Can read minds

No he is not you dumb retards, seeing as he's being chased by Ministry for decades because he's an evil racist Nazi wizard who killed thousands.

Plus Voldemort didn't see through Snape's lying and Snape got killed by Nagini which is a literal snek.

i love good guys turning bad, but man did that feel forced

Grindelwald has resistance to the wizarding form of TP. Its something expercienced wizards especially of Grindelwalds caliber should know and pursue.

I wish grindelwald would have been more extreme. He seemed very tame and boring.

2 and a half men

This was a major plot point in half blood prince. Harry having to learn to resist Snape mind raping him.

None of that movie makes any sense. I mean, Rowlings has a very real tendency to retcon her own shit and make up needless details years afterwards, but that movie managed to retcon itself.

>couple argue and break up in the street
>it starts raining
What a piece of shit movie

This. Racists are never powerful, they are the very definition of weakness

wtf are you trying to say?
is this even English?

Rowling puts plot elements in her novels and movies that are fed to her by MI6 or some other sector of British intelligence.
The Brits have been doing this for a long time.
It’s like the joke in Diamonds are Forever showing moon landing footage being filmed on a soundstage.
Or the plot point in License to Kill showing a corrupt televangelist involved in smuggling drugs.
Or taliban drug smuggling to Russia in The Living Daylights.
Maybe this movie is implying facts about WWII.

Voldehmort believed Snape was on his side and only dismissed Snape’s lie about the elder wand because Deh wants the wand for himself no matter what

>Plus Voldemort didn't see through Snape's lying and Snape got killed by Nagini which is a literal snek
Snape is an Occulemens, the entire sixth book revolves around snape teaching Harry how to stop people from being able to read his mind.

>critics pan the movie
>finally see it on streaming
>it's fucking kino, with a nuanced villain who has a creepy relationship to one of the good guys
>interesting character development
>unexpected twists
>loads of subtext

Fuck RT.

Attached: 1362103882719.jpg (542x493, 189K)

>Maybe this movie is implying facts about WWII.
>Implying we didn't already know that all sides were assholes and the allies were scummy bastards in the first place (see also the winter war).
Almost like history is written by the victors.

Fifth book but yes

You might be retarded

the franchise is dead

>Grindelwald openly states that he wants to remove muggle
>This bitch joins him because he represents "outcasts", which she and her husband are because he's a muggle
Bravo, Rowling. Bravo.

wait if that wasn't in half blood prince, what fucking happened in that one

>not powerful
>can kill thousands and gets away with it
Hmmm

Nothing. Nothing happens in that fucking book! It literally has no plot going on. Draco builds a portal and Snape kills Dumbledore. That's it.
Halfblood Prince is shit and only exist to trigger the events for Harry Potter: Endgame.

Attached: Beagle Boys taking their time to slowly fish money while Scrooge confused fucks his money.jpg (564x871, 108K)

I agree that her character arc is fucking retarded.

>why would wizards want to stop Grindelwald if his plan is to stop the Muggles from doing World War 2?
because they don't know WW2 will happen, he could be making it up. this really isn't a flaw. also, just because someone says "bad thing bad I'ma fix it" doesn't mean that person is right for the job.

I don't know anyone who enjoyed this movie. If they didn't spend so much time with world building and introducing characters no one cares about, they'd have a fanbase as big as HP.

>tfw no jewess gf

Attached: 1543612167229.gif (404x347, 1003K)

The two major plot points are Deh's past + introduction of horcrux, and who's trying to murder Dumbledore.
The mind fuckery is in 5 and in fact Deh idea it to trick Harry into going to the Minister.

Halfblood Prince is literally Snape's backstory setting up the biggest emotional gutpunch in the series. You can be mad all you want that it didn't have a huge action sequence, but it's still one of the higher tier books.

It really was a horrible movie. Even if you can get over staring at that fugly faggot bong.

You might be an ass baby spawned by me having anal sex with your mom twenty times or more.

Attached: 0au3LDK.jpg (689x1023, 69K)

>at least three qts in the movie and you're checking out the dudes

user...

Without WW2 muggle wouldn't have gotten the technological edge to stand a change against wizards

2=1>3>7>5>6>4

He never said he wanted to remove all Muggles.
In current magical society it forbidden to live with muggles. But Grindelwald actually would allow such marriages.
This is her reason.

Also, I recently watched and it wasn't so bad. Maybe because I never read Harry Potter books and do not really care about all that "canon".
I saw youtube video about why this movie so bad, and basically whole video was about MUH LEGACY MUH OLD CHARACTERS MUH KIDS MEMORIES and nothing else.

Im not even american but he's the evil drumpf reference in cas you didnt notice.
Hell,you have a literall scene of him ordering to kill a child in case you were thinking about rooting with a white male.

>the entire sixth book revolves around snape teaching Harry how to stop people from being able to read his mind.
this happens in the fifth book and it's only like 3 chapters

Thanos excepted, Grindelwald is a much more interesting villain than the last five MCU movies.

Faggot critics are hating because they're white knighting for Amber Heard over Johnny Depp...

>he's the evil drumpf reference in cas you didnt notice.
How exactly?

> in case you were thinking about rooting with a white male.
And main hero was black or something?

The sister of OP pic is really cute and the OP pic is cute. And I was staring at them when they were in scene. But the main character is that skeleton bong faggot with one facial expression. And he infuriates me.

>Thanos excepted, Grindelwald is a much more interesting villain than the last five MCU movies.
Oh yes, that is an incredibly high bar. MCU capeshit.

>ctrl+F
>"No!"
>dullest
>0 results
c'mon Yea Forums, step it up

Yea Forums really is retarded. The reason why Queenie can't read his mind is because of two things: he's an expert in occulemency and if he were to slip he doesn't think in English BUT in German. The same goes for the French Rosier chick. Two languages Queenie doesnt understand. In the first movie she even told Newt she has problems understanding Brits because of their accents.

Attached: 1540770793909.webm (549x396, 2.14M)

lads who nuked hiroshima killed like 100k dudes, so they are very powerful

Because the shoah was the greatest thing that ever happened to jewry

Why the hell would wizards help muggles?

She may not be able to read his mind but I think she can read everyone else’s at the rally. Maybe she didn’t feel anything wrong with any of grindewalds followers thinking.

>tfw no autistic gf

Attached: DbrzRIkW0AAmADQ.jpg (800x1200, 123K)

Why is everyone talking about this movie all of a sudden?

Attached: 1538292905180.png (550x535, 198K)

HQRip was released recently.

The movie was a clusterfuck. I torrented it and stopped watching after half an hour or so.

>Also, why would wizards want to stop Grindelwald if his plan is to stop the Muggles from doing World War 2?
Because of his intense homosexual relationship, they were homophobic

>2019
How can you faggots even care about anything Harry Potter related past ten years of age

>why would wizards want to stop Grindelwald if his plan is to stop the Muggles from doing World War 2?
He doesn't give a shit if they bomb each other, he is using it as an excuse to commit genocide. It's so fucking obvious m8

>corrupt televangelist
you can just say televangelist

>>can read minds
>>believes grindelwald when he says he's not a villain
because he's not a villain and she saw he was telling the truth

Came to post this. Past two movies were complete dogshit and the author (who was never good) got to be so insufferable not even Potter fans care about it anymore.

Did you just watch the Grindelwald jewtube review that was shilled in every feed?

Literally this. If his plan was to 'save' normals then he'd be telling his followers to bring down the secrecy, go out and start actually solving shit. Instead he's basically egging on the idea of a war while setting up to start usurping governments in the aftermath.

Someone post it

This. If you're going to watch it, at least go get the Extended Edition. It makes things a bit better and, at least the rip I picked up, has a little "deleted scene" label during some of the scenes not in the theatrical release. There's about 10-15min of additional content, some of it flavor some of it helps to clarify/plot/meaning

>he's an evil racist Nazi wizard who killed thousands
To save millions

Gay men having sex

Yea Forums does not appreciate nor care about character intentions or psychological character development. God forbids movie is based on books
>it's all about sneed capeshit shitposting

Memes aside, Kowalski and Queenie were the best characters in both, despite suffering in the second movie. In the first, they felt quite genuine and didn't suffer from being overpowered or completely useless.

Attached: fantastic beasts.jpg (1500x999, 217K)

I came to this thread to see the actresses big fat fucking tits and nobody posted them

that wouldn't be advertiser friendly bub

its common knowledge that if an author comes up with a stupid enough idea it doesnt count as canon. therefore gaywald is not gay and gay gandalf isnt either. debate me

Attached: 1553540692915m.jpg (930x1024, 77K)

I just wanted a fun HP movie with tons of cute creatures like the first one, Yea Forums.

Why did it have to be so bad?

Attached: 1525672642814.jpg (466x466, 64K)

I honestly don't get why people dislike this movie. I thought it was really good.

But that's the stupidest excuse. It doesn't matter if he can block Voldie from reading his mind, as soon as I notice that one of my subordinates is stopping me from reading his mind I would go full torture on his arse.

And it's the same with date rape bitch, if she tries to read wizard-Hitler' Mrk 1's mind to see if he's sincere and it's blocked off, I would straight away think something was up.

It's just more evidence that Rowling was nothing more than a children's book author.

it was a shit-pile with no second act, the third act just gets fucking dropped on you and the characters are written terribly.

The first one was barely even that. All they had to do was say Grindlewort was after Newt’s Pokémon or something, instead of having two separate plotlines that only progress through coincidence and cross entirely by chance. It would’ve been a fun family movie, instead of this weird dreary thing.

Were magic/muggle marriages outlawed? That wouldn't make much sense with the existence of squibs and muggleborns. Magic/muggle worlds mixing is an inevitability from how random being born with magic is.

I thought the only stipulation was that it didn't go beyond your immediate family (Or those who it is more convenient for them to know than not know e.g. Guardians), so your muggle grandparents couldn't know you were a wizard.

Johnny Depp elevated HP beyond anything it ever deserved to be. My favorite activity is to watch youtube roasties reeing about CoG and how it "contradicts canon" when their little squirrel brains just can't appreciate or even comprehend true patrician kinography.
Rowling's shit canon pre-CoG = cringe
CoG = based

Attached: screen-shot-2017-12-07-at-11-38-19-am.png (780x475, 451K)

I saw that video too lol

Why the fuck would Grinrchad block anyone off from reading his mind when his ideas are correct and righteous in every single way?

I am not embarrassed to admit that I liked the first Potter movie and the first Beasts movie.

Fuck all th erest of them though. JK is a terrible writer and her lefty fuckwit mind cannot piece a cogent tale together without a gang of people helping.
Beasts 2 was pure shit. Great example of how not to make a movie.

Snape was so good at mind-blocking that it looked like he wasn’t hiding anything at all.

because real life "villains" like Hitler or Stalin think they're doing the right thing, they're not like mojo jojo, they don't rejoice in their malice or whatever

this sad little post was screaming for a few (you)s but got none
here

>think

but yes in real life literally everyone think they are the good guys. if someone actually thinks they are evil they are most like for real deal insane

How the fuck is Autistic Smoke Monster a Dumbledore?
I can’t think of any reasoning that fits into canon properly

Based.
Depp truly is the best actor of our lifetime.

Maybe because it's a lie?

I meant besides that, really hope that’s not what ends up being the case because it would be lame

>caring about Hairy Wizard movies
Never knew so many womanlets browsed this board

She can tell its a lie if the person knows they are lying, same way lie detectors work in reality.
If you 100% believe what you say, the machine cannot detect the lie. I havent even seen this shit and im gonna go ahead and say thats exactly what is meant by this

>lie detectors work

lie detectors dont detect lies. you dont think it would be super useful to have a machine that could actually detect lies? it would totally change the landscape of the justice system of planet earth. fucking retard

Anyone else believe that Grindelwald era was the last time where a total domination of muggles by Wizard was possible or it is just me

Plenty of people know they're immoral and don't care and do shit purely for personal gain at the expense of others. Obviously dictators with religion-style cult of personalities don't but stuff like CEOs and normal politicians, definitely.

Sorry that I'll need to actually explaint his basic point to you fucking mongos.

If you believe 100% what you are saying then your body doesnt send the signals that a lie detector picks up on, thus passes as the truth.

I am aware lie detectors are bullshit, I made the faulty assumption of thinking you weren't inbred mongos with fathers who are your uncles and could use the information given to make the point. Entirely my fault you're fucking idiots.

A Plot
>Dumbledore and Harry are trying to find out about Voldemort's past and how to kill him. To pad out the book Dumbledore sends Harry to find out things that Dumbledore already knows
B Plot
>Malfoy is trying to kill Dumbledore and keeps hurting random bystanders when he gets impatient. Dumbledore does nothing about this so he can make a weird monologue about how goodness triumphs in the end before dying and Malfoy gets bundled back to be tormented by Voldemort and people who depended on Dumbledore gets hunted down and murdered
Not a great book, Rowling is far too much of a thot to handle something as serious as the war against Voldemort.

Sneedmen

but thats not correct you dope. if you want i can explain it to you. they detect types of stress which could signal that youre lying. of course it could also just be because youre stressed, scared, mad, excited, etc from being hooked up to a dumb machine with weirdos all around you subjecting you to a palm reader test with lights. you can totally belive what youre saying and still fail the test, in fact based off of research and testing it fails more people telling the truth then lying. there is also the fact that if never show signs on the test they will just assume youre a sociopath and you will still end up failing since all the results get "interpreted" by a human and not the machine. you fucking idiot

Attached: 1553077289960.jpg (904x711, 70K)

>I havent even seen this shit and im gonna go ahead and say thats exactly what is meant by this
Well you're wrong. She specifically has the ability to read people's minds and memories

1-Grindelwald is probably almost as good in oclumency as Dumbledore or Snape, you can't read his mind
2-because it would be slavery for muggles and most wizards are not assholes ?

WAIT, if Grindelwald hates muggles wouldn't he want WW2 to happen so millions of muggles would die???? I do not get it

You can't rule the dead.
WW2 give us a technological spyke never seen before

I don't know, but the important thing to take away from the movie is that allowing WWII to happen is a morally correct action

B...b..b..but MUH SHOAH

Because Grindelwald literally did nothing wrong.

I love how they had to throw in that random scene of them killing a toddler because they realized he was the good guy making the most sense and they needed him to something "eeevil"

>I didn't watch the first movie: the post

nice satan quads

Attached: 1455220414330.jpg (300x245, 23K)

based

Rowling also said that Nagini "was totally always some random Asian chick pre-Voldemort." She also says there is a fifth house... Don't buy into all of the bullshit she spouts post-Harry Potter, my dude. She's as bad as George Lucas at this point.

>Rowling said Dumbledore was gay after the series concluded
>said he had strong feelings for Grindelwald in their youths that led to something bad happening
>said it wasnt a relationship and was unrequited on Grindelwalds end
>at most Grindelwald led Dumbledore on to further his wizard supremacy agenda
>Johnny Depp the woman beater is cast as Grindelwald
>turns out he isnt a woman beater
>Rowling recently said Grindelwald and Dumbledore been fugging
hmm wtf bitch

lel the way this bitch is going I am sure this picture will become true in a few months!

Attached: harry potter faggotry.jpg (1071x1047, 289K)

Lol'd way too loud at that

do they have good wizard battles? i feel like we are getting closer to DBZ kino with the battles ive seen in potter and more recently infinity war

Watching Fantastic Beast 1 and so far I'm enjoying it.
Keep hearing how the second movie ruins something or other.

Ezra Miller is such a fag I kept expecting him and Graves to make out

Why does he wear the contact lens? Seriously, how come he doesn't look like a normal human being? He looked quite normal as a lad in the flashbacks and as an old dude in that one HP movie.
Why.

Attached: Screenshot_20190327_220835.jpg (1080x606, 210K)

>implying they didn't

Attached: you just know.webm (730x703, 1003K)

I don't get why Potterfags keep flipping out about Rowling's tweets. It'd be one thing if she was editing the books to be more woke like a Lucas would but the books are still the same as they always were. Just don't follow her on twitter like nigga close your eyes.

lol
did he get a boner?

>comparing Rowling to Lucas

Completely unfair comparison, a very large amount of people actually like the prequels, and even if many don't like the films themselves they ushered in a golden age of EU content. Barely anyone likes Rowling's bullshit and it hasn't really done anything positive for the franchise at all

I think the problem is she is making statements that contradict or add to canon and there are people who take it as the gospel and actively attack anyone who doesn't do the same.
Her continuing to add and modify shit creates a lot of conflict in the fandom.
It's bad enough potterfags are obnoxious and combative on their own, having the author of the books pour fuel on the fire is bad.

So Lucas' shit smells a tidbit better than Rowling's shit.
It's both shit. neck yourself for that "golden era of eu" bullshit, you half-literate fudge packer, no harry potter book, shitty as they all are, is as bad as any Star wars eu novel.

Attached: 1552772466252m.jpg (1024x954, 75K)

>DUDE HE'S NOT FUCKING DEAD
>DUDE LET'S SHOEHORN IN THE SIDESHOWS FROM THE FIRST MOVIE
>DUDE WE HIRED EDDY MEMEMAINE AND NEED TO SHOEHORN HIM INTO THE MOVIE
>JOHNNY DERP LMAO
>JUDE LMAO
admit it, she had a ghost writer for her harry potter movies, there's no way she wrote those with the amount of inconsistencies of her script for her "own movies"

without a doubt

Attached: 582f2c3365edfed40a8b46ef-750-563.jpg (750x563, 88K)

is not like grindelwald was extremely powerful and could kill all muggles by himself, he needed to kill dumbledore so he could convice people to join him
basically they want to stop grindelwald from communicating his ideas lmao

>interesting character development
>unexpected twists
>loads of subtext

...fucking really? are you really this dense

Attached: befuddlement.gif (195x229, 1.29M)

The difference with Lucas was he made the faux pas of trying to fill in the missing bits of the mythos when they should have been left alone for the views imagination to play with.
Also he added random CGI shit he thought was adding to the experience.
Lucas at least had the guts to actually make those changes and took the shit that came with doing so.
Rowling on the other hand is just rewriting the books one tweet and interview at a time.
She also is considered on touchable and off limits when it comes to criticisms of this.
Star Wars fans could openly criticize Lucas and for the most part everyone considers the renditions of the original trilogy gaudy and the story telling of most of the prequels flawed.
You even mention how Hermionie is definitively described as white in the books and a flame war ensues. Mock Dumbledore being made gay out of nowhere and the same happens.

she cute

>deplatforming in the 1920s
it's the beer hall putsch all over again

>implying Grindelwald isn't an accomplished Occlumens

Nice headcanon :^)

all wizards are evil and need to be exterminated

Very few movies are truly written by one person there is always a freelance rewriter or proof reader in the midst.
I highly doubt J.K. Rowling, who has never written a screenplay alone, was able to write a complete film with out aid.

that sounds gay, I prefer to watch women

she fucked Bojack

>she fucked Bojack

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 60K)

she wrote the script for the second american harry potter movie on her own.

God it amazes me everytime how ugly she is. I hope grindelwald or the autistic dude one shots her at the beginning of the third so we never have to see her again

Sure she did.
And Snooki from Jersey Shore wrote a whole book by herself.

What's wroooong, hun? Duntcha like magikal gurls?

Attached: queenie.jpg (1500x999, 105K)

are you gay? this chick is definitely not ugly

>not wanting a caring magical moll

Attached: zapp.jpg (603x464, 96K)

she's not even the best girl in her own movie

>thinks someone’s gay for not thinking an obvious tranny is attractive
wew

Only seen FB 1 how is she not the best girl in that?

because the autist girl exists

Most people are like "bitch it's fine that you wrote a story about white straight people, and it's fine if you wanna say 'I'd do it differently today,' but don't fucking insult me by lying and saying the story was secretly diverse and progressive all along."

>Were magic/muggle marriages outlawed?
Only in the US. At least I think that's what was established in the first movie.

Ezra Miller is not a girl user

Then you have the others saying, "HOW DARE YOU, YOU CIS FUCK!
SHE'S THE CREATOR SO WHAT SHE SAYS GOES! HERMIONE IS BLACK, DOUBLEDORE IS GAY, THERE'S ONLY A THOUSAND STUDENTS AT HOGWARTS REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!"

I was talking about Katherine Waterson

Well not yet.

>But Grindelwald actually would allow such marriages.
What gives you that idea? His entire philosophy is to turn muggles into house elves. It would be like marrying a dog.

>Grindelwald. You cannot imagine how his ideas caught me, Harry, inflamed me. Muggles forced into subservience. We wizards triumphant. Grindelwald and I, the glorious young leaders of the revolution.

Took my mother to see it with me, she was confused yet enjoying every bit of it. I think she had a crush on the fat baker.

Attached: queenie.png (660x613, 646K)

>make Fantastic Beasts
>it's not really a good movie but it's basically fine and watchable
>people liked some of the characters
Why does the immediate sequel retcon fucking everything?

>Next Fantastic Beasts movie
>There's a scene where Credence declares his desire to become a woman
>Phallus Inverticus, Axewound Dialationamora
>Grindelwald: Beautiful, this is your birthright

imagine the #woke Twitter posts

Attached: fag.jpg (660x990, 74K)

Nobody posted it yet? I guess it's hardly worth posting about one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises anymore. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: a_cure_for_dullness.jpg (1587x2862, 2.04M)

>Also, why would wizards want to stop Grindelwald if his plan is to stop the Muggles from doing World War 2?
more interested in making it seem like Harry Potter wizards are real instead of being its own story

Credence a best

Attached: CoG mountain explosion.webm (1280x533, 1.74M)