Aragorn ruled wisely and well... Yes, but what was his tax policy

What is the tax policy of the shitty fantasy world he created? Political relationships in his shitty universe are a joke

Presumably Aragorn would draw taxes from the movement of goods into and out of his cities, from the produce and production of his own personal lands and any traditional tithes/gifts/dedications from his lords including the raising of troops

Based

The Night King will definitely have expanded lore and motivations in the book, but I don't see how they're going to pull that off in the show in only 6 episodes.

>proceeds to write his own fantasy series for over 20 years, putting significantly more detail into incest than taxation, local economies or any kind of legislative policy and who’s main villain is evil because he’s evil
>Heh

Will you incels ever get over this. Its been like 15 years

>"I don't understand fantasy." - One of the most successful fantasy writers of the modern day

Also Gondor prospers under Aragorn because he's not some paranoid, grief stricken recluse who acts out of fear and clings desperately to ideals that no longer suit the time he's in. Denethor would be a great peacetime leader but by the time RotK happens he's so sunk under it all he's absolutely inept in his decision making.

Aragorn has real world experience as a leader, a warrior, a representative for the Dunedain.

Gondor prospers under Aragorn because not only is their biggest threat and enemy vanquished, but because he's a better leader - regardless of his tax policy or moral standing. It's almost like Martin didn't read the books.

this
aragorn was basically the obama of middle earth

More like Trump.

you gotta be stupid to not understand his point

rulers have real problems. what on earth were aragorn's problems?

it feels like every place is as idyllic as the shire, which makes the shire not special

Does he ever explain what the Lannister’s tax policy is? I know he says something super retarded like they’re rich because they have a gold mine.

>I don't see how they're going to pull that off in the show in only 6 episodes.
Isn't one episode enough to develop a character?

But that's not what that particular story was about. It was about him regaining his power, not about how he reigned after that.
Just like a story about how someone reigned isn't about how he got to power.

Why do tolkientards get so mad just because they can't refute him?

But the story was in no way at all about him rulling

lol
and these people call us snowflakes

isn't even worse than that?
i thought we deduced that he's just like the end result of this magical mechanism that the children of the forest created to kick the first men off their land but lost all control of eventually
he's literally just this fantasy version of a robot, and about half as interesting

I don't get what either of you are implying. Who the fuck is they and who is us?

>I don't get what either of you are implying.
dumb trump support cant read between the lines, why am i not surprised

SAD!

you have a limited vocabulary just like your orange fuhrer

y-you too

The prequel «learn the true origin of the Long Night» kek

wrong. ice zombie king is a good guy. he is upset of being magically confined to one side of an ice wall. He has the best tax policy

He was just trying to be a fucking smart ass. Tolkien never outlined his agricultural developments either, whoopdie-fucking-doo, Martin you fat hack.