Why won't they fix the inaccurate dinosaurs in Jurassic World?

Why won't they fix the inaccurate dinosaurs in Jurassic World?

Attached: zfrivuiz9v201.jpg (1600x834, 56K)

Other urls found in this thread:

sauriangame.squarespace.com/blog/2018/9/20/tyrannosaurus-redesign-2018
youtube.com/watch?time_continue=48&v=xTsVzxtOG7A
youtube.com/watch?v=9vWhf575Qr4
smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/t-rex-skin-was-not-covered-feathers-study-says-180963603/
rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/13/6/20170092
youtu.be/PpxevS5MSjM
youtu.be/2kviuLWrOpk
phys.org/news/2019-03-mammoth-frozen-cells-life.html
pdf.palaeontologyonline.com/articles-2017/Education_and_Outreach_The_history_of_dinosaur_palaeoart_Gornicki_September_2017.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Because
1. They still don't know how any of them would look
2. Trex went through several phases and now it turns out at best it only has a small mane
3. Public already have this idea on their mind due the older movies

Because there are no dinosaurs in Jurassic World, just monsters genetically engineered to resemble the popular image of dinosaurs.

because they are the way they are
it would break the consistency

Because most reptiles today are scarier than fucking chickens.

T-Rex didn't have substantial feathers. Many dinosaurs did, many dinosaurs didn't.

BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE REAL DINOSAURS YOU STUPID DOLT

FUCK

All dinosaurs had feathers around their body, fag

>never seen a dinosaur
>claims to know what they look like
lol sure buddy

It would ruin the built lore

calm down

Jurassic Park uses the dumb pop science method of cloning by extracting million year-old DNA from bones. You could say they're half-baked dinos.

Attached: 69692338038-1490132263.gif (240x360, 3.27M)

>real dinosaurs look like OPs
fuck off already feather fags

Attached: what.jpg (700x467, 119K)

This is unlikely to say the least. It seems like feathers developed very early, though. Many dinosaurs probably lost them, like modern elephants or rhinos lost their fur.

It's called paleontology, brainlet.

From paleontology, we know that they didn't.

What do dinosaurs taste like? Do they taste like poultry?

Reminder that birds are literally taxonomically dinosaurs.

Probably. The biggest changes that I could imagine influencing their taste is that their bones have gotten a lot less dense. I'm inclined to think sauropods might have tasted a little now different.

somewhat like crocodiles I'd imagine considering they've existed along one another

some of them even looked like this

Attached: C-hpVtkXcAQXGY9.jpg (1222x947, 167K)

Because they're chickens.

Attached: Dinosaur attacks.webm (855x480, 1.65M)

Brand recognition

The reign of mammals will soon be over.

Attached: 1406635378369.webm (1280x720, 1.76M)

Wasn't it actually addressed in one of the books that they deliberately de-feathered them because the public expected scaly death lizards?

Attached: jurassic park-3.webm (640x347, 2.69M)

today's megafauna like rhinos and elephants aren't very furry.

i'm thinking giant reptiles would be similarly leathery.

I think it's an artistic problem, No ones making the scientific models look cool, so the public perception wont change.

Attached: 1544246619137.jpg (1200x900, 953K)

you talk big with fancy words, but you ain't never seen no dinosaur

Yeah. I don't think it was specifically "de-feathering" but the park owner wanted the dinosaurs to be big and scary-looking, not accurate. I don't know if the feather debate was around when the book was written.

Because you're a faggot

neither did you

No one knows that for sure faggot

More films need Oviratpors.

Attached: Oviraptor.webm (1124x480, 2.93M)

Just fucking shut up

Attached: D1870196-8B53-4074-939F-8AA0E0F7FD57.jpg (600x600, 79K)

No they didn't you dumb faggot.

right on the movie

Thoughts on the new, most accurate T. rex reconstruction to date?

sauriangame.squarespace.com/blog/2018/9/20/tyrannosaurus-redesign-2018

Attached: rjpalmer_newrex_001.jpg (1500x537, 196K)

I also watched some recent show on sci channel where they talked about how the T rex also had really good vision and was actually very intelligent. Which would make sense if it was a predator since predators tend to have good senses. But it's pretty funny considering the common thought is they are literal retards that can barely see. Also how the fuck do they extrapolate stuff like intelligence and organ function from fossils

More like time-oh-sores, since they never existed.

Attached: this_image_took_longer_to_find_than_actual_dino_remains.jpg (560x370, 57K)

Dinosaurs don’t even exist. The devil put them in the earth to trick you.

Attached: SouleatingOviraptor-SR04-EN-SR-1E.png (476x695, 836K)

MORE Like a 6' turkey

You’re forgetting that nobody wants to see a chase scene involving a giant damn chicken.

Chonky T-sex has visited you. Your balls will be drained dry but only if you get digits

Lol

Attached: 6298B134-D958-4143-BB55-CAB3CF3E48EE.jpg (525x372, 90K)

O NO NO NO NO

LOOK AT HIS HANDS

because the dinosaurs inn that movie look cool and thats all that matters
>b-but feathers it's no r-r-realistic
do you think it's realistic that people keep cloning vicious, flesh eating dinosaurs and letting other people go and spend time with them on a remote island?
no but that keeps happening anyway because movies aren't real, just like dinosaurs. check mate athiesaurs.

Attached: 8JKXo.jpg (500x312, 43K)

sauce? tits in return

Attached: remy.webm (474x640, 2.81M)

imagine someones whole personality being "PEOPLE WANT TO FUCK ME"
yikes

Unlikely Saropods had any significant or noticeable feathering.

Small theropods, sure.

>T rex looked like a giant penis
>mfw

to trick us into what, buying plastic toys as a kid?

Do you feel in charge?

>imagine someones whole personality being "PEOPLE DON'T WANT TO FUCK ME"
>yikes
oof

looks like he has down syndrome lol

Lol wat a fucking pussy.

Why devianart retards can get the feather dinosaurs stuff right? It was a specific group

Attached: dinosaurs feathers.jpg (1600x1077, 314K)

Turkey rex got deconfirmed when feather bois got BTFO by analysis of rex skin last year.

Fake news

>During the hottest time frame in planetary history
>The largest land animals were covered in down

You want to know how I know you don't know what you're talking about?

Attached: breathes in.gif (128x128, 130K)

never claimed so, you ding dong

youtube.com/watch?time_continue=48&v=xTsVzxtOG7A

Attached: 3ad42d.png (1022x713, 1.39M)

Larger dinos had little to no feather coverage, smaller ones were pretty fluffy.

cute

Why did they make T-rex out to be the king of dinos when it was in fact the Spinosaurus Aegyptiacus

Attached: f3223f90.jpg (1920x1080, 1.4M)

>guys we found out these specific dinosaurs most likely had small amounts of proto-feathers
>braindead artists turn them into giant chickens with modern feathers

I know it’s not a dinosaur but Kronosaurus would fuck it up

This is a Chinese scam.

Speak for yourself

>scientist postulates that perhaps certain select species of raptors had feathers
>söyshits who watch mythbusters to feel smart spazz out in a contest to see who can out-AAAAKKKKSHHUUUALLY each other until it devolves into images of giant hens roaming around jurassic forests
Almost all of them looked more or less how they were depicted in the 1990s. Now shut the fuck up already nobody thinks your poor grasp of biology and archaeology is charming.

based emily

>get shat on for saying spinosaurus are kinda cool looking

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 192K)

>make feathers bright and not as ruffled as a chicken’s feathers
Here’s your dinokino

Attached: EE7F1E81-DA45-4C56-B552-91722F09FE73.jpg (1280x809, 292K)

Attached: dino feathers.jpg (819x746, 300K)

Here is your velociraptor bro

Attached: Fred_Wierum_Velociraptor.png (1002x641, 266K)

Take your feathers and shove em.

Attached: jurassic park muldoon-64.jpg (1200x825, 92K)

>eats fish
>slim
>weak jaw
>faggy sail
nope

Well spinosaurs were mostly fish eaters so I don't know faggot.

The raptors in both the books and movies were completely based on deinonychus anyway

here is your deinonychus bro

Attached: EWdeinonychus2-56a2549d3df78cf772747d48-5c2f9a7946e0fb0001119f8e.jpg (768x512, 52K)

I read they were based on Utahraptors but Chricton opted for “Velociraptor” because it sounded cooler. Which it does.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

The deinonychus in both the books and movies were completely based on your naked mom anyway.

Because bird T Rex is non cannon according to the Bible.

>science fiction movie about dinosaurs resurrected from preserved blood sample found in fossilized mosquitos, and then modified with the dna of a frog and put on display in an island theme park
>"non-feathered dinosaurs??? wait til Neil Tyson hears about this!!!"

Attached: sz6wdwxjjge21.jpg (378x378, 31K)

It was for that reason but it was Deinonychus, There's even a throwaway line in the book that kinda brushes over the fact. It was something like "Deinonychus are now classified as velociraptors too"

Does anyone even believe in dinosaurs anymore? More than 5000 years of human history and almost every discovery related to them was found in a couple of decades.

It was really Deinonychus that was in the first film.

Attached: muldoon jurassic park.webm (1200x650, 2.91M)

here is your mom bro

Attached: apatosaurus.jpg (624x351, 62K)

Attached: jurassicparkiii23.png (1920x1080, 3.69M)

OP is a Retardosaurus

>tfw no dinosaur gf

Attached: rex vs flare.jpg (1280x720, 266K)

Who here /Treygang/ ?

>all the "dinosaurs aren't real because jesus says so" bait in this thread gets ignored

never thought i'd see the day

Attached: sorna.jpg (258x195, 11K)

it's quite obvious it's bait

Attached: maxresdefault-2.jpg (1280x720, 91K)

Can we all just agree that certain theropods had (and have) feathers, and some a lot of them, maybe some others none or very few, and that T-Rex might have had some proto-feathers that looked like fur, but we don't know yet?

Size of eyes and their position (very forward-facing for good binocular depth perception)
Size of the brain case relative to body mass (more brain available for non-motor tasks)
Both of these are *general* patterns among living animals.

Attached: 1453519497327.webm (1280x720, 2.86M)

A big point of Jurassic Park is that their Dinosaurs are genetically engineered abominations and not the real animals.
I would really like a movie where people are hunted by giant chickens though.

why haven't they made a film about the most terrifying creature in existence?

Attached: australian magpie.jpg (1200x899, 1.29M)

This is probably very close to how a T-Rex would have looked like walking through the woods.

based

normal magpies are based, what's the difference with strayan ones?

Attached: 1511730050303.webm (1280x720, 2.91M)

Attached: nippy.webm (552x564, 2.92M)

>tropical animals don't have fur

Attached: Ritual.webm (422x608, 2.35M)

youtube.com/watch?v=9vWhf575Qr4

because at the time those were just a type of velociraptor

bearded vultures are so gorgeous

Feline kind weeps

>They have a vicious disposition. They lay two eggs, but only raise one chick. The larger and stronger chick drives its sibling out of the nest to die.
jesus

Attached: vulture rub.webm (640x640, 2.9M)

Attached: Hawk walk.webm (888x500, 2.66M)

Attached: Vulture walk.webm (752x582, 2.93M)

how aboit shark fetuses eating each other on the womb

HMMMmmmmmmmmmmmm

Attached: secratery bird.webm (720x404, 2.89M)

The spinosaurus died to environmental changes over time
A meteor had to kill the T-rex

Attached: The Eternal Honk Horde Terrorizes Human Settlement.webm (1280x720, 2.86M)

nature do what it gotta do i guess

this CG is better than some DIsney capeshit in 2019. fucking embarrassing

Attached: secratery bird2.webm (480x360, 2.92M)

Attached: Cassowary.webm (888x500, 2.86M)

Attached: bird box.webm (640x360, 363K)

The whole feathers thing already pisses people off enough.

can somebody PLEASE get this hothead outta here?

DNA from blood insects digested in hardened amber, not bones, you fucking idiot. They even explain it at a kindergarden level in the fucking movie.

Damn they look awesome. I also like how the second one goes "Oh it's a snake? Let's fuck it up".

Attached: bird qtip rub.webm (640x360, 2.92M)

Attached: Flamingos.webm (800x450, 2.84M)

Attached: bird vs snake.webm (960x540, 2.93M)

Attached: 1446746858149.webm (404x720, 1.49M)

Attached: bird vs snake2.webm (640x800, 2.9M)

Attached: 1328927381733.gif (250x188, 499K)

lol they're loving it the strange little bastards

Attached: Shrike vs snake.webm (720x452, 2.92M)

What the fuck did they mean by making that thing's eye appear so humanlike?

Attached: chicken-eye.png (1920x1080, 3.47M)

based bird webm poster

They literally say in Jurassic World that they're altering the dinosaurs to fit public conception of what dinosaurs look like.

I woudln't worry about it.

Attached: Quetzalcoatlus.webm (854x480, 2.57M)

>feathercucks
TODAY I WILL REMIND THEM
smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/t-rex-skin-was-not-covered-feathers-study-says-180963603/
rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/13/6/20170092

Attached: 1502573417314.png (746x600, 17K)

>2017
get with the times, gramps

There's so much else wrong with this piece of shit, ebola in movie form, who cares that the dinosaurs aren't perfectly accurate

They gave an explanation for it in the previous movie anyway

Attached: jw2-adv1sheet-trex-2sm-5ad8dd3ac4ad2-1.jpg (790x1251, 786K)

i like it because the second half of the film is fucking dino crisis from the psone.

Show me a more recent study, feathercuck.

All the feather meme shit is over a decade old.

Well the whole thing does have a nauseating videogame sheen covering the entire film so yeah.

POST MORE WEBMS OF BURDS

Even based American Museum of Natural History is getting into it.

Attached: Screenshot_20190313-174206.png (1080x2280, 1.48M)

>fucking underground black market dinosaur auction
>mosasaur pool moved from the center of the park to the edge so it can escape
>it's assumed without question that T-rex blood is compatible with a raptor's body
>Pratt outruns a pyroclastic flow
>somehow manages to be worse overall than pic related, which I didn't think was possible

Attached: transformers -revenge-of-the-fallen-(2009).jpg (1382x2048, 429K)

Attached: bird dab.webm (854x480, 571K)

birds of paradise are fucking amazing.

Attached: bbc planet earth 2 hello.webm (1600x900, 2.43M)

I FUCKING HATE YOU FUCKING FURRY FUCKS THEY DIDN'T HAVE ANY FUCKING FEATHERS STOP TRUINING MY FUCKING CHILDHOOD, ONLY THE FUCKING SMALL ONES AND A FEW EXEPTIONS HAD THAT FUCKING SHIT FUCKING KILL YOURSELF YOU FURRY FUCKING SHITS I HATE YOU SO DAMN MUCH.

Attached: 1401025248123.jpg (1280x1556, 390K)

>"Dinosaurs were real dude, I saw them in my school books"

If I revive T-Rex and it doesn't have feathers, then all featherfags must be fed to my hungry boy. Deal?

Attached: bbc dynasties adelie penguin to the rescue.webm (854x480, 2.8M)

you know she was loving it
hell what self respecting bird wouldn't

Attached: Penguin inspection.webm (934x720, 2.9M)

Attached: bbc planet earth 2 birds of paradise.webm (1280x720, 2.76M)

The most boring topic in the history of dudes talking about dinosaurs.

Attached: 1451909448067.webm (636x360, 2.6M)

Actually not, according to more recent studies.

t. I watch paleontology videos on youtube

Dinosaur movies fail to take into account that their organisms are dependant on sources of food that do not exist today, or would have radically different concentrations of the substances they require to sustain it.
Also, their lungs would be incapable of processing the oxygen present in today's atmosphere, since the concentration of gasses is also radically different from theirs. There is a reason land animals are smaller than in the past: as the planet changed, so did the species.

>tfw these birds are incredible, bizarre and beautiful
>tfw can't help but feel in the far-flung future, aliens will be looking at how humans compete for mates and I wonder if they will think the same things

Utahraptor was discovered after Jurassic park and Spielberg and Chricton were flabbergasted because it was basically a perfect match

(Former) Floridafag here, gator tastes like slightly gamey chicken.

>thinking dinosaurs were reptiles

that's a fucking pokedex entry, don't lie to me

Birds are dinosaurs
Birds have feathers

Thus, dinosaurs had feathers

BLOATMAXXED REX IS BEST REX

>somebody put a baby inside that thing
could you do it Yea Forums?
could you wife a "retired" porn star?

because they didn't

smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/t-rex-skin-was-not-covered-feathers-study-says-180963603/


only raptors did
also a trex with feathers wouldn't be scary

Attached: file.png (2604x1310, 587K)

>could be caused by face biting which is a behaviour common by t-rex
>behaviour of a long gone animal
good lord what a cutie :3

>a trex with feathers wouldn't be scary

Attached: tyrannosaurus-rex.jpg (2121x2121, 488K)

Just look at humans if you want to see what an apex predator looks like. We might not be the strongest or fastest but our endurance running while hunting prey is literally unmatched in the animal kingdom and our visual acuity second only to birds of prey.

However, our deadliest attribute is of course, pattern recognition and future planning.

that's literally all young women retard
and theres nothing wrong with that...their whole purpose in life is to create babies and pleasure men
women have no other value

Attached: turkey_rex_xd_by_nebezial-d57k63e.jpg (2000x1251, 370K)

Attached: yutyrannus_huali_by_cheungchungtat-d4v6nv1.jpg (807x1000, 893K)

>those affectionate nibbles when it could easily rip a finger off with its beak strength

All animals lose to headpats.

>ultimate predator
lmao where is he now? x)

It's like the kitchen scene in Jurassic Park except with falcons instead of Velociraptors.

>uguu

>smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/t-rex-skin-was-not-covered-feathers-study-says-180963603/

>But the study’s findings are not conclusive. Soft tissues like feathers are only preserved in the fossil record under specific circumstances, so “[j]ust because we don't see them doesn't mean they weren't there,” Steve Brusatte of the University of Edinburgh told Briggs. So it is still possible that the most fearsome of all the dinosaurs was fluffy and soft.
>yutyrannus, a close relative, was covered in feathers

Really makes you think.

there's no such thing as an accurate dinosaur, since they never existed

wtf why do they have so many goslings?

Mighty fine of you to join us Mohammed

That's ugly af, pic related would be more accurate
also why did they completely fuck up the Jurassic period in Lucy? looks like an optimical illusional

Attached: 00ED1968-30A4-4F80-A6E4-21FAD7583002.gif (542x402, 1.63M)

best hunters huh?

>no-fap arms
kek

gonna need more info on "saw-faced sharks".

>a close relative
lol, it's about as closely related to a T-rex as you are to a fucking gibbon. Then again, you are a feathercuck, so you've probably got second cousins that are fucking apes. So let's say it's about as closely related to a T-rex as I am to an gibbon.

I know digitigrades are the fucking SHIT but god DAYUM is that a fag bird
could feed a small town

> as you are to a fucking gibbon
thats pretty close related genius. And I still get some hair on my ballsack.

What next? You'll call aliens demons?

>tempting Shyamalan to make a dinosaur movie

my tits are bigger than than that wth

>thats pretty close related genius
Yeah, I figured as much. Give my regards to your family for the loss of your cousin, Koko.

Yutyrannus is not a close relative, it is even disputed on whether or not it's a tyrannosauroid at all.
And even if it was, even more closely related animals, show, like T.rex, absolutely no evidence of feathers, there's Yuty, and Dilong, a very basal form, and there are numerous reasons as to why Tyrannosauroids could've lost their feathers later on.

It should also be noted that by feathers on dinosaurs you should not be thinking of bird feathers. Only one group of dinosaurs evolved those, and they are specifically meant for flight. Every modern feather is derived from these Most dinosaurs (of those that had them) were covered in "proto-feathers" simply structures that could take a myriad of different shapes, from short stubby spikes, to long quills, to hair-like structures, from fluff to bristles.
Maybe T.rex did have "feathers" and maybe they looked like the hairs of an elephant, as in: barely noticeable. Or maybe it looked like a goddamn emu, who the fuck knows. But we have skin imprints, over a dozen of them, dispersed all over it's body, of the animal itself, none show "feathering" in any significant capacity.
So IF T.rex had "feathers" (And that is a big if, as far as I know that study has held up to scrutiny from the scientific community so far) It probably wasn't much, if even noticeable at all unless getting very close.

And finally, that man you quoted merely stated that indeed soft tissues like feathers do not fossilize well or easily, and it may just be the case that it did have these "feathers" (in whatever form they would've taken) and simply did not survive to be discovered by us.
But while absence of evidence does not mean evidence of absence it also does not mean the opposite. The fact that no direct evidence is being found of feathers on ol' rexy COULD mean it hasn't survived the ages, or it could mean it was never there in the first place.

I can envision exactly how the Jurrassic Period was now, it's crazy

Find me an animal with an insulating downy covering in the tropics that's over 200kg.
Every time this thing would try to hunt, it would collapse of heat exhaustion

He's a big guy

>some of these 10-million-old fossils had no feathers
>...
>"These findings indicate “that most (if not all) large-bodied tyrannosaurids were scaly,”
wow

Attached: 09E9CEA4-6C91-4799-A857-074E6109250B.gif (200x150, 901K)

that dad aka: ryan gosling, likes to fuck

Nice diversion from the fact that you're argument failed and humans still have hair, just not fully covered. Now let the grown ups talk.

A very reasonable answer. Honestly the elephant example is probably the most likely one, and maybe they had more plumage when they were younger and smaller, and lost it when growing up.
What my point mainly was that the findings don't 100& disprove that T-rex didn't have feathers.

reptilians really want poo on avians too huh
kek

>>Eats your nest eggs
Nothing personal

Attached: 1522357706707.webm (640x640, 1.97M)

Could it really fly that high?

Who can say for sure? I mean today, we have vultures who fly at up to 37,000 ft

>After factoring wingspan, body weight, and aerodynamics, computer modelling led the two researchers to conclude that Q. northropi was capable of flight up to 130 km/h (80 mph) for 7 to 10 days at altitudes of 4,600 m (15,000 ft). Habib further suggested a maximum flight range of 13,000–19,000 km (8,000–12,000 mi) for Q. northropi.[19]
pretty fucking crazy

swiggity swooty

See
The larger the species the less feasible feathers become. The wooly mammoth's descendents lost their coats completely to survive in tropics and guess what kind of environment the majority of dinosaurs lived in. Until you can find a definite plumed skin fossil of anything larger than a human, you're done here.

Attached: 1529086165471.gif (440x250, 479K)

>>you can tell by the way i use my walk i'm a woman's man no time to talk

Dinosaurs were literally created as viral marketing for the Jurassic Park, the fossils don’t even exist

That’s one big ugly chicken.

The sesame street movie begs to differ.

Why are birds so based, bros?

FUCK FEATHERS

Attached: carcharodontosaurus01.jpg (957x1463, 282K)

>#metoo

Attached: 1526309969724.jpg (1500x1125, 186K)

the artists who did those old dinosaur magazines were so good.

>fur follows the same logic as feathers
fucking kek you're retarded, not surprising from a loliposter though
ever look at penguins? living in the complete opposite environment of tropics? yet they have no feathers?

correct answer

Attached: 88eecuJ.jpg (640x640, 185K)

King Kong was Dinosaur Kino

Attached: king_kong_2005_vastatosaurus_rex_1_by_giuseppedirosso_d95sunb-pre.jpg (1371x583, 145K)

user...

Attached: 1551159231787.png (483x470, 184K)

youtu.be/PpxevS5MSjM

Actually here's your most recent reconstruction

Attached: baby.jpg (962x721, 72K)

Got some bad news for spinofags

Attached: AVRcJLP.gif (500x281, 1.39M)

And he only ate big fish. A T-Rex could snap his neck in a second in any given fight, his jaw bite was also significantly weaker than that of the T-Rex

yikes, I'm going to have to make my own movies
stupid "iconic" retardation brainwashed the masses like the sheep they are and now we're left with airheads that think big birds were reptiles, aliens look like ugly monster abominations, and the earth is flat

Attached: 🌌 .png (1200x1544, 1.9M)

>And he only ate big fish
Naeh, teeth marks suggests they've even preyed on pterosaurs

Seeing these hunt in swamps would be kino though

Maybe it would remain motionless for some time, the sail blocking the sun at a spot, causing fish to gather and then snap.

Spinosaurus is THE definition of what lanklet is.

Yeah I love the crocodile skin design. They had three of those things too, so they can show off the juvenile design.

Attached: Juvie_V.rex.jpg (486x347, 37K)

utterly bullshit thread, do you expect me to believe that t-rex’s were just giant birds

No, birds are tiny t-rexes

>more accurate
>feathered abomination whose placements of feathers makes no sense
bruh

>I can’t read

imagine if that was big enough to eat you and chase you down
the last thing you hear before getting picked in half and swallowed alive is the horrible low pitched clucking

Elephants still have hair you blindnigger. They just got so big that its not visible from afar. Also even when feather =/= hair, there's literally no animals on earth that had feather or hair by hatchling and lose it completely when it was an adult. Feathernazis went through many mental gymnastic just to make a real animal into a fantasy one.

they were you asinine sheep

>retard
bruh

Doesn't matter, they didn't live in the same eras. They lived 20-30 million years before T-rex was around. The spinosaurus lived from 90-110 million years ago, t-rex 65-68 million years ago.

Unless we dig up more fossils of both in the same eras, doesn't matter who's stronger, faster, or whatever. They were alive in different eras that were further apart than the entirety of human history multiplied by 100.

Most people don't appreciate that, and think that all dinosaurs of all types roamed around at the same time. Spinosaurs were fossils already by the time T-rex was stomping around.

Attached: timeline-jurassic-park-dinosaurs.png (1300x769, 73K)

That's such a good graphic, just a shame that dinosaurs isn't in quotation marks because it also lists mosasaurus and pteranodon

Why was Parasaurolophus so successful?

>BEAKED.com

what the fug

Attached: parasaurolophus.jpg (211x239, 14K)

WE

Recent studies now say Tyrannosaurus couldn't have had feathers.

>>the chadsaurolophus vs the viriginatosaurus

haha

JPdinos are always not true dinos and that was a plot point for the first movie.

Every single T rex fossil that's come out of Mongolia has feathers. How you prove they don't is beyond me.

Threads like this make me sad I abandoned my dream of becoming a Paleontologist.

THICC

>25 years ago
Spielberg you mastermind

They say that they had to fill in the gaps and that the genetic recreations arent how real dinosaurs were

>a big fucking chicken
no wonder these silly fucks went extinct

LOOK AT ME, HECTOR

>Juvenile legs on an adult body
Putting in a bootleg NatGeo watermark just makes it more desperate.

Also regarding featherfags. Everyone with a functioning brain already saw the similarities between birds and dinosaurs. Needing some fuckwit to connect the dots for you by drawing sparrow plumage on a t-rex and having it go around facebook 5 years ago makes you fucking stupid, not some insightful free-thinker.

>year 19XX
>a scientific manages to get the first dinoclone
>half lab starts sperging out
>"YO DUDE WHY YOU THREW A CHICKEN LEG INTO THE CLONING VAT"
>"FUCKING FRIED CHICKEN NIGGER"
>"THEY SHOULD HAVE NOT HIRED AN AUSTRALOPITECHUS TO MAKE THE WORK OF A MAN"

Hadrosaurs in general were the most successful dinosaurs of their time, if any non-avian survived the asteroid it would be one of them.

?

Attached: Screenshot_2019-03-14 1552523877102 png (PNG-bild, 1300 × 769 pixlar).png (344x279, 14K)

Formerly dinos were a lot cooler

This. Discussion should have ended here.

that's your penis lmao

Not even advocating for feather but the anatomy of the dinosaurs is fucking GARBAGE

Also tell me when why the stego is more accurate in the lost world than it is in JW, who made that decision

>my penis roamed for millennia among fucking dinosaurs
whoa based

I could if only I knew

probably Pachycephalosaurus

Man, trying to imagine what it would be like to go back in time and actually see these huge fucking beasts walking around and doing shit makes me kind of sad that i will never get to.

It must have been incredible....

Lol

Advanced biomechanics and imagery that allow us to determine muscle attachment points for one.

Raptor god

You're literally retarded

Jesus those ham hocks are legendary.

>This guy comes up to your girl in the Dino Club and slaps her in the ass.
>What do you do?

Attached: Jurassic-Park-3-Spinosaurus.jpg (1280x720, 53K)

What

they said in the film that the dinos weren't accurate because they basically genetically engineered them. the mosquito thing was a red herring. The park reflected the bad paleontology at the time

>Do something, pussy.

so the reason they won't change them in the film is the same reason they wouldn't in the park - they'd have to start from scratch and people don't care

Never knew the banner was CGI until recently

>Those hands
They should call this one the Trump Rex

Roadkill turkey gets better funeral procession that any Yea Forums fag

Rex... easy on the ceratops

youtu.be/2kviuLWrOpk

This guy is pretty cool

and here's the juvenile versions

Attached: dct6zye-7199571c-5253-4dcf-9279-cb353b678cb5.jpg (4094x1465, 763K)

I believe it

If you freeze dry and shrink wrap a cat, reconstructing it would give you a completely different monster because you’re not really taking body fat, fur, and overall “meat” in to consideration. You have a jarring pose, some skin impressions, big ass claws and fangs, and that’s it. And yet that’s how we’ve been reconstructing dinos.

I’m not just talking out of my boipucci, this is an example from a book I read a few years ago that I’d be happy to cite if I could find it. But the gist of it was basically that animals buried under pressure in those conditions don’t immediately look like how we think they do

That's a sexy bird.

phys.org/news/2019-03-mammoth-frozen-cells-life.html

We're one step closer to making Jurassic Park a reality.

>And yet that’s how we’ve been reconstructing dinos.
No it hasn't, you little ignorant whore.

SHADOWS GATHER

pdf.palaeontologyonline.com/articles-2017/Education_and_Outreach_The_history_of_dinosaur_palaeoart_Gornicki_September_2017.pdf

This is a good read

No, because anti-feather fags are retarded and don't understand that saying "all dinosaurs might have had feathers" means the possibility of fuzz, protofeathers and quills IS POSSIBLE and that doesn't mean we're making assertions.
They can't think in scientific terms.

You actually want to compare shit that haven't been in practice for over a fucking century?
Paleo reconstruction has been thinking about muscle and fat tissue, tendons and nerves for a long ass time. It's no coincidence that when we found the most well preserved dinosaur fossil ever it looked EXACTLY like the reconstructions.

>>thinking dinosaurs were reptiles


>-saurus
>combining form
>forming genus names of reptiles, especially >extinct ones.
>"stegosaurus"

>T-Rex
>Mongolia

>Every single T rex fossil that's come out of Mongolia has feathers. How you prove they don't is beyond me.


>Tyrannosaurus lived throughout what is now western North America, on what was then an island continent known as Laramidia.

>bad news
I love the new spinosaurus more than the old one. It's a 50-foot Moroccan crocodile that grew a sail just to flex on other predators that it was eating enough to do so.

>feathers aren't sca-

Attached: 1523761060120.jpg (1600x839, 405K)

OH MY GOD

look at that huge cock

>but our endurance running while hunting prey is literally unmatched in the animal kingdom
When will this retarded meme finally die.

Fake news.

smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/t-rex-skin-was-not-covered-feathers-study-says-180963603/

The endurance running is kind of memed up, but the pattern recognition part is spot on. It was pretty key in the Gatherer part of the Hunter/Gatherer schtick