Does Bill Maher have Alzheimer's?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
nytimes.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
npr.org
nytimes.com
foreignpolicy.com
twitter.com
law.cornell.edu
foxnews.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
(((Alzheimers)))
>TV man refers to TV in order to substantiate claims he makes while on TV
Yea Forums
Yikes
If Trump is a traitor then so is Jimmy Carter, they're both just doofuses
>"The truly horrible thing about all this (teacher fucking a 14 year old) is that nobody filmed it"
Fucking Jews
Kid Love Productions presents:
youtube.com
Bill Maher knows everyone he knows or thinks is reasonable thinks Trump is awful and a traitor so he doesn't need evidence to believe it, it's just a known.
He doesn't like him. Get over it. The last moron in office got the same treatment from all conservatives. It was investigation after investigation and Fox News was foaming at the mouth 24/7. Now they act like it never happened lol.
THEY TOLD ME IT WAS TRUE ON CNN I DON'T NEED THE MUELLLER REPORT THEY WERE BASING THEIR ASSUMPTIONS ON!
I think he's actually serious guys. Imagine having your brain create false memories like that, it must be really terrifying.
>It was investigation after investigation
What investigation into Obama?
>get over it
no. I want these people to hang.
The investigation into why he is so amazing and why his wife is so fabulous!
Did you really forget the investigations into clinton? They spanned years and cost tens of millions of dollars and in the end nothing came from them.
But you said "the last moron".
So again, what investigations into Obama?
He mention the last moron in office, Hillary wasnt
(((trump)))
Are you talking about lewinsky? He was talking about Obama
This is what brainwashing looks like kids. Imagine getting your news only from Breitbart or Fox News lol.
Let's completely erase the past and forget about multiple investigations into his administration! Wew
>I don't like him, therefore he's guilty of high treason.
The absolute state of American leftism. No arguments, only feelings.
Imagine the four year tantrum after Trump gets his second term
They are behaving just like how I knew that will behave.
Havev they accused Mueller of being "compromised" yet?
Trump is actually a very good President
based and TVpilled
False
I only remember one and that was to find out about why a us ambassador was murdered by terrorists.
>Did you really forget the investigations into clinton
>the last moron
god just kill yourself
So in just one post you've already backtracked and now say it was Hillary.
Maybe you should read breitbart and watch Fox, you might be more informed then.
Still waiting on those examples that don't include just gonna Hillary. Is even accept an investigation 1/4 of as time consuming and expensive as this Russia hoax was
>Imagine getting your news only from Breitbart or Fox News lol.
Wait, the ones who said this thing was a hoax the entire time.
THE NEWS ORGANIZATIONS THAT WERE PROVEN CORRECT?
AHAHAHAHAHA
You faggots CAN'T SAY SHIT about Brietbart and Fox anymore.
F&F
Benghazi
ACA website
IRS scandal
Clearly these were "false" and not designed to hurt him or his successor lol. Fox News talked about Benghazi nonstop for a longer period of time. I wasn't born yesterday you fucking idiot. All that outrage over 4 fucking idiots who were warned multiple times to leave prior to the incident. Wew
The treatment and outrage is the exact same. That's why I don't take politics seriously anymore. It's all a fucking joke.
You forgot the emails
>
does it really matter? It was the same administration. Also, I wasn't the same guy that posted that.
>
that wasn't me, same concept though.
>no need for proof LISTEN and BELIEVE
>the emails
There was enough physical evidence to warrant that investigation though.
And the result, from her buddy Comey, was essentially "we're choosing not to press charges at this time, but if anyone else does the exact same thing, we will probably charge them"
Retarded People:
>ITS A WITCH HUNT
Mueller:
>no evidence of collusion
Seriously, how can it be a witch hunt if mueller didn't find evidence of collusion? If it was a witch hunt it would have ended with fabricated evidence against the president.
>Wait, the ones who said this thing was a hoax the entire time.
THE NEWS ORGANIZATIONS THAT WERE PROVEN CORRECT?
No. You're just really fucking stupid like all of the other inbred morons who voted for a supposed billionaire to represent their broke, dumb asses.
Those are clearly actual scandals and deserved to be investigated. Actual crimes were committed based on actual evidence.
>but if anyone else does the exact same thing, we will probably charge them"
Literally everyone does it. Bush did it. He deleted millions of emails DURING a congressional investigation. Trump is also using a private server for emails. No one gives a fuck.
>You forgot the emails
Yeah an actual crime.
Wow you really are coping.
>how can it be a witch hunt
because of the way the media reacted over the past 2 years
>No.
Yes, yes they were actually proven correct while CNN etc were proven to be insane liars.
>who voted for a supposed billionaire to represent their broke, dumb asses.
The only way to increase living standards for the working class is to increase economic production, the only thing that does that is capital, from duh capitalists.
Those were actual things that happened and they were looked into. Russian collusion never happened and it was only made up to dispute the results of the 2016 election.
New rule: you don't need facts when you have propaganda
lmao, it's like watching someone mind collapse in real time
>Does Bill Maher have Alzheimer's?
no but I do
I get my news from the Dailystormer and the Onion. Even if it's an ironic site, it's more likely to be true than (((CNN))).
I don't think Russia handed Trump the election.
I just think he's a criminal because of the millions of dollars worth of fraud, the hush money payments, the sexual harassment settlements, the tax evasion and rent inflation schemes, and who could forget the millions of dollars worth of fraud.
No, just TDS
yes
Get over it. They have more outlets so it goes without saying any negative press will seem overblown. Build your own multimedia conservative presence with 100+ outlets and the exact same will happen in reverse. Playing the victim card here is lol.
>I just think they are criminal because of the millions of dollars worth of fraud, the hush money payments, the sexual harassment settlements, the tax evasion and rent inflation schemes, and who could forget the millions of dollars worth of fraud.
Stop your antisemitism you bigot.
>millions of dollars worth of fraud
Link?
>he thinks the non-citizen claim was made up by conservatives
It was Hillary actually. Conservatives just took it too far
I don't see how that was relevant to anything I posted
nytimes.com
>The president has long sold himself as a self-made billionaire, but a Times investigation found that he received at least $413 million in today’s dollars from his father’s real estate empire, much of it through tax dodges in the 1990s.
>Trump's attorney says that he's exonerated from collusion with the Russian Government
>Russian Government
Take that libtards, what next? Are you going to accuse the Trump campaign of colluding with Russians that weren't officially in the Kremlin? He's innocent, dumb dumbs. He's so innocent that we don't even need to see the report to know that he's innocent. It's the sort of truth that just feels real, ya know?
Anyways, back on the topic of Hillary's emails
>This is what brainwashing looks like
>writing REPORT IS FAKE next to completely real news items, like Mueller considering subpoenaing Trump but deciding against it
I hope you end your life in 2020
>Much of this money came to Mr. Trump because he helped his parents dodge taxes. He and his siblings set up a sham corporation to disguise millions of dollars in gifts from their parents, records and interviews show. Records indicate that Mr. Trump helped his father take improper tax deductions worth millions more. He also helped formulate a strategy to undervalue his parents’ real estate holdings by hundreds of millions of dollars on tax returns, sharply reducing the tax bill when those properties were transferred to him and his siblings.
Do you know why this is not news or investigated? Because rich people use loopholes like this all the time. They literally advertise things like this:
>can't stop strawmanning because then I'd have to engage my brain
Cool.
cry some more about your fanfiction
>actually trying to defend that
cope
Reported for anti-Semitism
None of that makes it any better that he did it, especially on the scale that it happened at.
MMMRRRRAUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU DRUUUUUUUUUMPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPGRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR DIIIIINGLEDOOOOOOORG UAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
Most rich people do that because they have good accountants. The only reason it was written up was because the NYT hates Trump. If you investigate most rich people in government they are doing the same thing because these are loopholes rich people exploit in the tax system all the time. That's literally why it's not news.
Lets put all of hollywood in jail then. Lets put all the jew bankers in jail. All the nepotists in jail. Lets put every rich jew in jail
>I have a TV
Boomers need to retire.
Or because it's unheard of for the president of the US to be responsible for that much tax fraud.
where are the "completely real news" items that don't imply the summary should be disbelieved? they all form a cohesive narrative that summary bad collusion real impeach now
>This is what brainwashing looks like
youtube.com
youtube.com
every show should have alan derschowitz on just to get dabbed on
What the fuck you guys told me he was redpilled.
YOU DONT OWN SHIT GOYIM
You're confusing the Barr summary with the Mueller report.
Good luck sending rich people to prison
Legally it's not technically considered fraud, it's a loophole in the tax system. This is something they could close but they choose not to.
He's only redpilled about hating capeshit
He's echoing the statement of braindead fools like him who don't care about the facts, they just let comedians and celebrities tell them what to think. Their reality isn't based in truth, it's based on late night talk show jokes. REMINDER: Not too long ago, most college aged people in America got their news from the Daily Show on Comedy Central, and people were proud of this fact. Those college aged kids are now in their 30s and 40s.
no, you worthless faggot. I'm just not brainwashed enough to believe that they must be polar opposites of each other
remember when buzzfeed lied about what mueller found with cohen? mueller came out and shut them up by refuting them. why isn't he refuting this? (This is rhetorical. I don't actually want to hear your brainwashed reasoning)
and at the time you coped by saying "n-no he didn't refute them" and buzzfeed coped by doubling down. what happened to that?
damn bros think I should get a tv if it's so good at solving mysteries?
>taking as many tax deductions as you legally can is fraud
Get a job. You don't donate your money to the government. You pay the minimum amount you're required to and no more.
The IRS scandal investigation proved that the IRS was actually more preferential towards conservatives instead of being biased against them.
Trump is literally Jewish
That was meant for somebody else. To address your post, there was suspicion of criminal activity hence the investigation. Of course they were going to jump on it because it could eventually lead to something that could damage his presidency. Even if it was something minor. Same happened with Benghazi. I seem to recall 0 indictments after all that bullshit.
You are away that tbr GOP had thr majority in bozh houses when zhr investigation startees, right? You literally believe trukps talk about a witch hunt over this very basic fact.
Because they were too busy making those loopholes in the first place
Gee, maybe the politicians at the time should have done something about those tax laws and loopholes instead of waiting until decades later to cry about people who were playing by the rules.
According to Cohen, his personal lawyer, he frequently inflated his assets (like, he had less than a billion to his name, but he claimed he had something like three billion dollars) when applying for loans and then low balled his wealth whenever he was doing his taxes. So that's massive tax fraud.
It's very comparable to a witch hunt, at least in the eyes of NPCs. To them, anyone who disagrees with them is controlled by Russia.
Redditors spent two years licking Mueller's dick, and now they think he's a russian bot. It reeks of McCarthyism.
>defendin white collar crimes commited by coastal elites to own the libs
Not him but there's zero indictments for Trump and Mueller is done with his investigation. If there were anything in the Mueller Report, Trump would have been indicted. I hate to burst your bubble, but you're really grasping at straws when the fact is it's over and we all just need to move forward. People who were so sure Trump was a "traitor" need to accept and admit they were wrong about Trump, realize that what they was spread lies about Trump and divide a nation over those lies, and maybe take a break from politics for a while and/or, at the very least, be more cautious in how they speak and behave in the future.
that is one salty man
>According to the guy who is in prison for lying to Congress
Great witness
Then you should ask for the full report to be released.
>So that's massive tax fraud.
yet he wasn't charged for tax fraud so I think your dumbfuck rachel maddow mommy might be wrong
Well according to CNN, Trump's personal documentary team, he's literally a Russian puppet who colluded with Putin, and the Kremlin, and be in collusion with Putin. This president. This president. In collusion with Putin, and the Kremlin, and be in collusion.
>I DONT NEED FACTS
why cant liberals just admit they dont know shit about law, government, and politics? That they just don't like Trump because....well idk what their reason is.
I tried to be liberal and switch my stances on things to get a closer feel on all the obsessive rage this snowflakes have. I can't be a leftist without feeling like I'm lying to myself.
>believe Trump is racist
But what racist shit has he actually done?
>he is a fascist
But he's anti-big Gov
>he colluded with Russia
He obviously didn't
I just wrap my head around it.
There was cause for this investigstion. Even the GOP agreed. It helped in 30+ sentencings and spawned 20 ongoing investigstions directly and indirectly. You just think it fell short because Trump moved the goal post. He brainwashed you.
If Trump fired Mueller or otherwise stopped the investigation Democrats would have become even more rabid about their little conspiracy theory. Letting it play out destroyed that retarded collusion narrative for 2020. They can't whine about the investigation or who carried it out since they spent the last 2.5 years talking about how Mueller will get Trump impeached, but if Trump completely stopped it or replaced Mueller with one of his buddies they would still be autistically screeching about collusion.
Do you think that's some kind of epic gotcha? don't mind if it's released, you absolutely worthless loser. I want it to be as soon as possible so you'll shut the fuck up. You'll immediately come up with another excuse though. You're pathetic.
Most people in politics understand they will not release the full report because of the 4th amendment as well as a lot of classified information. They know this but they will as for "the full unredacted" report to keep their braindead base energized. Asking for the "full report" is just a way to keep the conspiracy going.
>guy who got caught lying and decided to make amends
vs
>guy who got caught lying and continues to lie with literally every third breath
Eat shit and die reddit.
Trump cant be indicted according to gop guidelines. Mueller handed over material to dozens of probes. He might be done but we will see more indictments and sentencings resulting from what Mueller did.
>rich white man dodges charges in white collar crime
You act like this isn't an everyday occurrence.
>I don’t know the difference between the statements “trump didn’t actively collude” and “election interference”
Does your tard wrangler know you’re on the internet without you crash helmet on?
>30+ sentencings
literally fake news, Mueller indicted a handful of US citizens, one of which was jailed for 12 whole days. The majority of what you're talking about is him indicting a bunch of Russians who will never ever see a trial in the US, Mueller was basically bluffing.
This has nothing to do with what I said. The dems had 0 power in the first year od Mueller. It was entirely the GOPs doing.
>we will see more indictments and sentencings resulting from what Mueller did.
And not a single fucking one will be for Russian collusion or involve Donald Trump, which is ultimately what Democrats pinned all their hopes and dreams on. If you're investigating somebody for murder you don't get to say "Fuck it, close enough" and convict him for murder after finding absolutely no evidence of murder just because you find out some of his friends committed tax fraud.
The seeds were planted before Trump was even inaugurated.
Yepp, so you will believe barr who was appointed by a lying administration to shut down mueller (Trukp said so). I really would love to have so much blind and retarsed trust in aby one lradee. Lmao
>sad, angry and confused
Perfectly defines liberals
Again, if Mueller had anything on Trump, he'd have indicted Trump. He didn't because he doesn't. Again, you're only setting yourself up for further heartbreak and disappointment. Again, it's time to move on.
>Yepp, so you will believe barr who was appointed by a lying administration to shut down mueller (Trukp said so). I really would love to have so much blind and retarsed trust in aby one lradee. Lmao
you sound mentally ill to be honest
>The last moron in office got the same treatment from all conservatives.
He didn't. Leftists in power literally enforced a policy where mocking/offending Obama was a one-way ticket to being blacklisted, if not "re-education".
npr.org
Nobody ever thought Mueller would undeniably prove that Trump colluded. How would you even prove that? A direct phone recording where Trump says "Yes, Mr Putin, if you hack the DNC and release those emails, I'll make it worth your while when I take office". Not even Trump is stupid enough to be caught doing that. You realize that, right? That's just sorta not how the world works.
The real issue is that he interfered with the investigation; the definition of obstruction of justice that you kinda, y'know, don't do if you're innocent. And this is what Trump explicitly has NOT been exonerated to. Mueller explicitly left this to the DOJ and Barr. And what did they do? Exactly what they were expected to; cover it up. You're stupid if you believe Mueller didn't have a strategy for this though. Wait until he's called to testify in the house.
>What investigation into Obama?
>Did you really forget the investigations into clinton?
Amazing.
Barr just dismissed obstruction charges about the investigation into his collusion with Russia, Trump was cleared by Mueller for any Russian collusion or election interference. Even the obstruction charges were about trump tweets there is literally nothing another AG would have done.
Mueller's report was only on direct Russian collusion during the campaign. Every other potential crime he sent forward to be investigated elsewhere and that's why people like Cohen got into trouble, and in regard to Cohen Trump was already implicated in the Stormy Daniels hush payment campaign finance crime for which Cohen is now going to jail for.
"I listen to what the TV says" - Bill Maher
Wow, so smart.
Which is obvious that the dems want to fuck with the Trumo administration in anyway possible. All those politicians getting busted for things they ALL do. The fact of the matter is, you leftards have been hellbent over the Russia collusion story, and now that you've been proven wrong, you're switching to, "oh well he did other stuff too." It's just hilarious. You people fuckin lost. Get over it lmao. Fucking CRINGE.
People like Cohen got in trouble because Mueller hoped that he could make people flip on Trump and reveal the collusion secrets if he threatened them with their irrelevant crimes.
Only one problem: there was no collusion. The people who flipped could give him nothing.
>"BUT BUT BUT WHAT ABOUT MUH CLINTON INVESTIGATION??? THAT HAPPENED!!! SEE, THINGS ARE EQUAL!!!!"
The big difference is that there was ACTUAL evidence of Clinton's involvement in wrongdoing in Benghazi, as well as the fact that Benghazi got several innocent Americans needlessly slaughtered. That's pretty fucking serious.
Conversely, the claim that Donald Trump paid Putin to hack the American Election using Pokemon GO is not only a baseless Alex Jones-tier conspiracy-theory with zero credible evidence, but even IF it were true it STILL wouldn't involve the deaths of high-ranking America citizens.
>Seriously, how can it be a witch hunt if mueller didn't find evidence of collusion?
You might be the single least intelligent person on this entire board.
Seriously. This is some IMPRESSIVE stupidity.
>there was no collusion
That's simply not true. Mueller's investigation only determined that the collusion that happened between the Trump administration and Russia didn't reach a level of conclusive evidence to be convicted beyond a reasonable doubt. To say that it fully exonerates him is patently false.
Two words: Brent Tarannt.
>Imagine getting your news only from Breitbart or Fox News lol.
You mean the news outlets that were factually, provably right?
It's simply not true that unicorns don't exist. To say that they have been proven imaginary is patently false.
>"he's guilty of colluding with russia"
>no he isn't
>"well he's guilty of something else!"
Nobody should believe you, and you should really be questioning your own judgment at this point because you believed a wild conspiracy theory that included things like a "pee-pee tape" for, like, two years. You spread lies about the president, and divided the nation over falsehoods. Instead of continuing to do that, you should stop. You should really apologize as well and pay a penance for your wrongdoing, but you need to just stop. You were wrong and you need to stop.
>Leftcucks now ADMITTING they have an ideological monopoly on Media that they use for propaganda.
Well at least we're making progress in this dialogue, I guess.
>Seriously, how can it be a witch hunt if mueller didn't find evidence of collusion?
Because Witch-Hunts can fail in their goals yet STILL be a Witch-Hunt you fucking retarded knob.
Yep. He had so many people who would rat out Trump. Problem is, they couldn't rat him out on anything, because Trump has done nothing wrong. The Russiagate Conspiracy Theory is over.
>posts anime
Why am I not surprised.
No, it exonerates him in the investigation from Russian collusion. The only thing the Mueller investigation had left was obstruction charges. Do you even know what happened? They had zero evidence of Russian collusion. Also you are trying to invoke "beyond a reasonable doubt" while also saying "prove a negative", I don't know if this is a troll or you are just that retarded.
You're intentionally misunderstanding what I'm saying. A federal prosecutor must reach an extremely high level of evidence in order for them to believe that they can convict a person. Just because Mueller didn't reach that high bar doesn't mean it didn't happen.
>No.
You're literally a fact-denialist that this point.
Fox News and everyone else that makes you seethe was proven right.
No amount of ad-homs is going to change this.
>The real issue is that he interfered with the investigation; the definition of obstruction
Actually he didn't. Barr's report today made that clear. Time for you to move on. There was no crime and it's over
>complaining about Reaction-Images
>complaining about Anime Reaction-Images
>on fucking Yea Forums
Holy shit. Go the fuck back, newfag.
>You're stupid if you believe Mueller didn't have a strategy for this though. Wait until he's called to testify in the house.
You really have no idea how this whole process works do you?
What crime? There are no crimes. It's over.
I'm not misunderstanding anything. I'm intentionally pointing out that your retarded logic you picked up from /r/politics doesn't fly.
Mueller could not prove collusion. We believe in innocence until proof of guilt. You just BELIEVE he colluded, and you don't have evidence.
Well, I believe unicorns exist.
>taking advantage of an intentionally-created loop-hole
>"""""""Fraud"""""""
Pretty sure liberals with their 151 genders have been fact denialists for quite some time now.
Thats basically the definition of falacy
>a Times investigation found
Oh, goodness, that means it's iron-clad then.
Were these the same Times Magazine "researchers" that also named Will Wheaton one of the most important men of the century.
That's not how it works. You see, I live in a fantasy world, so if I believe Orange Man Bad, then Orange Man Bad. Any day now, Mueller will come down from Heaven and charge Trump with everything from jaywalking to rape and we'll get a big ol' peach mint, lemme tell ya.
>That's simply not true.
That simply is true. It was stated plainly that there was none by Mueller.
Who cares about Mueller? Did you hear that joke Colbert made about Trump performing fellatio acts on Putin's penis parts? That's all the proof we need.
>To say that it fully exonerates him is patently false.
Wrong.
Are you deliberately ignoring the past 13 hours? Barr pretty much made any question into so called obstruction and collusion go away today.
And it also doesn't mean it did. In fact in the laws eyes it did mean it didn't happen.
You don't get it. Barr was appointed by Trump to clear Trump. It doesn't matter what he says.
Even the jewcyork times had to admit that there is no crime here Donald is liable for
>white collar crimes
If it's legal it LITERALLY isn't a crime you faggot.
>The guy I don't like is a liar CUZ I SAID SO
>The guy convicted of lying is telling the truth because IT BENEFITS MY ARGUMENT
I can't imagine being this deep in the cope.
Stay salty.
>Climate change is real
How can anyone still take the climate alarmists seriously anymore?
>ISS DA RAYCISS SYSTEM AGAIN, FUCKIN' WYPIPO
The intellectual level of the Left's arguments keep degenerating.
“while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
That is literally a quote from Mueller's report you dumbasses. Again, as a prosecutor Mueller has to reach an incredibly high standard of evidence. Just because he didn't meet that threshold does not mean that there was no wrong doing or even illegal activity. Get off this website for once an read some actual news.
>there was no collusion
>That's simply not true.
It's simply true that there was collusion?
/r/politics faggots are out of their minds
It's not a crime
This is not news to most people who aren't leftists.
Leftism is entirely based around cognitive-dissonance.
That's not fraud. Otherwise he's been in jail. What his father did was totally legal.
>strawman strawman strawman strawman
Cool non-argument homo.
It's the same thing at this point. Are your accusing the attorney general if lying?
/pol/ has rotted your brain. Please step outside the next chance you get and seek professional help.
"while this report does not conclude that unicorns exist, it also does not prove they don't."
That is literally a quote from Tinkerbell's report you dumbass. Again, as a scientist Tinkerbell has to reach an incredibly high standard of evidence. Just because she didn't meet that threshold does not mean that fantasy creatures or even unicorns do not exist. Get off this website for once and read some actual news.
Nobody knows the difference between those statements because “election interference” can mean anything and means literally nothing.
That's why the term “election interference” keeps being used and overused and is never more specific than that. Leftcucks literally CAN'T come up with a list of what Russia ACTUALLY did. Or at least not one that doesn't sound fucking ridiculous.
>DEY BOUGHT SUM ADS ON MUH FACEBOOK
>DEY MANIPULATED THE RESULTS OF POKEMON GO
Seriously, fuck off.
No that's not true actually.
Why should I believe anything you say? You're an ax-murder and a rapist.
Do you know what he was not exonerated from in the report? The obstruction charges. Why are you even talking about this when you have no idea what is going on?
You are aware they didn't start it? It was the deputy attorney general right? Also your raging so hard to can't even speak.
You been to get over this thing. It's fucking over.
>please ignore the record flooding that's put large swathes of Iowa and Nebraska underwater the meteorologists say will be getting worse, the climate is definitely not being destabilized from increased average temperatures
Exactly the level of intellectual discourse I would expect from a place like this. You should be embarrassed for yourselves.
No, please explain. How is "there was no collusion" "simply not true"?
Well cohen is a proven liar trying to save his own skin.
>my argument is willful ignorance
Please stop pretending you have any intellectual authority, it physically hurts to watch.
Reminder that you can't get someone for obstruction of justice if there was no crime to begin with.
Do jews really think they can get away with this any longer?
No one knows what he "wasn't exonerated from" because it was an out of context quote used by AG Barr to give Trump a temporary win. When the actual report comes out it's going to expose a mountain of corruption and lies.
No I get it. You're desperately trying to say that the Mueller report doesn't say what it actually says.
>there was no collusion
>That's simply not true.
Democrats literally can't be educated.
They're not just ignorant: They're also stupid.
You can educate ignorance, but you can't fix stupid.
Any earnest attempt to educate their ignorance will be sabotaged by the stupidity.
It's just all so tiresome.
>Imagine getting your news only from Breitbart or Fox News lol
Yes goy, don't listen to those who were proven right, again.
It simply isn't true that there was no collusion. It is true that there was collusion. There you go you fucking moron.
>That is literally a quote from Mueller's report you dumbasses
No that's not a quote you stupid fuck.
>I literally don't understand what the climate is or how higher than average temperatures could trigger record freezes
Not an argument.
>It is true that there was collusion.
No, it wasn't.
LOL you people are desperate and pathetic.
No pol was right again
No collusion
No obstruction
>if I just misrepresent it badly enough I win
It's like watching your brain having a meltdown in real-time, utterly unable to accept a few simple facts.
It is according to the acting Attorney General of the United States. Are you saying that he is lying?
>When the actual report comes out it's going to expose a mountain of corruption and lies.
Okay bud lol just keep holding on, shitting yourself rocking back and forth in your chair.
>fraud
Of course there was. Don Jr. met with Russians in an attempt to get dirt on HRC. How exactly is that not collusion? He admitted that he did this by the way.
>"Even though there was no evidence it happened, it still happened"
>No one knows what he "wasn't exonerated from" because it was an out of context quote used by AG Barr to give Trump a temporary win.
That's actually the opposite: that line is being used against Trump. People don't know the exact contents of the report, but they know the following:
1. Mueller investigated Trump concerning Russian collusion.
2. Mueller did not recommend any indictments for Trump. Which means
3. Mueller found no collusion from Trump, as that is the only reason he would not indict Trump.
>Nobody ever thought Mueller would undeniably prove that Trump colluded.
Yeah, aside from the entire Leftist Media collective and the hoards of SJW retards that were going "TICK-TOCK, TRUMPY. MUELLER IS COMING FOR YOU".
The historical-revisionism by Leftists in the name of coping is fucking amazing.
that was only for the obstruction charge
and it was because he was a pussy who didn't want to say it himself. The AG and DAG agreed there was no obstruction
The Mueller report found no evidence of Russian collusion, and it left the obstruction charges up to Barr. If there is no crime, there is no obstruction so he cleared those charges.
The report is going to be literally nothing, it would probably be better for your mental health if it never came out, so you can keep pretending Trump is finally finished. But also you are a retard if you think they are going to release the full report, they just cannot because of the 4th amendment as well as a lot of it being classified. Calling for it to come out is just a dog whistle to conspiracy nuts to keep the Russian collusion angle going, most people in politics know it's not coming out.
Yes, you have no idea what "climate change" is supposed to be. Thanks for proving that again.
>Don Jr. met with Russians in an attempt to get dirt on HRC.
Proof?
Also if this did happen, it's unironically a good thing.
Boomer
Prove it? Oh you can't? Then there was no collusion.
End.
I can't wait to see what John Oliver has to say about this.
You don't know what those two are, right? You'r ejust spouting whatever the narrative of plebbit tells you to, right?
Wrong.
But that's not a "strawman", retard.
Do you even know what a "strawman" is, or like most leftists do you just parrot arguments you hear other people using regardless of context?
Because that's not collusion.
Congratulations. You got one story right. And you got Benghazi and the emails wrong. Of course it doesn't matter because those same shit outlets keep parroting the same damn talking points. They don't care about 0 indictments or real journalism. They want you to hate the other side. Explain how this is different than CNN and muh collusion bullshit?
See the difference between me and you is that I don't make excuses for my party. The same party that you actually defend right now. Oops!
>It is true that there was collusion.
>while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime
Reconcile these for me.
The report did not establish that he committed a crime. But there absolutely was collusion. So logically the collusion there absolutely was must not be a crime. So he committed non-illegal collusion? Why are you worried about non-crimes?
>i have a tv
remember when people told you not to believe everything they tell you on tv only 10 years ago?
>Are you saying that he is lying?
He certainly has a large personal stake in downplaying the contents of the report. The sitting AG is a Trump appointee who, prior to getting the job published a letter condemning the Mueller report and essentially siding with Trump on team "witch hunt". He has a documented history of bias against Mueller and the report, much like literally every other person Trump has kept in his inner circle. Its also not a coincidence that Repubs are blocking all attempts to make the report public. Its like if your teacher told you that you got an F on your science test but refused to show you the results. It makes no sense. If your suggestion is that we should just take the AG's word that there's nothing to see here then I'd call you an idiot.
Are you trolling or are really this stupid?
>The report did not establish that he committed a crime. But there absolutely was collusion
thats all the leftists and media say right now. he didnt commit a crime but that doesnt mean he's innocent etc. its starting to get really annoying
>bad weather happens
>UNDENIABLY GLOBAL WARMING'S FAULT
This is the problem with you retards. You've created a flawed system where regardless of what happens, you claim it's evidence of your theory.
Weather gets worse? Global Warming.
Weather gets better? Global Warming.
Weather stays the same? Global Warming.
More rainfall? Global Warming.
Less rainfall? Global Warming.
Same amount of rainfall? Global Warming.
That's not science. Predictions can't include ALL possible outcomes and still be valid.
nice conspiracy theory
>Nobody ever thought Mueller would undeniably prove that Trump colluded
Yes, just blend out the last 2 years. Holy kekes, all you fucktards are doing right now, is to make sure that Trump wins 2020 by displaying your utter insanity to everyone.
>paying only the money you have to instead of just throwing money at the government
>"tax fraud"
No wonder Bern-cucks fall for this shit. They're literally just mad at the idea of people wealthier than they are being smart about money.
and when trump does the same thing like every winter they call him retarded and tell him that weather isnt climate
>is to make sure that Trump wins 2020
Patently false. Trump is going to lose in 2020; the trends are already bearing that out. Did you forget about the mid-terms?
>there was no collusion
>That's simply not true
Seeing a brain meltdown in real-time is a a sight to behold. Fucking hell, dude, you really need help.
Cry harder libshit. Last weekend was election night reloded, can't wait for the third part in 2020.
>my argument is willful ignorance
I'd have to be ignorant of something for that to be true.
The Left has claimed Russia "interfered" with our election for 2.5 straight years. They've yet to specify HOW and IN WHAT WAY, aside from baseless conspiracy-theories and shit that wouldn't even matter if it were true.
But by all means, if we're so ignorant, educate us.
Drop the Truth-Bomb.
What dastardly tricks did Russia pull to mind-control millions of Americans to not follow Madame President.
We're all fucking ears.
its starting to become pathetic now
The emails were right though lol.
She just didn't get prosecuted for them.
>i have no argument so i will just ad-hom
Prove them wrong or shut your fucking cock-holster. That simple.
>mid-terms?
which were weaker than most midterms?
This place has gone to hell. You can't go a single thread without 10 rabid Trump idiots turning up to spew their fallacies and general patent lack of understanding everywhere. I wonder how you will feel in a week's time when the report is out.
We all do.
You might have a point if all those things were happening. They're not though. The average temperature continues to rise year to year, atmospheric CO2 continues to rise every year, and we continue to see more and more instances of extreme weather phenomena every single year. That's not "every possible outcome", it's a verified pattern of bad and novel shit and oversimplifying the issue because the petrochemical companies have you by the balls is no excuse for your wanton stupidity.
>2. Mueller did not recommend any indictments for Trump. Which means
>3. Mueller found no collusion from Trump
Wrong, he did not find evidence sufficient to bring charges against the president. That is entirely different than finding no evidence of it. Read a book.
Read above, and then a book.
Are you five years old?
foreignpolicy.com
That is absolutely collusion. Whether it rises to criminal action is entirely different.
What about the mid-terms? That a blue wave happened? Lmao! Nothing but a puddle and a huge victory for the GOP that night.
>I wonder how you will feel in a week's time when the report is out
>underreport profits
>not tax fraud
Try again.
>You've created a flawed system where regardless of what happens, you claim it's evidence of your theory
Read that again and think very very hard why you just supported his argument, fucking brainlet.
because we can go with out one shitposter making dozens of post
>spew their fallacies
you are the only one here inventing claims. everyone else is asking you to provide proof
Live stream your suicide after the full report comes out and that there was still no proof of collusion k?
>Wrong, he did not find evidence sufficient to bring charges against the president.
In other words, he has nothing. Zero indictments. Abandon fantasy. Join us over here in reality.
>he did not find evidence sufficient to bring charges against the president. That is entirely different than finding no evidence of it.
its the same thing
>>It is true that there was collusion.
>>while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime
>Reconcile these for me.
Easy. Robert Mueller was conducting a federal investigation for criminal prosecution. That means that he had to reach a level of evidence that was beyond a reasonable doubt. When the report says "does not conclude" what it means to say is" there is not sufficient evidence to proceed with prosecution" in lawyer speak. Trump may very well have committed a crime (and I'm inclined to think that he did) but Mueller didn't believe there was enough evidence for a jury to convict him. It's that simple.
Evidence does not equal guilt. They're clues to reach a conclusion, but if the clues are insufficient in making a case the defendant is acquitted. Declared innocent. This is civics 101.
>And you got Benghazi and the emails wrong.
But we were right, though.
She just didn't get prosecuted (which the pessimistic among us were also correct about).
She didn't. All you got was negligence and all the right leaning outlets got triggered hard. The talking points continue to this day and apparently she's some kind of demon out to destroy us. Again, explain how this outrage is different than what we see now? All I see is degeneracy on both sides at this point.
>foreignpolicy.com
this means nothing though
hillary met with many high profile russian officials secretly too
Fox and the other outlets you are seething at reported nothing incorrect about Benghazi.
Imagine being you.
It's incredible that people can be this brainwashed.
What you fail to understand is what the term "beyond a reasonable doubt" actually means in a court of law. It means there must be a 95% chance of something occurring. That is an incredibly high threshold.
There is evidence for unicorns, and there is evidence against unicorns.
If you look through history, many people have depicted the unicorn. Why would this be if they don't exist? It's possible that they just imagined the creature or were otherwise inspired by others, or maybe they thought they saw something they didn't. But this could also suggest that unicorns are in fact real.
Therefore, unicorns are absolutely real. We just don't have the evidence to prove it to a sufficient standard. What we should really do is lower our standard, because we already know they exist.
>remember when people told you not to believe everything they tell you on tv only 10 years ago?
These are Leftists we're talking about.
The calling-card of Leftists is to readily deny that they support X, and then 10 years later claim they actually DID support X all along, but it's OK because X is a GOOD THING. Then they start readily denying that they support Y, and so on.
No, the only time it talks about not finding "sufficient" evidence of was the obstruction charges. The report cleared him of collusion, that's why Barr dropped the obstruction charges.
holy shit, the emails proved how corrupt hillary was though, you're an idiot
That's a nice deflection, but it's still collusion no matter what side it comes from. Will it soothe your hurt feelings if I admit that Hillary colluded with the Russians as well?
>MY FALSE EQUIVALENCY MEANS I'M RIGHT
Seriously stop embarrassing yourself.
>but it's still collusion
no it's not
how do you know what they were talking about when they met dipshit?
How can liberals ever recover from this?
>and we continue to see more and more instances of extreme weather phenomena every single year
This is provably false though, brainlet.
This is entirely due to a combination of more ubiquitous sensing and documentation technology and the 24-hours news cycle.
You are the same kind of brainlets claiming "The world is getting more and more violent!" because you watch CNN's constant coverage of Iraq when the provable trend is the ongoing gradual deescalation of warfare ever since the end of WWII.
Read my other posts. A threshold of sufficient evidence must be met for a federal prosecutor to feel confident that a person will be convicted, without that confidence there is no point in bringing charges. This doesn't need to be explicitly expressed for people who aren't retarded.
why is d. va so cute
Those emails were proved to have been provided by Russia. Why do you believe them?
I hope you didn't let them influence your vote in the election. Because that would mean their foreign interference altered a vote. And that would mean that if a certain individual publicly asked for them to continue hacking and handing over supposed emails, they would be colluding with a foreign power.
If there was any evidence of collusion he would have perused it, the Mueller report exonerated trump of collusion, the only threshold for evidence was the obstruction charges, which are obviously dismissed if there is no crime.
It doesn't matter what they actually talked about, what matter is intent. Intent is crucial to criminal proceedings, as anyone with a brain would acknowledge. He obviously met with someone who was representing the Russian government as having dirt on his political opponents. Not even Don Jr. disputes this.
>Because that would mean their foreign interference altered a vote.
Foreign countries interfere with our elections all of the time.
We interfere with foreign elections all the time.
Who cares?
>because the petrochemical companies have you by the balls
Petrochemical companies are some of the most vocal about the seriousness of """""Climate Change""""" and how they are organized to help fight this "very serious problem".
Go look at Exxon's fucking website.
I also am constantly baffled as to how you Climatetards can constantly allege there's a giant conspiracy by Gas Companies making people skeptical of your Doomsday Cult, but it's totally impossible that your attitude is being puppeteered by Globalists and "green" energy companies.
your right
we need voter ID to stop mexicans from voting
>Those emails were proved to have been provided by Russia.
No they weren't.
Why do you keep lying?
>Why do you believe them?
Are you saying hillary's email leaks are completely fake?
>Trump is going to lose in 2020;
Remember
>Trump is going to lose in 2016;
?
What you fail to understand is Trump has zero indictments. He was investigated and they found no wrongdoing on his part, regardless of what some SNL joke made you foolishly and oafishly believe was true. It's fun to have fun and have a laugh, but play time is over and the truth is Trump did not collude with Russia. The Russiagate conspiracy theory has been debunked, but if you want to continue it, go stand in line with the flat earthers and other crazies.
this is actually real advice, people are so heavily entrenched in ego-centricism that there is rarely any possibility of having someone correct factual incorrect predispositions with reasoned arguments, civil discussion with someone whom you disagree with isn't just useless it's counterproductive so the only real way to get a message across is by subliminal suggestion, covert packaging of your position in nice feeling and self-serving pretense, pacing and leading so the person you are talking to is brought to your conclusions by what feels like their own conscious choice
its 2019 and every argument is a micro-psyop. buckle up kiddoes, it is only going to get worse.
>COLLUSION ISN'T A CRIME
>TOTALLY EXONERATED FROM NOT A CRIME
You're right, it's a false equivalency. I'm sorry. We shouldn't reduce the standard of evidence required to prove unicorns exist.
Now reasonable doubt in a court of law, that's another issue entirely. We, the public, already know Trump colluded with Russia. So it's ridiculous to say that in a legal sense we can't confirm that he did. We know he absolutely did, so we have to lower our legal standard.
>He obviously met with someone who was representing the Russian government as having dirt on his political opponents. Not even Don Jr. disputes this.
Proof?
>If there was any evidence of collusion he would have perused it
He did pursue it, that's what the entire investigation was about. If you meant to say "prosecute" than look at another situation for a prosecutor. "If there was any evidence for murder he would have prosecuted for it" That's just a dumb tactic for a prosecutor that wants to win a case.
>underreport profits
Actual PROOF that this happened and that some profits weren't just relocated/reinvested legally?
Top reply on twitter says it all.
Lol. So why is she not in jail? I'm waiting for your deep state conspiracy theory.
>Trump has zero indictments
>they found no wrongdoing on his part
Do you recognize that these are two different things? Do you recognize that someone could do something wrong or even illegal and not be indicted for it?
Trump will never run! Trump will never get the nomination! Trump will never win! Trump will never last a year without being impeached! Okay two years! Okay but it's Mueller Time baby he's definitely getting indicted oh wait no indictments. Well, uh, shit, he'll, uh, fuck. No, wait, I go this. He'll never get re-elected! Yeah, that's the ticket. Nostradamus here has made his prediction, ladies and gentlemen, based on the stars and the moon and the Mayan calendar and late night TV and polls where we rigged the results and other such nonsense. Just, uh, ignore every other prediction I made first that turned out wrong.
Have sex
>Proof?
Look at it for yourself, this is the email chain that he willingly released:
twitter.com
Collusion is basically treason in the US, and potentially carries a federal death penalty.
>Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death
law.cornell.edu
The incumbent US president was being accused of treason, based on absolutely nothing.
>No they weren't.
They were. You are the liar.
So again I ask, did you let them influence your vote? And what about the "hypothetical" individual I talked about? Let's call them individual one for convenience. Are they guilty of colluding with a foreign power? when they PUBLICLY told them to continue hacking and leaking the supposed Hillary and DNC emails?
not him but she's too politically powerful
They're the exact same thing, because if they'd found legal wrongdoing, they'd have indicted him. This isn't difficult to understand, and it's been explained to you before, so I'm done replying to you, and you can stop replying to me, too.
>Do you recognize that someone could do something wrong or even illegal and not be indicted for it?
Jesus christ this lack of cope.
wow a big nothing burger
If there was any evidence for actual collusion he would have perused it. His investigation had unlimited scope and money, but since there was no collusion for Trump or anyone in his campaign, there was nothing to pursue. The only time "sufficient" evidence even comes up is in regards to obstruction charges, that's why there will also be no more indictments because it was nothing.
>Because that would mean their foreign interference altered a vote.
Yes, and as we all know Democrats care VERY DEEPLY about preventing non-Americans from influencing, let alone altering an election.
If they were worried they'd stop selling carbon fuels to be burned and added to the atmosphere.
>We, the public, already know Trump colluded with Russia.
And yet this apparent common knowledge was impossible to prove in court. Hmmmm.
Almost like they'd need to examine his tax returns and relevant financial documentation to find proof of this. Too bad Trump broke with precedent for """no reason in particular""" to never provide anyone who would examine them critically with his tax returns prior to becoming president.
>They were.
PROOF?
SOURCE
ANYTHING?
Do you think wikileaks is a russian asset or something?
You're an insane conspiracy theorist and I'm glad it's common knowledge that you people are insane now.
a sad truth we can all now see but will have no effect on the next election. dt has the full support of the jewish lobby, he's unstoppable.
If Hillary, as a Presidential Candidate, colluded with Russian forces, shouldn't she be in just as much hot water as Trump?
>if they'd found legal wrongdoing, they'd have indicted him
You don't understand how prosecution works. They have to believe that they have a reasonable chance of convincing a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that crimes were committed. It's such a simple thing but you seem unable to understand it.
>They were. You are the liar.
Citation needed
At least he admits he's brainwashed by (((television))) programming
Just your typical liberal cope.
>They have to believe that they have a reasonable chance of convincing a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that crimes were committed.
And they could do that if they had proof.
Yes. She'll try but from jail she won't be able to shit up the nomination process.
>Lol. So why is she not in jail?
Because the Clintons are political elite with friends stacked in the FBI, CIA and Obama Administration.
All it took was one of them in a high enough position of power to go "Whatever; not worth investigating, lol".
He's under no obligation to and to suggest breaking precedent is breaking the law is jumping to conclusions.
wow these people actually thought this was the biggest scandal of their lifetimes, fucking incredible
>If there was any evidence for actual collusion he would have perused it.
Again, are you saying "pursued" when you mean to say "prosecuted"? He did pursue it, which is what the entire Russia investigation was.
>they couldn't find proof
exactly
>FALSE EQUIVALENCY
Ah yes; the calling-card of a Prog-Zombie who just got called out as a hypocrite.
Bingo. That other user is hopeless, though. Just ignore him and let him fester in his own shit.
Yeah. Just like you're an ax-murderer and rapist but we don't have the evidence to indict you. Shame because I really hate your kind. Why do you rape people? Why do you butcher them?
>If Hillary, as a Presidential Candidate, colluded with Russian forces, shouldn't she be in just as much hot water as Trump?
No, she isn't the President of the United States. There should be higher standards for people in higher office, especially the highest office in the land.
>all these liberal tears itt
It's like Nov. 9 2016 all over again.
I really wish Trump would just become 1st Emperor of the United States of America.
Take control of the military and do what needs to be done.
>There should be higher standards for people in higher office, especially the highest office in the land.
And an unprecedented 2 years of special counsel probe is exactly that, and then some.
And said probe cleared Trump across the board.
Cope.
>And they could do that if they had proof.
They did have proof. Just not enough for a criminal prosecution. Why is this so hard for you to grasp?
He's investigating something, so he pursues that avenue of investigation if there was a reason to believe there was collusion. If he found any evidence he would have tried to pursue that to then find actual proof of collusion to prosecute. Are you illiterate?
Now that the Russian "threat" is dead I fully expect them to return to the Boogeyman of "MUH NAZIS".
They did it before. When the "MUH RUSSIA" narrative ran out of steam they took a break from it for six weeks to weep and cry and moan about Charlottesville and put Democrats into enough of a religious frenzy to go out and commit another wave of violence against wrongthinkers in public.
>They did have proof. Just not enough for a criminal prosecution.
Translation: they didn't have proof.
Pigeons like you think the stink of an investigation is enough reason to declare someone guilty at least in the court of public opinion. I hope you never get charged for a crime you didn't commit. Once your name is mentioned in newspapers, even if you're found innocent, people will still hate you.
>Nobody ever thought
Stopped reading here
What was the proof?
Wow
>And said probe cleared Trump across the board
It didn't clear him across the board. At best you could say that it "cleared" (and I use that term incredibly loosely) him of interfering in our election with the Russians, but there are plenty of other illegal activities tRump was involved in.
>Nobody ever thought Mueller would undeniably prove that Trump colluded.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>If they were worried they'd just destroy their entire business overnight, destroying themselves, the people that rely on them for jobs and the entire nations that rely on them for use of petroleum-powered technology.
Yeah, makes sense.
What does this mean? Trump doesn't tip 15%? He likes White Russians? Proof would be front-page material, but all we got were McCarthyite smears.
THEY HAVE PROOF, YOU FUCKING IDIOT. READ A FUCKING NEWSPAPER. WATCH TELEVISION. COLBERT WENT TO RUSSIA AND JUMPED ON A BED YELLING PEE-PEE TAPE. THAT PROVES ORANGE MAN BAD. THEY WILL IMPEACH TRUMP ANY DAY NOW. REEEEEEEEEEEE
>he pursues that avenue of investigation
He did.
>If he found any evidence he would have tried to pursue that to then find actual proof of collusion to prosecute
He found proof of collusion, but it didn't reach a standard that he thought was enough for a jury to convict Trump. I keep saying it, and you keep not understanding. Try to read those words before responding.
This, if you question it you are a racist sexist magatard
>It didn't clear him across the board.
It absolutely did.
The entire point of the probe was to find evidence of collusion with a foreign power, i.e. literal treason.
And for two years, the left believed Mueller would find exactly that.
You have a lot of coping to do, I understand. The wound is very fresh.
I'll just have to relish in your salty, salty tears.
>it was real in my mind
off topic but real talk, McCarthy did nothing wrong
>muh jobs
Thanks for proving they only care about money.
>He found proof of collusion
What was the proof?
>What was the proof?
The Trump Tower meeting with Russian diplomats during the transition is obvious collusion, and no one disputes that it happened.
>He found proof of collusion, but it didn't reach a standard that he thought was enough for a jury to convict Trump.
Translation: he did not find proof of collusion.
No, if you question it, you're an incel. That's the current empty buzzword we use, my fellow NPC. You need to get the latest patch.
Citation needed, your doublethink is too apparent.
>The Trump Tower meeting with Russian diplomats during the transition is obvious collusion
Why and how?
Just because you met with someone means nothing.
You don't even know what they talked about.
>They did have proof.
You are conflating "proof" and "evidence" because you're low IQ.
"Evidence" means "something that I think could support my claim".
"Proof" means "something that proves my claim".
That's not proof of collusion
Which wasn't illegal. Presidential candidates meet with foreign diplomats all the time. Hillary met with Russian diplomats when running for the 2016 election.
Gloating fucktardery is also not an argument.
So with Trump winning in 2020, who are the top candidates for both parties in 2024? I got Crenshaw and Sinema.
Clearing across the board implies that Mueller was investigating every aspect of Trump's life. This isn't the case, as Mueller was only looking into Russian interference in the 2016 campaign. There are plenty of illegal things that Trump can be involved in that are illegal.
Did you know Obama, a sitting president, met with Putin in a private meeting in 2013? Proof he colluded with Russia
>during the transition
after he was elected
>Clearing across the board implies that Mueller was investigating every aspect of Trump's life.
Look at those goalposts fly.
Trump was cleared across the board for anything Mueller was investigating.
You know, the shit liberals thought was going to nail Trump, but turned out to be a nothingburger.
Of course it's collusion, look up the definition of the word.
Collusion isn't necessarily a crime, I've said so myself in this thread.
Obama straight up got caught assuring Dmitry Medvedev he'd be more flexible after the election.
youtube.com
The only Dem I can think who has a chance to win against Trump is Bernie but we all know the old man will never get the nomination.
>US electoral candidates meeting with foreign officials is collusion
>Look at those goalposts fly.
>Trump was cleared across the board for anything Mueller was investigating.
>It didn't clear him across the board.
It absolutely did.
HAHAHAHA you are the one that moved the goalpost you dumbass, you lose.
>that Trump can be involved
Oh, so you're starting to include the word "can" now.
I agree. There are plenty of things Trump can be involved in that are illegal. We have a lot of crimes he could choose from. Like ax murdering and raping. Hell, even you could be an ax-murderer and a rapist. In fact, you are.
It cleared him across the board in Mueller's investigation.
You have mental problems.
DNC is going to screw him again. It'll probably be Booker or Harris that gets the nom.
>Collusion:
>secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy, especially in order to cheat or deceive others
No proof that it was an illegal conspiracy to cheat others. Meeting with someone does not mean collusion
Oh, so Trump isn't a criminal.
If the collusion you think he did is so bad, make it a crime. Because apparently it doesn't even rise to the level of littering or jaywalking
>Clearing across the board implies that Mueller was investigating every aspect of Trump's life.
No it doesn't.
That other user is living in fantasy land and cares not for our mundane reality. In his head, yes, Trump is an ax murderer. Mueller just didn't have enough proofiest proofy proof to proofily prove it. If only we'd all clapped our hands and believed, Trump would be behind bars right now!
You said it cleared him across the board, full stop. Pathetic attempt at damage control. I'm done with you.
But it was certainly secret, was it not. It says illegal OR secret.
What does "clearing across the board" mean to you? Does that mean partially cleared? Of course not.
>You said it cleared him across the board, full stop.
And it did.
Mueller's probe cleared Trump of anything covered by Mueller's probe.
Then according to you and Mueller, Trump has done nothing illegal. Cool. I mean, nobody gives a fuck what you think really, we're all just having a good time blasting your dumb ass, but it's good you at least agree with us that he's done nothing illegal here and the whole investigation was a waste of time and everyone who tried to drag Trump's name through the mud and accused him of being Putin's puppet now looks like a complete and utter fool. Thanks, good job on that.
It wasn't secret, he met him at his hotel and that was known. It was private like a lot of meetings. Also no proof they were cooperating, and no proof they were trying to cheat anyone.
I'm glad you agree. It cleared (didn't find sufficient evidence for prosecution) Trump of things covered by the Mueller investigation, which was Russian interference. It did not clear him of crimes unrelated to Russian interference.
>What does "clearing across the board" mean to you?
That the entire investigation turned up nothing, obviously.
>The incumbent US president was being accused of treason, based on absolutely nothing.
This. I am amazed that leftists are still in denial at this point.
The democratically elected President of the United States has multiple people in multiple departments trying to sabotage the highest office in our nation, based on nothing but their dislike of the candidate.
If you ask me there's plenty of Treason in Washington. Just not Trump or the people under him.
>It did not clear him of crimes unrelated to Russian interference.
Why and how would Mueller clear him of things he didn't even investigate?
There wasn't sufficient evident for Mueller to charge Trump with a crime relating to Russian interference. It's that simple.
>it wasn't secret
>it was private
lol
The entire investigation relating to Russian interference cleared Trump from being charged. That's not the same as saying Trump never committed crimes that could be prosecuted.
>dude jobs & industry don't matter
This is why Greentards need to be excluded from public discourse.
Just go back to your mom's house, light up a bong and sit tight while the actual intelligent people conduct business and politics.
>You said it cleared him across the board, full stop.
He's right. A two year investigation that included 40 FBI agents, 2800 subpoenas, 500 search warrants, 230 communication records, 50 phone taps, and 13 foreign government intel requests, and they turned up 0 indictments on the guy. If the guy were guilty of even having an overdue library book, they'd know, so the fact that this led to nothing definitively means there's absolutely nothing on Trump. He's 100% innocent, and now he's 100% getting re-elected.
Deal with it.
He literally told the Russians to hack Hillary and the DNC and leak their supposed emails in a public speech. That's the definition of treason. And he only gets away with it because of lobbyists and because his base as well as Fox News which is basically a state-run propaganda outlet at this point, will all cover for him.
A secret meeting would imply no one knew the meeting took place. You also didn't show proof of how they were cooperating or how they were trying to cheat people.
That's exactly my point. It did not clear him of things that Robert Mueller didn't investigated, meaning every aspect of Trump's life not relating to his interactions with Russia. Thanks again for proving my point.
>colluding with a hostile foreign power is only a crime if you're the President, any political positions lower than that make it A-OK
Love how you've now started using the word "evidence" instead of "proof" after blasted your ass, you fucking retard.
>having a private meeting is collusion and collusion is treason!
Guess you have to execute anyone with a door in their office.
They were only investigation Russian interference, and just because he was charged with a crime doesn't mean that a crime wasn't committed. Deal with it.
So secret and private are polar opposites to you? Stop responding, you are wasting my time.
Well, no, he used "evident" instead of "evidence" because he's retarded.
>The entire investigation relating to Russian interference cleared Trump from being charged. That's not the same as saying Trump never committed crimes that could be prosecuted.
>It did not clear him of things that Robert Mueller didn't investigated
The Mueller investigation cleared Trump across the board FOR THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION.
The fact that you already have your hopes pinned on some other crime Trump committed changes nothing.
>just because he was charged with a crime doesn't mean that a crime wasn't committed
wat
>So secret and private are polar opposites to you?
No, that's not what I said. Do you have trouble reading or something? I said they are different, being different doesn't mean something is a polar opposite.
I'm dealing with the reality that Trump has zero indictments very well. You clearly aren't. But don't worry. We're here to help you.
I'm done with you retards. You have convinced me of nothing. You have convinced everyone reading this thread of the opposite of what you are alleging. Enjoy your echo chamber where you jerk each other off forever, knowing you will never accomplish anything in the real world. I'm heading off to a place where things actually matter, and retards like you are filtered out so the rest of society doesn't have to deal with your incessant autism.
JUSSIE SMOLLETT: 16 FEDERAL INDICTMENTS
PRESIDENT DOCTOR TRUMP, WWE CHAMPION: 0 INDICTMENTS
>i hurt myself today...
>Living in delusions this deeply
>It did not clear him of things that Robert Mueller didn't investigated
So obviously "across the board" doesn't include any of that.
When a tennis player wins all his matches in a certain tournament and people say he won "across the board", would you protest and say he didn't win "across the board" because he lost a match two years prior in a different tournament?
English obviously isn't your first language.
>"ha you lost because you didn't convince a mindless retard and instead made him ragequit"
>I'M GOING BACK TO RODDIT
Thank God. Don't let the door hit you on the way out, fag.
Thanks for the (You)s, by the way :^)
Never change /pol/tards
>You have convinced everyone reading this thread of the opposite of what you are alleging. Enjoy your echo chamber where you jerk each other off forever, knowing you will never accomplish anything in the real world.
Everything you just said applies perfectly to you.
>and retards like you are filtered out
And you're too caught up in your self-imposed echo chamber to see that.
A tennis player can't truly "win" until he's beaten every human being alive, every human being that has lived, every human being that will live, as well as potential human beings that won't live but could have lived. Until then, that tennis player is just a LOSER.
>can't debate his point
>has no evidence or proof of any claims
>"but muh feelings, I'm done with you idiots!"
>Thanks for the (You)
Thank you for yours.
And enjoy that aneurysm.
>you replied to me so I win
People replied because they felt the urge to counter your relentless stupidity
I got plenty of posts while not being a retard. Probably all from you.
I still win
>says he's leaving
>doesn't leave
That's kind of gay.
I don't think so. I don't believe you've ever particularly stood out from your peers at any point in your life, so why would you think you would here?
I meant I was leaving that line of conversation. Please show me where I said I was leaving the thread. God you are all so retarded.
Nice projection there buddy.
>"I'm done with you retards. You have convinced me of nothing. You have convinced everyone reading this thread of the opposite of what you are alleging. Enjoy your echo chamber where you jerk each other off forever, knowing you will never accomplish anything in the real world. I'm heading off to a place where things actually matter, and retards like you are filtered out so the rest of society doesn't have to deal with your incessant autism."
>"but i'm not leaving the thread"
>"even though i said i'm heading off to a place that matters"
>Please show me where I said I was leaving the thread
here: >I'm heading off to a place where things actually matter
Hey stop that you're not allowed to point out obvious bullshit. It's cheating.
You're still responding? That's pretty pathetic my dude. Next you're going to tell me that Trump won't be a convicted criminal who will be behind bars by this time next year or something.
>lose argument
>demonstrate your inability to differentiate between basic english words
>I-I was just pretending to be retarded
> Yfw you realize everybody posting here is fucking worthless
Here’s the final redpill. Both parties are absolute shit. Enjoy :D
Maybe try not being such a retard next time. Can't say I expect anything less from a Trumplette though
>I wasn't actually pretending to be retarded, but people replied a lot so that means I was a troll, right?
Thanks for being my 100th user, you will truly hold a special place in my heart
You're damage control is hilarious.
>no time stamp
You know somehow has lost an argument when they try to play the "I was trolling" game and brag about (You)'s. It shows they've just completely given up on whatever they used to believe, that you've defeated them that hard, and it feels good knowing I was a part of that on that dumb user who Mueller has proof that Orange Man Bad. It feels good to completely and utterly destroy that faggot to the point where, internally, he's admitted defeat, even though he's too much of a stubborn retard to admit it (and anonymously at that, what a fucking faggot). Well, see ya in the archives. Later.
You could keep arguing against my earlier points, but you have been utterly BTFO'd.
No, he's just another dumbfuck liberal spouting bullshit because he's wants his dumbfuck liberal audience to stay angry because they have absolutely nothing else. They keep getting btfo repeatedly and they STILL haven't learned yet that you can't just say a bunch of untrue shit and wish it true.
CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP
TWOO SCOOPS
TWO CLAPS
Hey there. You're a little slow, huh? Welcome to my thread. It's already over and we've all closed up, but I encourage you to read through. Might BTFO ya though. Just a tad.
thanks for the thread user I had a lot of fun
RUSSIAN PEEPEE MATTRESSES
