HE NEEDS TO BE VINDICATED!!! TO THOSE WHO BELIEVE THE LIES OF "LEAVING NEVERLAND" PLEASE WATCH THESE!!!
Part 1: youtube.com
Part 2: youtube.com
Part 3: youtube.com
HE NEEDS TO BE VINDICATED!!! TO THOSE WHO BELIEVE THE LIES OF "LEAVING NEVERLAND" PLEASE WATCH THESE!!!
Part 1: youtube.com
Part 2: youtube.com
Part 3: youtube.com
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtube.com
mjandboys.wordpress.com
breitbart.com
huffingtonpost.com
m.youtube.com
mjfacts.com
youtu.be
youtube.com
twitter.com
based faggotfist, this is the only based thing he ever done
>sleeps with little boys in his bed
>has a bell alarm system
this new doco doesn't need me to solidify my thoughts. that's all i need to know about the morbid cunt
i truly believe he just wanted to live the childhood he never had, he wanted those kids to be his best friends. i don't think diddleing them was the main objective, it just happened because of how close he was to them all the time. Fuck, me and my friends used to do stupid "sexual" shit growing up like puttting our dicks on weird things around the house, cold surfaces etc. we were just being kids exploring.
>rage
no fucking way when did he become awesome?
>OLD NEWS VIDEOS SURFACE SHOWING JACKSON BUYING WEDDING RINGS WITH JAMES SAFECHUCK
>THE VIDEOS PROVING SAFECHUCK'S STORY
links to videos:
youtu.be
youtu.be
Video of Safechuck in Leaving Neverland saying Michael bought him wedding rings and had a mock wedding ceremony:
youtube.com
mentally ill stalkers broke in to his home on a regular basis. he's not your next door nobody neighbour, ass.
Michael and Safechuck buying their wedding rings
Court document stating that Jackson bout the rings for Safechuck at Zales, the same store in the videos.
door bell system triggered by footsteps for his bedroom alone. this was a separate system from house security
1994 testimony at a court hearing for Jordie Chandler, in which Safechuck's father says that Jimmy told him and his mother that Michael kissed him on the lips.
i mean, whos says they were WEDDING rings? and if he were really buying wedding rings why the fuck would he go out himself with the kid? come on now
fuck off /pol/pedo
The rings
I didn't watch the documentary but c'mon everbody already knew he fucked them keedz.
How do you know it was for a wedding ring!? And hes Micheal Jackson and its the fucking early 90s, of course hes going t go out in disguise! He wouldve caused a damn riot. He was one of the most famous people ON EARTH!!
>whos says they were WEDDING rings
In the videos the reporters state that Jackson and Safechuck said they were wedding rings for possibly Sheryl Crow. It says that Safechuck did all the talking for Michael and tried the rings on.
Can they substantiate that those are the same rings?! How do we know they werent some random rings picked up from a damn gumball machine for christ sake!
Watch the videos it says it's a wedding ring they were buying. The reporters clearly say it, Bill O'Reily even interviews one a woman who worked at the store in the one video, in which she says how Jimmy was handling the rings for Jackson.
How can you be vindicated for raping lots of kids when you're already dead incel?
JEW ME
KIKE ME
Said it was for Sheryl Crow, its possible.
Child porn book that Jackson gave to one of his victims, which he signed to him
there was a stalker that was waiting in his bed, retard. do your research.
His handwriting in the book
Did you watch my vidoes!? Ive seen the documentary as well, the "facts" are all over the place.
>there was a stalker that was waiting in his bed
lmao
It's all in the past innit. Let's call him guilty and be done with it.
Did he marry Sheryl Crow?
>Did you watch my vidoes
Fuck off Razorfist, nobody cares about knuckledraggermcfucktard28's personal opinion on youtube with no sources is
This has been covered in my videos, its not form the same book! Its from a book that was on the table at Neverland Ranch. It was a photographic novel of kids playing with clothes on! Even the pic he signed no kids are nude. This isn't even close to "naturist" material, let alone CP.
Child porn, including the same book, "The Boy," recovered from a secret room in Jackson's home.
Maybe things didnt work out. How many guys have jumped the gun and bought a wedding ring only for the relationship to not last.
> It was a photographic novel of kids playing with clothes on
No it wasn't photos of the book are available on google and show full frontal nudity fucktard. The photos in it were taken by Hajo Ortil a reknowned child molester who admitted to sexually abusing 800 boys and promoted child love. The book was also edited by members of Nambla with one of them, George St Martin doing over a decade in prison for child rape.
MODS!! Posting CP!
JEW ME, SUE ME, EVERYBODY DO ME
KICK ME, KIKE ME, DON'T YOU BLACK AND WHITE ME
ALL I WANT TO SAY IS THAT (((THEY))) DON'T REALLY CARE ABOUT US
never gonna happen my dear tranny paedo apologist
He was jewish, he was (((they)))
>why the fuck would he go out himself with the kid?
Why would he do everything else that he did in public with children, even after the first accusation?? Because he's Michael Jackson and he knows that he can.
delet
or because he knows that it's innocent? why would a pedo be this open
LUL
If any one else (whose music you don't like) had those books in their house you would 100% think they are pedos.
GTFO here with lying to yourself.
indeed, why would a psychopath with a jesus complex do any of this
Who cares, he's already dead. Let the dead rest in peace.
He got buried with an alive kid. Fuck him
kabbalah was a huge fucking fad at that time, everyone fucking did it for some unknown reason even Madonna went all kabbalah crazy
cuz he was seriously fucked in the head.
True, but doesn't mean we'd be correct.
Why all the people who defend him come off as creepos?
ANNIHILATED
> why would a pedo be this open
Because people are stupid enough to believe his denials
Stop spamming your bullshit videos. You've been spamming Yea Forums for years and it never took off. Then you tried /pol/ in 2016. Take a fucking hint you greasy 14 year old boy in a 12 year old girl's body.
EWWWW!!!!!
> Safechuck
I love ironic names.
What do you mean? Razorfist, I mean Daniel Harris only has a video of himself online jacking off his tiny littlebaby dick and plastered all over encyclopedia dramatica.
Is that video real though?
MODS
Looks like a edgy twink with long hair and a small penis. So I'd have to say yes.
OP BTFO
Michael and Emmanuel Lewis in bed sipping baby bottles together. Lewis is around 12 or 13 at the time of the photo, but played younger on tv, because he was a midget. He was Jackson's first documented public child "friend" that he took with him place.
Blown out like your moms gash!?
More incriminating photos!!
Michael with Emmanuel's family, who he lived with for several months as if he were a family member, just like with all the other kids he's accused of molesting
>There was a time when the young boy/man love association existed
The world is turning to shit but we made minor progress here and there
Lewis is like 13 in this photo
Why wouldn't he just bang little girls instead? Fucking fag dude
What do you think their wedding night was like?
Fair point.
Lots of rimming and blowjobs.
Michael with 12-year-old Jonathan Spence, who a maid said she often found Spence's underwear on the floor of Michael's room. Police also recovered a fully nude photo of Spence from Michael's room during their raid in 1993.
Jackson used to make him call him "Daddy".
>Police also recovered a fully nude photo of Spence from Michael's room during their raid in 1993
where is it in the evidence log then
Recovered items by police.
>Notice the last item is a nude photo of Jonathan Spence
here
Not that Im doubting any of this, but why has none of this come to light? Why was he never prosecuted? I mean I know he had tons of money but with evidence that damning had to have sparked a prison term.
>know the trial is about to end
>"items to be produced: a lot of bullshit that doesn't exist"
>is never produced in any other case
yeah rock solid
Why would the prosecution seek to introduce a photo that doesn't exist?
Supposedly from what I've read the Jonathan Spence photo wasn't introduced, because the police and prosecution used the term "believed to be" Jonathan Spence, meaning it could be someone else, and if so who? Jurors never saw it.
mjandboys.wordpress.com
Damn. . .
>that doesn't exist
>mj lawyer acknowledge their existence in trial
the defense dismissed it as "art"
>23 magazines from 1936 that are collector's items
I love how they spin CP from back in the day, since no child porn laws really existed until the late 70's and early 80's.
>"IT WAS JUST VINTAGE ART!"
>"IT WAS A DIFFERENT TIME!"
So the police did find questionable content during the searches? Wonder why this hasn't been in the news. At least I haven't really seen it.
Some conservative sites like Breitbart reported it over the years, while websites like HuffingtonPost sought to defend Jackson and call it "art".
>None of the items seized from Neverland fit the legal definition of child pornography, and in fact many of the items that are currently creating the most media hysteria were not pornographic at all. They were legal art books; a few of them containing some examples of adult erotica, but again, these were not titles that could be in any way deemed as pornographic or even obscene. This isn’t to say that Jackson didn’t own any pornography at all. The truth was that a sizable amount of adult heterosexual pornography had been confiscated in the raid, but Jackson was a grown man and this type of pornography is not illegal to own. In the absence of any hardcore “smoking gun” evidence against Jackson, the prosecution tried desperately to make a case for several legal art books which Jackson owned as part of an extensive library, one that contained over ten thousand titles on art and photography (subjects that were of interest to him as inspiration for his own lyrics and films). These art books, as they were written up and described in the original police reports, were clearly stated as not being pornographic in nature but as items that could “possibly” be used as part of a “grooming” process (however, it is important to note that this was not a claim the prosecution was able to successfully prove in court).
also those 3 "art books" were made by convicted pedophiles and NAMBLA members
based and redpilled
jacko did nothing wrong
DAMN... :(
Being paranoid is not illegal
This whole thread reads like a couple of bots going back and forth with the most ridiculous shit.
Reminder that /ourguy/ Norm has been mercilessly shitting on Wacko Jacko for decades
m.youtube.com
HEE HEE
So are they digging up mj and putting him i jail?
No but it could lead to yet another lawsuit and this one could cripple the Jackson Estate financially
Sounds like you and your friends were being diddled by someone. Sexual behaviour like that doesn't come natural to kids unless an adult has introduced them to it.
IIT: we post faces of innocent men
Even as a kid I knew pulling your dick out was weird and I didn’t do it, did you have one too many ass-grab sessions with Uncle Lester and get tricked into thinking that was normal behavior?
You first
Safechuck, cast it into the fire! Destroy it!
everything from the 93 trial was permissible as evidence in the 05 trial, if shit this existed it would have been brought out then, end of fucking story
Formerly Safesneed
Formally dangersneed you stupid fucking CUNT
so did he do it
>Watches one documentary
>Suddenly becomes an expert on child abuse and pedophilia
What's the point in this doc? He's dead and the public already more or less believed he was into little boys
Almost certainly, but you’ll find a lot of Jackson estate shills who seem to believe anything short of a feature-length porno of Jackson and a little boy isn’t evidence
obviously not you noob
>Currently Safesneed
thats you low level schizophrenia settling in from lack of real life socialising
No, because in the minds of peado apologists paying multiple families millions of dollars to settle the case prior to judgement means he was found innocent in a court of law somehow
Probably, but it can never really be proven at this point unless some secret tapes come out or something.
Like Chappelle said "I'm not willing to say he didn't do it until all the facts come out"
Is that bill O'Reilly in the second one?
you mean after they tried multiple times and failed?
damn, michael looks cute here. why couldn't he molest me?
MIKE-IKES ON SUICIDE WATCH
>multiple times
you mean one?
the 93 one was settled out of court
PHOTOS OF MICHAEL DOING WEIRD SHIT WITH LITTLE BOYS IS NOT PROOF I PEDOPHILIA, I REPEAT, PHOTOS OF MICHAEL 'INNOCENT MAN' JACKSON DOING FUCKED UP SHIT TO LITTLE BOYS IS NOT EVIDENCE OF PEDOPHILIA!!
If it was, I guarantee everyone on this website would be in jail for fucked up shit they've done in the past.
Why are you typing like a 55-year-old mom on Facebook?
>I guarantee everyone on this website would be in jail for fucked up shit they've done in the past.
Nah I’ve never done weird shit with little boys because I’m not a pedophile like you and Wacko Jacko
You better take back what you said about based michael or else
I like his music, but he's pretty weird and I think he might have bummed them boys. Anyway hope to here more from him soon.
cope
Because the Jackson estate has been clickfarming shill accounts for over a week on all social media platforms. These threads are made by them.
Leaving neverland is such an obvious fkn con
The fact that it's being shilled as "must watch" but you conveniently need to buy HBO to do that makes it so clear
If it's so "important" why isn't it free on YouTube or something
they were planted there by the FBI
nice try, shill
this is a perfectly plausible explanation.
Also, what's stopping these explicit photos from being leaked huh?
Based anti-pedos on suicide watch
i see the pedo defense force is not even trying anymore, good
Oh Shit!
>this is a perfectly plausible explanation.
thanks for taking my bait, you deranged fucking mong
mine was clearly bait too you fucking retard. was the "Based anti-pedos on suicide watch" not enough of a give away?
Seriously now that you point it out, you have a point. Pretty funny.
stopped reading beyond the first sentence desu
i will personally beat the shit out of all anti-pedos just to defend michael's honour. who's first?
JEW ME
SUE ME
KICK ME
KIKE ME
*din don*
OW
>"be nice to uncle michale and do whatever he says he gives us lots of ncie things so don't tell anyone"
This is what happened.
Seeing these pictures..He's literally a pimp to little boys except he's also the only customer.
guys, i'm seriously starting to get worried. i;m starting to think based michael was actually a pedo? ther-there's no way it's true right?
Why do they blank the lyrics 'kick me, kike me don't you holahoax me, jew me sue me, don't you sheckel drain me' in the song 'they don't really care about us' ???.
katt williams know
Based and shamonepilled
i'm on michael's side but...this was pretty funny
Keked irl
20 YEARS DUDE
Not even his lawyer could stop him for a second incriminatin his ass after being caught LMAO
why did they ruin him then if he was one of them
SHAMONE
>gets beat up by a 14 year old
I figured he was innocent until I saw this faggot defending him.
$$$
damn based kitty kat
>well known news story
>proves safechuck right
Literally doesn't work that way.
You mean the book that you can buy on Amazon right now?
>40 year old mentally ill guy has ""sleepovers"" with cute boys within a specific age range in his ultra private bedroom in his ultra private ranch
If it was anyone other than MJ noone would be debating something so obvious today
MJ fans should defend him by focusing on how he got so fucked in the head in the first place rather than arguing for his innocence