Post your criterion collection

Attached: 1A8AB25B-7478-450D-A365-A045500579A9.jpg (4032x3024, 3.21M)

Cтaлкep (1979)

Soiterion.

They have to re-release some of the ones they had on laserdisc. Hoping for Godard’s Contempt and maybe Close Encounters of the Third Kind.

I mean I could screenshot my torrents folder but it's not very entertaining. I don't buy physical DVDs because I'm not a faggot and/or a retard.

I only saw 4 movies from Op's image
How can this be?!! I was supposed to be in charge here!

I started downloading torrents but the quality is shitty when watching on a big screen even if it’s in 1080p or whatever.

>paying for your flicks

Attached: CE7LKYrg_400x400.jpg (360x360, 30K)

then you're doing it wrong

>I don't buy physical DVDs because I'm not a faggot and/or a retard.

Attached: 9629171725874923769161.jpg (822x714, 40K)

congratulations, you re-posted what I said

Attached: 0dcd1b1df06af3174dc6bcd02d8f5ae3.jpg (720x960, 51K)

I assume high quality rips of these are only to be found on private trackers right?

What’s the right way to do it?

have sex

>going on rarbg to download a cinematic masterpiece like La Dolce Vita

Not getting them from YiFi retard
Get in some good HD encode private tracker
The average 1080p file should be 10-15gb

the criterion streaming thing starts in a couple weeks

Attached: 7813868168799166327.jpg (492x426, 19K)

>criterion streaming (low energy - movies I've already seen and can torrent anyways, no commentary)
vs
>The Last Drive In with Joe Bob Briggs (high energy - random shit that not even the director has bothered, with 10/10 authentic honest commentary)
It's not even a challenge

I do, every night. Get a life faggot
private trackers

>random shit that not even the director has bothered with
this is insultingly untrue, but it still made me kek

Attached: 1316905394001.jpg (600x450, 30K)

Why the fuck so you own a criterion edition of fucking Boyhood?

Attached: 1545516179286.jpg (1280x1280, 1.27M)

nice altman and wes anderson
cringe linklater
too much malick

While it's definitely true that the last drive in marathons so far boast 100% popular movies (perhaps ignoring phantasm V), half the shit on Monstervision were pretty damn obscure, especially for when they were airing, before internet databases and all

>Criterion streaming

Attached: gerard.gif (500x330, 998K)

oh yeah, monstervision's a different story, no question
last drive in's stuck with whatever shudder has the rights to
with is generally all gold so far, but still well known stuff

because he has autism

nowhere near as many as I should've seen, but still

Attached: download.png (967x269, 127K)

>boyhood
IT TOOK 12 YEARS TO MAKE!!!

Ive seen 25% over the years and I can safely say there are a lot of embarassingly bad movies in it

>kills a thread so he can show off his reddit collection
>makes sure to include his shitty audio technica record player in the shot
oh I can just picture this dickhead irl

you don't sound very knowledgeable
Out of that 30 percent I've watched maybe 5%, tops, have been bad
Naked and Tiny Furniture off the top of my head

I like the movie. I enjoyed the special features as well.

>digital media

Attached: hero.jpg (2340x1316, 889K)

I enjoy the audio technica so far. I’ll enjoy it even better when I get a better sound system.

How does it feel to be a symbol?” Benicio del Toro is asked in his role as Che Guevara. “Of what?” he replies and is told: “The revolution.” But in Che, Steven Soderbergh’s two-part art thing, this revolution is about style—not politics. After decades as a poster boy for counterculture hipness, Che Guevara provides Soderbergh a pretext for another idiosyncratic, uncharismatic enterprise.

(This one makes Bubble look like Gone With The Wind.) Out-perversing Gus Van Sant’s Milk, Soderbergh makes a four-hour-plus biopic about a historical figure without providing a glimmer of charm or narrative coherence. One can’t accuse Soderbergh of pandering to feel-good piety because Che proudly resists sentimentality about people’s power, distribution of wealth, Marxist theology, radical chic or morbid celebrity.

Attached: 1552857142814.jpg (591x566, 137K)

Soderbergh glosses all that, yet still wins Leftist critical acclaim (and a WTF Cannes Best Actor prize for Del Toro’s inexpressive performance) because Che— dead or deadening—remains a politically correct icon. It requires some new kind of orneriness to take Che’s famous image (saintly pose in beret with a star or sexy pose with a cheroot hanging from his lip) and continuously alienate an audience from what it represents. Che’s two halves are divided between his international fame exporting the Cuban revolution (speaking at the U.N., meeting the press) and then his Bolivian sojourn in late 1960s.Time-jumping meta-narrative contrasted with a de-centered guerrilla war semi-doc. Both halves defy absolute comprehension. Sequences are designed to prevent emotional involvement; part one is projected at 1.85 aspect ratio, part two at 1.66.This obstinate artiness resembles a Lars Von Trier scam; sure enough, each half opens with long map montages, emulating the interstitial montages of Von Trier’s Breaking the Waves— not a good sign. In Spain Rodriguez’s new comic-book novel, Che: A Graphic Biography (Verso), a poignant narrative interruption recounts Rodriguez’s own memory of living through the Cuban missile crisis. It makes Che’s significance personal and immediate. Soderbergh doesn’t bother; he’s above the personal revelations of Latin American political drama as risked by Alex Cox’s Walker and Pontecorvo’s Burn. Neither rabble-rousing politician, humanist historian or trailblazing artiste, Soderbergh’s a Pseud.

Attached: patrick (2).jpg (881x649, 299K)

>in this moment i am euphoric

Attached: 20190324_143312_HDR.jpg (864x1536, 182K)

>DVD

I wouldn't say I haven't seen a bunch of movies

Attached: Screenshot_20190324-204628_Letterboxd.jpg (1080x1920, 612K)

you sound like an insufferable onions faggot

But you are a retard for watching shitty looking movies.

Attached: 1a.jpg (770x433, 37K)

nope blu ray

>buying plastic discs that degrade within 10 years and supporting hollywood pedophiles
JUST

Attached: 1528913122283.png (817x443, 34K)

No comparison to a disc. Watch a movie on something other than your phone tranny.

Attached: 1519369803816.jpg (595x574, 70K)

>using discs with elevated audio which sounds nice on your hi fi, and which has special features

>download BDMV
>burn to a 4 layer BluRay disc that costs $3
>save paying $50 for a UHD

dr strangelove
house (hausu)
royal tenenbaums

it's art hoe shit

>make $42 an hour
>spend a few hours torrenting a shitty rip and then burning the shitty rip to discs
>never watch them
>throw them out after two decades of 4evralone

I disagree, I would say you haven't

Attached: download (6).png (398x81, 21K)

>shitty rip
BDMV is untouched bluray fag

all that effort is not worth it, you can buy a second hand dvd from amazon for less than £3 (I guess that's about $5 if you're an americlap retard)

Why is this $150?

Kino but the dildo ruins it

>buying DVDs

i really want the olympic films set but i can't justify the expense

Is there any apps or websites where you can upload your movie and watch it on your ps4 or mobile phone?

>downloading for hours and burning it to a disc like an absolute wasteman in his mom's basement smoking weed in between wanks and pizzas

idk, Plex? Never used it though

dunno

There are stores in the US where you get used blu ray for $1.50.