You Yea Forums Incels have no power in mainstream

Then you have nothing to fear

>i get trolled and then go around unironically spouting it
leftoids have absolutely lost their minds between Obama and Trump.

Is this even legal?

Attached: 1552714874467.jpg (1936x1936, 379K)

tree fitty

so that's why Trump was elected? you wanted more restrictions on the businesses he owns?

Someone explain this

This is what I find funny about the use of incel that's emerged. It an insult against a huge array of people from different backgrounds and with different political views. It also objectifies women, marking them as just achievements required for a man to be a man, and nothing more.

Nobody on Yea Forums who calls himself right-wing does, at most they support the breakup of mega corporations and removing regulations afterwards, and that's just libertarians, most of the national socialists support just shooting them all up.

>trump was elected for his economic views
lmao you stink of reddit faggotry

disney bot

No they don't. 1: Nobody on Yea Forums calls themselves a "rightist" because they're all liars and 2: they favor anarchocapitalism and always have because it always inevitably becomes oligarchy, which they've always been in favor of except when getting their literally fascist tweets shut down.

that guy is great at making money why else would you want him as president?

Libertardians are almost as gay as Progressives. Sensible regulations, particularly around fraud and anti-trust are where it's at. What the left has done with making excuses for corporations, especially with retards to freeze peach, is comical. Complete 180-degree and everybody who isn't a zoomer child knows it. The fucking "red scare" old kooks were right. Can't trust leftoids. At least we know what the greedy corporations want... money. Nothing is enough for deranged religion-tier "progressives", though.

Nobody on the left makes excuses for corporations. You literally don't know what the left is. Also, see what I said?

>"Well, ackshually, corporations are communism."

What you are calling the "left" are just rich white twitter whores who are all RIGHT wing. They are staunchly capitalist, anti-welfare, pro-war. They are the polar opposite quite literally of leftists. Far rightists are simply so fucking ape-brained they think that if anyone uses idpol to get attention on twitter that they're the next Joseph Stalin.

>b- b- b- freedom of speech protections dont apply to corporations
>constitutional protections on speech only means the govt can't shut down your speech.
Just a decade or so ago this was a common argument made by libertarians, which lefties would laugh in the face of because -they know- it may be technically accurate, but it's bullshit and isn't in keeping with the spirit of the law. Nobody who isn't an autist thinks that corporations should be able to use their power to squelch individuals speech or that that is how America works in practice. As soon as Obama got elected and then corporations started virtue signaling, lefties fell all over themselves to actually defend corporations banning speech and dismissing the 1st Amendment argument, which they never used to do. Total hypocrites.

HAVE
A
V
E

S
E
E
D

Economic policies weren't his only sell point retarded, I not even a trump supporter but I can recognize that.

So the audience score of 62% is accurate? Oof.

If the 90s ever had a legit, full, complete revival in popular culture, mainstreamer faggots like you would get eaten alive

Corporations pay pajeets working out of warehouses money for marketing purposes. Whether that be youtube views, subscribers, likes, twitter likes or other social media commentary.
You can buy a million views on youtube for less than $2000. That's how you shape public perception of your product.

Hell yeah corporate interests

>constitutional protections on speech only means the govt can't shut down your speech
Nigger, YOU don't believe in the 1st amendment, what the hell are you even talking about? 2 years ago you were dancing in the street that your senile yam was attacking every component of the first amendment. Now you're up in arms because PRIVATE businesses are shutting you down for using THEIR services. What do you propose? Nationalizing them?

Disney fears basement dwelling incels. It’s hilarious.

Sorry, i dont recall that. However, i suppose being senile is better than being paranoid and delusional.

is that what this phrase means? /pol/cels say it constantly but I've never known what it means

>Sorry, i dont recall that
Uh huh.

Attached: hwPPXck.jpg (2168x890, 168K)

The only power you have is to agree with multi-billion dollar corporations.

That's not much of a power.

If you were a superhero, you would be Captain Agree-With-The-People-Who-Have-Already-Won.

Not much of a power.

automatically calling anyone an incel for not jacking of to Larson isn't going to slow down this down

Attached: 1552794189269.png (822x712, 498K)

>What do you propose? Nationalizing them?
Social platforms are currently benefiting from regulations associated with being a public square in which people voice their opinions, while simultaneously operating as a public utility.

>The social platforms wants no responsibility for the content their users post? That's fine. Then they have no right to delete content that does not violate US or local law.
>The social platforms are willing to accept responsibility for the content their users upload, like every other website? That's fine too. Now they can delete anything they'd like.

See how that works? They can't claim to not be responsible for the users' content because it's a public square, while simultaneously shutting down people they don't agree with.

Attached: 1541861894795.jpg (326x294, 18K)

these (in)famous major internet platforms got where they got in part by being perceived by the public and legislators as 'common good' services and they generally reinforced that perception by taking a hands-off approach to speech and deferring to the actually law (observe and report like security guards). If they had made it clear they were going to do an about-face and start purging shit they dont like that falls far beneath the legal threshold for "yelling fire in a crowded theater", they never would have gotten as big as they got. They betrayed the public trust and will probably take the fall, with leftists blaming them for Trump and with the right holding them accountable for blatent double-standards in banning their pundits.

>Companies have the right to silence you, is their service after all
>These same companies have the power to influence and manipulate political discussion and there's proof that they do so, also proof that they silence dissenting opinion even though it is not agaisnt their terms of service
also this

Who the fuck cares about aggregate scores? People should just find a few reviewers they actually respect and leave it at that. Aggregation makes a turd look better than shit.

This is what will be the hilarious irony if and when the media giants start trying to repackage and sell the 90s back to us, like they've already been trying to do with this flick and a few others. The time was organic and wholly anti-establishment, and utterly driven by the music of the time. The only political angle the recording industry had back then was navigating censorship. As such you cant wrap it all up in some neat little streamlined biw for lefties or righties of today without looking utterly fake and poseurish. It worked with 80s nostalgia, because 80s shit was rooted in fairness. Won't be so easy moving forward.

>Social platforms are currently benefiting from regulations associated with being a public square in which people voice their opinions, while simultaneously operating as a public utility.
So is that a yes?

>See how that works? They can't claim to not be responsible for the users' content because it's a public square, while simultaneously shutting down people they don't agree with.
So is that a yes?

>4 replies in less than 15 minutes
Struck a nerve.

>fairness
FAKEness, rather.

>I not even a trump supporter but I support trump

cosmicbook.news/captain-marvel-tuesday-box-office

>So is that a yes?
How fucking retarded are you?

I laid out two options for the social platforms. The same options that politicians have laid on the table.

Either they choose to take responsibility for the users content, and thereby continue to delete content they don't personally agree with. Or they choose to continue to act as a public square, and thereby revoking their right to delete content that does not violate the law.

Attached: 1388311321992.jpg (237x229, 18K)

Glad more and more people are paying attention to this and recognize what the fuck happened.

only one of those is me. see what i mean about paranoia? so sad watching whats happened to you lefties.

t. NPC

orange man bad, is that right?

>singlehandedly took down the want to see rating
>79% - 62% scores even after a large portion of negative reviews were deleted
>disney bought out their own theaters and inflated the opening
>the movie still hasnt broke even and probably didnt even make it past $100m

I mean you cant refute this, and apparently they've even admitted to paying off critics you groteque unholy disgusting unlovable creature.

>You Yea Forums Incels have no power in mainstream.

Attached: lead_720_405.jpg (720x405, 42K)

>Say something that triggers zoomers
>400 replies in a minute
>OMG how dare you not know which one was me!! This means you have trump derangement syndrome!!
Lol fag.

He is though.

So we should regulate corporations more, is what you're saying? I firmly agree. Let's get started by enforcing anti-trust law.

Attached: 55f.png (412x691, 268K)

>If incels have no power then why do they live in your head rent free?

they're living on this board rent free, i wish they'd just go away

LIES!!!!!!

Disney lapdog sand niggers false positive rotten tomatoes. Media doesn't report that but continued to call dissenters trolls. Sticking to their agreed talking points

>I'm STILL getting (You)s
Yes, it really is this easy to trigger low IQ zoomer peasants.

Attached: 1458181779321.gif (500x281, 995K)

Absolutely. The outer elements of both left and right can firmly agree that the US is no longer a democracy, but ran by corporatism.

The issue lies with neocon brainlets on the right who defend corporatist talking points because the TV told them that any anti-corporation talk is communism, and brainlets on the left who defend corporatist talking points because the corporations are peddling their social justice nonsense.

The root of the problem is legalized corruption. The first solution to ending this bullshit is through campaign finance law and the illegalization of PACs.

It's actually in the '30s but you can't leave a negative review only positives are excepted

>and brainlets on the left who defend corporatist talking points because the corporations are peddling their social justice nonsense
That is NOT the left, for the last fucking time. You literally don't know what the left wing of politics even is if you think fucking democrats and donut twitter are "left". Performance identity politics are aren't left OR rightwing. They're blatant attention whoring. It's literally not even related to politics. It's just a masquerade.

>You literally don't know what the left wing of politics even is

I think you need to put your glasses on and re-read the post.

>STILL getting (You)s
This is absolutely not nothing to brag about, you sad cunt. You are are also giving (You)s. You are absolutely pathetic.

Attached: lolol.jpg (1535x2105, 456K)

>brainlets on the left who defend corporatist talking points
I'm pretty sure I read it fine. Literally not one leftwing individual in creation is defending the EXISTENCE of corporations, let alone any of their propaganda. Leftwing does not mean "talking about brown people and women".

>I'M NOT MAD! YOU'RE MAD!!!
Lol

They just want to play off of the "remember this?", they wouldn't know how to repackage it other than through references of just things that existed 20-30 years ago. They always kind of want a generic formula they can replicate to churn out money making media, and they have kind of found that with capeshit.

Their biggest problem is just they are becoming so creatively bankrupt that they have to reboot and make sequels for so many things that were popular before in hopes that they can replicate that past success. This is why is shocks me that anyone, as a consumer, can really back corporate interests when they are the ones sucking the life out of movies, music or any kind of thing they can monetize that could be considered art.

>this is absolutely something to brag aboute
learn english

I'll spell it out for you, then.

The word "left" does not equal "left wing". It's a very broad term.

That's literally what it means.

Are you fucking serious? The right/left paradigm exists outside of National Socialism and Communism.
When the media talks about right/left fiscal or social policies, they aren't referencing the far elements of either ideology. Right means closer to center. Left means closer to center. When you start adding wings, it's because you're getting into the extreme. It's in the fucking word.

I genuinely can't understand how you believe "left" means "left-wing" and "right" means "right-wing". Is that why so many brainlets walk around thinking that anyone who believes even the mildest form of center/right social policy is an actual nazi?

>they werent -true- leftists
nice fallacy you got there. you 'progressive' people are looking more and more like a religion every day as you grow more and more insane at the world not turning out the way you said it would.

Attached: Logical Fallacy 17 - No True Scotsman.png (879x559, 282K)

Captain fungus

So, Americans? I love that country but why does it's politics seem so retarded?

>call a hummingbird Scottish
>That's not a scot-
>NO TRUE SCOTSMAN! NO TRUE SCOTSMAN!!!
They're not leftist at all. Tell me one of their policy positions that is leftwing.

Because the country is full of retards.

right wing
/ˈˌrīt ˈˌwiNG/
noun
1.
the conservative section of a political party or system.

left wing
/ˈlef(t) ˈˌwiNG/Submit
noun
1.
the liberal section of a political party or system.

Why do you think it only involveds the extremists?

Because you have to be some fucked up entertainer-politician hybrid to win here.

Truth

I have to revert you back to You really need a fucking dictionary, or some book about political ideologies, since you seem to live in a world where there are only two stances; right and left. And within those two stances lies a unified vision of how the world should work.

Would you lump National Socialism in with Libertarianism? Because in the end, Communism is more likely to be compatiable with National Socialism than Libertarianism is. Despite the two first being part of the right-wing.

It's literally laid right before your eyes. You even copied it. Do you not understand english?

Does anyone know why it says estimated? Did they not get the numbers?

Attached: adsf4DfeTEte4556Mbh.png (624x712, 36K)

I got my dick blown off in Iraq by an IED while fighting for jew's freedom, so please don't tell me to have sex, or call me an incel. That is an antisemitic canard.

>the liberal section
Clearly this was from an American dictionary. Liberalism is a rightwing philosophy. That's why stupid youtubers are always "correcting" everyone that they are "ackshually classical liberals". Both democrats AND republicans are liberals. They believe in individualism and self-governance, despite anything actual right wing fascists try to scream about nanny states, the democrats block anything of the sort whenever they're able.

The mistake you've made was thinking that liberal means anything other than rightwing. It doesn't. The sooner you internalize that reality, the better off you'll be understanding politics from the perspective of reality rather than propaganda.

>Would you lump National Socialism in with Libertarianism?
Oh and btw yes. It's not coincidence that all those insufferable libertarians all transformed into frothing neonazis as soon as trump got appointed. Must be all coincidence. The thing they have in common is capitalism. Capitalism is ALWAYS dynastic, ALWAYS authoritarian, and ALWAYS full of shit and lying.

>The thing they have in common is capitalism

Now we're back to understanding words. National Socialism. You see that last word? Socialism. You know what that word promotes? Socialism. You know what it doesn't promote? Capitalism. You know what libertarianism promotes? Capitalism on steroids.

I'm out. There is no point discussing politics with someone who thinks National SOCIALISM promotes capitalism.

So much stupidity in this post. Capitalism can breed those things, but it doesn't guarantee them.
>libertarians turned neonazis
At first you try to break down the system destroying you, but eventually you realize the only way to preserve your way of life is through force.

>Must be all coincidence.
You misspelled "cohencidence".

Attached: Truth.jpg (900x1024, 245K)

Rome wasn't built in a day.

>(((Pro-immigration)))
>(((Pro-Muslim)))
>(((Pro-Mexican)))
>(((Pro-open borders)))
>(((Pro-degeneracy)))
>(((Pro-money)))
>(((Pro-Israel)))
>(((Pro-Jewish)))
>(((Anti-Christian)))
>(((Anti-white)))
>(((Anti-American)))
>(((Anti-European)))
>rich white twitter whores
>RIGHT wing

(((Capitalism))) is anything but right wing btw. You don't seem to be able to differentiate between dual-citizen Jews, (((neocons))), and general white goys.
Stick to plebbit, there's more pseuds there who won't question you, you'll fit right in.

>but it doesn't guarantee them
It literally won't exist without them. But if you're against them, then surely you favor a 100% inheritance tax. That literally won't even create parity because rich kids will still have monumental advantages over everyone else, but it would mean they had to work more for their wealth, though still not as hard as anyone not born to wealth.

But we both know you won't support that, now don't we? I wonder why that is?

And now we come to the final last gasp of desperation from rightist opportunist mongrels. "Oh, actually capitalism was leftwing the whole time!"

>Communism is more likely to be compatiable with National Socialism than Libertarianism is

Attached: kys mong.png (1583x5897, 690K)

oh no no no, my friend. You're only counting the ones that actually continue to participate vocally in politics, which admittedly went far futher to the right. But, the vast majority of libertarians became dissolutioned by Trump as he represented 'the dog finally catching the car', so to speak... only when they finally got their "outsider" into the Oval Office, it was all wrong and he was the wrong guy (for them). Same thing with the left and Obama. As soon as he bailed out the banks, they knew he truly wasn't /theirguy/, but they were able to lie to themselves and turned authoritarian (because it's natural for them). The Libertarians mostly couldn't shill for Trump - probably due to their innate earnestness and sincere idealism - so they've gone mostly silent on current politics. Between Bush, Obama, and Trump, we've seen Neocons, the Liberal Left, and Libertarians all get discredited and dissipate or morph into something uglier.

Attached: Screen-Shot-2016-05-29-at-6.56.50-PM.png (1068x614, 791K)

>The left
>Obama
There's that idpol bullshit again. Holy shit this is why republics should be illegal. People are literally too fucking stupid to understand that dark skin isn't a wing of politics.

But you're wrong about a central issue and that's that the those "libertarians" ARE all shilling for trump now (though trying to distance themselves from the walking failure he is more every day), because they were always the same thing: upper middle class white male opportunist parasites. They don't work, they have no skills, low IQs and have never had to deal with any sort of consequences or adversity, so they're a bunch of spoiled little twats. They don't give a shit about political labels. All they care about is that they can get theirs and fuck everyone else. It helped their class interests to identify as libertarian 10 years ago. It helps their class interests to be a neonazi now. It's that simple.

Obama was a neoliberal...

>dark skin isn't a wing of politics.
There's that leftoid paranoia again. user didn't actually say that. But, now that you mention it, holy shit the leftoids are basically wrong, as "dark skin" correlates to politics with a greater than 90% accuracy rate, which make melanin-enhanced individuals about as reliably Democrat as those employed in Hollyweird, despite harboring social sentiments that profoundly embarrass most "white liberals" and throw them into fits of fresh excuse-making.

Attached: double-retard.jpg (1280x720, 52K)

Sad thing is, Trump himself is still 100000x better than any democrat candidate. Better than any single one possibility. Consider that Obama (who i voted for 2x) left the USA on the brink.
ISIS was at the height of it's power, Syria was a powderkeg, and WW3 Featuring North Korea/China seemed like a very real possibility.
Now, a few years later, People are only worried about impossibly trivial shit, and go figure, every politician hates his guts for somehow slowing down whatever dystopian future they had laid out for us.

ONE OF THE LOWEST MARVEL WEEK TO WEEK DROPS BTW

INCELS BTFO
you will see in the morning

>leftoid
Left also doesn't mean "mommy, this man disagreed with me".

which was only discovered -after the fact-. Most people who supported Obama thought he was going make their wishes come true, be they holding the banks/corporations accountable or -finally- and once and for all putting to rest the issue of race. I bet you think everyone back in the late 80s thought the first two seasons of TNG sucked as they were premiering, as this opinion is repeated often on Yea Forums

Trump is unironically one of the best presidents I've seen in my lifetime because of how LITTLE he does. Literally the more an American president does, the more evil he commits. Although as time goes by trump's becoming more and more like a standard warmongering corporatist president anyway.

All of this simply proves that Muslim culture and sharia law introduced under the guise of leftism is the only way to save the west from it's own degeneracy.

Feminists and homosexuals would be purged overnight, for example. The right fights against their own values, while the left brings in a demographic that would cut the heads off of their 'allies' that helped them in the first place.

>after the fact
No it wasn't. He was a standard democrat.

>be they holding the banks/corporations accountable or -finally- and once and for all putting to rest the issue of race
Voters are retards. News at literally right now.

>6.2/10 critic rating
That's fair.

Attached: 1521332228961.gif (530x320, 312K)

holy shit i never realized that all of that fucked shit was happening right when obama left, and suddenly we get the guy that is hated by all politicians and a few years later none of those possible armageddons are even a fucking thing anymore.

really activates the almonds. i can see why inbreds would call obama 'in league with satan' now, he walked out and we had 2 potential apocalyptic situations and ISIS was at its peak strength.

based and muslimpilled. i feel bad for the christians but the current pope has fundamentally broken their religion, and the ones without a pope were always perpetually vulnerable.

Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton literally created ISIS in full public view, then lied about it, again, in full public view. It was like living through a scene right out of 1984.

>Incels
Why do you incels use that word so much?

they were ready to plunge the world into nuclear armageddon, remember hillary's proposed no-fly zone over syria? jesus fucking christ, Trump has to win again or those mongrels will just bring us back to that.

Setting aside the whole rejecting Christ thing, Islam would unironically be based if not for a huge portion of the current population of Muslims literally suffering from being inbred over centuries. It's truly a miraculous system burdened by horrible people who practice it (again, setting aside the actual spiritual implications of rejecting the Lord ans Savior Jesus Christ, peace be upon him).

you only think that because the last democrat was Clinton and you can quip dismissively at voters all you want but while doing so, they're electing Trumps and voting for *exits. About Obama, people had -very- specific hopes pinned, as specific and important as Trump's base is and immigration. Obama falling short had massive impact on a generation of voters, turning them far more cynical. It's just hard to spot because lefties are natural liars. They direct their anger and disappointment to designated scapegoats, like savages sacrificing people to appease the gods.

It's too bad they didn't succeed really. I wanted trump to win because I thought he was the apocalypse candidate. But he was just the pampered rich bitch candidate and all he's done is sit on his fat stupid boomer ass watching tv and going golfing. Hillary was the one who could have ended the world and now I'm disappointed she lost.

I think that voters are retards because voters are consistently retards.

>About Obama, people had -very- specific hopes pinned, as specific and important as Trump's base is and immigration
Yeah, I remember. They were "first black president". Don't think for one second that anyone who lived through that time could possibly scrub the televised beatification of Obama from their minds.

>It's just hard to spot because lefties are natural liars
Again, you're retarded and don't know what a "leftie" even is. You're a retarded fox "news" zoomer who thinks brown skin and wimmin are "leftwing". You probably couldn't even identify even one policy that's even approaching the left wing.

reminder that nihilism is cuckoldry

I notice you not only you, but nobody screaming "da left! da left" can itentify what "leftwing" actually means. You all unironically seem to think it means "uh brown people and uh wimmin".

>i'm so brooding and hard
>i stand apart from all political orientation and declare a pox on all of them - right or "leftie"
careful with that edge, user. Your dismissal of "fox news" watchers for thinking of blacks and gyno-citizens as left/democrat voters is guffawable since statistically -it's overwhelmingly true- in the case of blacks and easily achievable with women given enough media/social nudging. You're basically trying to make of people who have demonstrable common sense that -you seem to lack-.

As far as being unable to identify left wing policies, the confusion is understandable since the left is so batshit insane, they don't even know what they stand for anymore. The last I checked it was being pro-war and pro-corporation whilst bleating insanely something about how "walls dont work".

Attached: 00410800-1209039231.jpg (395x600, 38K)

>Your dismissal of "fox news"
You're right. Dismissal isn't enough. They should be thrown in the trash.

CNN is worse

All for-profit media is bad, but it's hard to find something on tv as bad as fox.

Attached: c01cb4e1f84b394174917a8e5d3e53b5.jpg (236x236, 17K)

fucking based.

Attached: 584adc_3366022.jpg (1600x900, 154K)

79% and 62% is pretty fucking awful for one of the most circle jerky fanbases and progressive review board.

And keep in mind, this is after they cleansed the site of the "wrong" reviews.

Break up Disney.

>seething incel manbaby confirmed
If you weren't on the wrong side of history, you would be glad there's a corporation like disney out there putting out movies that might not be that good, but they put out a good message. I for one am glad they exist, even though i rarely watch them, and the few ones that i do, i immediately forget about them and they have no impact on my life.

What does it mean to be "informed"?
"Know only the things I know"?
That makes no sense and sounds like literal propaganda.

give user a break. he's an edgy xoomer throw-back from the mid-00's, back when John Stewart was hosting the Daily Show, Colbert was funny instead of going full retard and becoming a parody of the parody he was, and the rest of late night TV at least -tried- to make you laugh. Back then, it was cool to spout
>FOX News viewers, amirite?

I wish the shills like you would go away too, guess we can't get what we want!

Imagine defending Disney. Monopolies are bad.

this triggers the roasties

This.

I don’t fucking care if the popcorn bucket is up,down, or buttered that movie is a D- according to the public.

Who gives a shit? "Mainstream" is trash.