validate themselves and feel superior towards "sheeple" who are "obviously dumb enough to believe in any lies the scientists and the government are feeding them".
And then there are legit retards who are gullible enough to fall for anything, as long as someone out there is insistent enough to brainwash them into it.
And the amount of shilling is probably inversely proportional to the amount of people falling for these conspiracy theories, since being a minority makes them that much more passionate about their cause.
We probably went, but I can't help but find it strange that the U.S. went 6 times in a row, and no other country in the 50 years that followed has bothered to go. Seems a little far fetched.
Hours ago just fourth country landed anything on the Moon. Hilariously it was Israel and even more hilariously they crashed. But that's just how complicated it is. And to transport humans you need bigger rockets.
The moon landing was totally fake because the so called "astronauts" left stuff up there which we can see today. Also Kubrick would of totally put some weird shit in the background for artistic effect if he really did shoot a fake thing. I would go on further but my measles is giving me grief and I need to rest.
It also has to do with the brightness level due to the reflective surface of the moon. If you attempted to capture the background stars, the foreground brightness would be blinding.
The US and Soviets were in a pissing contests in the 60s. After the Commies bailed out we decided to not go there again because it's expensive, dangerous and has little actual scientific value
I really don't give a fuck over something as trite as the moon landing
That is a theory, that the moon landing happened but the footage is fake, to hide something.
Wtf I believe in the moon landings now!
yeah, one of the astronauts was actually female and showed a nipple. The footage was burned and sprayed with holy water to protect ameristan
After 6 trips I wouldn't bother again either, but no other country going seems strange. Then again, with how far technology has come, why bother sending people when it's probably more efficient to send a probe.
Sadly, there's no point in talking to anyone on 4chin about this stuff because there are people here who just want to spread misinformation like Flat Earthers.
You are aware of the concept of film being corrupted by the radiation belt?
>
Which one?
We went there 6 times, you ignorant moron.
>Did Stanley Kubrick fake the moon landing?
Of course he didn't.
>Why do you or why do you not believe it?
I believe it, because the science and facts add up, and the people who think it's fake are either schitzophrenics, or shitposters who think it's funny to egg the schitzo's on.
>>nasa realizes none of their cameras are working
This is the part that's hilarious. All of their cameras didn't mysteriously stop working. They had a full complement of cameras on board - film based, which you can see the results of in the archives. There's quite a few of them, like around 6000 still images. The live video feed, which was just a publicity stunt anyway, was cobbled together mess, because of the limitations of broadcasting so far away, were stored on tapes for data, and were lost - and weren't that important as the actual data and film recordings made.
But IT WUZ FAKED BECAUSE THEY GOT LOST HURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
Take your damn meds, schitzos.
>Then decades later, rival nations put robots on the moon, and took video that looks identical to the moon landing pictures. Why would china be in on it?
This photo was taken on the moon in 2013 by China's Chang’e-3 lander. It looks exactly like the moon surface in photos and video of the Apollo missions, and no stars in the sky, just like Apollo photos.
Yet idiots like Owen Benjamin never bring stuff like this up, they keep saying they know the moon landings were faked. Fucking idiot.
Worse. Bigfoot people mistake bears and animals for Bigfoot, but moon hoaxers just made the whole thing up.
Based and blue-pilled
Their suits had water cooling in the suit, and a water pump and heat exchange in the backpack.
Where does the heat go though. Just into the water?
>Every scientist has said how impossible it is to go to the moon
Name one.
Kubrick was going to fake it, but he was such an autist that he demanded to film it on location
We didn't "see" the black hole, not optically. It was generated from data. The image of the black hole is not a photograph.
The Hubble, one of the best optical telescopes ever built, is limited in the visible light bands, in terms of what it can focus on, and is intended to look in the non-visible frequencies, like x-ray. It can't focus on small objects on the moon in ways we could see with the naked eye, or by photograph, because of optical limitations it's pointless to write a book explaining how optics work to explain, at kindergarden levels of thinking for the autists here.
The technology to fully emulate the 1/6th gravity on the moon on film didnt exist then.
Theres a video where an astronaut falls forward and braces himself too hard on the ground and bounces back up.
Thats something you cant do underwater or with wires and motors/actuators
You'll understand when you get to high school physics.
i can understand going a week without eating, but how did they go a week without drinking water? theres no sink on any of the apollo craft. i don't even want to get into how did they shit on the moon? and please don't say muh diapers.
No, it wasn't fake.
Whats really gonna bake your noodle is how they reuse ALL water on the station
They didn't go a week without eating.
They also carried water, in tanks. The moon lander used water created by the propulsion system, as a byproduct, for cooling, for example. They didn't have sinks aboard spacecraft, because faucets are pointless in low gravity environments. Don't be retarded. Educate yourself. This is stuff grade school kids know.
>Don't be retarded.
>ad hominem
your response is automatically invalidated
>not giving a fuck about mankind's greatest accomplishment
where did the kubrick part come from
No. I do not believe it because they did indeed go to the moon..and were promptly told to fuck right off immediately by aliens.
you mean white people's greatest accomplishment
If it was fake why did we build all these rockets?
Because they look cool
Vaccines, anitbiotics, cloning, cryonics, cosmic background radiation, first picture of a black hole.
We are closer to playing god through those discoveries than we are by flinging a few scientists onto a nearby rock
Space race was just a nicer alternative to the arms race.
The US posting "FIRST" on the moon is comparatively insignificant
they were for nuclear bombs. the space program was a cover.
It's like shooting retarded fish in a barrel. Summerfag is back on the menu, boys.
Autism and schitzophrenia.
answer me this then, smartypants. how did they get through the van halen belts without being burned alive? i'll wait.
>argument from fallacy fallacy
dropped
God I love that picture
Isnt it odd everyone else struggles to fill our shoes in terms of contributions to science and higher learning?
We've been making some pretty big scientific discoveries for a while now. Just yesterday, it was released that they found a new human race in the Phillipines. No comment, because "Muh Trump" and "Muh Assange." People would rather roll around in mud pits of autism and rant and rave about fake moon landings than pay attention to the cool as fuck shit we're discovering.
A team of scientists got the first data and image of a black hole, which is a huge step in science, but as usual, it's met here with "It's fake, because muh brain juices are bad, reeeeeee."
It's ignoble savages who think a Bic lighter is bad juju magic.
Speed, dummy. Even Van Allen admitted he was wrong, go snivel at him.
Even if it was fake we all agree it's a better investment and accomplishment than using money on this
While I appreciate all of the people calling moon landing deniers childish, you’re better off just dropping a fact and leaving rather than trying to argue with or convince these people.
>van halen belts
They jumped
show me a vid where eddie van halen admitted he was wrong. protip: you can't.
Ah christ, did I miss that? That thread was fucking epic. fuck me. Well played, user.
Nah man my friends boyfriend is a legit flat earther. Gets super pissed if you tell him he's wrong and says you're going against God, some people are nuts
Flare is for the lazy idiots, leave that stuff to the bill nye types that excel at making it fun.
We got petabytes of data when we turned on the CERN particle collider for a few seconds. With a boring flip of a switch we could potentially uncover the workings of strong weak interaction, how gravity really works and how to create particles of our choosing
this is probably what actually happened.
Religious flat earthers sound the most boring. No schizophreniac beliefs in unreasonable conspiracies involving thousands of people and many generations. Faulty analysis of press conferences or photos. They just read in their translation of the Bible that the sky is a firmament (celestial sphere?).
Oscar "Cumshot" Hernandez, PhD. of the Aeronautical Institute of Guatemala
Checkmate, Sheeple!
when did this site become reddit? jesus christ kill yourselves you fucking faggots
>the van halen belts
it's the van helsing belts, duh
That was probably fake too. U.S. had to put the space theatre game.
Look into the government film studio in Laurel Canyon.
I don't believe it was faked based on the grounds that america as a whole has a big problem with some other country flopping thier dick on the table, and would absolutely waste trillions of dollars just to push someone else outta the spotlight historically
Russias dick back then was pretty fuckin huge, and it hit that table with a thump heard around the world.
America panicked, and immediately try to find a way to one-up them. So they gathered up a bunch of cheap Irish contractors to build the scaffolding, hired a bunch of fresh out of college niggers do the math and calculations, and strapped a handful of poor bastards on top of a billion gallons of fuel and shot them to the moon.
>Russias dick back then was pretty fuckin huge
Their dick is smaller back then than it is now, shill.
They used Hagar shielding.