> b-but low review scores are because of trolls
b-but low review scores are because of trolls
Jason Morales
Alexander Davis
Yes they are? The audience score was at 36% at times. It is now 62%. Which means a vast majority like the film. As opposed to what the incels in here would have you believe.
Ryder Martinez
>vast majority
>62%
Jason Brooks
>12% is a vast majority
My fucking sides.
Noah Russell
>vast majority
>62%
>after forcefully deleting bad user scores
>with 99% of the reviewers on payroll
Michael Lee
Just stop using RT.
Jeremiah Rodriguez
50% is exactly half. 62% is 24% more than half. Which means it is a vast majority.
Austin James
>62% is 24% more than half
I don't have a reaction image for this level of brainletism.
Brandon Russell
>62+24=50
Sure.
Jackson Carter
0.62 = 0.5 *1.24
thus:
62% is 24% more than half
>not even catching the drift
The absolute, total, final, terminal state of burger education.
Grayson Morris
>*1.24
>(You)
Nolan Turner
>calculating a percentage of a percentage
That's not how difference works.
Brayden Phillips
Bait
David James
>The absolute, total, final, terminal state of burger education.
Says the guy that calculates a percentage of a percentage as if it was the row number.
You have serious cognitive issues if you think even for a second that you're right.
Christian Torres
Sure, so if a movie has a score of 90% it means that likes are 180% more.
So instead of being 90%/10% it now is 180%/20%. Oh look, we can simplify and it becomes 90%/10%.
What an amazing magic the relative percentage of a percentage.
Joseph Green
>doesn't understand the principle that percentage calculus is fundamentally multiplication and XX% of Y is Y * 1.XX
A percentage is still an amount
>percentage of percentage
by induction is still an amount.
"Half of something" is X. 24% more than X is X*1.24. You SERIOUSLY fail to grasp that?
Brainlet
Quite correct, 90% is 180% of 50%.
Adrian Cooper
>A percentage is still an amount
Sure, an amount of a percentage. See What you did makes no sense. It only makes sense because you're suspending the meaning of a percentage while applying the same abstraction for a second time.
Please stop shaming yourself user. You're not helping your case.
Not only that, but it's the opposite. If you take out 6% of the total from negative reviews and you move them to positive reviews, you end up with a 12% difference.
So in reality you just need 6% of the total from the positive reviews and make them negative to end up with 50/50.
Your 24% is just retarded since the real difference is made by 6% of the total.
Nathan Martin
>What you did makes no sense. It only makes sense because you're suspending the meaning of a percentage while applying the same abstraction for a second time.
So we have established that you have never heard, nor grasp the concept of compound interest.
Stopped reading there desu.
Luis Diaz
>Pulls out a concept that has nothing to do with what we are talking about
Definition of grasping at straws.
Are you still here?
Aiden Lee
That's a yikes from me
Noah Brown
>Stopped reading there desu.
You forgot to add "XD"
Josiah Hall
It's more like 6% since the 2 sides are complementary percentages. Look up the definition
Hudson Phillips
That's a mighty big straw at that and i am talking girth. But you wouldn't know.
Ethan White
Serious question: why do you people use review sites? Can you not form an opinion about a movie on your own?
Grayson Green
>62% is 24% more than half.
Noah Torres
thats got to be the most kike way of interpreting the stats I've ever seen. you aren't wrong, 62 is a 24% increase from 50, but on the 100% scale its only 12% more than 50.
James Robinson
honestly I admire you committing to this bit, when I post bait I never put the effort into writing paragraphs where I double down on the bait
David Russell
At this point reviews are irrelevant, all that matters for marvel these next few weeks are the box office sales.
John Smith
>you aren't wrong
Only relevant part. I shit on every word of the rest.
>i go fishing but never with more than 1m line