What makes a film good? Can a film be objectively bad? Are there any who would argue that The Room is good, for example...

>doesn't eat for an entire month
he repeatedly said he didn't sleep for an entire month, not even once, which is scientifically impossible.

Define 'postmodernism'

Define "define"

Attached: 4567654578.jpg (225x225, 13K)

i have read multiple books on the subject and he gets it pretty much correct.
you are wrong or a liar.
and since continentals think think language is not a tool to communicate objective truth about the world, but a weapon to dominate their political, racial, sexual, and economic enemies, im not going to believe anything you say.

Attached: 1553552945484.jpg (3630x2722, 441K)

nothing, Petersontards and Peterson himself do not even know what the word means

yeah, I don't care enough to recheck the quote but yeah that's what he said, what a fucking braindead retard

>honk honk

or you know, the fact that it is directly derived from litteral members of the nazi party like martin heideggar, and other nazi intellectuals like paul de man and marice blanchot and literal butt fucking communists, and combines them into a gigantic shit stain of failed epistomology.

>What's wrong with postmodernism anyway
Relativizing everything is for lazy pieces of shits

>Relativizing everything
I mean, in some ways it does, but in another way it really doesn't

Attached: 0e9.jpg (499x499, 26K)

>which is scientifically impossible.
No it's not.

>What's wrong with postmodernism anyway?
i will tell you. here we go...
During the middles ages everything sucked. 90% of people were serfs, barely 1 step above a slave. Almost all governments were autocracies and theocracies. Equality under the law did not exist, different laws applied to different classes, races, and religions. Corruption, poverty, and violence were part of daily life. The aristocracy justified their tyranny with tradition, religion, and naked force. If a serf ever asked a noble, “hey, why should you be a noble, and why should I be a serf,” the answer would be, “Because that’s the way its always been, because my armies will beat the shit out of you, and because god said so.” For over 1000 years, that’s the way people lived, and it sucked.
But then the enlightenment happened, people began to reject tradition, religion, and force as sources of knowledge and justification. They replaced it with reason and empiricism and individualism. People began to use these new sources of knowledge to learn about the world, and then use that knowledge to make their lives better. From enlightenment thinking they created or rediscovered democracy, equality under the law, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, meritocracy, free markets, the abolition of slavery, science, technology, and medicine. The Revolutions in America, the UK, and continental Europe overthrew the oppression of the feudal kings to set humanity on the path to prosperity, peace, and progress. The Enlightenment is one of the greatest glories in the history of man.
But the enlightenment had enemies from the very beginning. The counter enlightenment movement sought to preserve the monarchies and theocracies of Europe against the enlightenment by using mainly theological arguments. The counter enlightenment was centered in Germany, and over 200ish years it became more irrationalist, relativist, and authoritarian until it eventually evolved into the Nazis.

After the defeat of the Nazis, the communists were in trouble. Originally, communism was an enlightenment ideology, it used reason to try to make the world better. But, by the 1960s and 70s, the weight of evidence and arguments were starting to make communism indefensible. But former communists still hated capitalism, and they began to look for ways to continue the fight. They found over 200 years of powerful philosophy that was specifically designed to attack the entire enlightenment foundation that capitalism rested upon. They found the philosophies of literal card carrying members of the nazi party, like martin heideggar, and other far right counter enlightenment intellectuals, like paul de man.
Thus, a peculiar situation arose. Far left philosophers began using a philosophical tradition that was once the exclusive province of the reactionary far right. They started to hate reason. Hate science. Hate democracy. Hate peace. Hate freedom. Hate individualism. Hate humanism. And of course, hate capitalism. They created the intellectual ecosystem known as postmodernism.
For several decades, they developed their theories, and many former Nazi philosophers converted to the far left and became leading members of the postmodern movement.
Today, many commentators have noticed that the SJW left seems to have gone so far left that they have looped all the way around to the opposite side of the spectrum. The term “Regressive Left” has arisen to describe them because they believe many of the same things that the god damned Nazis believe:

The LEFT is now arguing that a person’s race/sex/class is the most important thing about them, just like the Nazis did.
The LEFT is now arguing that a racial elite of capitalists is oppressing their race/sex, just like the Nazis did.
The LEFT is now arguing that an identity group has formed an international conspiracy to oppress their identity, just like the Nazis did.
The LEFT is now arguing that resources, education, political power, and employment should be distributed or denied by race, just like the Nazis did.
The LEFT is now arguing that legal protections, like trial by jury, right to counsel, and presumption of innocence, should be removed to better prosecute “oppressors,” just like the Nazis did.
The LEFT is now arguing that races and sexes should be treated differently by the law, just like the Nazis did.
The LEFT is now arguing that freedom of expression should be restricted, to protect their race, just like the Nazis did.
The LEFT is now arguing against science, just like the Nazis did.
The LEFT is now arguing that coercion, violence and “any means necessary” are the best way to resolve disagreements between races, and sexes, and classes, just like the Nazis did.
The LEFT is now using false flag attacks to manufacture support for their agenda and hatred for their enemies, just like the Nazis did.
The LEFT is now arguing that cultural mixing and contamination should be stopped, to protect their racial culture, just like the Nazis did.
The LEFT is now arguing that culture must be carefully managed by elites to protect their race, just like the Nazis did.
The LEFT is now arguing that the sexuality of particular races/sexes must be suppressed or controlled, to better protect their race/sex, just like the Nazis did.
The LEFT is now arguing that their identity group is under attack from another identity group to promote racial/sexual unity, just like the Nazis did.

Who the FUCK said you could talk to me?

In my country, the left hates post modernism

>No it's not.
Yes it is.

I said NO, it's not.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatal_insomnia
And here comes the backpedalling

I said YES, it is!
Here is my wiipedia article, bitch.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleep_deprivation

i would not categorize postmodernism as left vs right.
i would say it is enlightenment vs counter enlightenment.
so which ever faction in your country is failing miserably in their arguments, they are forced to fall back on anti enlightenment positions to survive.

so for example: if one faction says men and women are biologically different, and another faction say they are the same, the same faction will be forced to adopt postmodern tactics because they are objectively wrong. so they have to develop alternative methods (usually coercion) to make people accept their position.

>Corke died in 1993, a month after his 42nd birthday, when he had been completely sleep-deprived for 6 months
Is 6 months longer than a month? Shit I don't know

>Randy Gardner holds the scientifically documented record for the longest period of time a human being has intentionally gone without sleep not using stimulants of any kind. Gardner stayed awake for 264 hours (11 days), breaking the previous record of 260 hours held by Tom Rounds of Honolulu.
>Claims of total sleep deprivation lasting years have been made several times,but none are scientifically verified.

His diet is meat and greens, and there's nothing wrong with that.

>intentionally
And there's that backpedalling I was looking for. Proceed to kill yourself now.

Insomnia means having trouble sleeping, not absolutely no sleep at all

You just got here? Fuck off

I'm more of a Zizek kind of guy

Attached: zizek.jpg (362x376, 30K)

*GETS RAPED BY BASED CHOMSKY*

>During the middles ages everything sucked. 90% of people were serfs, barely 1 step above a slave.

Anachronistic, postmodernist understanding of history detected.

Zizek literally is a rambling idiot with more ticks than a stray dog.

It was said that Corke had insomnia, not that he didn't sleep at all for 6 month, retard. You are also"sleep-deprived" when you sleep only one hour a night. The source linked for that paragraph in wiipedia also doesn't say that he was awake for 6 months straight, brainlet.

youtube.com/watch?v=WXYuqrO8LLo

>i don’t like peterson for some reason so i’ll just say his real and factual idea of postmodernism is wrong
you literally sound like a postmodernist

Not gonna watch it, I have my big boy pants on and can pass my own judgements. But let me guess, they are gonna mention the lobsters?

>the LEFT
>the LEFT
>the LEFT
Why do amerimutts think everything is about their rigged two-party politics?

I don't know if you noticed, but we've gone insane since our last election. It's been very annoying.

Based left, racewar now-

Darn, I must’ve gotten here too late to see you get BTFO lol

protip: there are multiple factions within the political parties.

You are now construing loose parallels to the Nazi regime to discredit your political oponent just like The LEFT did.

t. right winger

not even once. it's criticism of him from the right, not the left.

protip: nobody outside corn-syrup land cares

It's even worse when you realize they think their liberal party isn't right wing authoritarians just like the other one. WE HAVE A CHOICE DEMOCRACY
>only choices are more bombs dropped on Israel's enemies and more income inequality.

Capitalism is dehumanizing, one of the most redpilled things Marx ever said against capitalism is this:
>Society is undergoing a silent revolution, which must be submitted to, and which takes no more notice of the human existences it breaks down than an earthquake regards the houses it subverts. The classes and the races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way. But can there be anything more puerile, more short-sighted, than the views of those Economists who believe in all earnest that this woeful transitory state means nothing but adapting society to the acquisitive propensities of capitalists, both landlords and money-lords?
He basically predicted the mongrelization of white countries for profit, it's too bad his solutions were such garbage because he hits the nail on the head about capitalism.

marx is the doctor who can diagnose you very well but you'll come in with a stomach bug and leave without an arm. His cures are worse than the disease/

Imagine not being a positivist post-modernist in current year+4. Take the subjectivity pill user and use it to be able to agree with someone but still oppose them because everything is a spook.