Can someone redpill me on this movie?

kek

Uh, have you never heard a feminist talk? Have you never seen the rallies they have in support of slaughtering their offspring?

What is a subject that rallies feminists more than abortion?

lmao

haha she has a buttnose

typical jewess

Attached: butt nose aka jew horn.png (189x106, 54K)

Literally murder but I can live with it if it kills mostly niglets.

So... no sauce?

Gibsmedats and muh oppressIon?

It's not murder if you do it [arbitrary number] days into the pregnancy! It's just a lump of cells anyways haha, it's not like it's encoded with genes and a unique DNA upon conception!

less abortions = more dumb irresponsible people

Only reason evangelicals in America are against abortion is that they don't want to feel like the only stupid people around on earth and they're afraid that if people weren't forced into raising mutts, there wouldn't be more people like them around in the future (and that's a good thing).

Abortion is BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD and the people who support it are BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD. There, I've saved you $10.

how fucking retarded are you?

Attached: my-body-my-choice-sign.jpg (970x647, 84K)

I'm pro life christian and it's good that there's a mainstream anti-abortion movie, but I hate those PureFlix "faith-based" films with a passion.

unfortunately it doesn't usually work that way because the most irresponsible people are still spawning like crazy.

Daily reminder that Spartans were pro-abortion

Spartans were also fags

Same screenwriter and director as God is not dead. So it will be a shitty hamfisted movie about something important.

Better to be murdered than raised by people who are not only willing to murder you, but are also too stupid to figure out contraception.

>God is Not Dead
>about something important

So are Americans

This.

Wait, is that real?

Im talking about abortion.

>it wont get rid of all of them its not true.

Idiot moms have idiot kids. That will never change.

Why is pro-life always connected to religious?

You literally don't need to be religious to have a brain and realize that it's literally murdering your own child. Like that's what it literally is.

I’m curious about the plot of the film. The only description I could find was vague. How was the woman at such a high level in planned parenthood without ever assisting in an abortion? Was her role merely administrative?

I know the twitter account for the movie was briefly suspended, but is anyone actually advocating censoring or outright banning the film?

I’m actually in favor of abortion being legal simply because making it illegal will just result in more dangerous back-alley abortions.
It’s pretty ridiculous how disingenuous people are about the issue, though. It’s a tough one, and both sides have a point, but everybody acts like the other side is a raving lunatic. The pro-life argument is simple: that is, or will be, a human being and murdering it would be wrong. But the opposition acts like it’s all about misogyny and taking away “a woman’s right to choose.”
People who attack abortion clinics aren’t any better. I just wish we could have a rational discourse about it, instead of just strawmanning the opposition into oblivion.

it makes degenerate lefties squirm

Because I hate pro-lifers and I also hate religion.
They make very convenient targets.

Incredible dedication to use footage of an actual abortion for this scene. Pure inspiration.

Yes that was my little bro Sparky. F

cringe movie for retards

\thread

Daily reminder Spartans got KEKED by the stronger Macedonians and Romans.

imagine being this retarded

>literally murdering
Try picking up a dictionary, brainlet

>How was the woman at such a high level in planned parenthood without ever assisting in an abortion?

You already know why.

>Based on a true story

Attached: 111111111122222.jpg (489x400, 109K)

Reefer Madness

the thumbnail looks like amber heard.

There is no defense to allowing abortion after the baby could be viable outside the womb.

she cute

Well why the fuck would anyone follow planned parenthood on twitter?

>But the opposition acts like it’s all about misogyny and taking away “a woman’s right to choose.”

Because it is. Pro-lifers go out of their way to make abortion as hard to get as possible with arbitrary rules and regulations that in more red states basically makes abortion inaccessible to all the poor people while the rich go out of state. And the issue revolves entirely on the prospect of denying women access to healthcare, because Planned parenthood is often the primary place women get any healthcare and pro-lifers want to get rid of PP entirely, rather than any kind of morality. The morality part only applies for pro-life side's moral grandstanding. And it's entirely hypocritical, as we've seen time and time again when pro-life advocates are caught making their own family and mistresses get abortion because "they actually needed it."

>How was the woman at such a high level in planned parenthood without ever assisting in an abortion? Was her role merely administrative?
yes, bureaucrats are not nurses or doctors; most pro-abortion people have never witnessed an actual one.

Directors names sound jewish

>pro-life advocates are caught making their own family and mistresses get abortion because "they actually needed it."
source

Google Tim Murphy and mistress.

shouldn’t women be kept in a survival state so that our civilization actually, you know, thrives?
dumb libs understand everything except human nature, why we do things, why we need struggle, what causes high birth rates which we need if we don’t want to have a bunch of brown people imported into our country by babylon.

nice fallacy
they're rallying behind the idea that they should have control over their bodies including what is inside their bodies. I don't necessarily agree that they should have control over the unborn child living within them but I don't disagree either. It's a difficult argument

The MyPillow Guy is gonna make a cameo so you know it’s gonna be kino.

>How was the woman at such a high level in planned parenthood without ever assisting in an abortion?
She had never taken part in an abortion that involved a fetus at such a late stage in it's development.

Just
Dont
Have
Sex.

Jesus christ people it's not that fucking hard

Well, you're an expert on that

>shouldn’t women be kept in a survival state so that our civilization actually, you know, thrives?
So you're saying women should be forced into what you call a survival state in order that our society thrive. What you're advocating is called totalitarianism and it ensures that the happiness of a society goes down the toilet. A society can't thrive when the people who compose it aren't happy. There has to be a balance between taking away peoples freedom and giving them freedom.
Autistic people like you will have trouble understanding this since you're so used to thinking in absolutes.

Oh there's a reason goy.

They make abortions as difficult as possible to get because, shocker, they don’t want people to get abortions. Don’t make the mistake of lumping politicians in with the constituents. Most politicians, on either side of the aisle, don’t give a shit about social issues, they just want to be re-elected.
Most planned parenthood facilities didn’t even offer primary health care as an option until relatively recently, and the war against abortion in this country has raged on for quite a while.
Why exactly would pro-life people want to withhold health care from women? What would they stand to gain? They want to get rid of PP because PP is primarily an institution devoted to performing abortions.

Pointing out a handful of hypocrites really doesn’t enhance your argument, and it certainly doesn’t negate all the people who ardently believe that terminating an unborn child is a despicable act.

>It's a difficult argument
No, it's not. The "clump of cells" is not their body, period.
The fact that the whole muh body muh choice is 100% about the freedom to take cum in their pussy with impunity is a terrible joke. There is virtually no moral argument for it. More than 99.5% of abortions are elective. These scenarios where a mother's life is in danger if she gives birth, or she was raped, are just not happening.
Anyway, I'm just looking for a scenario where only white women are blocked from abortion services.

Have sex.

She saw Sneed

As if society has any way to flourish wile being destroyed with the happiness of wallowing in sin led by Jezebels and Eves.

God I wish that were me

>incapable of having a child
>have an opinion on abortion

?

Its also not your body, why do you have an opinion? You also contradict yourself- if its ok for non white people to have abortions, whats your moral argument againdt abortions?

>No, it's not. The "clump of cells" is not their body, period.
No, not "period". The clump of cells is dependent on their own body just like all the other clumps of cells that make up these multicellular organisms. There is no written law passed down by the creator of the universe that explicitly says "this clump of cells is not their body therefore they can't kill it". There is more nuance to this argument than just simply stating that they can't have control over this ball of cells. They have control over every other ball of cells in their body. By saying that this particular ball of cells could grow into a full grown person doesn't mean anything. Science is proving through cell research that many other balls of cells within the body could theoretically grow into a full grown person.

Lexi Belle?

Based nigger killer.

Attached: Abortion saves white lives.jpg (510x352, 30K)

Why do women get impregnated in sex in the first place? How irresponsible can you get

>playing on chess dot com
>face some random christian player with Jesus as his profile picture
>he spams an advertisement for this movie
They're really desperate lol.

>Republicans ban abortion.
>Black population starts growing for the first time in decades.
>Democrats get even more votes.
Shieeeet.

To many it is flourishing. It's just not flourishing in the way you want it to because you think there is only a certain way a society can be run. Everyone thinks a society must be run a certain way. You're no different than anyone else in this regard.

Both sides do not have a point. The pro abortionists have flimsy counterpoints that only affect 1% of the people that want abortions. Mothers who might die from the childbirth and rape cases account for roughly 1%. There are no other valid points, don't try to say the cost of living bullshit when its the personal responsibility to feed themselves and their offspring. But back on to rape, i still think birthing the child and putting it up for adoption is a fine choice in some rape cases.

>Why exactly would pro-life people want to withhold health care from women?

Because muh moral outrage > your healthcare.

>why do you have an opinion?
The moral value of making elective abortion punitively difficult to achieve is far greater than appeasing a woman's childish appeal for why she should murder her offspring for convenience's sake. I intervene when I see petty crimes around me too.

>if its ok for non white people to have abortions, whats your moral argument againdt abortions?
Because I hate nonwhite people breeding in white countries to a far greater extent than any child-minded women hates having to take responsibility for her actions.

Retard, morals don't apply to nonwhites

I argued with this woman once that if you have the right to kill your babies because it's your body your choice then conversion therapy can't be outlawed because that's their body their choice.

Yea Forums is just one big dumb right wing hive mind at this point. Nothing but wedge issues and virtue signaling and bait

>Most politicians, on either side of the aisle, don’t give a shit about social issues, they just want to be re-elected.
This is true but you're missing a very big piece of the puzzle. Politicians will push certain issues onto the public and then promote those issues in order to get people to vote for them. This is exactly what happened with abortion. They wanted to get the Evangelicals to vote for Reagan, so they promoted the idea that abortion was a crime against God.
Politicians did the same thing with Israel. No one considered supporting Israel as an important topic until politicians who wanted people to vote for them began to tell them that yes, you should support Israel and anyone who doesn't support Israel is bad. In this way, they created issues out of thin air and convinced the public they were important.

>talks about moral value
>thinks abortion is ok if its non white

I looked at the account just after they got unbanned and one of their first posts since coming back was replying to some Q shit. They actually hired a boomer to run their social media.

Nah its funny watching them ignore science, try to take the high ground then move the goal posts on their morals the darker the skin of the mother

Now who's being narrow-minded?

conversion therapy doesn't work though and it just puts them through unneeded pain

Considering the profound impact pregnancy and childbirth have on a woman, it’s not unreasonable to consider how they feel on the matter. For nine months, your body swells up like a balloon, causing a great deal of nausea, pain, and such an abundance of hormones that it could be said that you clinically lose your mind. This all culminates in one of the most painful experiences known to man, and leaves the body permanently altered. Though it’s much rarer in today’s society, you can even die. It is, quite literally, the stuff of nightmares.
>just don’t have sex
Yeah. Just ignore one of the strongest biological impulses we have, which a ridiculously disproportionate amount of our culture is built around.
Beyond that, so many abortions are just stupid kids who don’t know better and made a mistake. Even beyond the pregnancy, your life will be profoundly altered, probably for the worse, if you keep the child. You may also lack the adequate resources to take care of said child. Alternatively, you could put it up for adoption, where it might be treated like absolute shit.

No matter how you slice it, the issue is not simple or easy. I think it’s disgusting and disingenuous when either side pretends otherwise.
I think society is better served keeping early-stage abortions legal, but you should definitely feel guilty for having one performed.

>thinks every woman just has sex non stop and has abortions non stop
>calls others narrow minded

??

>think of the childreeeeeen!
>pea sized lump of cells that won't be conscious for another 2-3 years

NARAL and NOW -- though it might be an American thing, since the rest of the world has real issues.

>think of the childreeen!!
>except all the brown children lol

>You may also lack the adequate resources to take care of said child
this is one of the biggest reasons why I'm not pro-life. What if you don't have the resources to take care of a child? The child's going to die regardless of you getting the abortion or not. Or it's going to become a criminal because it wasn't raised properly and it'll end up hurting our society

But muh contrarian morals

They figured it out, they just intentionally don't use it. Extra points for busting out 'be fruitful and multiply' when they ignore 99.9999% of the rest of it.

I don't understand the American pro life stance on abortion. I mean, are they for outlawling it alltogether? Can women pregnant for 12 weeks or over abort?

Lol based chess player

t. bugman with two moms
>To many it is flourishing
yeah, many idiot degenerates
>Its also not your body, why do you have an opinion?
t. purest groid/kike logic - impossible for them to empathize with anything
Other countries can do what they want, but in America we have the right to life.

We all used to be children. When I was a little boy; I hated laws and rules because while I necessarily didn't want to do bad things, I hated the idea of having the option to do bad things taken from me. When I grew older, I saw the folly of this.

>It is, quite literally, the stuff of nightmares.
Then why do mothers do it again and again? Why have humans not died out for lack of interest in having children?

>ignore one of the strongest biological impulses we have, which a ridiculously disproportionate amount of our culture is built around
Sexual intercourse isn't a human right and never will be. Anyone can get their "cummies" by their own mechanical effort.

>your life will be profoundly altered, probably for the worse, if you keep the child
At least you will have fulfilled your biological imperative.

>You may also lack the adequate resources to take care of said child.
This is not the middle ages. There are a ton of idiotic services and gibs that came as a result of appeasing useless people who made lots of noise throughout history.

>Alternatively, you could put it up for adoption, where it might be treated like absolute shit.
Not even tangentially relevant.

>you should definitely feel guilty for having one performed
On that I absolutely agree. Every medical professional complicit in it are breaking their oaths.
Loathe as I am to echo the left-side-of-history wank, the abortion issue is one of the big things people in the future are going to judge us by.

It gets even worse because the only argument they have is "w-w-w-well what-what if th-they got r-raped?????? wh-what then??????????"
they try to treat every case of a bad murdering mother equal to a ten year old being impregnated by her dad.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_youngest_birth_mothers

I completely agree with you. It’s also why politicians continue to pretend the gender wage gap exists.
But usually, they don’t invent issues, they just stir up the hornet’s nest as a way to garner support. In this case, “should abortion be legal?” is a question worth asking, and both sides do have a point. Ultimately, it’s better to make it legal, because people are going to do it either way. Better that they go to PP than to a back-alley or down the stairs. Time limit restrictions seem reasonable, too.

Which is it? The only place women have gotten access to primary healthcare, or it's only been offered recently?

Maybe it has something to do with how the conservative solution is always punitive and never wants to allow sex ed and easy access to contraceptives to stop the need for abortions. Banning abortion also only leads to one thing: desperate mothers dying in back alley abortions.

I'm a right leaning Christian myself... but I don't get movies like this. It's tailored for evangelical boomers... Our goal as Christians is to reach out and win people over, not polarize ourselves into our own echo chambers (In the world but not of it etc etc).

I'd be surprised if this movie changes anybody's mind on the matter. Maybe it will and I'm a centrist dumbass..... who knows.

>It is, quite literally, the stuff of nightmares.
>Then why do mothers do it again and again? Why have humans not died out for lack of interest in having children

oh look you just contradicted yourself

>There are a ton of idiotic services and gibs

Social welfare isn't going to provide a good environment for your child if working two jobs and barely making ends meet doesn't either.

The point of these movies isn't to change peoples minds, it just allows right wing christians the opportunity to see their anti-left-wing fantasies played out on the big screen. It's a popular form of entertainment among Liberals too (see: every show on Netflix).

The real solution is surreptitious global sterilization followed by a public announcement that cloning humans is viable.

Then everybody can have as much sex as they want, and no one has children unless they go to an IVF clinic. No one's reproductive rights are trampled -- unless the right is to reproduce regardless of ability to care for a child.

Never had a real opinion on it, it's a done deal and repubs against are just pandering to catholics and evangelicals. Not a service I'd ever use. I do cringe at the zealots that go to marches for it's support and give it the glorious ritual sacrifice treatment.
>inb4 pol tells me it is

>Social welfare isn't going to provide a good environment for your child if working two jobs and barely making ends meet doesn't either.
Leave cities. Marry the father of your child. Stop spending money on luxuries.
No child actually knows he's poor until he's told he is. He does know something isn't right when there's no dad in the picture.

Yeah, that's plain to see. If there were more diversity of ideology in entertainment, we wouldn't have right-wingers and christfags throwing money at low-quality echo chamber entertainment due to how blue-balled for it they are.

He'll know something isn't right when he goes to bed hungry every night

The problem as I see it is the huge growth in politics as entertainment. It didn't used to be that people wanted politics in their entertainment. Now it seems like you can't watch anything without it. I wish people would stop this shit and make entertainment entertaining for it's own sake. Stop pretending you're trying to spread a message and just make an entertaining film/show.

>
Though it’s nightmarish, it’s essential to our survival. In time, test tube babies will almost certainly become the norm.
Honestly, imagine it for a minute. Starting tomorrow, this thing is going to start growing in your belly, causing it to swell up and hurt more than anything you’ve ever experienced. There are many horror movies related to the fears of childbirth.

>
I’m saying it’s unreasonable to expect young people to abstain in the world we live in. This is purely from an observational standpoint, and the right to have sex or not isn’t relevant. It’s going to happen.

>
The biological impulse to procreate is crucial to lower organisms, as it ensures that the species survives. Humanity is in no such danger. If anything, flooding the Western world with more unwanted, poorly reared children only harms society and presents a greater danger to our future.

>
Those services are mostly garbage. It (mostly) prevents children from starving in the street, but there’s no guarantee that they’ll have a decent quality of life.

>
Of course it is. The eventual well-being of the child is paramount to this argument. It’s a double edged sword, though, and can be used by either side.

>
A fetus in the early stages really is an unthinking, unfeeling mass of cells. In time, it will likely become a human being, but does that afford it all the same protections as one? What about individual sperm cells or eggs? Are they sacred as well? There’s another step involved, but they are still alive and do have the potential to become a fully fledged person.
Abortion should not be undertaken lightly, and we shouldn’t pretend it’s an easy issue.

OY VEY GOY IF YOU AREN'T ON BOARD WITH INFANTICIDE ALL THESE WOMEN WILL HAVE NO ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE HEHEHE

no, you can't hear the whispers "mommy, mommy, nooooo"

I don't know what fantasy you're living in, but in reality it's mom if anyone who goes to bed hungry and Shayquan just goes to bed mad because he's sick of eating mac and cheese 12 times a week. I don't see any 4'9" hood nigger manlet epidemic because mamma or grams failed to provide food for them in their formative years.

You can just be replaced by third world POC. No cloning necessary.

I’m a socialist politically but personally I am ardently pro-life. Abortion is horrible and should done rarely. I believe it should be legal, but God help these women and doctors who murder innocent babies. It’s a vile business. In this movie she saw a fetus fight for its life. They CAN feel pain!

>a socialist politically but personally I am ardently pro-life.
There's no contradiction here.

Who said anything about cloning?

Abortion is murder. That is just the God’s honest truth. And there are affluent 30-somethings out there who blithely murder their baby because they want a career or whatever. It’s terrible.

lol it's not like that in real life
the fetal tissue doesn't even squeal!

Well, what I mean is that I’m not a Republican (nor a Democrat, reslly). I am what might be considered Left in some ways, but I am socially pretty conservative in that I am pro-Life and anti-Trans. Also #metoo is crazy. Am female btw.

Reminder this movie is poorly made and people are only shilling it cuz muh prolife message. The cinematography sucks, the editing is awful, the score is terrible, the acting is mediocre, and the message isn't subtle at all.

post bobs and vageen

>There are many horror movies related to the fears of childbirth.
I can only think such movies are marketed to women who've never given birth and men with overly vivid imaginations, like you.

>it’s unreasonable to expect young people to abstain in the world we live in
I'm pro-natal and anti-promiscuity, so the compromise is young people get married and have kids in wedlock.

>flooding the Western world with more unwanted, poorly reared children only harms society and presents a greater danger to our future
Occidentals are not lower organisms, on that I can also agree. The proper rearing of children can take place in two-parent households. My idea of the species surviving is either the hegemony of whites over the planet, or the spacefag approach where whites leave and let the nonwhites evolve to our level. In either case, we still procreate even in your sci-fi test tube baby scenario.

>Those services are mostly garbage
And yet ghetto moms have more kids because they improve their quality of life with what the government gibs them. Quality of life for a kid, again, is pretty subject to whether the kid is aware he's poor.

>Of course it is
The quality of adoptive parents and services is a bureaucratic issue whose unfucking is mutually exclusive to the abortion debate.

>but does that afford it all the same protections as one? What about individual sperm cells or eggs?
Life begins at conception, and having human DNA and near-total potential at personhood SHOULD afford it all the same protections as a unique person. The clumpacells is not her body anymore.

Imagine hating on Hollywood movies for making unsubtle diversity and feminist movies, but then praising a shitty film just because it aligns with your political beliefs.

i laughed so hard

I haven’t seen the film, so I can’t praise it. I guess I just know the story.

Never gets old, huh?

In late term abortions they inject the baby with something to stop its heart first. There's not much of a period before the abortion cutoff where they have a developed central nervous system so wouldn't be able to react so you'd never have a baby actively react.

or bobs and peen

>biological imperative

Attached: 1513789325244.png (625x773, 111K)

There's plenty
>the woman doesn't feel like raising it
>it makes a women feel powerful to abort it
>its organs can be sold for profit
>you're a mysoginist for opposing it
>it's her choice
>it's her body
>it's 2019
>there's too many people already
>she'll just abort it herself anyway
>it might grow up to be the next hitler
Meanwhile there's literally no argument for not aborting.

girl peen

why if this even an issue
if a woman wants to make a stupid decision, let her
most of them are defined by that, anyway

Answer this!

You don't have to imagine.

Attached: 1402359915424.jpg (488x410, 44K)

Why not just outlaw abortions for white women?

>those ultrasounds of abortions on YouTube by Indian doctors
>comments are angry soccer mom's reeing at Dr.Pajeet

>being against abortion

Attached: 455.png (324x362, 45K)

i can fap to that

Go back to facebook mom

i saw a movie with a talking dog

>why if this even an issue
>if a woman wants

Answering your own question there buddy.

>because making it illegal will just result in more dangerous back-alley abortions
If you're prepared to kill your own child, you deserve anything and everything that happens to you as a result. This is a hill I'm willing to die on.

>abortion is wrong because it's murder
>but abortion kills black people so it's good
Stop trying to discuss this on Yea Forums.

>Also #metoo is crazy

Finally calling out men's bad, abusive behaviour that for decades was quietly accepted and trying to stop sexual harassment is crazy?

>Quality of life for a kid, again, is pretty subject to whether the kid is aware he's poor

This is bullshit. Your quality of life being awfyl is entirely removed from awareness of poverty. If you cannot, for example, afford healthcare, it doesn't matter if the kid doesn't know you're poor if his health is at risk because you can't do anything unless it's time to go to the emergency room.

So it's entirely about punishment, not saving lives.

Those aren't mutually exclusive. You lock up serial killers to punish them AND to prevent them from murdering more people.

The theme song is a mess
>There's no such thing as unplanned in the eyes of the Lord!
>Carry that rape baby you can't support to term because it's what God said he wanted

>that's right jay

Trips of truth

>carrying bastard children
>carrying rape babies
>carrying incest babies
Abortion is necessary.

Attached: 13627281697863926361.jpg (360x360, 19K)

No matter the message, the bottom line is the movie they made makes cable movie tripe like you'd see on the Hallmark channel look like Oscar-worthy efforts.

But the post said women who do abortion basically deserve to DIE.

The movie is literally just right wing virtue signaling and propaganda, ironically the one thing right wingers always whine about movies, them having an agenda.

this is what republicans actually believe looooool

Attached: 1502387617533.png (290x301, 123K)

and Abby Johnson is a lying whore

>be biological human
>all instincts geared toward reproducing
>200k years pass where you were lucky to reproduce, and have your offspring survive into adulthood
>manage to get pregnant
>kill it cause "nah"

>literally just pull out and don't cum inside
>can be as effect as contraception
>Still fuck it up

The government would tax it if it got older, better to end it's misery now.

>pull out
>cum
>stick it right back in
>do this multiple times in the span of 2 hours
Man I was a fucking dumb 20 year old.

Tbh I support her if only for finding a way to scam conservative Christians out of their money
She's probably made more off this movie and book than she ever did at PP

t. satanic democrat

if you pee before putting back in you're good to go. It's so easy not to get pregnant

The "rape and incest" argument for abortion is basically using the tiniest, tiniest edge case example to color the whole picture. It'd be like essentially saying we should treat every human being as if they have AIDS, because .0001% of the population has AIDS.

It's literally the smallest divisible fraction of all abortion cases, and yet it's the only one people trot out when you demand they justify their position.

Bear in mind, I'm neutral on abortion, I don't really care one way or another. But what I do see is the case, is that NO ONE IN THE HISTORY OF THE PLANET who supports abortion has ever done so for sound, consistent, logical reasons that they can delineate and then stick to when pressed on the issue. Every single person I have spoken to, heard speak, or read, has always made purely emotional appeals and then when pressed for specific facts has not thought about, or has shifted on their positions.

>calling out
Why didn't they report it in the first place?

>Finally calling out men's bad, abusive behaviour that for decades was quietly accepted and trying to stop sexual harassment is crazy?
Yes, because it's a concept that is not based on principals, and the people involved and supportive of the act of "calling people out" are inherently defensive of people in their own tribe, meaning that it's not actually an honest expression of desire to change culture for the better, but simply a new way of targeting and removing opponents via the court of public opinion.

Why are women too stupid to use birth control or keep cum out of their wombs?

Attached: jon computer.png (540x480, 204K)

>There's not much of a period before the abortion cutoff
There's no such thing as an "abortion cutoff".

And it's not wrong.

I can't even beat the computer on easy mode

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

According to the graph, 50% of black babies are aborted.

Funny how when it's liberal people like Al Franken, Jihn Lasseter, Joe Biden, Weinstein, R. Kelly, etc. they are all called out by the left and forced out, where as if it's someone conservative the right's response has been nuh-huh he dindu nuffin!!! like with Roy Moore or Bill O'Reilly, and Bill only got the boot because shareholders were pissed that Fox secretly poured millions in his sexual harassment settlements without informing investors like they're supposed to.

He didn't say they deserve to die, he said they deserve whatever is the consequence of their action.

When you make something that there is a demand for illegal, you create a criminal enterprise in providing that thing. And because criminals are not scrupulous businesspeople, you are inherently putting yourself and others in harm's way by engaging in criminal activity.

Whether or not you think the thing that is criminalized is justified in being so, doesn't change the fact that what the person is doing is dangerous and illegal and unregulated, and they deserve the consequences for their actions, which might be the personal injury or harm incurred while committing the crime AND the penalty for breaking the law.

Literally splitting hairs.

>The only place women have gotten access to primary healthcare
Absolutely not, OBGYNs exist, but damn if these liberal women actually go to doctors that specifically exist to help them. All of the benefits that anti-natalists spew that PP has? OBGYNs have them. OBGYNs have had those benefits for years.

Wokeism and empowerment replaced responsibility. These people live and breathe by double standards. It's perfectly okay for them to defame someone with false rape accusations, and then distance themselves from their claims when the defamation suits start flying. They'll claim it was "free speech, which means it's in the past, move on." These are the same people that love it when twitter/youtube ban white supremacists, claiming "freedom of speech doesnt mean freedom from consequences."
It's okay when liberals do it, because they're on the right side of history. If "I'm on the right side of history" doesn't make your blood boil, you don't have a soul or a brain

A lot of rural places don't have access to OBGYNs beyond PP.

>Funny how when it's liberal people like Al Franken, Jihn Lasseter, Joe Biden, Weinstein, R. Kelly, etc. they are all called out by the left and forced out,
Joe Biden is currently being defended by the Left, but if your contention here is that some people who are ostensibly "on the left" were kicked out and publicly shamed for their actions means that ALL public shaming and tribal exorcism is a good thing, I think you'll find that there are plenty of names one could posit of people that are not only not publicly shamed and removed for their beliefs, words, or actions, but are actually defended and sheltered by the tribe. So you're not likely to win any major points there.

>here as if it's someone conservative the right's response has been nuh-huh he dindu nuffin!!!
I don't think that's true at all? I mean, what is more often the case is that right-wing figures are accused of things BY the Left, and the people on the Right tend to want evidence and proof, because otherwise we get Kavanaugh, where one single unsourced, unfounded, unsupported allegation can almost tank an entire career all because you want to win points for your party. In general, the Right is opposed to all types of "call out culture" because it's so easy to make untrue claims and have the mob descend on an innocent person, which is inherently immoral.

Abortion is going to be nonexistent in 50 years.

The story's made up. She's a scam artist, like most evangelical converts.

>All of the benefits that anti-natalists spew that PP has? OBGYNs have them. OBGYNs have had those benefits for years.
I'm not an expert on the topic, but I'd wager that being a for-profit company, Planned Parenthood can offer services to people without insurance at competitive market rates that primary physicians and OB/GYNs can't do.

Not that I'm justifying it, obviously Planned Parenthood is a horrible organization.

>doesn't realize spermatozoa can be found in precum

Allegations against Roy Moore were bullshit and everyone knew it immediately. Including you.

If he and a Neocon tv bloviator are all you have you're grasping at straws.

>Allegations against Roy Moore were bullshit and everyone knew it immediately.
Not only were they bullshit, the Roy Moore stuff was actually an active disinformation campaign created by a company called Hamilton 68, a fake dashboard claiming to aggregate tweets from known "Russian bot" accounts on social media for the purposes of identifying what the "Russians" are trying to control or affect in elections and policy. It was revealed that not only was Hamilton 68 fake, but the over 1000 "Russian bots" it tracked were run by the site owners so that they could essentially create whatever disinformation they wanted, and then sell it to the press (Hamilton 68 is a widely cited source on basically every Russian collusion or conspiracy news post you've seen in the last 3 years).

So basically a Democratic activist used hedge fund money to create a fake information platform that was vetted and accepted by mainstream news, and then fed them entirely fake and fabricated info on what the Russians were saying or planning to do involving various conservative figures and candidates, causing the media to then brand those figures and candidates as corrupt and in bed with the Russians, thus tanking their careers or campaigns.

t. incel virgin that doesn't realize that the sperm which can sometimes be found in precum comes from previous ejaculations, and is killed by
Also, laughing at all the cucks ITT that fell for the 'women's rights, my body my choice' bullshit.

>>pea sized lump of cells that won't be conscious for another 2-3 years

So its okay to kill a 1 year old?

People should have to get a permit to be allowed NOT to have an abortion.

KILL
I
L
L

BABIES
A
B
I
E
S

>Eugenics
>Racial homogeneity
Goverment controlled abortion is based and redpilled
Fight me, moral fags

Attached: 1538660313481.jpg (622x350, 25K)

How so? I’m pro choice but I just realized that if we were to ever crest a true utopia non medically nessicary abortions wouldn’t happen. This whole debate is pretty much yelling that we live in a dystopia and how wrong it is to bring kids into that

kino

What did Sansa see?

The argument for legalizing it in the 60s was that this would eliminate unsafe procedures. That hasn't happened, and the reason "back alley" abortions happened in the first place is they were not abortions. Abortion has always been available to women requiring it out of medical emergency. The coat hanger operation, omitting gross details, was to cause an injury bad enough to justify hospital abortion but not serious enough to kill your prostitute.

Hey hey hey, let's not omit eliminating pay raises, increasing labor flexibility, doubling the tax base, capturing soft academia, and the unquestioning support of the worst policy ideas.

WHIRRRRRRRR

>the irony in this post

>Yea Forums is now full of brainwashed satanic demoncrats
Nice. That said, this movie isn’t going to change any minds, but abortion is still an awful thing. It’s even crazier that killing unborn babies is now normalized completely

haven't heard bugman used as an insult in awhile

You know what else is awful? Human beings being treated like shit by conservatives after they leave the womb. Poor social safety nets. Shootings all the time because no gun control. Poorly treated vets and elderly.

Attached: 50586d.jpg (400x400, 24K)

right here my man
numberofabortions.com/

Looks like BR2049 lmao

>okay with straight up killing post-birth babies
Hi Cuomo.

where are the titties?