Did he do it?

Did he do it?

Attached: 1560661_orig.jpg (960x540, 36K)

he did
the movie just tries to ease the viewer into thinking he didn't, visualizing the mental delusion that Mats uses on himself as well

haha le EPIC troll guys! pranked them good haha

I saw Mads at a bar in Copenhagen yesterday. I told him how cool it was to meet him in person, but I didn’t want to be a douche and bother him and ask him for an explanation of The Hunt or anything.
He said, “Oh, like you’re doing now?”
I was taken aback, and all I could say was “Huh?” but he kept cutting me off and going “my character was a child molester” and thrusting his crotch in front of my face.

Yes it’s obvious he did.

That’s the twist of film.

Initially you’re meant to sympathy with him being falsely accused but as story goes in it become clear he did do it.

Clever way of putting you in perspective of a remorseful pedo.

At the end of the film is symbolic for the guilt and shame he still has.

(You)

goin b real
kno 2 sister that sleep w their father
older sister still butthurt
young sister became a bigger slut
They both fuck their cousins but
from what i heard female can do whatever
Like a underage chick hangout 4 "attention"

Even IF he didn't (which he did) it's better to keep our kids safe and lock him up just in case. You mistrust strangers who want to dress as a chick and go into the bathroom to peep at your girls more than a class of kids who accuse him of molesting them.
I liked the end credits scene where you hear footsteps and a chain being pulled, and he's in his secret basement.

This so much, we should lock up every straight white male on the planet just in case.

You should have to be accused first at least, and by a kid, otherwise you stupid women would say "well he abused me!" and nobody would be safe.

Women were kids once. I don't see why they shouldn't be able to accuse men of pedophilia if they wanted.

Eat all those people? Yes

Any movies about living in the shadow of your younger brother?

Attached: lars mikkelsen.jpg (620x349, 31K)

This so much, when a kid says that his friend Tommy is stupid Tommy should be hanged in the city centre of that day.

pedophilia isn't against the law

This movie is so.y horror.

This.
You should also ask the kids leading yes/no questions for proof.

I don't think the 'lent makes you a molester. That's a fear only incels know.

He didn’t, it’s just a movie mate

>horror
This is your brain on buzzwords

It is now, incel.

>horror is now a buzzword

It's literally Lolita but from the angle of being exposed.
Mads tries to reason to the audience that his actions were nothing more than that of a normal teacher, he thinks it's normal to give encouragement to children in physical form.
The reason his son is the only one to stand by him is because he instilled the same dogmatic thinking that he himself abides by into him. This is apparent, because if the son had nothing but the fathers words to go by, he'd at least be suspicious, but no. He defends him like a man defends his faith.
What we see at the end is very emblematic, it's Mads' ascent to the realization that everything he thought was right, has been anything but. It is Mads' super ego shooting at him from the hill. After all, the name Lucas means in biblical terms "The bringer of light" and as it happens, the shadowy character is perfectly behind the sunrise. His own illuminated self is shooting at his former self, trying to remind his soul that the road he has walked has been covered in thorns and that it's time to change course.
I admit, the subtext can be a little heavy, repeated viewings might be necessary to really absorb everything Vinterbeg was trying to convey.

It's a buzzword when you throw it at anything.
You'll be calling war films "le soi horror" soon aswell

haha le EPIC troll guys! pranked them good haha

But why did Marcus try to shoot him at the end? Because remember, the other hunters were on lower ground and going in another direction, only Marcus knew where his dad was

based retard

he was aiming at God

this pasta never fails to amuse me.

Let me guess, you thought Sucker Punch was about female exploitation?
It wasn't Marcus at the end, it was Lucas' super ego, his moral self. As to why was it during the hunt that his soul cleansing began, I can't answer, I'm still trying to figure that out. Obviously that's the crux of the film as the title suggests The Hunt is pivotal. I juggled with the possibility of it signifying the hunt that predators partake in, and now that he himself had been in the role of a prey, he understood that what he did was preying on innocents, just like when he himself thought he was innocent.

lmao guys he's doing the crazy epic le trolling guys! haha so funny

t. too dumb to understand a simple movie

He was kino as notPutin in House of Cards. Also in 1864, though that was a smaller role

>interpreting things that aren't there
>assuming: the post
>tries to sound smart while exposing himself as a retard
yep. that's a Yea Forums poster

LE EPIK SWITChEeeRoooo!!! Thanks for the silver stramger Rolfff!!!

Watching the film as is, isn't wrong, but calling someone a retard for thinking about a film just exposes yourself as one. The shooter at the end can be no other than Lucas' himself, and because he's standing downhill, it can't be nothing else but a abstract projection.

Read a single Vinterberg interview and all your le epic headcanon baiting becomes worthless

There's "head canon" which is making up your own shit, and then there's interpretations which is what art is for. All foreign movies leave things vague because they don't like to write concrete stories

Again, your headcanon baiting is worthless if you just read a single Vinterberg interview about the film.
The entire script is based on actual false allegation cases, there is no "vague" interpretation there

Ah, so we're bringing outside influence that has nothing to with the film into the equation? So I should probably read Clarke's book to understand 2001 perfectly? I should follow Cosmatos completely to really read between the lines of BTBR?
Use your brain, don't delegate the thinking to other forms of media.

or it's just a guy that thinks he is a pedo? showing that just because his buddy and inner friend circle now believe him the general public still does not? you know, just like in real life? not every movie is some sort of very deep artpiece. and yes, someone interpreting and litteraly making stuff up without evidence to back his theory up is a retard who thinks himself as an intellectual film critic.

Attached: 1552546841371.gif (746x479, 196K)

>movie literally ends with his conscience finally coming to haunt him and him no longer being able to deny what he did despite getting away with it
Lmao I bet the people who think he was innocent wlso didn't realize K was dead at the end of BR2049

Attached: 1487338171272.jpg (800x800, 135K)

There's absolutely nothing in the film even remotely implying that he actually did it, from first to last frame. It literally makes sure to let the viewer know that he didn't do it in countless ways.
I know you're baiting but someone might believe your stupidity

Attached: look into my eyes.webm (1920x816, 2.99M)

So why does he get shot then?

Because once you get accused of such a thing, some people will think you did it no matter what.

The director didn’t choose to make the shooter look ambiguous so the viewer has to "figure it out", he made him look ambiguous because the shooter could've been anybody.
What matters is that no matter how much evidence he has and what the trial outcome is, there will be always someone who believes that he actually did it.

The movie shows how the "innocent until proven guilty" system sadly works only in court, not in the society itself.
Today a simple "user on trial for sexual assault" newspaper headline is enough for literally everyone to be convinced that you actually did it and that you need to be hanged in public, the evidence or the outcome of the trial doesn't matter at all at that point, your whole social and work life is fucked for good no matter what you do anymore.
False allegations are a scary thing.

He was innocent like the muslims in Christchurch

A class of kids describing his secret rape cave that is invisible to police?

It's the same as the inspector shoving answers in Klara's mouth, kids are extremely mentally malleable, which the film shows aswell. Inspectors talking about white goos coming out of penises, parents repeatedly telling to the kids that they were indeed abused even though the kid says multiple times that literally nothing happened etc. One parent starts talking about some basement and spreads it to others like wildfire and so on.

The kid did nothing wrong except for not being aware of the severity of her lie, the real culprit is that fat fucking inspector guy who shoved answers in her mouth, her brother's friend for exposing her with hardcore pornography at the young age, her parents for actually convincing her that he actually abused (her cunt mother especially) even though she repeatedly says he didn’t actually do anything, all the locals panicking and making up stories so everyone is somehow been abused etc etc

Interpreting what's happening is making stuff up? No, it's making stuff make sense. Also, no evidence? I've just explained my reasoning for my view.
The film is strictly from his POV, how would you feel if someone accused you of something immoral when you feel it was moral? I found his reaction to the attacks on his morals to be quite realistic.
Yeah, that's one interpretation of the film, and not a bad one. It just left a dissatisfying taste in my mouth.

>The film is strictly from his POV
No it isn't, why are you lying? There are numerous scenes in the film without Lucas in the scene at all, or people watching Lucas from the distance. You get to see how Klara get's exposed to hardcore pornography in her home without Lucas being there, you see the fat inspector shoving answers without Lucas being there, you see Klara's cunt mom convincing Klara that she was abused even though Klara says multiple times that it didn't happen, countless examples just like that.

Literally every single scene is making sure to let the viewer know that he didn't do anything wrong.
Also go watch Festen

I worded that a little shabbily, I meant he is the only POV character in the film, it all circles around him. The scenes you brought up, Lucas' approximation of what happened between the parties that made them blow his actions out of proportion. He sees nothing wrong with what he did, the girl now afraid that Lucas will suffer because of what he did to her and in her mind, he didn't cross the boundaries which is why she starts backing up on her words. Again, Lucas fondled Klara, Klara being infatuated with him, didn't mind. When Lucas rejected her "marriage proposal" she sought revenge and said he touched her. When Klara saw what damage she had caused, she tried to fix it by saying it didn't happen, because she still has that infatuation towards him and doesn't like seeing the whole town against him.
Lolita with a more subtle injection of the relationship the two have and at the end the corrupted father instead of shooting his moral self "Quilty", the moral self shoots him.

Yes, like all women are whores, all men are rapists. A key to a door

>When Lucas rejected her "marriage proposal" she sought revenge and said he touched her
Why are you still lying? Klara tried to kiss Lucas while standard kindergarted playtime and Lucas literally immediately tells her that it's wrong and that she must not do that. She get's angry at him and then says the first bad thing that comes to mind to her, which is a hard erect cock that she was forced to see on a tablet the day before.

Again, watch Festen, the previous Vinterberg film. Lolita has absolutely nothing with it

Did Michael do it?

You're all a worthy sacrifice to be rid of anyone that thinks that Lucas was guilty in any capacity.

Attached: 1285385666280.jpg (396x360, 26K)

Why is no-one in this thread vilifying Klara’s cunt mother?

>ctrl + f "cunt"
>3 results
Already done

>you're a cunt if you want to keep your daughter safe
isn't this what the whole ultimate cuckold thing is about? not wanting your daughter to be a slut?

But the opposite happens in the film, Klara repeatedly says to her mom that nothing actually happened and het cunt mom repeatedly says "no Klara, you are a slut and you fondled with Lucas many times over, that's what happened and how it is no matter what"

She planted falsehoods in her daughters mind, that’s not keeping her safe - that’s letting her practice destructive behaviour that ruined Madd character’s life.

Not sure why you’re referring to cucks, clearly you’ve got something on your mind.