What is Yea Forumss view on suspiria and its 2018 remake?

What is Yea Forumss view on suspiria and its 2018 remake?

Attached: 179C885E-CF97-4A59-B5FA-BB2C3DD5FBC6.jpg (220x305, 20K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=woR3r-ujMTU
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

The original is great. Feels like a weird dream.

GOAT music too
youtube.com/watch?v=woR3r-ujMTU

thom yorke is a talentless hack

Only seen remake, it was good

The remake is...interesting. Not sure its faithful at all to original vision. Its its own work. I would say inferior but warrants a viewing.

nobody on tv has seen films pre-1980, user

go somewhere else for legitimate film opinions lol

that said, original suspiria is great
remake is shit

I immediately noticed an absences of colour, of music, and dream like pacing. The film is no longer a terrifying fable. But a bleak, disturbing, if competently shot, nightmare, both are interesting but it shouldnt call itself suspiria.

It's like the director of the remake went out of his way to be as different from the original as possible.

yeah and in doing so made a 2 and a half hour long boring piece of pretentious wankery. Ending was cool though.

You are right, what was i thinking coming here for actual film discussion.

Captain marvel bait threads solicit hundreds of replys but legitimate film discussion gets 10. This place is a dump

Probably because he recognized he didn't have the chops to make a remake that was on the same level as the original. In the same way that sometimes when an actor is taking on a role that had been done before, they try to make it 'their own' instead of just trying to emulate the same mannerisms of whoever played the role previously.

I don't think the remake is good, but I can see why the director would actively try to avoid vibrant colors and music.

>Only seen remake
absolute yikes

Gonna watch the original for the first time tonight.
It was between that and Marketa Lazarova. I've been meaning to watch Marketa, but I've been watching so many bleak medieval movies that I need something colorful. Hope Suspiria is what I'm in need of.

If you enjoy T H I C C Reds, Pinks and Blues you're in for a treat. Will you be watching the 4K Remastered version? It's gorgeous.

>I need something colorful
just what the doctor ordered

The remake was pretty good except for the ending.

Both are Kino

the original was corny as fuck whilst the remake was boner city

Mother Suspiriorum was the old hag in the original, not Susy. Director's own good/bad twist. People who enjoyed the original won't enjoy the remake.

I liked the ending, my problem was the doctor's subplot took too much screentime.

Attached: suspiria-backstory.gif (540x350, 2.97M)

ending was the best fuckin part

are you aware that porn exists? i don’t understand

what the fuck. the ending was only unique thing in the whole movie. rest of it was just a bland retread of black swan. like wow! scary intense dancing and lesbianism! how cool!

Nigga i'm not but i'm beyond porn, only shit like does it for me.

Susy wasn't the Mother in the original, she was just some fucking American student who slew the Mother and caused the school/coven to crumble into ruin. The ending in the remake was dumb and artsy, and was, in the director's own words, purely for female empowerment. Retarded. No horror. No majesty. The actual Mother was a fucking haunting enigma in the original, not some dumb twist.

Attached: mother_tenebrarum_second_mother.jpg (749x456, 41K)

lmao that’s “beyond porn”?
that’s what would get me off when i was like 13
“Beyond porn” is like people dying on liveleak

Apparently the faggot director is making an unnecessary prequel instead of moving on to the sequel Inferno

Nah, she being the mother was great, plus it was another thing that made not a souless 1x1 remake.
I hope Guadninorino ends up remaking the entire trilogy.

You think i haven't fapped to that?
like i said kid, i'm fucking beyond.

yeah bitch i know, i’ve seen every Argento movie. i agree the plot was whack and that forced twist was stupid—but the ending was the only part of the movie that looked aesthetically cool—which is what i want out of a suspiria remake!

So you prefer female empowerment over actual horror, the thing the movie is supposed to be? That hole in her chest was supposed to be a second vagina by the way.

Original is good but it's Argento so a lot of things don't make sense and it frustrates me because of that.

Remake is okay, and I guess it makes more sense, but it's too long and drab looking. Also Tilda as the old man is an odd choice and that subplot probably should have been shortened considerably or taken out altogether.

the mousey woman with big glasses was CUTE

Nigga pls, the original is barely ''horror'' is a dark fairytale that has the good girl beating the super ultra badass witch by literally pricking her to death.
Go fucking to the capeshit threads if you want to cry about your feefees about feminism.

Question. Was that one witch in the remake a fucking dude in chick get up.

Nah, faggot. It is pretty clearly horror. For it's time it was exactly that. A horror flick being dated doesn't mean it isn't what it set out to be, you absolute nigger. You're clearly the triggered tumblrina here for defending sjw Hogwarts for women.

>So you prefer female empowerment over actual horror
It's not binary. What is "Alien" to you? Or "Phenomena"?

they are both good for different reasons

Cut out Dr. Swinton and shave it down to the original's runtime, and the remake becomes a decent film. The setting was completely irrelevant, none of the main characters outside of the doctor were even aware of it nor did they reference it. You could just as well have set it in modern LA.

Original is kino, remake was... Alright I guess.

I own the dvd of the original that I rented from netflix (back in the red envelop days), I lost it then found it couple weeks later and they just let me keep it

Wondering same thing