So how many civilian & personnel deaths occuried when 3 helicarriers shot down each other out of the sky and crashed...

you realize this is the same universe where loki wrecked new york and nearly got it nuked and the avengers literally destroyed an entire country stopping their own robot. Comparatively, this is hardly anything in terms of collateral damage.

> showing the helicarriers crashed into the potomac to illustrate your point
> the city of you

>not crashing into a 50 story building over a densely populated Metropolitan area

Attached: 3.png (1680x1050, 1.15M)

>Building shown to be largely empty in multiple shots including in that image

The avengers destroyed a city not a country

That's SHIELD's building, and it's on what is basically a moat.

COMPLETELY TAX PAYER FUNDED SOCIALISM FOR THE RICH SHIELD BUILDING

Less than 20 million which is how many wouldve died if they hadnt done it

Which has directly lead to the world being saved 3 times at that point
Thanks for arguing for socialism

23 civies.

Attached: dead nerds.png (1920x1080, 2.65M)

Considering everyone in the building and on the carriers was SHIELD that seems right

>not crashing over a densely populated Metropolitan area

Attached: 5.png (1680x1050, 2.56M)

>Literally over the river

they had to make it crash onto civilians to appeal to the gook audience. those insects get off on seeing cities of expendable working class fodder get levelled

how much personnel does it take to operate 3 of these Nimitz sized helicarriers

23 casualties sounds like a coverup

Members of SHIELD are not civilians based retard.

forgot pic

Attached: Helicarrier_Up-view.png (1920x1080, 2.88M)

Still waiting on a personnel death toll anons

all i hear is excuses and deflection

I answered one half of the question, the only half I can answer you third world retard.

Super tech helicarriers need less staff

Sokovia (Sokovian Cyrillic: Coкoвиja; Sokovian Latin: Sokovija) is a landlocked country in Central or Southeastern Europe.

it doesn't seem like a lot

hydra was a cancer in shield but they seemed to have skeleton crews, since tony's engines can run indefinitely and the guns seemed automated with zola's targeting. even in the 1st avengers the helicarrier's command deck didn't seem to have more than ~30

Attached: bridge.png (676x311, 379K)

Yeah ok but look what actually happened in the film. It was half a city.
It might be a city-state, but then the point about it just being a city stands.
Also Ultron was a free willed being created by the Mind Stone not Tony, so its not their fault

>worrying about a few helicarriers falling into a river in Winter Soldier
>when hundreds/thousands of people died in the battle of Chicago in Agents of Shield

youtube.com/watch?v=KnYy6W7YlV8

Attached: come on now.jpg (960x882, 59K)

So let me get this straIGHT anons, a flying aircraft carrier the size of pic related only needs 30 crewmembers to operate

(LOL)

Attached: USS_Nimitz_in_Victoria_Canada_036.jpg (3032x2008, 3.53M)

people actually watch Agents of Shield!?!??!

how plebian

Attached: 1532055914138.png (500x338, 44K)

>WHY THE SCIFI MOVIE THING NOT THE SAME AS REAL LIFE

No cleaning ladies, line cooks, etc in those buildings?

Pretty comfy show honestly

Building. Singular.
There mightve been up to 23.
They might use robots to do it.

Those are the same building?
Where does the river base extend the skyscraper from?

Yes

I always wondered about that kek. I guess they went down over the lakes around the Triskellion or whatever it was called but it seemed like some massive destruction.

Jesus that cgi

Attached: bitch what.jpg (1024x904, 101K)

they were hydra

You know what movie had a crazy fucking crash at the end and then just glossed over it like nothing happened? Star Trek Into Darkness. They fucking level their city and give it the Man of Steel treatment, then minutes later cut to a happy ending ceremony.
>youtube.com/watch?v=AQkLWa6J3dM

Attached: st id.jpg (1920x800, 683K)

Everyone was happy kirk lived, brainlet

the better question is where did the funding, construction facilities and time to build a bunch of flying carriers come from?
As a reference USS Gerald R. Ford nuclear-powered supercarrier cost 9 billion dollars (not counting R&D costs) and took 12 years to build (not counting the initial political decision period. And that's a conventional sea-ship

This is a universe where the US fought an open war with an offshoot of the Nazis with lazer guns and power armor

Yeah wtf

Also what is Thanos’ tax policy

They stopped a war with the Klingons.

Cap made a public announcement on the intercom and then a massive gunfight broke out so it's safe to say any civies there were either outta there or already dead

Did you even watch the movie or did you just see this clip on YouTube and decide to bitch?

DCkeks are still trying to defend the man of murder then

good point, why has no one pointed out the strip mine-sized plotholes in that nazi germany where able to develop those weapons when in reality (apart from certain areas like jet engines and rocketry) the german armed forces actually demechnized as the war progressed

he was as far as I remember never in a position to dictate a tax policy in the first place.
HOWEVER, why did he spend all his life trying to realize a plan that can easily be picked apart in five minutes?

That's really nice. Why does Abrams have to be a massive hack and show a good few dozen skyscrapers and fields full of people getting 9/11ed and then less than 10 minutes later show people in the same area celebrating to victorious music after a sudden transition with nothing to space out the pacing? Even MoS had room to breathe between all the big desctruction set pieces and the ending.

>why has no one pointed out the strip mine-sized plotholes in that nazi germany where able to develop those weapons when in reality (apart from certain areas like jet engines and rocketry) the german armed forces actually demechnized as the war progressed
Because the fucking movie is a throwback to golden age comics and is supposed to be as cheesy and stupid as possible in terms of setting, the directors and screenwriters have said this multiple times

It's ok because the credits include something about terrorism being bad

I'm so glad that Beyond, a good movie, took the route of just completely ignoring Into Darkness.