Should he start reviewing films?

Sent from under my rock

holy shit, yeah. this drives me insane as well, i can't understand how anyone that actually needs glasses could live like that.

>all he does is describe it

???

how is that bad?

>HE GAVE BLACK PANTHER A 7?!?!

what are you talking about? How do you know if they fit just from this image

I hate Youtube for allowing an influx of talentless dickwads who can neither write, compose, direct nor articulate anything of merit to become famous solely for sharing their fucking thoughts on things. Now every jackass and his brother is trying to launch his own show or podcast. Fuck.

It's the equivalent of a reviewer e-celeb reading the plot synopsis on Wikipedia and not saying much else.

Reviewing music is much harder than reviewing films because there's so much less to go on. Most people will decide if they like certain music based simply on how it sounds, which is a massively subjective sensation, whereas films not only have sound but are accompanied by visuals, greater run time, characterisation, writing, dialogue, cinematography, lighting, editing, scoring etc. There's so much more to hone in on in a film, and so for music to seem as though you know what you're talking about, you have to lacerate aspects that most listeners would simply pass up, like the meaning of or significance of lyrics, or how appropriate the use of a certain instrument is.

scott adams is a douchebag

WATERY CINEMATOGRAPHY