Why didn't they just let Superman have a mustache?

Why was this the first scene we saw of the movie? It added nothing to the movie except bad upper lip cgi. Why would anyone think this was a good idea?

To be fair, he shoulda had a full beard after being resurrected.

DC is so fucking incompetent, they cannot do anything right. The company is more retarded than it's fans... and that's saying something!

Attached: 587cfd790d7a0b109f9dc42b4b557763.jpg (656x960, 116K)

wonder how far his hair can go before they give him a wig

Was the moustache so good for whatever movie he was in he couldn't just regrow it? They know hair grows back, right?

I believe it was for Mission Impossible and they were already filming.

I want to think that it was Cavil's way of protesting the movie. Like Wesley Snipes refusing to open his eyes while filming Blade 3, so they had to CGI his eyes in.

Attached: 516662_v1.gif (300x297, 300K)

my god that's kino

This lmao why the fuck didn't they just give him a beard

>why did this literal cascade of failures of a movie fuck this little thing up?

Wtf is this legit????

Attached: 1520847184742.jpg (657x527, 45K)

>Supersoi

People complained that Superman didn't smile enough in Snyder's movies so Whedon put in a shitty scene of him smiling right up front

Yes.

Superman doesn't wear a beard, that's not who he is. At most he would have had a beard for a little bit after he was resurrected and then shaved.

In the end it would have been the same cause he had a mustache in his current movie and they cgi it off for reshoots.

>what we could have gotten

Attached: 9734a948664e5c5eebdb5c5fff082442.jpg (1000x1000, 101K)

>t.

Attached: 1435950859648.jpg (3216x4288, 3.02M)

imagine somebody telling you a decade ago that the movie about freddie mercury getting aids would make more money than the entire justice league, or batman vs superman

but here where we are. and who can we blame for that? zack snyder. embarrassment of the century

>Superman doesn't wear a beard, that's not who he is.
DC "fans" everyone.

It's ok. It's not your fault. Your characters have been misrepresented as shallow cardboard cut out by the garbage DCU adaptations.

Attached: 4ytgfqqt.png (633x353, 441K)

>t. asian masculinity

He kept that for the rest of the show, right?

>Original Superman: A total chill dude. Completely human because he was fucking raised on Earth by a down-to-earth human family, his Krypton heritage is just an explanation for his super powers. He wants to save people because he can, because he's a nice guy.
>DCU Superman: A introvert alien who feels out of this world and is burdened by having to save others, all while looking down on humans and only being motivated by his erection for Lois.

What went wrong?

Threadly reminder that Deep Fakes would've fixed the beard issue more convincingly than CGI did.

Attached: 1528721358552.webm (1280x720, 1.84M)

I was trying to say that a character is more than just a loose collection of physical traits, but I guess you are motivated to believe what you believe.

Shit that's convincing. How did they do it?

Being a muscular man with a stache doesn't mean what it used to, OP. With that said I still don't properly understand how it first developed gay associations.

Gen X 80's emo faggotry worked its way into Superman.

Only three rules when it comes to Superman, he does good because he's a good person and it's the right thing to do, he has to show that while he has absolute power he isn't corruptible and needs to fight have villains like Lex and Braniac that also have absolute power but have become absolutely corrupt. With those two out of the third one falls right into place where he inspires through his actions and sometimes his words to make you want to be a better person.

but some people think that's corny so good luck ever seeing that version on screen

youtube.com/watch?v=YaQ2st5CyaA

magic

And I said that at best he would keep his beard just a little while after he would be brought back to life at best, but I guess you just want to act like you know everything.

They were filming and he was literally contractually obligated to keep the moustache and MI production wouldn't budge on it.

Imagine the gall of some pathetic cape shit production trying to mess with your shoot.

>so good luck ever seeing that version on screen
I have. It's called Captain America. He's basically that same person except without god powers.

So society *is* ready. I blame only the particular filmmakers in charge of the DC universe right now.

It's not acting, I do know that you could make a bearded superman and people would love it it the character was written well. You are making excuses; and for a hypothetical situation, no less.

>millions of dollars of CGI from otherwise cheapskate Jews
>some virgin and perverted programmer boi

Yeah Cap and Supes are very similar ideologically, but DC really likes punished Superman for some stupid reason, Superman 1978 did it really well and DCAU did it pretty well but that's about it.

>I still don't properly understand how it first developed gay associations

"castro clones", breh. relatively speaking it's not even an old development

Holy shit, this is CG?

It literally looks like the most well-shot sex tape I've ever seen in my life.

DC also had a thing in the Mortal Kombat fighting game crossover that his hair couldn't be messed up. Maybe it was just a video game thing though.

DC used to pull that a lot, check out all of the DC/Marvel Crossovers, Superman and Batman aren't ever allowed to lose and other such oddities.

Oh okay, you're a troll. I get it.

I think it's more from the backlash that Batman Forever got. After that they stopped making Batman and Superman campy in movoes and more gritty.

The power of penis prevails again.

Deep Fakes A.I.
Any inconsistencies they could've fix with CGI. DC was being idiots who wanted to burn money that badly.

He didnt refuse to open them in protest of the movie though he refused because he'd spend all day getting stoned in his trailer and didnt want to reveal his glazed over and bloodshot eyes

I get making Batman gritty, Batman going from camp to gritty is probably the most successful character reboot of all time, they were going to cancel his comics in the early 80's due to basically 0 sales until his gritty reboot.

I don't know why it bled into Superman though, that doesn't make any sense, the two characters are literally the day and night differences.

why are Yea Forumscksuckers so cringy?

Not sure why they did that. The contrast of personalities make pretty good banter. Maybe it was cause the X-treme phase of the 90's that never left or they didn't let go. They did try to make him a happier guy in the last part of Justice League, but it was way too late for that.

Why didn't they do this instead?

It's even in HD.

>trite
That’s not a noun. You probably mean
>tripe
thicko

The whole DCU has been hijacked by some kind of neo-christian caveman dudebro shit. It's some kind of pathological discussion about whether to worship the old testament god despite being terrified of the mere idea of an all-powerful being; the movie is looking for both excuses to keep worshiping him and fantasizes about killing him while full of "manliness signaling" and parental issues. Both the heroes' and villains' characters and the crucial moments of the plot revolving around mother and father figures, which all have to do with the religious obsession with paternity and these people being basically stunted children.

It feels less like a movie about the actual characters that are being adapted, and more about the people who are adapting it and watching it using the characters and the story to.... cope with becoming increasingly less able to believe in bullshit but at the same time also incapable to see the world as adults yet, seeking power structures and fantasizing about saviors and villains?

I don't know. I feel like Marvel has transcended this "level" of the superhero myth.