>In a 2015 interview with Rolling Stone, Howard explained that he had formulated his own language of logic, which he called Terryology, and which he was keeping secret until he had patented it. This logic language would be used to prove his contention that "1 × 1 = 2".
>"How can it equal one?" he said. "If one times one equals one that means that two is of no value because one times itself has no effect. One times one equals two because the square root of four is two, so what's the square root of two? Should be one, but we're told it's two, and that cannot be."
Awe the black man just realized numbers are conceptual.
Kevin Scott
At least dumb people who think they're smart aren't as bad as average people who think they're smart.
Nolan Martinez
>"Now nigga, this here, is Chewbacca..."
Jason James
This is the shit every retard kid says when they learn multiplication for the first time
Jaxson White
>tfw too dumb to stay in the marvel cinemtatic universe and don cheadle stole your money
Colton Bennett
Please tell me everything about his current jig, sounds intresting
Sebastian Kelly
they cut him because his dick was too small look into it
Benjamin Gutierrez
Yeah who knew that refusing to negotiate pay and then demanding shit that's not in your contract would get on Disney's bad side? He's lucky to be working at all.
Blake Collins
Who the fuck told 'us' that the square root of 2 is 2
Jeremiah Williams
Multiplication as an isolated concept using "x" as a symbol is practically useless in the real world and just causes confusion. It's used to represent things like coefficients and inversely proportionate properties but you never multiply numbers together without some context (variable)
Jaxon Ortiz
numbers are racist
Cooper Gray
This is the real answer.
John Cox
>Howard blames his leaving Pratt over disagreements with a professor regarding this hypothesis. He also stated that he spends many hours a day constructing models of plastic and wire that he patented and claims to confirm his belief.[32]
this is like a south park episode
Aaron Peterson
based
William Garcia
Jesus christ this is so fucking stupid. There's nothing to prove. There's no literal number 1 or 2 in the universe it's just a means of conveyance. One thing one time leaves only it and two things one time leaves them.
Levi Hill
>There's no literal number 1 or 2 in the universe it's just a means of conveyance. One thing one time leaves only it and two things one time leaves them.
real talk; 1 doesn't exist and neither does 0. There was 0 and it exists, but you can't do anything with it. 1 doesn't currently exist but will do later. You can't exist without a 0 and 1 comes later. binary bilingual bullshit.
Wyatt Davis
based schizo user
Nathan Perry
>One thing one time leaves only it and two things one time leaves them.
youre thinking of basic math, you need to be on the level of advanced math
Chase White
>so what's the square root of two? Should be one, but we're told it's two, and that cannot be. It should be 1.41*, we were learning square roots of numbers in fucking elementary school. Is this the famous american education?
Lucas Kelly
Numbers aren't actually real.
Dylan Peterson
Engineer here.
We actually have very rigorous math standards in our colleges. I was required to take Algebra and Trigonometry (actually had to take twice because it was so difficult) in order to even get my degree
>multiply something by its value annd you,get that many of it. Are these people shocked when they press vanilla coke on the vending machine and get one vanilla coke. Maybe you should get two vanilla cokes?
Easton Allen
No algebra and trig were the math requirements. I had to retake trig because it was so difficult but nonetheless I was able to pass it and get my degree
Isaac Bell
>Are these people shocked when they press vanilla coke on the vending machine and get one vanilla coke. >Somebody reprograms coke machine so that pressing vanilla coke once gives two vanilla cokes where is you math now?
Brandon Evans
Thats what the guy is saying in op. He wants two cokes. He wants one to equal two.
Noah Bennett
but that's forcing 1 to equal 2, math isn't flexible
Anthony James
>He wants one to equal two. But you can do that by reprogramming the machine to give two cokes by pressing one. Your logic is flawed
Henry Lopez
He's being a dumbass. As an engineer you have to take a stupid amount of calculus along with physics and other engineering courses
Bentley Richardson
>actually had to take twice because I'm a retard and failed the first time ftfy
Juan Fisher
What?
Cameron Nguyen
ay yo i work zero hours x reparations = 1 billion dollars. mhmm das rite.
Jose Thomas
>having a dick so small you try and rewrite the basic laws of mathematics to cope Feel bad for Terry tbqh.
Caleb Perry
If you had to take algebra and trig only then you're not an engineer. Fuck off
Matthew Green
DAS RITE
Samuel Barnes
I don't think you are as smart as you think you are dummu
Jeremiah Hall
Actors have the biggest fucking egos, don't they?
Playing an intelligent character doesn't mean you're one IRL, Terrance.
Evan Ramirez
I believe in Terryology tbqh. They made fun of Galileo and Newton too
Ian Walker
1/3=0.3333 0.3333x3=0.9999
Can someone explain this shit to me. And none of that "0.9999 is the same as 1" shit
Andrew Wright
Because 1/3 actually equals 0.3333.. (with 3 repeating forever). Hope this helps.
Carson James
>not a single source >errybody fighting a black strawman
God damn it stop pushing these lies. He was contracted for a certain amount of money, then Disney decided they'd pay him 1/8th of what they were supposed to pay him.
Logan Baker
Is the rumour true when will smoth asked how much money he wanted for Indepence day 2 he asked for the entire budget and got sacked?
Aiden Miller
1/3 = 0.333... literally makes no sense
Its like saying if you had a 10cm ruler and cut it in three equal parts you would have infinitely long parts of the rulers
instead of infinitely long, think of them as infinitely short like that thing where nobody can accurately measure the coastline because of fractal patterns giving it infinite length depending on how accurately it is measured
Jack Gonzalez
one part is actually .33333333334
Benjamin Barnes
>think of them as infinitely short Still makes no sense it can't be infinitely short
John Martin
>like that thing where nobody can accurately measure the coastline because of fractal patterns giving it infinite length depending on how accurately it is measured what
that sounds like nonsense, surely the coast has an exact length
not really, the more accurately you measure it the longer it will get but that doesn't make the information useful its the same with 1/3 being 0.333 recurring; you can measure it infinitely or you can not be a sperg and just round it off
Jackson Walker
It just exposes the flaw with our numbering system. Here's a thought experiment, if you zoom in on the end of a ruler with the end exactly at the center of the frame the end will always be at the center regardless of how far you zoom. Now cut the ruler in thirds and do the same thing. Mathfag logic says the end will gradually move left or right as you zoom in. But it won't because the recurring number is just an irrelevant representation of reality; 1/3 of a ruler is just 100% of adifferent size ruler
Ryan Martinez
>you can measure it infinitely No you can't it exists as a physical object at some point it has a fixed end
Sebastian Allen
its pointless to measure it accurately anyway. Erosion is constantly changing the shape of the coast.
Bentley Hill
the ruler exists as a physical object, the concept of 1/3 being 0.3 recurring does not physically exist only conceptually.
Kevin Butler
>does not physically exist only conceptually. aka doesn't exist at all. Hey, 1 = 0 doesn't exist physically, only conceptually in my brain therefore its true also.
Carson Flores
it means you cant divide 10 into 3 perfectly you just get close to it. You can divide 9 into 3 perfectly. Theres no leftovers.
Juan Parker
yo real talk t howard has a tiny ass penis, literal micropenis, look it up on google and then marvel at the fact that he agreed to do a nude scene, we're not talking hogs here we're talking piglets
So you think Disney willingly broke their own terms of employment written up by them, overseen by lawyers and notarized all in person?
Yeah I'm sure it's whitey's fault.
Owen Brooks
Yes because a physical object is essentially x number of atoms wide. Trying to measure its size more accurately than that would be paradoxical. Like there's 3 people, how many people are there? There are 3, that's as accurate as you can get
John Gray
I'll take your lack of refutal as a win then
Jaxon Baker
...
Aaron Gomez
now I feel even more bad for him
Grayson Davis
>mfw I BTFO brainlets trying to tell me 1/3 = 0.333...
Im doing mech in college just now it is pretty much all maths. Doing differentiation and sheeit just now.
Elijah Campbell
This The so called "real" numbers are a joke In the real world only positive whole numbers exist. How can you have a negative value of something? How can there be a 1/2 amount of quark? How could there a number between every number when there is a minimum distance in the real world?
Gavin Hughes
It's literally what happened according to Howard. No one has refuted his claims at all.
Carson Carter
So can we all just agree that fractions are a jewish trick?
Logan Miller
Yeah, but you are a white male
Jacob Torres
If 1/3 x 3 = 1, and 1/3 = 0.333..., then logically, 0.333... x 3 = 1. It's that simple.
Nicholas Perez
Yes also negative numbers. We need to start math again from scratch and get rid of them
Aiden Ross
its almost like tay tay is inviting the viewer to fuck her over that table. Beautiful shot.
Brandon Barnes
Court jews invented fractions are decimal points and negative numbers to commit usury
Bentley Nguyen
why bother to refute nonsense
Dylan Rivera
There is a reason we use the word "times." If you have one of one one time is one. Two one time is is two. One two times is two. Two two times is four. I'm a fucking regard and even I get that...
Jackson Diaz
>I'm a fucking regard
Noah Ortiz
Well he's not wrong. You gotta give him credit for being able to type a sentence (mostly)
Benjamin Hughes
I have a group of 10 people, and want to divide it into 3 smaller groups of equal number. Is it possible?
Levi Gutierrez
no one will die.
Noah Clark
Yes, the extra person will serve as assistant supervisor.
Jackson Nguyen
>Its like saying if you had a 10cm ruler and cut it in three equal parts you would have infinitely long parts of the rulers No, the reason it stretches to infinity is because it's trying to divide the three parts perfectly. If you went cutting anything, you'd come up with small fluctuation in length.
Bentley Wood
Deep black philisophy
Jaxson Lewis
You're an idiot and you're conflating a made up measurement with a physical object consisting of atoms
Jeremiah Powell
Yo would have to cut one person into three parts, but as soon as you cut them the pieces would grow infinitely
Also, for all the math dipshit out there.. How can you reconcile with the fact that there are some infinites LARGER than other infinites
Ryan King
A person cut in half is still 1 person. Is everyone dumb?
Nicholas Edwards
maybe in heaven
Caleb Phillips
>ITT: The finest minds on Yea Forums
Isaiah Garcia
>Yea Forums is actually baited into arguing whether or not 1x1=2 you guys are something else.
Gabriel Jones
>Yea Forums is one person Its at least two people.
Luis Howard
can confirm. Cut my dick in three parts and now I have an infinite dick.
Dominic Anderson
If 1 x 1 = 2 than does 2 x 1 = 1?
Noah Wood
This is what happens when you surround yourself with “yes” people.
Jordan Martinez
no
1 x 1 =2 , a x a = b 2 x 1 = 1 , b x a = a
Doesn't make sense
William Harris
Also, according to conventional wisdom
1 x 1 = 2, a x a = b
How can 2 a turn in to b?
Joshua King
1 x 1 = 1, a x a = a
I meant how can 2 a turn into a?
Julian Hill
>In the real world only positive whole numbers exist. what is debt? what are cents? >How can you have a negative value of something? if you have $100 as your total assets, and owe (((someone))) $200, then your total value is -$100
Landon Bell
>if you have $100 as your total assets, and owe (((someone))) $200, then your total value is -$100 No your value is $0
Show me -5 apples, I'll wait
Jose Williams
>what is antimatter
Michael Fisher
Does that made up statement hold any use when it can't be applied to the real world anymore? When you've exhausted the instruments of measuring time by dividing 1/3, I don't see the use of debating the matter. That is the point at which 0.9999 becomes 1.
Carter Lee
oh so you're a brainlet unable to grasp hypotheticals. are you an engineer by any chance?
Oliver Barnes
bullshit
Cameron Clark
>hypotheticals you mean made up bullshit
Gabriel Peterson
You're not an engineer.
Engineers require insane amounts of math and Newtonian physics to even get past the first semester.
Algebra and trigonometry are taught at 15 years old at the most. At least in civilized countries, don't know what shithole you spawned off from. This is why you learn about all the collapsed bridges and shit in third world countries, they produce "engineers" like yourself.
John Walker
Yes if you have 8 normal people and 2 irishmen who count as half.
Julian Rivera
>math I don't like/can't understand is liberalism yeah all those crazy activist mathematicians.
Aaron Sanders
>hypotheticals The entire argument is that it doesn't exist in real life
Ayden Clark
A conceptualization of matter made of baryonic lke particles that have an opposite electric charge.
Owen Morgan
time and math are wypipo shit s mh
Jordan Bailey
>according to Howard. You mean the same nigger who can't figure out how multiplication works?
Parker Johnson
what does that even mean? take complex analysis, it's literally used to build your computer's components' circuits making your shitposting possible
imagine being so mindbroken from having a dick so small while belonging to a group who are supposed to be packing that you decide math isn't real
Landon Collins
>1 is a different value to 1
Ah yes. By that logic then (a) + (a) = 46, because the value of the first (a) is 2 and the value of the second (a) is 44.
(a) is also a constant and consistent concept too, don't forget that.
This is maths on Lindeloff.
Isaiah Kelly
>all the assblasted engineer plug and chug pajeets taking the joke at face value and outing themselves as brainlets P O T T E R Y
Daniel Roberts
Biology students take the same amount of calculus, Rajesh
Nathaniel Bailey
We can use it to model the real world, but the real world is made up positive whole numbers of particles
Isaiah Moore
everything about this post was retarded.
Landon Evans
>oh so you're a brainlet unable to grasp hypotheticals. >hypothetical non-existent apples
Carson Johnson
>2015 You night as well have said 1998.
Carson Phillips
>it's literally used to build your computer's components' circuits You don't even know what this means. You just read it on reddit.
Liam Rodriguez
I bet he unironically said "I love science" at least once in his lifetime
Jonathan Long
based. Terry is literally correct. Brainwashed brainlets exposed ITT
Josiah Edwards
>People are really too dumb to understand this concept. You cannot literally "times" something. It is shorthand for saying "and [x] of itself." 1 * 1 = 1 is "one, and one of itself, is one." 1 * 2 = 2 is "one, and two of itself, is two."
Adam Smith
Wrong
Daniel Hall
No, times is short had for adding up
2 + 2 = 4 = 2 x 2 = 4
1 + 1 = 2 = 1 x 1 = 2
Jaxon Kelly
Reminder that Terrance Howard has a micro penis
Jonathan Watson
Antimatter is not just baryons, there are plenty of anti-leptons as well (e.g. positrons). And they differ in more than just electric charge
Brayden Davis
Same shit, poindexter. Now scram before I shove your face in the toilet.
Connor Davis
What in the hell is that punctuation? Does, he not know how, a comma, works?
Bio students, as I was one, only needed Calc 1 plus stat classes. Engineers need Calc 4.
Liam James
based 80 iq user w/ a filmmaking degree making non-claims about math
Luke Peterson
No, it is literally shorthand for "and [x] of itself." If you apply Howard's logic cannot stand up to basic long division.
James Hughes
>Howard's logic cannot stand up to basic long division. Because that is wrong too, because of being built on the fundamentally incorrect assertion that 1 x 1 = 1
Sebastian Nguyen
No fucking way you're an engineer
Daniel Garcia
>Multiplication as an isolated concept using "x" as a symbol is practically useless in the real world and just causes confusion. user you shouldn't even be using 'x' as the multiplication sign behind highschool. Same with the stupid division symbol.
Bentley Richardson
user... >1 + 1 = 2, 1 x 1 = 2 1 x 1 = 1 + 1, that's what you've established. Now tell me why >3 x 3 = 9 but >3 + 3 = 6 Under your logic
Brandon Bennett
x 3 = 9 >but + 3 = 6 >Under your logic
Because 3 x 3 really means 3 + 3 + 3, so 9. 1 x 1 means 1 + 1, so 2.
Thomas Cook
0.9999 is literally the same as 1. If it wasn't you'd be able to find a number between the two
Ayden Thomas
Now tell me why do you add an extra 3 despite using the same symbol.
No, you cannot "times" something. It is not a physical verb. It is shorthand for "and [x] of itself." Read: You cannot "times" something. You don't "times" one apple by one apple and get two.
Nathan Morales
>I can't understand and don't know about complex analysis in regards to EE or anything else, thus it's dumb God I honestly wish I could shoot you in the fucking head. You really do deserve it.
Joseph Butler
@112543531 Get better at shitposting or stop trying you dull faggot.
Terry going off the deep end at the Oxford debate club. This is required viewing for any aspiring Terryologist's out there. 1 x 1 = 2 is just the tip of the iceberg. The guy thinks he's the reincarnation of Da Vinci.
this user is right, we just need first level calc and a stats class. Although really there should be more stats classes for bio, or really any degree that reads studies using groups of things.
Brayden Thompson
how much is 1/1?
Zachary Rogers
0
Brandon Robinson
0. You can't fit an apple inside of another apple
Ryder Moore
lmao is that what your homeschool teacher told you
Michael Jackson
One "divided into one piece" is one. One "divided into two pieces" is .5 AKA "half of itself."
Elijah Jones
1 movie x 1 million dollar paycheck = 2 million
Bentley Bell
>retards on Yea Forums don't "believe in", or understand, algebra and think it's a conspiracy incredible. the stupidity in this board never ceases to amaze I bet there are unironic flat earther in here
Hudson Rivera
3x1 = 1 + 1 + 1 = 3 2x1 = 1 + 1 = 2 1x1 = 1 = 1
Cooper Morgan
Jews stole your 0.00001
Thomas Wood
it's when you have 10 apples, and then you shove 5 of them up your ass, you absolute brainlet
Julian Gutierrez
Why do retards on Twitter captialise their words at random
Nathan Nguyen
I see that more with schizos and retards. Crazy people on here do it
Cooper Adams
>In a new interview with Rolling Stone, Howard expresses contrition for a 2001 incident during which he allegedly punched his first wife, Lori McCommas.
>"She was talking to me real strong, and I lost my mind and slapped her in front of the kids," Howard, who was arrested following the incident, tells the magazine. "Her lawyer said it was a closed fist, but even slapping her was wrong." (The police report also notes that Howard "punched her twice with a closed fist.")
>As for his second wife, Michelle Ghent, Howard was accused (in a lawsuit she filed) of beating her severely in 2013 in Costa Rica.
According to the lawsuit, Howard "followed [Ghent] into the restroom of the rental house and punched her on the left side of her face. [Howard] also grabbed [her] by her neck and pushed her against the bathroom wall and strangled her for several seconds."
>Howard responds to these allegations as well in the Rolling Stone interview. "She was trying to Mace me," Howard explains, "and you can't see anything so all you can do is try to bat somebody away, and I think that something caught her. But I wasn't trying to hit her."
I rated this guy as an actor up until learning this today.
Ayden Barnes
It's a bit humorous because in old English, yes, we used to capitalize words we deemed important.
>Remember the basic laws of common sense Fucking hell, if this wasn't written by a black guy, I'd be convinced that it's satire.
Zachary Wood
>get on Disney's bad side? He's lucky to be alive at all. Ftfy
Chase Scott
They think it Makes them appear Smart.
Jack Reed
dis nigga dumb
Bentley Butler
you can if it's the same apple
Ryder Jenkins
Do you think he just went fucking insane when he missed out on the biggest fucking film franchise?
Daniel Thomas
How can this absolute moron even tie his own shoes?
Multiplication was invented as an easy way to find the sum of groups of things. If I have three bags and each bag has two apples in it, how many apples do I have in total?
3×2=6 Aka 2+2+2=6
Same if I had one bag with one apple in it: 1×1=1, or 1=1
What a moron.
Henry Sullivan
It's not the same since it's 1÷1. Just because it's the same number doesn't mean it's the same entity. 1 and 1 are distinct entities.
>reprogramming the machine to give two cokes by pressing one Yes, you changed 1 button from giving 1 coke (1*1=1), to 1 button giving 2 coke (1*2=2). Except in reality what you did was change the quantity. You're back to 1*1=1 but you get more coke.
Chase Howard
The 0s cancel each other out.
Wyatt Sanders
>How could there a number between every number when there is a minimum distance in the real world?
Uh what? What is that minimum distance in the real world? You can take any distance in the real world and divide it into smaller parts, just like you can find numbers between every number.
Nicholas Stewart
Don't bother.
Bentley Baker
the Planck distance, sweetie.
Blake Torres
I remember there being an article where he admits to "getting greedy" and that's why he got shitcanned
Logan Evans
Thank you, I needed the laugh.
Jack Price
Because 100 sets of 100 apples is synonymous with 10000 apples. While 1 set of 1 apple is just that. Multiplication isn't magic, you fucking troglodyte, it's a readable way of parsing large quantities.
Leo Bailey
... which can be divided into smaller parts?
James Ramirez
Literally an arbitrarily small number necessary to quantize distance.
Jonathan Fisher
why do blacks have such an overrated sense of self?
but they equal each other like your last two digits
Lincoln Young
wrong. Everything smaller follows the laws of quantum mechanics, thus it's not the real world anymore. You've been schooled on high school physics, how do you feel?
Christopher Wright
anyone remember that story a few years ago about that black woman that earned her PhD in mathematics and someone dug up her thesis and it was basically a bunch of copy and paste and and "lol stuff happens here I can't/won't explain". Like, her entire doctoral thesis was half assed bullshit but they still gave her the degree.
Alexander Clark
That's simply a problem of measurement, it's not the "minimum distance" of things.
Benjamin Roberts
Hes saying dont think of it as a function. Think of 1×1 as saying "one grouping of one thing
And think of 3×7 as "3 groupings of 7 things"
Bentley Miller
>didney be muliplayin dem numbas and scammin niggas
Zachary Sullivan
>Literally the math equivalent of gibs me dat My sides, fuck
Grayson Myers
He's just bipolar you guys, calm down. This is what mania or hypomanis sounds like.
Gavin Sanchez
>Does, he not know how, a comma, works?
He doesn't know how grade 1 maths work. Why would you assume that he knows anything at this point?
Liam Reyes
What's Oxford Union? Is it like TEDx?
Tyler Thompson
>its a dumb nigger doesnt realize hes dumb episode
Tyler James
wow cool it with the racism my dude
Isaac Diaz
wtf are you talking about? being bipolar doesn't turn you into a brainlet
Chase Russell
The original problem said "smaller groups," not "smaller groups of people"
Evan Watson
>As an engineer you have to take a stupid amount of calculus i wished
Dominic Turner
Wrong, 1 x 1 means you have a single 1 which = 1
Jonathan Edwards
>comparing your retarded math ideas to the civil rights movement
That doesn't work. If you could divide the distance between two points infinitely, how could you ever get from point A to point B? You'd only ever be able to approach infinitely close to B.
Ethan Rogers
>1/3 = 0.333... literally makes no sense it does. But you need to think more rigourously to actually understand this. You already assume some representation of floats as given. What does something like 0.25, 0.108 or 0.8769 mean? where does it come from? It is the representation of rational numbers to the base of 10. If you define 0.ABC to mean A * 10^-1 + B * 10^-2 + C * 10^-3 you can easily in a straight forward manner develope that 1/3 equals 0.3... if you use 10 as your basis. 0.3... has to mean the LIMIT of the power series \sum_i=1:n 3*10^-n.
Nolan Carter
Wait why are we arguing about masic math?
Aaron Davis
Zeno please your retarded paradox was already busted in ancient Athens
Luis Bell
If you gave a monkey an infinite amount of time there is still no way they would ever type the works of shakespeare
Daniel Wright
That's what happens when Niggers start thinking that they're just as intelligent as everyone else.
>If you could divide the distance between two points infinitely, how could you ever get from point A to point B? Because we can divide things into progressively smaller increments. Infinitely.
Adam Torres
you need to give him infinite typewriters as well for it to work. It's in the theorem.
Andrew Young
Which type of non-smart person are you?
Joseph Ward
Isn't there a website on the internet doing this right now
Jackson Rodriguez
I'm American. I took algebra in 7th grade, son.
Brayden Butler
Terryological 1/8 equals 1 to everyone else.
Isaiah White
By "literally bullshit", you must literally mean "figuratively bullshit" unless you are figuratively a fucking brick and literally believe that the idea of the coastline paradox is made of the shit from bulls' buttholes. Try using the correct word when you tell people they're wrong.
Anthony Hall
Imagine being this literally pedantic. Pro-tip: words evolve and can change meaning depending on what they are used for.
Gavin Torres
>Try using the correct word when you tell people they're wrong. Trying learning to read, it said liberal bullshit, not literal.
Kayden Butler
mission failed
Jaxson Ross
and liberals insist that you Listen and Believe people like this
Parker Rivera
Reminder that white men had no concept of zero before based Indians enlightened them
Michael Nguyen
>libraryofbabel.info/search.html Assuming the monkey is truly randomly hitting characters there are only so many possible combination of all the letters, and only so many combinations of combinations, you can prove this without having to actually type it all out with an algorithm. There is no combination of english characters you couldn't find in there.
If I had any doubt this board was retarded before this thread, I sure as hell don't now.
Ryan Robinson
white men before like 1700 got all of their knowledge from Arabs, Indians, Egyptians, etc. this is known
Brody Thompson
You and terry would get along great.
Lincoln Torres
These are the consequences of common core.
Colton Mitchell
There is no way that you are an american engineer, at the very least.
Leo Harris
>How can there be a 1/2 amount of quark? You can't, it's a quantization of a field.
Christian Rodriguez
tf is this
Alexander Murphy
Some retard got an infinite amount of monkeys to open up an infinite amount of browsers with dev view enabled.
John Johnson
Times is plural. You can't have one times of something.
Alexander Allen
You are the brainlet here for taking such simple bait
Christopher Wilson
Who cares? sometimes you just have to slap a bitch.
Jayden Jackson
Imagine a library with a countably infinite number of books arranged on a countably infinite number of book shelves. By numbering from one to whatever you create an address for that page, on that shelf, which is used as a seed for an algorithm it generates a combination of letters and spaces. Since there are only so many combinations, anything that has been, will be, or can ever be written using that combination of characters has to exist in this infinite universal library. Since you know what the algorithm used to find the page number is, you can feed any combination of 3,200 characters into it and be able to generate a page number where that exact combination shows up. If you typed in today's headline, you'd get a page number where that's written. If you could go back in time, and tell yourself to go find that page a week ago, that exact same thing would have been there.
Daniel Mitchell
the law of very large numbers Just like you could find the birthday of everyone who has been, or ever will be born in the digits of pi.
>using a commonly understood resource for the sake of expediency on an impromptu internet argument disqualifies the information provided because retards are angry that they are being spotted as frauds
Grayson Brooks
The only fraud here is you, and you have been exposed. Go back to reading your wikipedia articles and let the real physicists talk.
Charles Martinez
It doesn't need to randomly generate anything. It's an index. You put in the same seed, you get the same results. If you were Shakespeare, and had infinite time to search through this library, page by page, he could find every thing he had written. It's not magic, or a trick, it's just a really interesting experiment in information theory that is a little bit mind fucky. It would be impossible to physically print all of this out because it would take infinite time, and infinite resources, but lets say a Wizard did it, you could search for your post, find the page number and location of the book, give that to your friend, have them go to the library and look up that exact physical book, and they would find what you were going to type.
Cameron Butler
If the information I provided is wrong, counter it. But, you can't, because you aren't a physicist, and I'm not wrong.
>If one times one equals one that means that two is of no value because one times itself has no effect
I was trying to make sense of what he was saying, so let start with the beginning
How the fuck the fact two being of no value relate to the multiplication 1x1 ?
Julian Smith
>ignoring the part about countering the information Lmfao, this is either extremely good trolling or terminal autism
Grayson Reed
Precision. You know google can do do graphs, right, search f(x)=1/x. the line gets closer and closer to the axis and eventually converges at an infinite point on the number line.
Some calculations only care about degrees of precision. You don't care about the 5th decimal place when carving a wooden table. You do if you care about cylinder radius on an f1 car.
It's literally impossible for zero to exist in any way except conceptually.
David Rogers
>9.99..... - 9 = .99... >Therefore, .999 = 9 Is this the mathematical equivalent of ESL?
Luke Gray
By that logic, it’s impossible for 1 not to exist. G-d is The One.
Anthony Price
Bullshit, this is easy. How many tiimes have you had sex?
Christian Reed
I searched what associative and commutative law (it wasn't even named at my school, that's just common sense) and it's literally not what he just said, am I missing something ?
Thomas Thompson
I am currently working on my phd in Terryology, AMA
Blake Wright
If 1 didn't exist then there just wouldn't be anything. That's different from 0 existing.
Connor Johnson
>It's literally impossible for zero to exist in any way except conceptually. Sure it does. I'll prove it 0 = the number of women you will ever sleep with.
Grayson Brooks
Think about the way floors are labeled in an elevator. In some buildings it calls the ground floor the 1st floor, while in others the second story is called the 1st floor. To line up to reality you would have to have the ground floor labeled ground(or 0) and jump immediately to 2.
Matthew Green
What's one dollar times one dollar?
David Cooper
2 dollars
Hunter Miller
wut
Anthony Fisher
>Yea Forums now doesn't believe that math should exist outside of natural numbers Either this place is getting dumber or I'm getting smarter
and I don't feel any smarter
Carson Thompson
What's 100 cents times 100 cents?
Robert Bennett
100,000 cents
Julian Perry
but if there not the same what is then 1/3-0.3333...? I don't get it :(
Owen Bailey
Its all the third worlders you see
Isaiah Thompson
What does it mean to multiply a thing by an amount of things? Usually you multiply a thing by an amount, but Terrance has figured out how to multiply a thing by an amount of things. Can you explain how this works and how it's different from just multiplying a thing by an amount?
Ryan Sullivan
Late:
Nolan Garcia
if 0.9...=1 does that mean that 1.9...=2?
so what about infinity? infinity is like .9... but moreso. So doesn't infinity=a number? whats that number?
Parker Price
In the US the "first floor" is usually the ground floor. In bongistan the first floor above the ground floor is called the first floor.