What the fuck is Tarantino thinking when he does this effect?
What the fuck is Tarantino thinking when he does this effect?
Other urls found in this thread:
For me its Mr. Blue
>just like the old movies!
Uno Farto 3:17
He’s thinking “fuuuuuck this is some GOOOOD COKE”
He's thinking that he is going to reveal to everyone that he is a bad director and his only talent is at writing overly clever, quippy dialogue.
>IM DIRECTING
>What the fuck is Tarantino thinking
BIG
BLACK
DICK
that it doesn't look like ass
based and bluepilled
>overly clever, quippy dialogue
post examples
"le 70s pop culture reference"
That's it.
epicly memed, my good sir!
I like split diopter shots in film ,how else your gonna get both actors in focus? yes trantula doesn't know how to use it properly
He didn't go to film school, he went to films
Why didn't they all just run away instead of jerking each other off in the warehouse
he was thinking "I'm creating effective shots that not only paid homage to my favorite DePalma films but give the torture scene a heightened/distorted sense of reality."
couldnt get more kino than split diopter shots
feet
Why am I supposed to not like this exactly? It just looks like a normal movie scene.
I love Tarantino because he knows that you (the audience) are smart enough to know you're watching a film. So he plays with that. He's Brechtian in nature and that's why you and everyone on earth loves the living shit out of him. Filmmakers now a days are such huge pussies that think the audiences are retarded so they make films with no personality so as "to no intrude on the experience". Would u rather have Virgin Villeneuve or the Chad Tarantino?
How is this diopter thing something anyone even notices? It sounds like the only thing that happens with a scene like that is that there's slightly more visual detail because there's more focus? I wouldn't botice either way.
>those split diopter shots in blowout
MMMMMMMM NOW THATS KINO
is see them every time
lol Blowout is a shit film but i stand by my point that split diopter is the way to go
I see*
Hey hey HEY, don't talk shit about blowout my dude, bodydouble is the best depalma but blowout is great too
best depalma film is Carrie by far :)
Carrie is fine, but early Depalma? Obsession is clearly superior.
Are you just a film student who was taught to pay attention to tiny visual quality details like that? I wouldn't notice at all, it doesn't change the plot or anything.
havent seen obsession... gotta get on tha
The NEW TARANTINO TRAILER IS OUT
youtube.com
not that guy but it's pretty fucking obvious
no I just have a basic enough knowledge of how cameras work that it's usually pretty obvious when the fore and background are both in focus
Removes immersion for me quicker than when a character looks directly into the camera.
You are all fucking stupid. He is using split diopter to show to things hapnneing at the same time. It's impossible to get this kind of shot on color film camera without split diopter, that's why he is using it.
Redpill me on what split diopter is
there's this website called google.com
At least you can talk
>split diopter
meme diopter
it's similar to gay sex
You would know, you fucking faggot.
yeah i fucked your dad
me too. small world
>youtube.com
this seems incredibly uninteresting desu
Wow, he genuinely improved with the usage of diopter "technique"(?). Had no idea it was used in The Hateful Eight, but in Reservoid Dogs it's nothing short of distracting.
Why would anyone notice the degree of focus when looking at something? That seems like such a weird thing to notice unless a lack of focus is blurry enough to where you can't tell what you're looking at.
hows your visual acuity?
mines pretty fucked but still, things like this are pretty apparent.
do you usually pick up on details while watching film. do you usually look at the framing for example, do you look at the backgrounds?
have you played around with camera lenses before?
I find it hard to believe that people don't pick up on things like this
Its when you blur all the areas that aren't being focused on