You should stop using electricity and start living in mud huts because a walrus killed itself...

>you should stop using electricity and start living in mud huts because a walrus killed itself, China and India you are exempt

What did the documentary mean by this?

Attached: 1B52EE8A-7CB3-4F57-A351-FD4684702023.jpg (725x402, 34K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aral_Sea
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dzerzhinsk,_Russia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norilsk#Pollution
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1958_Mailuu-Suu_tailings_dam_failure
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Karachay
lmgtfy.com/?q=india climate change
lmgtfy.com/?q=china climate change
lmgtfy.com/?q=bangladesh climate change
lmgtfy.com/?q=mongolia climate change
ssvk.org/climate_change_sustainable_development.pdf
nrdc.org/experts/anjali-jaiswal/india-launches-national-clean-air-program
nytimes.com/2017/12/19/climate/china-carbon-market-climate-change-emissions.html
projects.worldbank.org/P122320/ulaanbaatar-clean-air-project?lang=en
gapminder.org/whc/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Pests_Campaign
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>Hey guys maybe running your air conditioning all the time and dumping styrofoam into the storm drain isn't the best ide-
>BUT WHAT ABOUT INDIA AND BANGLADESH

Attached: how many earths.jpg (1000x1642, 219K)

What drives climate?

>a literal giant nuclear fusion bomb in the sky that changes temperature
>an American eating a cheeseburger

FUCK WHITE PEOPLE SAVE THE TREES

Maybe there shouldn't be so many people if this is an unsustainable way of living then?

Why are you taking climate change as a personal attack on white people?
I'm sure the "let's kill 5/6 of the planet's population" argument will go over well

that’s not the argument he was making brainlet.

>bait thread
0/10

In before this is based on land size vs population because thats the only fucking this india is that low on, look at their beaches its fucking disgusting.

Air Conditioning COOLS the air brainlet. I'm saving the Earth by blasting my AC, what the duck are you doing?

This is why I can't stand the right wing. I'm pretty anti liberal in alot of ways, if only right wing parties gave a fuck about the environment I might want to vote for them.

>use barely any energy
>barely wipe my ass thanks to bidet
>recycle and dispose of garbage properly
>barely drive
>eat a lot of meat but am cutting it down
Feels good for not being the problem desu

It's another piece of propaganda to get dumb people to ask for restrictions on their lives.
Walrus was chased off the cliff by polar bears, it's how they hunt there.

Indians shit on the street like animals and turn toilets into wierd shrines so they're hardly a good model to follow

Libcucks don't give a shit about the environment either, they just pretend to.

the environment is basically something hijacked by democrats as an issue when it shouldn’t be. like yeah, i’m pretty sure the world won’t end in 3 years but polar bears and other wildlife rapidly approaching living-hell conditions isn’t exactly a partisan issue.

>Multinationals outsource nearly all productioning and resource mining to poor countries with few legal restrictions to protect the environment

Gee, I wonder why.

>another climate change bait thread
knock it off

Socialism now or the walrus gets it

Attached: A9876C82-B0FF-49BB-A2AF-EA9024F6FC88.png (680x680, 221K)

>skirting over the question and trying to deflect this badly

rofl

>Not having offspring because pathetic virgin

Literally the best you can do for this world. Like everything its entirely the normalfags and boomers fault

They're watermelons. Green on the outside, red on the inside.

Campaign for them to improve their regulations then.

But you won’t, because they aren’t white and can do no wrong.

>it wypipo fault!!

Attached: 1554012056211.png (3400x2400, 916K)

So what you're saying is overpopulation is a direct parallel to climate change?
What's the clean energy version of sex?

>STOP HAVING KIDS
>WE NEED MIGRANTS TO IMPROVE BIRTH RATES

I’m surprised people still fall this obvious climate hoax

>You avoid China like the plague because they’re the worst despite being communists

This. The real inconvenient truth (lol) is that Commies have always done more damage to the environment that Leftists care so much about than the dreaded Capitalist menace could ever dream of doing.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aral_Sea

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dzerzhinsk,_Russia

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norilsk#Pollution

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1958_Mailuu-Suu_tailings_dam_failure

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Karachay

Attached: Soviet Pollution.jpg (578x385, 59K)

lmgtfy.com/?q=india climate change
lmgtfy.com/?q=china climate change
lmgtfy.com/?q=bangladesh climate change
lmgtfy.com/?q=mongolia climate change

The reason you don't hear about it from your local newspaper is that your local newspaper doesn't serve these fucking countries.

Based

>I'm pretty anti liberal

Sure you are, wise and impartial voice of reason.

Attached: SJW's Stealthing as 'Trump-supporters'.jpg (740x641, 52K)

That depends on your definition. I have entirely eliminated plastic from my life. Bamboo toothbrush. Metal straws. Glass containers. Wood disposable utensils. Aluminum+wool driver balls. 100% cotton/wool/linen/leather clothing only. Reusable burlap grocery bags. Etc.
But I human led climate change is bullshit. The focus needs to be on a cleaner Earth rather than "muh climate change".

Double-Think.

Attached: Double-Think.jpg (375x435, 33K)

>commies have done more harm to the environment than capitalists

you couldn’t be more fucking wrong holy shit. I’m an unironic falangist, but capitalism has done immeasurable damage to the environment.

I would personally kill 10 walruses for an hour of electricity.

>rides a bike
>am vegetarian

Feels good to not be part of the problem.

Nobody is exempt nigger. Just because you see other people are destroying the planet doesn't give you a guilt free pass. So you could make changes in your life or you can admit you don't care.

Attached: 1544838577178.png (746x798, 56K)

>but paggliacci....i am the walrus

Attached: walruspepe_by_errane-d9gga0i.png (719x1111, 119K)

>a literal giant nuclear fusion bomb in the sky that changes temperature

according to NASA, the temperature and heat put out by the Sun hasn't changed since the 1970's m8

>using fucking Indians as a shining example of ANYTHING

Income inequality, health, hygiene, corruption, broken infrastructure, overcrowding, JESUS FUCKING CHRIST is there even a worse country?

Even if we are causing temperatures to rise that doesn’t change the fact socialism is a shit system.

>oh no a rising sea level

Build a sea wall. Problem solved. Taxing people to death doesn’t solve anything

>trying to blame white westerners again

Again, those countries clearly don't care about the environment. Or else they wouldn't allow such a thing.

it doesn't matter who's responsible.
of course retarded third worlders and chinks are the one actually killing the planet. but do you think they're going to do anything about it on their own? no. it's our responsibility to sphered them for their sake, but mostly for our own: their fuck-ups are costing our childrens' futures. white man's burden and the 14 words.

nice phone posting asshole

If you're breathing out CO2, you're part of the problem.

no, it's because criticising nonwhites is not permitted in white countries

That's a lie, the sun is entering a solar minimum.
The earth is actually about to go into a mini ice age in about 15 years.

Reducing your own carbon footprint and wanting China and India to get cleaner processes are not mutually exclusive.

Lol.yeah like that one time where. Oh wait. Capatalism is just the beleif that a free market self regulates because money talks. What you actually are trying to refer to is CONSUMERISM. A system that directly promotes disposability.

Why don't we just AC the earth though?

go fuck a roo retard

Why do people always think it’s impossible to adapt?

The region next to me literally used to be in the sea. Now it is land.

If waters rise you can polder or build a sea wall.

We can bioengineer crops.

But no, let’s preach Armageddon and pay more tax to millionaires. That will save the planet (lol)

Then why is it hotter some days than others? Checkmate. Oh, you mean because the giant heater in the sky not changing temps doesnt mean our relative position to it doesnt change and with that comes drastic temperature changes?

Good timing then

Heard joke once: Man goes to great clown pagliacci. Says he's depressed. Says life seems harsh and cruel. Says he feels all alone in a threatening world where what lies ahead is vague and uncertain. Pagliac i says, "Treatment is simple. Walrus is in town tonight. Go and see him. That should pick you up." Man bursts into tears. Says, "But Pagliacci...I am the Walrus.”. Walrus jumps off a cliff. Walrus smashes against rocks.

thanks for taking the bait, shit fuck. I'll wipe my ass with your (you)

Why don't we just re-heat our Sun a la Sunshine film?

ssvk.org/climate_change_sustainable_development.pdf
This article was published in the high seat of liberalism, Berkeley, and has been cited professionally in peer-reviewed journal articles almost 200 times

[Citation Needed]

Please see: And that's far from anywhere near a complete list.

Despite lasting less than 100 years, Russia managed to damage the environment in ways the Capitalist West, which has existed for hundreds of years at this point, could never, ever match.

Even at their worst, white western capitalist nations have NOTHING that matches fucking Lake Karachay or the Aral Sea.

How do you account for this discrepancy?

>But muh overpopulated beachfront property areas
Good. Fuck all those people that pay millions to live in a tiny shed next to dozens of other tiny sheds next to the ocean.

If it's backed by ruling class circles like the Club of Rome and the Council on Foreign relations I'm on board. Also UN agenda 21 mandates this. Stop breeding.

>The earth is actually about to go into a mini ice age in about 15 years.

Can't wait for the narrative to change back to "OMG GLOBAL COOLING!" again for that period.

Attached: 1548962997031.jpg (3300x2550, 896K)

Why should I give a shit about a planet that's going to be inherited by niggers?

t.

Attached: C7386A04-582E-4B14-9985-FDC2C2166E9F.jpg (732x493, 64K)

Because you happen to live in it.

>Taxing people to death doesn’t solve anything

Not quite true. It solves China's problem of having to compete with the West.

that’s literally no different than saying communism is just an ideology. if you’re only going to seperate ideology and consequences when it benefits you, you’re literally a boomer.

>Contribution of industrialized and developing countries
>Historically, the industrialized countries have been the primary contributors to emissions of CO2. According to one estimate, industrialized countries are responsible for about 83% of the rise in cumulative fossil fuel related CO2 emissions since 1800. In the 1990s, they accounted for about 53% of the 6.3 GtC/year, which was released as CO2 from fossil fuel combustion. These countries have contributed little to the release of CO2 from the burning of vegetation, which is largely due to tropical deforestation during this period. According to another estimate, developing countries accounted for only 37% of cumulative CO2 emissions from industrial sources and land-use change during the period 1900 to 1999 (Figure 1), whereas industrialized countries accounted for 63%, but because of their higher population and economic growth rates, the fossilfuel CO2 emissions from developing countries are likely to soon match or exceed those from the industrialized countries. Large countries, such as China and India, could match the USA’s year 2000 greenhouse gas emissions within two to three decades. Figure 2 shows that when fossil fuel CO2 emissions alone are considered, due to population and economic growth in the coming decades, the contribution of developing countries as a group will soon overtake the industrialized countries. Historically, the responsibility for emissions increase lies largely with the industrialized world, though the developing countries are likely to be the source of an increasing proportion of future increases.
Oops!

And yet leftists invest millions into one, but not the other.

Money talks, faggot.

tl;dr

unless al gore made a movie about it no one gives a shit

>playing words with capitalism but not doing the same to communism
Technically human greed and shortsighted apathy destroys the environment. It's just that if you lump it all into an ideology then you can pretend that you don't need o change. It's literally 16D scapegoating chess.

The situation will change when every person takes care of this mentality in themselves, rather than immediately getting defensive when someone implies that they aren't fucking perfect and deflecting to some other imperfect person very far away.

Muh communism is just something people can talk about with heir shitty friends in a bar while drinking logic out of their head. Same for the rest of these words. It all comes back to human behaviors that weren't caused by ideologies. They just take the form of ideologies every now and then.

Attached: Who-wants-change-Who-wants-to-change.jpg (589x732, 49K)

Good joke

>pouring millions into an economy that isn't ours
aren't you faggots the ones pushing isolationism?

Red is the only solution

Attached: Dpe0arlW0AEZG19.jpg (694x1024, 189K)

Yes, but not for that long to inconvenience myself so that future generations (niggers) may have a better life.

>investing millions into another country that we have no control over dereasing their emissions
Lead us through how that would be done please. They don't give a shit. Leading by example, using renewable resources AND doing better would be the only thing they'd be moved by. As in, they'd want to copy that success.

We literally need to make clean energy better than fossil and push fossil out of competition nothing else will work.

this is 100% of the reason i vote right wing. this planet is going to shit anyway and i want to make sure all you faggots die in most unfortunate ways possible.

rofl. caring about the environment is inherently isolationist.

nrdc.org/experts/anjali-jaiswal/india-launches-national-clean-air-program
nytimes.com/2017/12/19/climate/china-carbon-market-climate-change-emissions.html
projects.worldbank.org/P122320/ulaanbaatar-clean-air-project?lang=en

It seems like most of your talking points can be taken apart by quick google searches

Many African countries, Afghanistan and PNG all have lower average life expectancy

plastics pollution of ground and water and oceans, air pollution, deforestation and human expansion are all more damaging than emissions

When the part about the deforestation in Madagascar came on, I thought "Damn, this is my fault." Is anyone else flying to Madagascar soon to join the logging industry and make some big changes?

Attached: 1517236278000.png (502x432, 172K)

what does this walrus have to do with climate change?

they used to have ice to sit on but then white people stole it all to make cocktails so now the walruses literally kill themselves in protest

unless you're bringing guns and an army with you you're wasting your time

>this planet is going to shit anyway
Except it's not, it's never been better and it's getting better every day. You need some facts you angsty little faggot.

gapminder.org/whc/

What does it matter when sub Saharan Africa has on average 6-8 children per female head. It's unsustainable replication.

the problem arent the jews or the niggers. the problem are the australians

desu we should all kill ourselves

When do the co2 fags get the rope?
I don't even blame so many normalfags having a natural repulsion to ecology now because of these morons. Meanwhile actual ecological problems are ignored.

who ever made this tried saying they're falling off cliff due to climate change or some bullshit but it's literally how polar bears hunt

Attached: 1554922968177.png (962x891, 323K)

Micro plastics are the single largest problem. We litteraly have no idea how to even begin removing them from the water supply. Its impossible. But while the $$$ tells you to stop having kids and go anemic on a vegan diet, they continue to wear polyester designer clothes and sell you on their "green" 50/50 blends...

Only 1 in 7 people worldwide live in abject poverty with large families. If your concern is population then you want everyone to get richer because as people get richer they get healthier and have less kids who are more educated.

I suspect your view is more dramatic and less fact-based, though.

>if you don't do this thing u r jew

Fuck off.

>let's convince the pagans to join our war against the jews: the article

Man you right wingers are really running out of soldiers if you're scraping the bottom of the new age for scraps.

That's kind of good I guess.

The documentary started blaming white people for the walrus slipping off the cliff

>trips wasted on that gay pagan backwards-looking larp faggotry

ok, shitstradamus

Only 1 in 7. Out of more than 7billion. 1billion people. You are talking about 1billion people user.

Do the left know that climate change wouldn't be an issue had hitler won?? Not even a nazi it's just true

That's about the same as to say that cyanide will solve a headache.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Pests_Campaign

>China and India you are exempt
BASED

Attached: 1525671791851.jpg (778x1046, 230K)

or, something as simple as encouraging them to have less kids, which requires no effort whatsoever. nice job trying to bait him into saying something you can just go full “muh pol” at though.

>we need socialism to save the trees!
*makes pets of Russia and China inhospitable*

>we need to stop having kids to save Mother Gaia
*imports blow IQ people for the sole reason of increasing birth rates to sustain the debt ponzi scheme*

Why are left wing people such hypocrites? Is it sinister sneakiness or are they just genuinely retarded?

Attached: 5B95EA18-878E-40CC-8F7B-56B0CEFC6C62.jpg (731x837, 44K)

Explain yourself retard

>or, something as simple as encouraging them to have less kids, which requires no effort whatsoever

How old are you?

>*makes pets of Russia and China inhospitable*
Elaborate

Jews good even though they are willing to burn the entire world as long as they're the flies on the pile of shit.

I always forget Yea Forums is full of normalfags.

Attached: 1554927414016.jpg (720x720, 39K)

*parts

They literally destroyed an entire sea

>or, something as simple as encouraging them to have less kids, which requires no effort whatsoever

Attached: 1545273723138.jpg (2544x4000, 906K)

Most leftists in the US are bourgeois liberals, not socialists

Fuck off with your world socialism pipe dream.
Your handlers see humans as negligent animals and would like nothing less than to exterminate the majority of them.

get mad you uneducated gaylord, look up solar cycles

>Your handlers see humans as negligent animals and would like nothing less than to exterminate the majority of them.
Didn't think they're this based and redpilled

ok it's this retard still

Projecting hard aussie

thats how you know its bullshit

What you arent understanding freind is that these people litteraly do not know where kids come from. I am not joking you can go research it right now. Places like Africa and I am sure rural India and China as well, the people really dont know sex=kids. That's why they have so many. They start fucking as soon as the hormones kick on, and they start popping out kids as soon as the hormones come on. All the while believing each kid was a gift (or curse) from the gods. That it is entirely random when it occurs. There is so much knowledge you and I take for granted that took our forefathers thousands of years to learn. Truly fascinating.

Naturally, with the advent of automation the surplus population is no longer needed and should be reduced as much as possible to preserve the planet for the future.

>Your handlers see humans as negligent animals and would like nothing less than to exterminate the majority of them.
That has nothing to do with political ideology. Humanity itself has developed that cynical self view. Go to any political article on any social media site you'll find people talking about how we should just nuke X area (or the whole planet) and get it over with. There are literal larping nazies talking about unwanted ethnicities (which are conveniently never their own).

If anything, most of this is concentrated on the right-wing, not the left. The left of has some politicians who are like that, but mostly secretly, because they're not rally political, they're just power hungry faggots who put themselves to the left on the flip of a coin. It's all fake.

Left leaning PEOPLE don't think this way. They would not build a world that works that way.

same thing leftypol

Severe delusion: the post

ok then, you guys tell me how we’re going to get them to stop.

>A world with 7 billions Indians would be clearner than a world of 7 Billion Aussies

Yeah nah, i don't think it would.

Culling

Nuke them with a biodegradable bomb

you need to be a fascist to think "we should survive and everyone else is expendable". That's what the word fascism means. From the Latin fasces, meaning a bundle of rods. "Together we are strong". Stronger than who? "Everyone else" of course. It is an ideology cursed to exterminate itself though conflict.

The middle eastern terrorists who come to blow you up aren't liberals. They are the god-fearing conservative nationalists of their countries who think that you are the undermensh by definition of you now being them. It is that simple. The right wing is an oroboros.

Distance yourself from locale and see the whole planet as a whole, see every place where it hits up its ugly head and how those places then behave towards each other, and you'll see. The only reason why it hasn't killed the species --yet-- is becasue travel and communication made actual interaction harder for thousands of years. Cultures could live secluded not even knowing about each other, no being tested and challenged by contrast. That is no longer a reality. No border will hold information.

Hydrogen bomb*

Attached: 1433263897261.png (1724x1633, 1.22M)

>you need to be a fascist to think "we should survive and everyone else is expendable". That's what the word fascism means. From the Latin fasces, meaning a bundle of rods. "Together we are strong". Stronger than who? "Everyone else" of course. It is an ideology cursed to exterminate itself though conflict.
>The middle eastern terrorists who come to blow you up aren't liberals. They are the god-fearing conservative nationalists of their countries who think that you are the undermensh by definition of you now being them. It is that simple. The right wing is an oroboros.
>Distance yourself from locale and see the whole planet as a whole, see every place where it hits up its ugly head and how those places then behave towards each other, and you'll see. The only reason why it hasn't killed the species --yet-- is becasue travel and communication made actual interaction harder for thousands of years. Cultures could live secluded not even knowing about each other, no being tested and challenged by contrast. That is no longer a reality. No border will hold information.

Attached: 1530814833136.png (360x360, 21K)

>you need to be a fascist to think "we should survive and everyone else is expendable".
>That's what the word fascism means.
>From the Latin fasces, meaning a bundle of rods
>"Together we are strong"
>Stronger than who?
>Stronger than
Not even a paragraph in and I already know you're a moron.

You were already told. Sex ed and better living conditions. Humans naturally make less babies in modern lifestyle. There's research into this. Life compensates the fact that 6 out of 10 babies die by making 20 babies just to be sure. It's almost like an algorithm of the system of life itself.

2nbd generation immigrants of those countries already don't make as many as the rest back at home.

Life doesnt compensate, it because we gave medical shit to people who weren't ready for it.

It should have been 8 in 10 babies died to shit, it was changed to only 4 in 10. now they have to many kids and they all starve.

There is also clearly a connection between IQ and the amount of kids you have. Low IQ's dont worry about the future and thus think 8 kids is sustainable and end up needing the government to bail them out. there are very very few families that can support 8 kids without the government paying their way.

Shit is biodegradable, turning on the ac because you're a pussy damages the ozone layer. Eating a 4 person meal because you're a fatfuck is wastage. You existing is already damaging the environment.

>Whites are going extinct and yet I am supposed to care about future generations

Fuck 'em. I hope the niggers and their Jewish masters inherit this Earth just in time for it to die. I hope every piece of farmland and every mile of fishing grounds are contaminated with chemicals and plastics. I hope the nigger air in the niggers nigger hovels becomes more toxic than sucking down cigarettes. I hope 50% of all the little shitskins children get fucking cancer and not a single pajeet can grind two brain cells together and figure out what to do.

Attached: 1554226137737m.jpg (1024x674, 172K)

>turning on the ac because you're a pussy damages the ozone layer

Attached: 1439069572568.jpg (346x346, 36K)

Because living conditions didn't really change. The economy and infrastructure are the came, if it can even be called that. Just because you gave meds so children don't die from illness that doesn't mean that they have something to eat or somewhere to life.

That's not the same as the uplifting of a civilization.

How are you using the internet from your eco-friendly, off-the-grid wooden shack?

Is uplifting a civilization (if it can even be called that) better for the environment than eradicating it?

>give them more money, the problem will fix itself!
>any day now!
it's all so tiresome

That has nothing to do with the environment. It is a statement about who we are and how we approach life. Our first contract with intelligent life is ourselves.

Overpopulation is not the issue. Go into vertical farming, renewables, modular housing, 3D printing, AI micromanagement, or any of the tech that's on it's way. Overpopulation is a meme to hide that society is badly managed.

if anything we need to go MORE high tech to be sustainable, not less, you uneducated nu-right brainlet

wtf anglosphere stop destroying the planet

Attached: co-emissions-per-capita[1].png (3400x2400, 210K)

There's a finite amount of resources on this planet and a finite amount of energy it receives from the sun.

>overpopulation has nothing to do with the environment
That's factually wrong, user. And you know it.

OH NO THE ARCTIC
What ever shall we do

The focus needs to be on less people.

this wtf nobody even lives there lmfao

It is factually wrong, yes, but it has nothing to do with population itself, and you know it. It has to do with how effectively we can produce to sustain society. This planet is theoretically capable of sustaining even a civilization of 50 billion. The planet is not the limiting factor. We are; and not by nature, but by effort.

>dude just make cities larger lol
fuck off. i don't want to live in a planet of 10+ billion people, most of them shitskin subhumans who do nothing but spread hiv and have 7 kids per woman

And plastics are produced in third world countries to sell to first world countries.

Kek. First world BTFO

BIG
AUSSIE
DICK

We're still below 1% of global emissions though

because subhumans will work for lower wages

Why put effort into that? What the fuck is the point? Don't you see enough people around?

I don't believe this chart solely because India is represented as producing a low amount of CO2. How can that be? Don't they have a shitload of massive metal smelting factories?

Because they're exploited by first world countries.

In my country of five million people they are literally putting up automatic toll booths to save the climate. It's amazing how retarded this shit makes people.

If it were based on land size, the chart would look far worse for India. India has more than 100 times the population density of Australia.
If it were based on land size, the Australia scenario would actually be pretty sweet, the world's population would be only half a billion.

This seems like bullshit. But what do I know, Im just a dumb prole.

It sounds like we need to start culling some third worlders

no retard, it's because they will work for less so the western capitalists choose them over workers in their own countries. the west needs to start making its own stuff again and let the third world die off

>all those emerging technologies I read about on Wired will save the world!
Yeah, and nuclear energy will allow us to all have flying cars, right?

Attached: Vault-boy12.jpg (200x232, 17K)

I am Australian, and you will never stop me from using air conditioning when its needed. Not wanted, needed. Needed to keep me from a state of wanting. Global warming is basically a bunch of establishment actors crying that the common man isnt giving up his sovereignty for the sake of ice niggers. You can all get fucked.

weak

Like the walruses bones against hard rock, yes?

If you gave a shit about the environment you’d say let’s bring the populations down of South America, Africa & Asia down to 300 mil tops for each continent. I would suggest a full genocide of the useless people but libturds will always find a way to make conservatives suddenly forget that more shitskins is detrimental to their world view

this sounds ridiculous and a cursory search gives me nothing to support it
where should i be looking? who is publishing this research?

documentaries like to show footage like this, because who is responsible is very open to interpretation (ignoring for a while that walruses dying like this has been witnessed for quite a while and probably just a natural phenomenon).

white guilt westerners love to see themselves as the guilty party for this. that's a little harder to do when you show the polluted Yangtze or Ganges rivers, the Aral Sea dried up due to Communist mismanagement or Africans poaching endangered species because Chinese superstition demands huge ivory supplies.

you'd need 1.6 earths for the Earth to be sustainable. the world's ressources can replenish themselves slowly, but not if you consume faster than they can regenerate. forests grow back, but not if you cut them too fast. that's what that figure means.

No need to keep searching because in referencing my own material I learned the studies that suggested this were wrong. So ignore me I'm a retard.

Of course it's all selective viewing propaganda for westerners already conditioned to hate themselves for years by nu-PC mental programming. What a nightmare.