Will it be kino?

will it be kino?

Attached: 1554233897608.png (1682x1152, 1.16M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=6vCb1yCi24I
jbpdaily.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Only $15? Pretty pathetic.

yeah I mean he's pretty much sacrificing himself
youtube.com/watch?v=6vCb1yCi24I

Why doesn't Zizek have Dr. before his name? He is one, as far as I know.

Holy fuck he's loaded now

Attached: peterson KEK.gif (433x505, 2.53M)

Look how distressed this guy is when he hears how much peterson is making.

Doesn't seem very communist to have people pay to attend a debate

Yeah no shit, he is grifting his way straight to the bank, its painfully obvious that he loves money a little too much at this point

Attached: lobster.png (620x625, 252K)

Its Peterson charging to watch a fucking livestream on his website, not Zizek

Yes. I can't wait to watch the highlights on YouTube.
I do like Peterson but I hate his bootlicking "you can't change the system, just get used to it" attitude and I can't wait to see him btfo

>I can't wait to see him btfo
Wont happen. Zizek and Peterson are coming from two completely different angles. Peterson will start talking about gulag archipelago and Zizek will respond by talking about fistfucking or something

People this smart don't get btfo. Neither of them will hear any points they haven't already heard before. If you think either person wins in these debates, that's your own bias.

>Why doesn't Zizek have Dr. before his name? He is one, as far as I know.
He is, he is also a Professor. He doesn't like being called either though

Attached: Zizek-wedding-0002.jpg (467x627, 54K)

>communism is when everything is free

B A S E D
A
S
E
D

He's making just a little more than Belle Delphine

Attached: zizekon4chan.png (914x898, 321K)

happiness is a fucking emotion, there are people that miss communism as there are people who are rich and extremely unhappy

literally pointless debate

And so the think about judaism, I mean you have to look at the the scriptures , the Talmud especially. Like golly gee look at it's ties to Zionism. And it all becomes apparent why so many of the government are duel citizens.They are ruining this country purposely. And you bet your bottom dollar buckos, that those in charge would leave to Israel the second this lobster is done frying. The thing to remember is antisemitism is used as a tool to stop any criticism, how can you clean your room if it's on fire. You can't. They want you under fire, ever notice you lose your job at mere asking why such a small percentage have so much power gets you in all kinds of strife. Well bucko now y'know.

Attached: 220px-Jordan_Peterson_June_2018.jpg (220x309, 14K)

But I need someone to worship. and I want to feel superior to others

Just clean your room lmao

because zizek isn't a simpering faggot like peterstein

Dr. Peterstein to you bucko

That's at least $4 million a year, probably more like $5M. Damn that's impressive for an academic

to be fair its easier to be happier under marxism. i live comfortably but i'm constantly depressed and suicidal, under marxism i'd be happy if i just managed to find some food that day

kek

Destiny vs Stefan Molyneux on 4th of April btw. This month is going to be debatekino.

Attached: 1465109986799.jpg (750x400, 32K)

>Stefan Molyneux
What is this, 2016?

Attached: 1553274979452.jpg (250x238, 8K)

It's a fix. Peterson will take a fall in the 3rd round.

Find somebody else to sully, you evil goyi- I mean coward.

>Happiness
>both look sad.

Who will actually watch this shit lol don't you niggers have jobs or an education to gain

Why hasn't this guy reunited with Buffy, Willow and Faith already
you tell me, doc

>an education to gain
I'm enrolled in Jordan Peterson's univeristy actually

Smack the yamaka off his head for a laugh.

Slavoj's point is that happiness is indicative of the slave morality, not the master morality, and it's a dumb thing to pursue.

Slavoj will absolutely blow Peterson out of the water. Peterson's whole schtick is that Cultural marxism is evil, and Slavoj whose whole career pertains to it will simply explain "yeah that ain't what it means shithead."

Slavoj is next level intelligent and Peterson hasn't even done the reading assigned for homework.

Reminder that Peterson got into a twitter argument with a Zizek bot account lmao

Attached: TNGThSP.jpg (750x819, 139K)

peterson really isn't that smart

Based on what?

Attached: DYrwz1sVAAAsM8m.jpg large.jpg (783x960, 84K)

THEY'RE BOTH MARXISTS


wtf?

Attached: peterson living room commie alt right.jpg (950x634, 348K)

Dude is shit with tech. Your point?

Well you see, it depends what you mean by ''smart'' *rambles on for 10 minutes and squirms out of any concrete definitions*

>an academic

Guy hasn't worked a day in his life since he found out he can give incels basic self help advice on patreon and print money doing so

Attached: ebin.jpg (604x874, 77K)

two hacks.
zizek has literaly written 50 books, all about the same inane bullshit and peterson wrote a glorified self help book.

Be honest here. He'd obliterate you at pretty much anything.

>the bloody marxists are terrible
>yesh but uh uh you uh *sniff* talk of marxists deese, deese, uh transexshuals, and pink hair-ed freaksh
>we shoot them all and then get back in bread line and so on and so on

>If you think either person wins in these debates, that's your own bias.
Careful user your stepping on toes lmao

He's a typical e-celeb leech that dumbasses keep falling for

Attached: 1526731830334.jpg (796x398, 63K)

He abandoned patreon (he didn't like paying them 5%) and has his own patreon type thing now

jbpdaily.com/

This, I've seen people call this the next Vidal vs Buckley and it makes me laugh

>itt a bunch of fucking commies

Attached: 2008_11_06-nixon-angry[1].jpg (400x265, 17K)

am i the only one who actually read zizek and realized his points an arguments are absolutely retarded?
nobody is gonna continue his thought, he is an intellectual dead end.

yes
based

>He'd obliterate you at pretty much anything.
Probably but I'm no good at public speaking

No but this is

Attached: the-perverts-guide-to-ideology.jpg (1920x2560, 921K)

Which campus, St. George and what do you study?

zizek is the science nigga of philosophy.

Doesn't matter. Pretty much anything is barely about public speaking.

Zizek is going to eviscerate this clown. I'm no marxist but Petersons ponderances are the intellectual equivalent of popcorn. The definition of armchair philosopher.

uoft gang we out here

Unironically the Chomsky vs Foucault of our generation. This will go down in history books

ebooks*

>having to pay to get in
Looks like capitalism won desu

that's not really how adults hold discourse, m8.

who here /bahen/?

Jordan literally larps as a victim of soviet oppression.

>ivory tower retard vs degenerate post-modernist
actually yes it's fitting

This is probably more than anything why some other """academics""" hate him so vehemently. He found a way to make all the time and money he sunk into his PhD into something which people value enough to pay him enormous sums for while they languish slaving as adjunct bitches or desperately scramble to justify just one more grant with fudged studies and sloppy work. His success through interaction with a huge amount of people reminds them of how much of their lives they've wasted on worthless degrees and how they'll be debt slaves till they're 70 because they lived their entire young adulthood in college taking out student loans.

>how they'll be debt slaves till they're 70 because they lived their entire young adulthood in college
Only the Americans lol

It'll be shit since modern 'debates' are a farce. Each person is entering it purely for financial gain and to get their "AH HA!" moment. Civil discourse and reasoned arguments have given way to a culture of "GOTCHA!" moments so these easy to digest quips can be put into #REKT youtube compilations.

youtube.com/watch?v=8Y9-9AkQV-c

Zizek on twitch now lads, zoomers turning Marxist

>*sniff*

that's because bans anything remotely right wing from their service

They'll either be speaking in such different terms that there will hardly even be a conversation... OR, Zizek will actually often say he agrees with statements Peterson makes, but put it in Marxist terms, which Peterson, also being a bit iconoclastic, might quibble on a couple details, but find some common ground on.

Honestly, Zizek isn't nearly as incompatible with Peterson as Derrida, Foucault, or Butler are. These two just might surprise us and get kind of chummy.

And so it should

The guy who created Fable?

Jordan will just waffle about how nothing can be said because it all depends what you mean by X Y and Z and then he'll just start bringing up Jung and some random book about shit no one has read but him, he'll conclude by blathering about some generic shit that doesn't actually answer the question and leaves everyone able to interpret what he means their own way.

Destiny will get mopped.

Go away Molyneux

They are both going to talk past each other and claim victory

yeah, but your image of zoomers is distorted because you're only seeing leftist bootlickers on these services. because as we know leftists suffer from oversocialization, which makes it impossible for them to rebel or be interesting in any way.

Destiny is used to debating lightweights so he got a little too confident and picked a fight with Molymeme. Say what you want about Molymeme, but he's one of the best public speakers around.

Holy fuck hahaha

People actually listen to YouTube philosopher debates?

Yikes!

Because Peterson is also a psychologist and Zizek is an fake doctor (academic).

Where are the real philosophers then if not on YouTube?

>psychologists are real doctors!!!

>Painfully ovbious
Oh geez you discovered that man likes money. So groundbreaking bro.

It will barely be a debate, the format will be a 30min speech from each one, then 10 mins where they respond to each other's points, then a Q&A.

>Where are the real philosophers
On mountaintops

>say what you want
yeah molyneux runs a self help cult and is a perpetual child who blames his parents for all of his mistakes. he cant even structure a psychoanalytical hot take that parents = the state to escape from his perpetual victimhood. the man is a moron. he should be deplatformed simply because debating pure ideology on its own terms and being disallowed from calling it irrational will never win a debate against cultists. when told they are purely acting on beliefs without any scientific, dialectical structure behind their arguments they will shrug and act as though belief is good enough. deep down they are nihilists who embrace whatever beliefs let them play out their alienation in antisocial ways. molyneux is a vessel for their nihilistic pursuit of chaos
it is acceptable because peterson likes to bog whoever he is talking to down in his jungian pseudobabble swamp. peterson says he hates chaos, so let it be ordered and concise discussion... yknow what he is worst at. he does best when attacking opponents personally and talking shit anecdotes off the cuff

Yes I'm sure Zizek will be much more coherent and actually respond to statements and not just talk over him.

Maybe, but he's probably smart enough to not agree to something that would make him look like a fucking moron and jeopardize his revenue stream
If you go into this expecting to see Peterson talk about lobsters and Disney movies just for Zizek to blow him out, you're gonna be sorely disappointed

>he should be de-platformed so we can prevent alienation and antisocial ways

DEEEAAAAAAAARRRR kindly dr. Peter, The problem with the Jews!
Is they take all our money, And control all the news!

They pit us 'gainst eachother, And profit off our backs!
GOLLY, MOSES, Naturally we'd attack!

Attached: westsidestory61.jpg (470x264, 28K)

Yes, he's pretty smart. You just don't feel inclined to agree with him. Anyways, most of the things he says are things liberals would have agreed with, and involves sources and ideas that liberals were into until recently. Pretending they're all suddenly above or beyond Jung etc now is pure dishonesty, they're just saying it because they perceive him as an 'enemy' and feel inclined to just oppose him as a rule. When in fact he's really a fairly liberal person, mostly just centrist.

I don't agree with him on everything, probably not even that much, but he's reasonable enough and acting like he's this terrible or stupid thing is pure signalling.

He's able to get away with it because from the very start he's said he wanted to make money off of it at the same time and very pro capitalism.

RETARD VS RETARD

>popcorn
Well you see, take a step back and think about what exactly "popcorn" means eh. It is corn that is either popped or unpopped; its defining characteristic being the ***ability*** to be popped that gives meaning in both of its states of existence. Going from brown kernels into Golden Popped Popcorn is an act of becoming Gold, which is the highest state you can orient yourself towards, which is characterized by the image of the Sun. The Sun is something that guides the community *through* the act of the Individual becoming divine; and you know if we had it the way the bloody postmodernists want it there would be no popped corn or unpopped corn, because they value the equality of outcome over the hierarchical structure; we'd all just be meaningless partially-popped popcorn if those social justice tribunals get their way.

The Japanese, who saw the image of the sun as their guiding foundation of Being itself, chose to present it as red and white? Now, how come popcorn containers are red and white too?

***Exactly.***

Attached: 1553302580684.png (496x747, 218K)

this thread is off topic and spam. based ku$hner

>both sides will be arguing extreme sides while presenting bad modern examples of complete moderate and hybrid governments

OH NO NO NO NO

for once i root for the commie

Based schizo

It's the foucault vs chomsky of our generation

Brainlet here, I like to watch debates but I'm not sure what they're talking about

>an academic
t.neet

all post enlightenment philosophers are cringeworthy