So what do we think about it?

So what do we think about it?
youtube.com/watch?v=Scf8nIJCvs4

Attached: once-upon-a-time-in-hollywood.jpg (1200x675, 86K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/mpx4ODP35VQ
crazydaysandnights.net/2018/04/todays-blind-items-fading-superstar.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Looks good.

It will be good you contarian retards
See I said It will be good ad you guys are contrarian retards
Now give me (you)s by saying that It won't be good, seeing how contrarian retards you are

>we
kill yourself asap

t/v/eddit will love it and then pretend that they never liked it.

It will win best picture because Hollywood loves movies about itself. Screencap this.

they'll say nigger no fewer than ten times

The fact that it doesn't look like a over the top action, genre movie with tons of shoot outs makes me more interested than I otherwise would have been.

looks reddit af

problematic

Attached: DT.png (216x197, 75K)

Attached: leo dance.png (589x701, 358K)

Tarantino will subvert everyone's expectations again, and the movie won't be focused on the Manson murders at all, just like he did with Inglorious Basterds

Attached: 1548808326942.gif (308x312, 3.15M)

Attached: adf.jpg (306x53, 4K)

Inside Hollywood movies are pretty based tbqh

using bruce lee comically like that pisses me off especially since he's dead

fuck off with your sacred cow, he was just an actor

Attached: 1544473461715.png (400x400, 175K)

Will there be a Margot nude scene?

Attached: question.jpg (339x399, 49K)

she'll probably show her feet, it's a Tarantino's flick after all

Wanna know a truth bomb? Screencap this, seriously.

Part of the movie is about Steve McQueen going after Manson. It's like a revenge chase movie.

bruce lee sucks cock in hell

Attached: PAZUZU.jpg (1380x998, 243K)

Nah he's on blast for it right now so he probably had to sharpie out all 56 uses of the word from the original script

stop sucking chink cock, you fucking faggot

Anyone who thinks this is foregrounding the Manson murders is an idiot.

>no goggins as manson
blackpilled and gay.
won't watch.

And Caprio and Pitt are clerly supposed to be faggots, that's why they smirk at the "carry the load" wordplay.

Attached: Charles Manson.jpg (630x344, 21K)

>Looking at wikipedia to find the film
>Click on Bruce Lee article
>Scroll down to his death
>Reading
>"..Lee had had his underarm sweat glands removed in late 1972, in the apparent belief that underarm sweat was unphotogenic on film."
What the fuck?

Attached: 1550831671948.png (696x665, 742K)

you can't tell shit from a trailer, retard.

>implying he won't make Manson sympathetic like he did with Landa

Hopefully this will focus more on dialogue and characterization which are the only two things Tarantino is good at.

It's gonna suck, faggot.

quentin will never win another award now that he doesn't have harvey to lobby for him anymore

He can direct action well when he has a guest choreographer

yes

Attached: margot.jpg (1332x807, 97K)

I'm going to complain that the Manson Family barely seems to be part of the movie at all despite most of the trailer obviously taking place at Spahn Ranch.

It's gonna be bad. Tatantino is shit

I'm so smart

more sweeney plz

it will be good, but forgettable
you forgot that Tarantino has an absolutely terrible taste for feet (he liked Uma's feet ffs), so we probably won't get sweet Margot soles, but some ugly feet from other chick, instead
>dialogue
arguable, it was great in his first 3 movies, but deeply flawed in every other after it
>characterization
are you kidding me? every character in his movies is like a caricature or a parody of itself
plus, they all sound like him

Looks like his first non-cartoonish flick since what, Jackie Brown? I'll probably watch it.

Real life Manson was too charismatic to not be sympathetic. Outside the murders of course

youtu.be/mpx4ODP35VQ

boohoohoo, are you going to cry, baby?

I think most of the characters that Tarantino wrote are meant to be cartoonish

>arguable, it was great in his first 3 movies, but deeply flawed in every other after it
Indeed, but his first 3 films show he has the skills for good dialogue if he let it flow organically instead of trying to force it to make up for the shitty aspects of said films.

>are you kidding me? every character in his movies is like a caricature or a parody of itself
That half the appeal of Tarantino films. They're deeply unrealistic, yes, but that's what makes them fun. In that sense what Tarantino does is comparable to what the Coen bros. do when they write comedies.

This movie looks incredibly stupid. Its going to suck so hard user's.

It's about Leo's and Brad's characters solving the murder of Sharon. They catch Manson a shoot some of his followers. They are also looking for a job and at the end they go to Italy to make westerns.

He doesn't know any other way to write a character

could someone make a webm of Margot's scenes from the trailer?

oh god that sounds so fuckin stupid

tarantino=trash
This place is full of raging redditplens, so I'm sure this shitpile will have a nice following here

>at the end they go to Italy to make westerns.
I can see Quentin doing that

imagine a scene where Manson is singing this good and people in the teather are asking themselves, "hey why is this crazy sycko is singing this good? he was supposed to be the scum of the earth, not this charismatic nice guy!'
can Tarantino pull it off?

It will obviously be a main plot point/ something to revolve around. It's not going to be the climax though

It's a likely contributor to his death too

Looks like a fun movie. A needed break from capeshit.

The trailer is where you're SUPPOSED to tell shit from. I.e., wether or not it's worth the watch.

This. Even if it's not as great as Inglorious Basterds its still going to be a breath of fresh air from all the other shit thats coming out

I just hope there is a scene of Dennis Wilson clocking Manson in the face

Attached: Beach-Boys.jpg (400x400, 31K)

you could swap dialogue from every single one of his movies at randome and you wouldn't notice

Why? The mans been dead for 40 years. He's ben subject to every form of postmortem dicksucking, mockery, and parody you could imagine, what does it matter if he's portrayed as a cocky jack ass who beats the shit out of Brad Pitt? The guy was famously arrogant early on anyway.

He was a mentally ill drug addict, he should be mocked.

its gonna be good, tarantino makes good movies even thou he is still devil worshipping leg perverted rapist.

Attached: jeesus moi.jpg (262x192, 11K)

Somebody claimed that his sister worked on the film and leaked the whole plot. That was the ending.

fuck off, the dude was famous for running from real fights

yea, suck jap cock instead! so kawaii! evangelion and jrpg's what have you

>characters acting comically in a comedy

woah

except that the bitch boi never did it. he basically ran away and got police escort
also, "never learn not to love"is pure shit compared to "cease to exist"

the trailer is the means by which the studio tricks a person into thinking the film is worth seeing, regardless of whether it's shit or not.

It doesn't count as "tricking" if the movie actually turns out worth the watch

the idiot basically killed himself by having his underarm sweat glands removed, thereby making death by heat stroke inevitable as long as he continued his strenuous lifestyle. he's the 70s' biggest darwin award winner, basically.

>stop sucking chink cock, you fucking faggot
He's only 3/4 chink

Attached: bruce lee china 0.jpg (630x727, 270K)

>the idiot basically killed himself by having his underarm sweat glands removed,
WTF? Who told you that, your Judo teacher? He died from a brain stroke. Chuck Norris said from lifting

Attached: bruce lee china.jpg (630x430, 160K)

nothing special about the trailer, really.

take "the whatever movie by foot fetishist" and what you got? some scenes all over the place and leonardo di caprio ACTING (and shiting his pants).

it will be self references all over:

> they kill manson, like hitler
> story happens out of order, like pulp fiction
> the climax is a gory fest, as usual.

and tarantino self references are actually references of other people work and people, pre internet, tought it was cool and original instead of shameless rip offs.

Attached: ashesanddiamonds-1600x900-c-default.jpg (1600x900, 261K)

I'm just happy to see blond men in a movie where they're not playing cuc.ks, elitist highschool jerks, or psycho cuc,ks for once.

Attached: robert redford.jpg (474x582, 45K)

>plens

It will be disappointing as Inglourious Basterds, Django Unchained and Hateful Eight.

how do you go from this...

Attached: tmp_Ylhazz_05da3f81a3f5f5d9_GettyImages-2662182.jpg (2048x2547, 637K)

to THIS?

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-03-21 at 3.40.51 PM.jpg (1920x801, 234K)

an over the top tarantino film centered around bruce lee sounds way better than whatever the fuck this is

I know Pitt's character is probably Robert Redford, but who is Leo playing?

Tarantino didn't budget in the plastic surgery to the overall budget

Attached: 1546396522774.gif (480x270, 1.36M)

only if bruce lee is portrayed as a conman

What's this movie going to be about?
I hate hollywood, hopefully it isn't 90 minutes of wanking the jews

>So autistic he can't handle someone seeing a trailer and saying "that looks good"

crazydaysandnights.net/2018/04/todays-blind-items-fading-superstar.html

Attached: brucelee.jpg (845x900, 84K)

It was called Kill Bill