Realising bale and jake gyllenhaal didn't get nominations for nightcrawler or American Psycho

>realising bale and jake gyllenhaal didn't get nominations for nightcrawler or American Psycho
How can you take the academy seriously after thinking about that?

Attached: 1522290914792.png (420x420, 267K)

>realising /ourguy/ bale only won 1 oscar
and people still take the academy seriously

Attached: 1544734785412.png (400x416, 41K)

Maybe the academy doesn't like psychopaths. Maybe it hits too close to home.

Or maybe the producers didn't pay the academy to nominate them unlike everyone else

Gyllenhaal gets screwed on every single masterpiece that he is involved, it doesn't even hurt at this point

Dubs don't lie

Attached: Dubs Runner 2044.jpg (762x600, 253K)

Why don't people take the golden globes more seriously then the oscars
Even they were smart enough to nominate Jake

based and redpilled
The golden globes are also more entertaining and don't just nominate utter trash

Attached: 4hstnsawus2y.jpg (700x573, 51K)

you think THAT's bad?
>Leone, Lynch, PTA, Fellini, Godard, DePalma and Cronenberg (among plenty of others) have never won an Oscar
>Kubrick only has one (for special effects in 2001)
>Scorsese only has one (for one of his weakest films)
>Iñarritu has 3
>Del Toro has 2
and I'm not even mentioning the ridiculous acting picks, best movie winners, etc

They don't. They've been jewified for decades.

gyllenhaal is a jew himself, why would they do their own boy like that?

Agenda is more important than appeasing one of your own. Big picture.

because the producers of nightcrawler didn't pay the academy for a nom

Fuck off frogposter.

I can't believe Kubrick didn't even get nominated for Best Director for The Shining
That's some of the best direction Iv'e ever seen

ribbit

Attached: 1523564810203.png (469x452, 277K)

Wanna hear a bigger joke? For The Shining, Kubrick was nominated for worst director award at the Razzies.

Razzies = Pleb Filtered
The Oscars = Ultra Plebs

>PSH, wahkeen and Amy Adams all got snubbed
Absolutely faggotry.

Attached: waahhkkeeen.png (1367x768, 1.34M)

the shining was garbage tho, so that makes sense.

Shit bait

waisted dubs

OSCARS ARE NOT GIVEN FOR ACTORS/DIRECTOR/WHOEVER BEST WORK IN HIS CAREER, THEY ARE MERELY GIVEN TO THE BEST ACTOR/DIRECTOR/WHATEVER OF THAT YEAR

LEO WON HIS OSCAR FOR THE REVENANT NOT BECAUSE THAT'S HIS BEST PERFORMANCE, BUT SIMPLY BECAUSE THAT WAS THE BEST PERFORMANCE OF THAT UTTERLY SHITTY YEAR FOR MALE LEADS

>tfw amy adams didn't get an oscar for vice

Attached: cbb.jpg (680x818, 65K)

So was Snyder.

>realising people take the academy seriously after all of these snubs

Attached: MC Ride Autistic Screeching.jpg (480x360, 33K)

Snyder is a hack though

Yeah... like Kubrick. You'll grow up someday and realize his genius.

I don't remember Kubrick making manchild capeshit and zombie flicks

Like I said, you'll grow up someday.

>Believing the Oscars were ever meritocratic in the first place
ishygddt

Attached: 1551309797444.png (441x516, 150K)

Things were going fine until Slumdog Millionaire won Best Picture and everybody was confused. Then everything kept getting worse and here we are today, living in an era where Black Panther gets 7 noms (including BP).

How can you take the academy seriously in the first place?

I thought it was when that one actress used her speech to attack Israel way back.

Who?

Edward Norton didn't get his Oscar for Primal Fear and instead they gave it to a nigger just because he "was around for a while"

the Oscars are a pathetic attempt to make a competition out of art creation
movies and actors shouldn't compete among themselves, and spectators shouldn't regard the nominees as potential winners or losers
the Cannes Festival is a far better movie event, aknowledging substantial efforts and contributions to cinema, without stimulating competition. There may be one, a handful or no winners at all in one year.

Huh? Never heard of this one.