Sword gets drawn from a leather scabbard

>sticking your sword in the ground
>sheathing your dirty sword without cleaning it first

Attached: 9hbJWGM.png (900x818, 470K)

Very smart too

Attached: vegs lard.jpg (359x222, 41K)

> Comfy 5 minute youtuber starts making 50 minute unfomfy videos.

Why can't he go back to talk about medieval weapons again in 5 minute shorts again?

Attached: k9s35yyb54nz.png (2518x1024, 310K)

what if they have have a metal edge on the scabbard?

Except when goes full Eternal Anglo. It becomes cringe pretty fast.

Attached: 34756345357.jpg (257x253, 14K)

Now I see

I literally made that up to get (You)'s, is it actually a popular myth?

his worst moment was his bren vs "spandau" videos
one of his arguments of the bren being better was that the allies managed to consistently push the Germans back all over western Europe since June 1944
nevermind that Germany was also engaged with the Soviet Union in the east in the largest military operations in the history of mankind
he literally says that the Eastern Front is "irrelevant"

wow, who would ever try to make movies more exciting if it means exaggerating some things.

>MEDIEVAL BRITAIN RULED ALL OVER EUROPE, WE WERE THE STRONGEST MILITARY POWER AT THAT TIME
"What about the French or the Holy Ro-"
>WE WON THE THIRTY YEARS WAR

Attached: 1515591555663.png (469x452, 277K)

Literally this. Matt Easton has a video on that very point, but of course it's like a 10 minute fucking video for something that could be explained in five sentences.

>worst moment
that would be his boer-concentration-camps-were-refugee-camps-anglo-dindu-nuffin moment

what's the BBC thing?

Or maybe the "there's literally nothing wrong with the English language" video.

yea, that shit was retarded

Or how about the one where the British developed a silenced pistol in the 1940s that was so silent, the only thing you could hear was the drop of the bullet casing?

Attached: 1504291076453.png (306x306, 117K)

>Archers use burning arrows
>They are portrayed as medieval laser rifles that burn everything and everyone on contact

Attached: 1551813485416.jpg (640x628, 40K)

Bullshit.

>But after upsetting the vegetarian community Mr Lloyd has had his internet access withdrawn, his essay has been removed and he has lost the voluntary research position he has held for six years.

Attached: 1539189200459.jpg (640x640, 89K)

>character sticks sword in the ground and leans on it
Even worse when they do it with a katana or a rapier.

Attached: 1554667712679.png (411x466, 108K)

t. lindy

Totally
Worth
It

anyone have the 'stages of anglophile' image?

What's a "voluntary research position"?

Attached: 1538786702448.jpg (720x616, 94K)

I love Lord of the Rings!

Attached: talking_scabbard.jpg (760x596, 209K)

>sword is pulled out
>swung around like a lightsaber

This

Did this happen?

Fucking ventriloquists.

>its a nogunz britbong talks about guns episode

Attached: Gun Jesus delet this.png (479x404, 164K)

Attached: virgin lindybeige vs Chad Ian.jpg (2862x1384, 451K)

>SHWIIIIIING

Attached: bubber.jpg (1200x845, 177K)

he wasn't getting paid

as far as i know the channel isn't associated with any particular armory or auction house, a better title would be 'the forgotten chad'

reminder that Lindybeige claims:

>no one used swords, axes
>no one used horses
>no one used throwing knives
>no one used double strap arm shields
>no one used scythes
>no one used mail coifs
>no one used torches
>Pikemen didn't fight each other
>no one spoke French during the French revolution
>no one spoke Latin during the Roman Republic
>battle of Zama didn't happen
>Romans carried one pilum
>Vikings weren't real
>berserkers weren't real
>climate change isn't real
>stagnant social mobility isn't real
>castles were defended by three soldiers
>butted mail is better than riveted mail
>operation market garden was a success
>Napoleon was literally Hitler
>The Churchill was the best tank in WWII
>The English won the Hundreds Years' War
>British naval guns on Malta could launch projectiles into space
>brodie helmets were superior
>English accents are superior
>English is the best language
>Normans weren't French
>imperial system is better
>dunkirk was a british victory
>british officers don't duck
>the bren gun was like a full auto sniper rifle
>boer concentration camps were refugee camps
>the French are German

>climate change isn't real
does he?

>implying any of that is wrong
are you fucking stuipd

>Norman
>French
pick one

>Berserkers weren't real
He's sort of right, the hollywood/videogame version of a berserker as a mad warrior running almost naked into battle and being able to ignore pain is just fiction.
But being/going berserk was a real thing in the nordic countries, it meant going lawless, like a robber in a western. Dangerous and unpredictable. A person that went "berserk" was fair game for anyone to kill without repercussion because the person was viewed as a threat to the community since they didn't follow the laws or customs of the rest of the people. It wasn't a warrior title like modern fiction would have you believe.

>vietnam war
>it aint me starts playing

>user makes a shit post on the tv board on 4channel
schwing

every autist have a story about that one time all the normies became really mad at them for doing a joke

So, are you saying that...he did it for free? What a loser, what kind of person would work for nothing?

that´s not the name of the song

Don't the assistant mods here work for free?

i thought berserkers were guys that worshiped the bear spirits and wore bear hide armor

>hide armor

Attached: lindy3.png (585x663, 765K)

does tanned leather count as hide armor

*ahem*
*cuts rope*

your getting a gun toting lindy in any case

Attached: lindy5.jpg (1280x720, 152K)

>>berserkers weren't real

Well, they most likely weren't in the sense that pop culture likes to portray them. Most likely they were just high ranking veterans who acted as bodyguards for important tribesmen.

>the French are German

The Franks were 100% Germanic. Charlemagne was born in Aachen.

SPANDAU

>no one used swords, axes
He said they weren't primary weapons which is true, soldiers were using mostly spears
>no one used horses
He said it took some time for humans to start using them as heavy cavalry
>no one used throwing knives
He said no one used them in battles which is true
>no one used double strap arm shields
He just said they weren't as common as other types
>no one used scythes
He said no one used farming scythes as a weapon
>no one used mail coifs
He only said coifs might have looked slightly differently than modern reproductions
>no one used torches
That's true, people used candles instead
>Pikemen didn't fight each other
He said it was rare and it's true
>no one spoke French during the French revolution
He said most French spoke various dialects and not Parisian French
>no one spoke Latin during the Roman Republic
He said Greek was the language of the elites which is true
>battle of Zama didn't happen
His video was about how the battle most likely happened
>Romans carried one pilum
He just said that some Romans probably carried only one
>Vikings weren't real
He was debunking the modern conception of vikings. Vikings were just sea raiders from Scandinavia but not all people from that region were vikings
>berserkers weren't real
He was debunkging the modern conception of berserkers. He said they were probably champions and bodyguards
>climate change isn't real
He said there's no proof for man made climate change and that's true
>stagnant social mobility isn't real
He said if there isn't any social mobility then that isn't necessarily a problem
>castles were defended by three soldiers
He said that castles didn't have many soldiers stationed when a lord wasn't staying in there
>butted mail is better than riveted mail
He said that butted mail was historical even if it didn't offer as much protection
>operation market garden was a success
It was 90% successful

>Napoleon was literally Hitler
He was a deceiving warmonger that put Europe into decades of war
>The Churchill was the best tank in WWII
It was
>The English won the Hundreds Years' War
That was just banter
>British naval guns on Malta could launch projectiles into space
They actually could do that
>brodie helmets were superior
He said they were good mass produced helmets
>English accents are superior
They are
>English is the best language
Correct
>Normans weren't French
They were from Scandinavia
>imperial system is better
It is, as it's based on something real and it's not abstract like the metric
>dunkirk was a british victory
It was as they managed to evacuate most of their troops
>british officers don't duck
They didn't and there's evidence for that
>the bren gun was like a full auto sniper rifle
It was used as a sniper rifle sometimes
>boer concentration camps were refugee camps
Correct and the guerilla warfare by the Boers disrupted the British supply lines which created problems in the refugee camps
>the French are German
The Franks were a Germanic peoples

Jesus Christ, Lindy, go make a video about how british commit suicide better or something.

Well the concentration camps were for concentrating into enclosed areas a thinly spread out enemy population. There's nothing inheritantly evil about that

Piss off, Lindy

the boer wars was one of the most blatantly evil things the anglo has ever done.

>Most likely they were just high ranking veterans who acted as bodyguards for important tribesmen.
No it was literally just a specific word for a type of outlaw in norse culture. It wasn't a warrior title or a champion, it was a branding that cast you out of society and made you fair game for anyone you meet on your path. It was usually branded on people who did things like kill a farmer and raped his wife or such. No leader or chieftain would ever disgrace themselves by taking in a man who was branded berserk.
>He was debunkging the modern conception of berserkers. He said they were probably champions and bodyguards
So he realized the modern conception was wrong, and instead of actually reading up on it he just made some stuff up.

What were the Boer wars?

the anglo wanted to fill a country of white farmers with niggers to work in their mines in sub-slavelike conditions but the farmers wouldn´t let them so they fought wars about it

Gimme some sources senpai

Berserkr was a norse word that meant 'bear shirt'. Vikings were madmen that ate shrooms and thought they turned into animals

Why do anglos like shipping Africans everywhere?

BBC love

Some Vikings were as big as black bears so I guess it's reasonable.

Well they do have a whole media group named after it.

For you

ITT ass mad frogs

in this case it wasn´t so much the niggers as the diamonds the niggers were hired to dig up. but if i had to guess it´s because in the olden days you could treat niggs just bad enough that their work gained you some profit without there being massive public outcry

Reading a traditional saga was required in school, the one we read was "the Saga of Gisle Sursson" in old norwegian (much closer to the original norse than current norwegian) from 1250. It's based on real events, but with some added drama of course. In it there's two chapters about a man who's "gone berserk" where he comes to a farm and challenge the farmer to a fight to death for ownership over the farm and his wife. Though the saga obviously does not directly explain, it's easy to understand how the word "berserk" was used back then and what it meant. It wasn't some warrior thing, it was an immoral, lawless and dangerous person kind of thing.
Add to this the fact that I've literally not once come across any kind of mention of "berserk" as a warrior kind of thing at all when we learn about viking history.

The meaning of the word is correct but the rest is completely made up. No text ever mention any use of mushrooms or animal delusions at all, you've just bought the lies of the butthurt english monks that made shit up.

>Patricians during the most proud Roman times of the Republic speaking anything but the native tongue of their ancestors
lol

>>no one used swords, axes
>>no one used horses
>>no one used throwing knives
>>no one used double strap arm shields
>>no one used scythes
>>no one used mail coifs
>>no one used torches
>>Pikemen didn't fight each other
>>no one spoke French during the French revolution
>>no one spoke Latin during the Roman Republic
>>battle of Zama didn't happen
>>Romans carried one pilum
>>Vikings weren't real
>>berserkers weren't real
>>climate change isn't real
>>stagnant social mobility isn't real
>>castles were defended by three soldiers
>>butted mail is better than riveted mail
>>operation market garden was a success
>>Napoleon was literally Hitler
>>The Churchill was the best tank in WWII
>>The English won the Hundreds Years' War
>>British naval guns on Malta could launch projectiles into space
>>brodie helmets were superior
>>English accents are superior
>>English is the best language
>>Normans weren't French
>>imperial system is better
>>dunkirk was a british victory
>>british officers don't duck
>>the bren gun was like a full auto sniper rifle
>>boer concentration camps were refugee camps
>>the French are German
all true btw

But all of his rebuttals are correct. The person he replied to lied about almost all of his points. I know cause i just last night watched a few of the ones he lied about

Imagine being this wrong about it, are you even a scandi?

Attached: African slaves.png (720x720, 309K)

The shrooms shit is completely made up by weed-faggots trying to normalize their degenerate hobbies "they vikings ate shrooms too man xDD just smoke some w33d xDD"

Attached: weed faggot facebook.jpg (500x431, 66K)

How much of a boring fuck do you have to be to think weed is degenerate. Jesus Christ, get out more.

>unironically defending weed faggotry

Yepp, time to hide your posts.

Attached: Homer squinting.jpg (297x411, 23K)

Did you time warp from the 50s or something, dude? Weed is the most boring and widespread drug in existence, literally nothing degenerate about it.

shut up you boring old cuck

Attached: offensive humpr plsytfytfu.jpg (720x583, 33K)

>brown eyes
if you’re going to genderbend lindy at least give him blue eyes

why you gotta make me feel those feels right now

Attached: 90BE6610-63AB-4150-BB21-2EBD24C16E8F.png (1080x1080, 999K)

wew

urskola.se/Produkter/155358-Family-Foster-England

At 9:10

Probably the most Chad thing Lindy has ever done.

>>no one used horses
You really should put this one in the middle where people will skim over it.
In context, that's not what his video said at all

that's actually amazing

And what do you mean I'm wrong in? Here's one of my sources what are yours?

Attached: 56563181_736749570054191_430938657495449600_n.jpg (720x960, 100K)

It was that or leave those fucking duchies to the natives, i'd call any homeless duch a refugee.

Is that real? Is that year 2004? What the fuck?

Attached: forn_vännen.png (717x975, 1.01M)

I bet you can't read Swedish though

Attached: bärsärk.png (309x599, 174K)

That's not even remotely true.

Attached: No way.png (1145x1598, 1.3M)

Why are you so obsessed with me understanding scandi or not? Do you think I would own a saga in nynorsk if wasn't? Of course I can read swedish. Your source still doesn't say anything about it being a warrior title, just the literal meaning of the word, as in a guy going topless.
Second paragraph is the relevant one.

Attached: 56739296_824150157942444_893394858750771200_n.jpg (720x960, 115K)

>someone cuts my rope instead of just untying it

Attached: 1517732682637.jpg (900x973, 204K)

>the virgin rope maker
>the chad rope cutter

based

>He said there's no proof for man made climate change and that's true
Direct observations find that CO2 is rising sharply due to human activity. Satellite and surface measurements find less energy is escaping to space at CO2 absorption wavelengths. Ocean and surface temperature measurements find the planet continues to accumulate heat. This gives a line of empirical evidence that human CO2 emissions are causing global warming.

The second paragraph literally just tells about a berserk who went around and demanded holmgang from people who didnt do what he told them to do. Also, you did not all disapprove my source at all. Read the fucking poem again you retard. BÄRSÄRKARNA HYLADE, BÄRSÄRKARASERI, you are actually fucking dumb bro

>saying that modern conceptions of something or how our media present is has some inaccuracies is the same as saying they weren't real.

>fart comes out of ass
>makes a whistling noise

Attached: pepe.jpg (900x900, 77K)

Imagine having a life so boring you care about stuff that happened centuries ago and about which there are no certain sources anyway.
This is why people should focus on scientific studies.

every single notable thinker in history would disagree with you.

I thought "varg" was a catch-all term for bandits or the lawless in old norse?

>natives
zulu aren't native to south africa

Khoisans and zulu invaders, who at least were native to the continent

Share metal that size will make that sound. I bet you fags think firearms sound all clicky and clacky like they're falling apart and shift built just like the movies.

>DUDE THE PUNCHLINE IS SEX LMFAO XD

The punchline is that he doesn't buy the sword with it though

Nah you are just too arrogant to see that the word is obviously ambiguous in meaning as it seems to imply different things in our examples. In yours it's from a poem about a berserker in battle, in my it's a retelling of a person that was stated as being a berserker but he's not at all described as some madman in a rage, more like a coldblooded brute taking what he wants by force. The definition in your example doesn't work very well with my excerpt, does it? Yet it's a direct translation, and the events in the saga have been cross checked with different sources that matches up so it's reasonable to assume the gist of it is true.
I'm guessing the word didn't have a pure definition, but was used as a way to describe someone that was brutal and had little regard of human life.

It's one word, but as in most languages I'm guessing they have several words with distinctions that might be lost to us. You have to remember the vikings didn't have paper, so there's next to no surviving texts from that era. Most of it was written down 300 years later, and language could have been lost/changed in that time.

Franks aren't French, you dimwit, there are literally still Franks living in Germany speaking Frankish. Northern contemporary Bavaria for example

Attached: Franken_Region_Uebersicht.png (2360x1650, 1.68M)

The guy wasn't selling the sword through, he was selling the scabbard.

>NAPOLEON IS LITERALLY HITLER
I'm not even a frog but holy shit are bongs still butthurt?

>"We're not so different you and I."
>they actually aren't

Attached: 1521673775-feelsweirdman.png (136x102, 26K)

Why would they be butthurt? Napoleon's trade wars failed and, outside Moore's retreat, they conducted successful proxy wars that culminated in Wellington's successful invasion, then in an Allied victory at Waterloo.