US
Attached: screenshot-www.rottentomatoes.com-2019.03.19-19-33-53.png (952x175, 25K)
US
>Joey uses a thesaurus to write a letter" The Review
"anything for a laugh", he thinks this will get him attention
Absolute piffle.
Clearly whoever uploaded this to the site accidentally missed a line or six
>monody of genre
>monotony of tone
>in the name of specious homogenity
Kek
I saw this episode 2 weeks ago.
Lotta buzzwords my dude.
That's not a run on.
Indubitably. His loquacious verbosity cannot save him from his reprehensible grammar skills.
It's like he's trying to be Armond White but fails miserably.
this writing style was on purpose if you don't see why then you are a brainlet
*grammatical
Idiot
Only Indubitably, loquacious and verbosity are bad words to use in that sentence. "Reprehensible grammar skills" is fine.
it's not even a run-on, his style of writing is retarded but you're just a brainlet
Glib Facsimile.
"Grammatical skills" aren't a thing moron
Fuck off Nigel
Yanks BTFO by based Brits yet again
F
gone too soon.
A review like this isn't meant for audiences, it meant to help the author gain clout with other critics.
I thought I was following along for a few words but by the end I realized I was lost.
I don't understand what's being said here but fuck niggers
Now THIS is a smart people review
Only big brained individuals appreciate that level of frankness.
Based
the best part is you can't read the rest of the review unless you pay for a subscription to the Financial Times.
>nigs chimp out when they see the perfect streak of fresh reviews ruined
>chimp out harder they try to read the blurb and it hurts their monkey brain
Those aren't buzzwords, retard. That's purple prose.
this guy has sex
wew
It took awhile to find it glad you like it
Pretty sure this is a Spinal Tap reference you guys. Look it up, zoomers.
Looks good to me
This vapid review seems such as so forth the dividend of the previous film's banal excrement and increment, aspirational finality the new kinography's empirical setting of livelihood and drawling physiology in standing of a poopy.
zizek?
Ergo, concordantly, vis-a-vis, ipso facto, and so on
yes, poopy... indeed sir
Goddam masterpiece.
Quaint and proper (you)'s. Alas, I forgo such indicative indignation as is criterion of said retorts.