This looks terrible

This looks terrible

Attached: lion King.jpg (1080x759, 147K)

Your face looks terrible

t. mouse jew

Like clockwork

Your screenshot? LOoks pretty good to me.

Oi m8 you takin the piss yeah?

Have you even seen the original lion king? Simba could be drawn in ms paint in minutes.

Attached: file.png (410x243, 138K)

>dude photo realism means it's good lmao
once you see the fucker in OP pic talk you'll see how bad of a decision this was
think a little why they barely shown any voice acting

I didnt say the movie was good. I said the screenshot looks good.

Looks weird as shit, photo realistic lions showing no emotion in their faces but trying to sound emotional, whats the point

why did they recast all of the lions as black people?

Yup. Vastly inferior to the timeless original. Worse cast. The CG will age horribly. Totally soulless.

This
Also just a few of the original VAs are on board
I hope it flops beyond repair

Pls kys

I hope this shit bombs

Disney needs to fuck off with this shit already

Not an argument

>keep James Earl Jones because he’s black
>recast Jeremy Irons because he’s white
How is this not racism?

>"""live action"""
>actually just pure uncanny valley CG that already looks dated and ugly


Why do they keep doing this? It was bad in The Jungle Book and it's worse here.

And it’s not like little kids don’t love the originals. Literally what is the point of these “remakes”

It looks like they've just re-animated the original scene-for-scene.

Why.

to make 2 billion at the cinemas

>pure uncanny valley
How does that lion look like a humanoid to you? Because it has a face? FYI, having a face is pretty common among animals.

It is. And is also a huge downgrade. The sad thing is, Chiwetel Ejiofor is a great actor with a great voice but not for this role. Hell, Isris Elba would have fit better but they already used him on Shere Khan.

>uncanny valley only applies to humans
Dumb fuck.

This but they took out all the facial expression/emotion. This looks awful.

Attached: file.png (497x245, 21K)

These pseudo-realistic talking lions are eliciting the same response, therefore it applies. Update the definition. Retarded namefaggot.

Man, not sure about this one, Disney. Lions aren't cute, even Lion cubs have long faces with beady eyes.
The entire point of anthropomorphic animals is to give them human expressions and mannerisms, the original lion king did this just fine with smiling, frowning, happy, angry sad lions.
These things just look like regular gormless lions

>Noooo, my father just died and my facial expression is exactly the same as it was when I was singing I can't wait to be King earlier when I was really happy, am I angry? sad? Happy? It's impossible to tell with my neutral features

what was the fucking point

Holy shit you reddit faggots and your "Not an argument" like someone needs to break down why a piece of shit is a piece of shit for your tiny mind to comprehend. Unironically kill yourself.

I disagree, the animals look great but I don't think a photo realistic remake is gonna work, can't have the same range of emotions on a lion when they mostly look stoic or intimidating. I mean just look at the jungle book remake.

>Holy shit, you reddit faggots! How dare you dispute that you said he movie was good, even though you only commented on a single frame of animation!

THE MOUSE IS FUCKED

Attached: 768560766682802.jpg (500x500, 13K)

Read a book and learn to put a sentence together then kys.

>Both of my favorite Disney cartoons as a kid are getting raped this year


I actually can't tell which looks worse, this or Aladdin. At least the girl playing Jasmine is hot.

>"There's just one frame of animation! How can you comment on the entire thing when it's just one from in OP's post?!"

Imagine unironically being this retarded.

Tell me, when did I say that movie was good? And why are you so angry at me telling you I never said it was good?

I didnt say no one can comment on the entire thing you moron. I said that I was only commenting on one frame. I even specified that I was commenting on one frame when I made the post, you brainlet.

Disney are retards live action animal movies are shit Dumbo flopped and this is banking on a brandname

"The screenshot looks good" is fucking retarded and adds literally nothing to the conversation, it's just you being a faggot.You know he's not talking about the screenshot, but you want to make that the focus of attention. "The screenshot looks great!!! LOOOL" Go back.

Dumbo flopped because who the fuck ever liked Dumbo to begin with? Boring, ancient movie even back when I was a kid in the 90's, pretty sure only 1930's kids had nostalgia for that shit. Why Disney ever thought remaking that would somehow be successful or interesting to the world is beyond me. No one nowadays can even relate with the idea of a circus, that shit doesn't exist anymore and for good reason because they are lame, clowns are god awful, and animal cruelty isn't entertaining.

And you saying that I said people can only comment on the screenshot in op is retarded.
Maybe don't be so hypocritical.

>clowns are awful
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me you little bitch?

Attached: 1554331357650.png (512x512, 116K)

Attached: 1537202040534.jpg (772x198, 67K)