$800 mill in a week

>$800 mill in a week
Yea Forums BTFO

Attached: 1552847071588.jpg (1496x1093, 603K)

Not gonna lie, I expected a huge drop off after Friday. Consider me surprised.

shazam won't even make half that in its entire run
rip chadzam memes and another blow for Yea Forums

Based orsonposter

Yea Forums must enjoy being wrong to keep getting BTFO so consistently.

>another blow for Yea Forums
The Last Jedi got BTFO by Jumanji. Seeing that was still glorious to this day and the mad lads are doing it again this year. Kek.

*whips and naenaes on Shazamcucks*
EAT
THE
DISC

>Actually defending and shilling this movie. On Yea Forums of all places.
Reddit is in the other side buddy.

Attached: 1550687387510-v.jpg (590x590, 47K)

>n-n-no! stop! quit bullying meeee
get dabbed on little faggot

>Disney spends $500,000,000 of its own money to make it look like this movie was successful
hey whatever it takes amirite

>doubting the mouse

Attached: 1552257581980.jpg (1296x818, 398K)

because Endgame

They should teach you at middle school how to make a better comeback. Because it's as worthless as your exsistance.

paste and breadpitted

Attached: 1552841984638.png (1673x814, 502K)

what's it like knowing that even on this board, a place you come to as a safe space, you get blown the fuck out like everything else in life?

Attached: 1543179493487.webm (406x720, 2.84M)

>Because it's as worthless as your exsistance.
lmao careful with that edge, soi cuck

what is that webm from?

Big cringe for little incel

>thinking we're defending disney
>not thinking we're bullying incels
you chose this future

NNYYYEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!!

Attached: IMG_8273.jpg (291x344, 15K)

You guys working overtime since the NZ shit?

*spends billions buying out theatres*
Hu huh

Attached: Mickey.jpg (450x450, 48K)

>believing in conspiracy theories
you've never had sex before

>>$800 mill in a week
>Yea Forums BTFO
shit movie for consumers makes money
wow color me surprised.
it'll btfo Yea Forums when all of tv watches it and collectively wastes 10,000 man hours on that trash.

fuck off to pol, pol-fag

yeah dude Disney is lying to their share holders about the profits so they can anger a bunch of incels online

>Disney wouldn't prop up someone they already signed on to 6 other movies as the next face of the mcu

They paid her more than Chris Hemsworth for her first appearance and youtube changed it's algorithms to keep down negative reviews for no possible logical gain on their part.

Sneed's Feed and Seed

Formerly Chuck's

Yea Forums wastes more than that every day whining about movies it's never even seen, BTFOing itself more completely than a corporation ever could

INCELS SEETHING

Every website that you turds visit has to incel proof itself afterwards, color me surprised

*dabs on alt-right incels graves*

Attached: 1526118170318.jpg (686x751, 90K)

INCELS COPING

Christ, I can't even follow this abortion of an image.

based

Me in the cyan swim trunks

This.

Incels should be IP banned from the internet.

Incels ACTUALLY believe they are so important that a publically traded company would commit securities fraud just to make them angry

>youtube changed it's algorithms to keep down negative reviews for no possible logical gain on their part
I barely give a shit because YouTube's pretty awful these days, but part of what makes it shit is how openly and blatently right wing outrage channels are gaming the recommended video/autoplay section. If I watch a recipe or cooking video, there's no fucking reason I need to have a "Ben Shapiro absolutely DESTROYS a liberal!" recommendation. I use a VPN and I clean my history every time I close my browser, and aside from that I don't even fucking watch political videos. Yet there they fucking are, every time. If you don't think those same outrage mongers are farming the search algorithm for clicks on the latest "woe is white people" faggotry, you're out of your mind.

>somebody saying something negative about a woman
>they're doing it because they're from /pol/
>/pol/ is right-wing
>incels hate women. Reddit told me this
>incels from /pol/ hate this movie because there's a woman in it

Is this your logic?

Is this what you think?

Is it really?

Or do you just parrot what you hear from reddit. Like a mother bird vomiting into the mouth of its babies.

I don't think anyone doubted that this movie was going to make money. I think people said "It's a bad movie"

Marvel with an infinite amount of resources and money at its disposal attempted to make Captain Foot Fungus into an enjoyable movie, and it could barely scrape 80% on Rotten Tomatoes.

>Saying something negative
>Repeatedly, in several threads
>Organizing with others to crash online opinion platforms
>When efforts fail, spread conspiracy theory instead of accepting that your narrow POV has been rejected

You are literally seething at a movie and coming up with conspiracy theories because you thought it was "SJW"

Incel

>I don't think anyone doubted that this movie was going to make money. I think people said "It's a bad movie"
Lmao this damage control revisionism.

There were plenty of /pol/ incels screaming about how Captain Marvel was going to flop, and now that it hasn't, they've backtracked to "w-well we never said it wouldn't make money, j-just that its not a good movie"

>Saying something negative
>Repeatedly, in several threads
1. These people aren't one person
2. I'm waiting for you to explain why this is supposed to be bad

>Organizing with others to crash online opinion platforms
People weren't trying to "crash" Rotten Tomatoes

They were clicking a button that said "I don't want to see the movie"

Apparently this is what "review bombing" means.

What are you saying, that they were doing something disingenuous?
I don't know what they could do except make multiple accounts. Which if it were the case you would think some kind of evidence would have come out at this point.

>When efforts fail
I don't know what you think "failed" except for the number on Rotten Tomatoes not being lower
Which people are all but certain was manually altered

You will never pass and no one will care when you kill yourself.

^^^^^^ fuckign this

you coward nigger incels cant erase the past

>They were clicking a button that said "I don't want to see the movie"
>Apparently this is what "review bombing" means.
That's not what happened and that's not what reviewbombing means at all and you know it, you disingenuous little shit.

>You are literally
You are "literally" a crow-magnon that uses words without looking up what they mean.

Fuck off. Google $3 words before using them and trying to sound smart

>seething
Yes, I have a negative opinion about something.

If this is what "seething" means then I guess you can call me that.

I don't know what it's supposed to prove.

>coming up with conspiracy theories
What, that Rotten Tomatoes altered the score?

The user ratings went from 35% to 60% overnight. Literally overnight.
I guess it's a "conspiracy theory" because Rotten Tomatoes has not said verbatim that they altered it.

>Incel
Are you virgin-shaming?

Because I can just as easily tell you to go flap your roast beef on some other corner on the internet

Or are you saying "I'm an incel and I hate women because I'm insecure because I can't have sex with them". In which case the only rebuttal you're going to get is "Not everyone does things because they're insecure"

>People weren't trying to "crash" Rotten Tomatoes
Bullshit, a bunch of outraged pink skinned faggots heard Brie Larson "didn't want white dudes seeing her movie" and decided it was time for OMEGAS TO RISE UP

Efforts failed because Captain Marvel is still a success and all the tantrums on this and other sites proved to be impotent. Fucking capewar megafaggots, as usual, are ineffective compared to the mainstream movie watching audiences, who knew. The public doesn't even care about that shit, but clearly YouTube outrage mongers farmed you dumbasses for views, likes, and subscribes as usual.

Cunts never learn.

>That's not what happened and that's not what reviewbombing means at all and you know it, you disingenuous little shit.
What does it mean, and what did happen

Because no article has explained what was supposed to be happening and why it was bad

There's 2 buttons, and you can click one of them depending on your opinion
I don't know how somebody could use this badly, except for exploiting it to pretend that they're multiple people

now THIS is shitposting

>What, that Rotten Tomatoes altered the score?
No, your retarded conspiracy theory that Disney is buying tickets to their own movie.

Despite the fact that
A) there's no evidence for that
B) It would likely be considered fraud by the SEC if it wasn't represented on a balance sheet (which you are incapable of showing that it even is on Disney's 10Q)

It's a conspiracy theory for brainlets unable to admit they made a shitty prediction about box office numbers.

>Bullshit, a bunch of outraged pink skinned faggots heard Brie Larson "didn't want white dudes seeing her movie" and decided it was time for OMEGAS TO RISE UP
Yes, they "rose up" by clicking a button that says "I don't like the movie"

Why is this a bad thing?

Attached: Tom-Holland-Brie-Larson-meme3.jpg (1125x1116, 169K)

Attached: 1552870332164.png (936x1002, 55K)

I guess you don't know what literally means either because the ratings didn't get to 60% overnight.
on march 9th the score was 39% and it didn't get over 60% until march 13th. you can use the wayback machine to see for yourself

Because they hadn't seen the movie and their disagreement was based on falsehoods of a weak ideology. Their efforts to disparage the movie were clearly meant to cost the studio money. The effort, and its root cause, are both deceptive. It's weak fodder for weak minds. It's a poor trend for young men to focus on this shit. Playing innocent or coy about it now is pathetic.

They clicked "I don't like a movie" for a movie they haven't even seen. That is objectively reviewbombing and RottenTomatoes is right to remove it.

>No, your retarded conspiracy theory that Disney is buying tickets to their own movie.
I am not every other person that thought this was a bad movie.

I don't know about that, but I would completely believe it.
Both because it's Disney Corporation and because of the insecure roast beef flaps demanding that people like their capeshit

Alright so it wasn't literally overnight. Overnight it jumped up like 10% and within 4 days it was "The majority of people like this movie"

And I'm just going to point out that this is with the nebulous scoring system that they seem to change depending on the movie. What was that movie where someone ran some algorithms and objectively determined that they weren't counting the reviews that were half-a-star

i hate you all

Attached: 90s-pepe.jpg (651x656, 93K)

>I don't know about that, but I would completely believe it.
Yeah because you're a retard who doesn't know anything about publically traded companies or GAAP.

Please, show me where on Disney's F18 10K report that they have money allocated to "buying their own tickets"

>They clicked "I don't like a movie" for a movie they haven't even seen. That is objectively reviewbombing and RottenTomatoes is right to remove it.
It's for whether or not they want to see it.

>and their disagreement was based on falsehoods of a weak ideology.
"They're wrong"

I'm waiting for you to actually explain why.

>Their efforts to disparage the movie were clearly meant to cost the studio money.
Yes. The website for reviewing movies that is meant to tell people whether a movie is worth seeing is being used by people that think it isn't.

Why is this a bad thing?

>The effort, and its root cause, are both deceptive.
You don't know what "deceptive" means. They're saying "I don't like the movie", there's nothing disingenuous about it

>It's weak fodder for weak minds.
You don't know what "fodder" means.

If only I had a mind strong enough to appreciate Captain Marvel

>It's a poor trend for young men to focus on this shit.
I don't care.

No one cares.

This movie would have immediately left my brain if reddit and every female-led news outlet weren't insisting that it's important.

Attached: Captain Marvel message to tv.webm (640x480, 2.21M)

I said that I have no evidence one way or the other

I would just completely believe it if you told me it was true.
Me and everyone else doesn't trust Disney Corporation. They have a long and colorful history of fudging the truth and doing disingenuous things to bring in as much revenue as possible.

>this movie would've left my brain if reddit and every female-led news outlet weren't insisting that it's important
You just admitted to browsing reddit and caring what reddit thinks. Go the fuck back.

peak seethe

>I said that I have no evidence one way or the other
So its on the same tier as retarded conspiracy theories

>I would just completely believe it if you told me it was true.
So you believe things that confirm your prior views without evidence. Got it.

>incels hate women. Reddit told me this
incels told me this themselves, here, every singe day

>"reddit" hates women and is trying to disavow this movie because they hate women
Can you atleast try to make sense?

Attached: 1552519875164.gif (472x360, 2.18M)

>I'm waiting for you to actually explain why.
Because Brie Larson spoke about wanting to see more diverse critics for movies that have more diverse casting, and lying faggots on YouTube turned it into "BRIE LARSON HATES WHITE MEN AND DOESN'T WANT THEM TO SEE HER MOVIE."

Case closed. Literally nobody would bother going to "click a button" or start numerous threads or fill YouTube comment sections up with venom unless they believed something that simply wasn't true. The fact that you can't grasp that is very strange. I'll just have to assume you're pretending to be retarded.

>I don't care.
>No one cares.

But they do. Weeks and weeks of threads about this fucking movie about how Brie flat assed fungus monster who hated white men. Tons of threads crowing about the low audience score on RT, reposting clickbait articles from comic news sites nobody actually reads or visits, dumb shit like #AlitaChallenge. I'm glad you don't care. Good for you. It would be very unhealthy for you to fixate on this movie in that way.

>*dabs on all CM shitposters that were flooding the catalog*

You admitted that you wouldn't pay attention to this movie if it wasn't for reddit telling you it's important. That implies you browse reddit regularly enough to know what reddit thinks is important. You need to go the fuck back.

I believe in due process.
I just don't trust Disney. This doesn't make me believe things without evidence.

What is all but confirmed is the fact that Rotten Tomatoes removed thousands of negative reviews. It hasn't been proven by somebody just running Python scrips or something yet, but I await an article in 3 days review


Fratboys are misogynistic.

But I don't hear you using "fratboy" as an insult.
Probably because "fratboy" conjures an image of somebody with an active social life that has sex. And "incel" does not.

I'm putting on my thinking cap here, and I think you're degrading people for not having sex.
Apparently "sexism is bad" but a canned insult against your masculinity is a rebuttal.

Go back to r#ddit you fucking liberal tree hugging, whale saving, rainforest protecting, bleeding heart cuck bastard.

>tfw Justice League had better moments then the entirety of Captain Marvel.

Attached: 1518379809398.png (607x554, 230K)

>I believe in due process
No, you believe in things that confirm your prior view. You just stated that you'd be willing to believe Disney lied on their SEC filings despite there being no evidence for that.

Damn. China sure loves white people, huh.

Attached: autistic shrieking.jpg (125x125, 2K)

Blessed image.

It's quite possible captain marvel to make a billion even with China completely removed, though it will be very close if it does happen.

>Captain Marvel
>smiling

>Because Brie Larson spoke about wanting to see more diverse critics for movies
That is one such way that you can phrase what she said that can instantly absolve her of any kind of responsibility.

She said "I don't need a 40 year old white dude to tell me what did or didn't work for him about A Wrinkle In Time"

Anyone that actually used their brain to break down what she said (and this doesn't include her) understands the implications of this:

1. "Probably being some way because other people that look like you" doesn't mean "You absolutely are that way, and should be treated as such". This is called "racism"

2. You can watch a movie featuring people that don't look like you and still appreciate it.
I don't think Das Boot was "made for me". I can still appreciate artistic genuinity"

There are an infinite amount of interesting implications about a piece of art.

Her appreciation of cinema begins and ends at "There are people that look like me". Not everyone is this boring.

3. The movie had absolutely nothing to do with being black or a female
Nothing. The main character was a little black girl. Her mom was black, and her dad was white.

If she thinks it's about being black because the character is black, then that sounds like a prejudice based on race. Which sounds like racism.

This woman is a moron.

I said "I believe it is true"
I did not say "I am going to act like it is confirmed"

Do I need to write it on my dick and fuck you in the ass for you to understand it?

God damn. Google what "due process" means.

>Anyone that actually used their brain to break down what she said (and this doesn't include her) understands the implications of this:
She said "I don't," as in, she doesn't. She's saying she wants to hear more diverse critics about movies starring diverse casts. She doesn't say there needs to be LESS white men reviewing movies, and in fact very specifically said as much. So are you just retarded, or are you pretending?

Publications in general are not gonna have more than one people reviewing movies so more critics being minorities will automatically replace the white male ones

Unless it's just a bunch of literally who bloggers reviewing it which is already happening

>I said "I believe it is true"
You said
>I would just completely believe it if you told me it was true. Me and everyone else doesn't trust Disney corporation

Completely believing something just based on someone telling you that it's true without hard evidence because you WANT to believe it is not "due process". It is confirmation bias. You are too stupid to be aware of your own cognitive biases, apparently. You won't even acknowledge that this is a cognitive bias, which makes your opinion worth very little in my eyes.

>do I need to write it on my dick and fuck you in the ass for you to understand it?
Fag

>She said "I don't," as in, she doesn't. She's saying she wants to hear more diverse critics about movies starring diverse casts. She doesn't say there needs to be LESS white men reviewing movies, and in fact very specifically said as much.
Language is flexible.

That is one way to phrase what she said. Another way to phrase it is "Being white and a male is inherently bad"

AKA moronic racism.

But unlike some people, I don't wish for this woman's career to be destroyed. Nor do I hate her. I just think she is a moron with an infantile appreciation of cinema.

Does he have a boner?

>Completely believing something just based on someone telling you that it's true without hard evidence because you WANT to believe it is not "due process". It is confirmation bias. You are too stupid to be aware of your own cognitive biases, apparently. You won't even acknowledge that this is a cognitive bias, which makes your opinion worth very little in my eyes.
You are an idiot.
Please stop trying to use big words and official sounding language when you don't understand what "due process" means.
Or the scientific method.
Or really any kind of construct human beings have invented to deal with problems that is not just doing something because you feel like it.

I believe that the thing is true. I am not going to act like it is because I think it is

As hard as it might be for you to believe, not everyone is this self-serving and disingenuous

*tips fedora* arigato sensei

You admitted that you're willing to believe something is true without evidence because it confirms your preconceived belief. That is literally the definition of confirmation bias. Look it up.

And it is YOU who doesn't understand what "due process" means. If you said you believe a man is guilty during jury selection but it's okay because you're not going to act on that belief, you would be kicked off so fast it'd make your head spin. Are you literally 16?

Yes, she could in fact just want to hear more minority critics. Bloggers, starting their own websites, whatever the case may be, but she's interested in what they think. Is there some reason she wouldn't be allowed to state that?

>Language is flexible.
>That is one way to phrase what she said. Another way to phrase it is "Being white and a male is inherently bad"
Except she said:

Larson continued, “[Audiences] are not allowed enough chances to read public discourse on these films by the people that the films were made for. I do not need a 40-year-old white dude to tell me what didn’t work for him about ‘[A] Wrinkle in Time.’ It wasn’t made for him. I want to know what it meant to women of color, to biracial women, to teen women of color, to teens that are biracial.”

Any parsing of this quote to make it about hating white men is so stupid that it boggles the mind. You could say she has a narrow view of the media that audiences have access to, or that every movie is made for every person who sees it, but then you would be stripping away the nuances of film making and the experiences of the audience.

You have to seriously twist yourself into some kind of knot to get "white people are bad!" out of such extremely subjective and personal opinions though. When a movie comes out with a certain cast or about a certain subject, I absolutely want to know what certain people in certain demographics or professions think about it. That's not controversial in any way.

>Reddit is in the other side buddy.
There are incels on reddit too faggot.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO THIS CAN'T BE HAPPENING INCEL BROS

Attached: 1499391374563.png (394x360, 139K)

I've wasted an hour of my life in this thread

I don't care about any of the particulars, or Fedora T. Autismo up there arguing with the premise of due process

Here's just an unorganized list of reasonable statements and reality checks:

- This movie is crap
- This movie did not get "review bombed", people just thought it was crap
- This movie made a lot of money, yes. I guess this proved wrong all the people that thought it wouldn't. But I think a more interesting conversation is "Is this movie good"
- This movie isn't hated by "incels"
- This movie isn't hated by incels because it's a movie with a female lead
- Brie Larson is an idiot
- People do not hate Brie Larson because she said something negative about "white dudes", they hate her for the many valid reasons that exist to hate Brie Larson for

>lol there's a subreddit for it so it's emblematic of \reddit

You're like the tards that say "Go back to \reddit" when you see something alluding to Trump because of /r/The_Donald

/r/The_Donald exists entirely in spite of \reddit. \Reddit was so anti Donald Trump that a few people got so sick of it that it fused into this

If there's 2 things that \Reddit is against it's Donald Trump and incels

if people thought the movie was crap it would've dropped hard in its second weekend, instead it had a regular 54% drop (the MCU average is 53-54). It also had A Cinemascore
Certainly doesn't align with the reviews online

>big cringe
Is this really how m*llennials speak?

Being a millennial is all about being mentally 5, yes.
Why do you think they watch superhero movies?

>captain marvel post
>its about the Box office
why is this the only topic??? at least discuss the film

Attached: memed.jpg (300x300, 25K)

This level of COPE

I expected more details about Ronan

lmao