THIS MOVIE WAS FUCKING AWFUL

THIS MOVIE WAS FUCKING AWFUL

christ why am I reading that this is good or for that matter better than the original movie

Attached: 1582343827771.jpg (1311x2048, 3.02M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=nr5kRk0Ba5I
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>stephen king
What did you expect

I’m fine with them taking liberties with the book such as it not being Gage. I understand the logic of it being too difficult to get a solid performance out of a toddler.

That said, was it just jump scares and CGI shit? That’s what it looks like from the trailer

Fuck off WBshill. Pet Sematary is way better than Shazam. Everyone should see it instead.

> remake an awful movie
> it's still awful

stop the presses

I completely forgot this movie was coming out

oh no, i was looking forward to it. fuck.

The exact opposite. But in the sense there were hardly any horror elements. There's no complete plot arc in the movie, things 'just happen', so by the time the end comes it feels like you're only watching a part of the actual movie. And for fucks sakes I was kind of hoping the windigo made an appearance, instead we got allusions it likes taking dead people, patching them up, and then sending them back to the other side of the barrier.

Is there really an army of zombie children?

Watched it last night. Grew up with the old one and the remake is much better. The movie is still a 6/10 though.

Eat my ass punk

What the fick is wrong with you?

I see the DC shills are out in force today.

Attached: 1554495025973.jpg (600x696, 30K)

>he actually hoped to see the wendigo
how much of a retard are you

They never showed it in the book either. You could Judy hearr him. Only time you really “saw” him was when he started talking through the dead people

Did they play The Romoan’s song?

they played some cover of it

Lou saw it when he was about to bury gage

the "subplot" with her dead sister was fucking stupid to give that much attention to in the movie, at least 50% of all scares in the movie had to have been related to that and it didn't pay off in anyway

yes I know it's in the book but the way it was included in the movie was honestly just dumb

Yeah. And by the end the whole family becomes a zombie too. Which begs the question, why the fuck isn't the whole world full of zombie people if it's pretty obvious that something is trying to kill people and turn them dead-alive, and it's been going on for centuries.
I've never read the book and I've never seen the original so shut the fuck up.

>admits to never read the book.... or watched the movie...
>tells others to stfu like a stupid child who got his tablet taken away

Time to take your own advice and add a fuck off to it.

The only people that call others a child are children themselves.

>I've never read the book and I've never seen the original
Well now you know the Wendingo never appears. In the book, the 'villain' was not the Wendigo, but the knowledge of man that a place exists that can bring back the dead.

Sometahms dead is bettah

That subplot is not important in the book either, its just there as background for Rachel. If it was given that much importance then they were out of ideas already, I knew this would be shit but damn son.

THE GROUND THERE WAS BAAAAD

Who are you quoting idiot? Why don't you go pick up a book neetboy.

I liked in the orginal movie they made Zelda into the Windigo. How undead Gage dresses up like her

Attached: D9D32A71-25EB-4652-BA28-EE19460BA220.jpg (590x601, 55K)

The Ramones, dumbass.

Yeah, there's a cover by the band Starcrawler. Totally neutered.
youtube.com/watch?v=nr5kRk0Ba5I

Sounds like it belongs in the Craft or some other shitty 90s horror movie

>the craft is shitty

Hahahaha holy shit the absolute state of Yea Forums. So did you just not go back to school after spring break?

Careful user, all that estrogen is making you talk stupid

Naw I'm way above average. Any real man would admit the craft is great and only babyhand manlets like yourself will say otherwise.

Oh ok Sandy, don't get your knickers in a twist.

OK, I liked it, but there were some issues.

I thought Ellie was well done and creepy, though I did not like the change from Gage to her. Part of Louis's intense grief and shame for when Gage died was because it was entirely his fault - Gage was an infant who was just learning to walk and was entirely dependent on his parents for safety, while Ellie was old enough to know not to go in the road without paying attention. They also didn't emphasize Louis's inability to learn about death, which I thought was the crucial plot point of the book. They should've kept the entirety of Jud's Timmy Baterman story instead of a brief news article snippet, and had Louis be the one to bury Rachel, instead of some sort of weird thing with the returned dead trying to build an army or whatever the hell they were showing with the ending. That was a bit more like the Pet Sematary 2 plot.

I did like the emphasis on Zelda, though, since she was the real life situation that I believe the book/other movie were parodying - keeping the very ill, husk of their former selves, better-off-dead people around simply because people find it hard to let go. But, as people, we find it impossible to accept that sometimes it is better just to let someone die/sometimes dead is better no matter how many times we can see that to be true, as was reflected in the book/older movie by Louis continuing to use the burial grounds against all common sense (which was, again, a theme that was downplayed in this new film).

Overall, the first part of the movie felt a bit disjointed. It got better as it went on, but it definitely took a while to draw me in. I did like how they kept the Cujo reference from the book, and the Derry road sign was cute. Also, the Pascow gore looked better in the other adaptation.