Steiner's assault

never gave UK a "chance to surrender". And it didn't affect his invasion of the Soviet Union which is what doomed him

dunkirk, you fucking zommer

Attached: FireRises2.jpg (539x600, 40K)

He didn't want a world war at all. He just wanted the Danzig corridor and a secure buffer between Germany and the USSR. He was genuinely surprised when the UK and France declared war over invading Poland. He didn't think they had the balls. His plan was to take eastern Poland, build up a more easily defensive line, and maybe later invade the USSR if it came down to that, and it did come down tothat when the western powers declared war on Germany. He never expected the western countries to get involved. His plan went to shit after that precisely because it was unexpected. He didn't intend to take over the whole world, and that never occured to anyone until Britain and France got involved. The situation spirraled out of control, and Germany had to invade more countries simply to secure its flanks. The German invasion of Poland wasn't justified and violated a treaty Germany had signed, so Britain and Frace were entitled to declare war, but the idea that Hitler wanted to conquer the entire world or even go to war against the western powers is hyperbole. Hitler was a megalomaniac but was very much aware that Germany could never handle a war on two fronts.

>be Germany, a fairly small nation
>almost landlocked
>entire world against you, only allies are fucking italy and some gooks halfway around the world
>this means a dead limit on how many beans, bullets and bodies you can produce
>your opposition is funded by other nations you're not at war at AND other countries collaborating
>"No you see they could beat the nations that each was an equal"

>NOT NOW, MY FUHRER I GOTTA DO THIS HERE TALLY OF HOW MANY JEWS WE LET DIE IN OUR CAMPS OVER IN POLAND. IF I FUCK THIS UP, THEY'RE GOING TO SAY MILLIONS GOT BURNED UP WHEN WE ALL KNOW A CREMATORIUM CAN ONLY PROCESS

Attached: steinermath.jpg (490x356, 22K)

Wasn't a chance to surrender, was Goring being dumb and thinking the Luftwaffe could reduce the pocket when all that happened was it was BTFO

Moreover taking 200,000 Brits POW would have been a much better bargaining tool to secure a surrender

Moreover he never even offered surrender terms

Moreover it didn't affect the decision to invade the USSR or declare war on the US and both happened well after.

You're a retard

>Am I out of touch?
>No! It's UK, France, Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg, USA, USSR, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Greece, Yugoslavia, Norway, Denmark, China, Albania, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, Costa Rica, Guatemala, El Salvador, Venezuela, Colombia, Brazil, Chile, Argentina, Peru, Uruguay, Paraguay, Bolivia, Saudi Arabia, and South Africa who are wrong!

>Right...Italy?

Can we stop for a moment and praise this man reverted one of the worst economic crisis Germany has ever faced?

if he didn't want the world to be at war with him maybe he shouldn't have declared war on all those countries.

>He didn't want a world war at all
Then why did he violate so many treaties? Why did he violate Poland soverignty despite fully knowing the consequences

>He just wanted the Danzig corridor
Just like he just wanted the Sudetenland? Come on dude the Allies tried appeasing Hitler best they could if he didn't break his word so much he could've been trusted

>and maybe later invade the USSR if it came down to that
Invading USSR was always part of the plan see Lebensraum

>He never expected the western countries to get involved.
Germans are notoriously autistic with foreign policy

He didn't. Created shortages on even basic foodstuffs that used to be plentiful in Weimar

What he did was manufacture a temporarily stable economy through mass conscription and rearmament for his coming disastrous war. If Germany didn't go to war it would have collapsed economically, which is a Hitler rushed to war in 1939 before his generals wanted.

Attached: muhnaziutopia.png (740x581, 76K)

read it

Attached: 9780307405166.jpg (477x720, 55K)

THE ATTACK WAS BY THE NUMBERS
THEY WOULD HAVE SPELLED DISASTER IF YOU WEREN'T AN ARROGANT LITTLE PRICK
STOP BOGARTING THOSE PANZER DIVISIONS, ADOLF

Attached: scottsteiner.jpg (600x338, 29K)

>muh danzig!
no

Attached: neckbeardtriggerdanzig.jpg (960x4344, 2.43M)

If he didn't want to go to war with the West, he shouldn't have kept invading Western allies

Star shit, get hit.

If retardler hadn't cancelled it, it would have stuck

>fat 65 IQ boomer cries hitler dindunuffin inbetween invading all of europe
no

>He just wanted the Danzig corridor and a secure buffer between Germany and the USSR.
>His plan was to take eastern Poland, build up a more easily defensive line, and maybe later invade the USSR if it came down to that
you can't even keep a consistent narrative in your own thoughts you fucking retard

>Germans are expelled from shitton of countries
>Think they're the victim
why?

Attached: german expulsions.jpg (720x540, 68K)

>He just wanted the Danzig corridor and a secure buffer between Germany and the USSR
And poland
And ukraine
And france
A few other things

Krauts are parasites that subvert and destroy prosperous nations

Attached: eternalkraut.png (1232x2974, 203K)

ITT: /his/ trannies

>Then why did he violate so many treaties? Why did he violate Poland soverignty despite fully knowing the consequences
The same reason Russia and the US routinely ignore treaties and violate other countries’ sovereignty: he thought he could get away with it.

t. naziboo 56%er

nazi's were the real trannies. Being a tranny is based and redpilled!

Attached: gay nazis8.png (1100x577, 456K)

awwww did someone try this incel shit on /his/ and get chased out? I feel bad for you man.

>dying by the tens of thousands for an oligarchy with the pretense of "nationalism"

Attached: 61231994_p0_master1200.jpg (977x1171, 237K)

The fucking propeller on a fucking stick instead of an engine block ruined any and all immersion I had while watching this film.

That poster wasn't implying any legitimate moral reason for wanting the territory, stop looking for reasons to get angry where there are none.

>What was his endgame?

Domination of West Eurasia

>war was 100% unwinnable

It was easily winnable he was just an insane meth addict.

youtube.com/watch?v=GizXdEYIIg4

One of them would have broke it sooner or later.

Is this movie actually good?

The pact was to last 10 years and the Soviets were in no hurry to invade Germany.

Hitler would have won if he had a long range bomber.
He could have attacked the Soviet factories in the far east.

Was gay.

Based.

this was memes at that time, something funny and quirky that people did to pass time and entretein themselves and its peers, also there was other variations like couples dressing as each other and mimicking them. thats why bugs bunny does it on the cartoons too, back then it was to crack some lauhgs, now is done out of mental illness.

nope. Just think about it, Russia has fucking unlimited land, Hitler can't cover it all, russians would just move further and further to consolidate. France ran out of ground to run that's why they got beaten, Russia won't

woah hitler was such a fag lol, thanks for the redpill

Mein Fuhrer, Steiner . . .

>t. brainlets
Clearly you have never opened a history book.
The end goal was always to destroy the communist menace in the east, and secure lebensraum on top of that.

There's literally no justification for Russia being that fucking big, they can't even administrate it properly themselves. Having Germans administrating it would have allowed all of that territory to be properly utilized.

But the eternal anglo was so pissed at the prospect of losing their relevancy that they decided to sack their entire empire just to spite the Germans again.
Poland was literally the final stepping stone to Russia, had Hitler been allowed to complete his original plan, the red Army would have been destroyed by 1940, and today we would have a world without Slavic subhumans fucking everything up.

Homoerotic Roman LARP

He wanted to crush Europe with no survivors and he basically succeeded.
Daily reminder that this faggot that is idolized so much around here by braindamaged retards killed millions of white people and fucked the entire continent over. G*rmans in general are a fucking plague.

Nah, that would be the anglos that were the prime cause of that.

Anglos, will all their meddling and backstabbing are still much, MUCH better than the unholy creatures that are the G*rmans.

were you ok with the power-out kill?

Verrat!

>this is what redditors actually believe

Attached: cJoelGoodman_2016_15.jpg (1500x1000, 1.09M)

>braindamaged stormnigger calling anyone a redditor

Nah he could've won easy if he chose the right focuses
> Justify war goal on Poland as soon as possible
> Invade Poland
> Rush Anschluss
> Justify on Belgium
> Declare on Belgium
> France and UK should join war
> Invade through Northern France
> France will capitulate pretty easily
> Invade Britain (you should be making 100% subs from the start of the game for naval dominance)
If he had done this, he could have buttfucked the rest of Eastern Europe and then the Soviets with all his industry

you only know that from hindsight
everyone thought the war was almost over when france fell

>soviets building up forces along the entire border despite non-aggression pact
>reputable intel is coming in showing signs the soviets are planning an attack on the German fronts
>either wait and do nothing, giving them the upper hand if an attack happens, or hit them with a pre-emptive strike instead

He did the right thing. His mistake was trusting the dirty commies in the first place; although it bought enough time.

you deserve this

Attached: medal.jpg (1132x890, 140K)

>germany don’t invade poland or we’ll declare war
>*invades poland*
>wtf britain and france why are you warring me
total horseshit, this post

It was a turning point you fucking zoomer

Attached: brit.png (854x670, 1.46M)

fuck you

Attached: bomber harris.png (480x360, 266K)

It was a mutually beneficial agreement that was meant for both sides to buy time, but neither of them were expecting to last. Germany needed it to fight a one front war while the Soviets needed that to happen because they were a complete mess after the Great Purge and needed time to prepare for a proper war with Germany. Of course the Germans knew this which is why they were the ones to break it since it was advantageous for them to engage the Soviets while their industry was vulnerable and their military leadership gutted. Germany never had the resources to win any war of attrition so in reality that was their only chance, as waiting any longer would just mean that they would be fighting a relatively stronger and more prepared soviet force.

ah yes, invading britain is as easy as saying it

dubs confirm

>He wanted to crush Europe with no survivors
what? All he wanted was to stop russia and the expansion of communism to save europe - and he did.

I don't understand why this board has such a hard on for an ethnic German supremacist movement from the 20s. is it just zoomers that don't know any better or NEETs trying to be as edgy as possible?

Attached: 1521109273898.png (1806x404, 155K)

[white cliffs of dover playing in the background]

Attached: UgH_WhAtCouldofBean.jpg (640x360, 54K)

>France will capitulate pretty easily
The only reason you think this is because they fell easily in the Battle of France but the German victory there had just as much to do with sheer luck as French incompetence. I'd argue that 8 times out of 10 that invasion fails or at the very least gets bogged down

>h-he wanted to save europe from communism! that’s why he invaded a bunch of countries, started genociding the population to make room for the germans, and left europe in such a destroyed state that russia managed to take nearly half of it after
hahahaha the fucking state of naziboo revisionism

Real life is not hearts of iron, kiddo.

oh yeah not to forget his secret agreement with the communist russians where he happily handed over half the continent
what a great job he did “””””saving”””” europe

Nazis used some very Jewish tactics during WW2 as well. False flag attacks and faked casus belli were standard

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleiwitz_incident

what's the best parody? for me it's kutcher replacing sheen.

>other empire
Literally the same one
Rest is accurate though

I'm listening to Dan Carlin right now and it makes me think you'd have to be ultra braindead to still idolize Hitler or Stalin. The way they ruined their respective countries and how they treated their people just makes me sick.

Fucking /pol/tards

Attached: Europe Sea of Tranquility.gif (1412x997, 601K)

Attached: allies BTFO.png (1129x293, 107K)

Exactly by any objective measure Hitler left Germany in a much worse state then he found it in. Hell Germany was divided for over 40 years because of him what kind of infographics are these zoomers reading to fall for the NatSoc meme?

the pact didn't stuck because hitler invaded the soviet union

>the nazis were the real Jews, both in the fact they pretended to be jews while also employing all the scumbag tactics they attribute to being a sign jews are evil
>they did this so well that retards in the modern day still think jews are evil

Attached: 1520304929212.png (325x550, 9K)

>things that are lies

>ganged up on him
Hittler invaded Russia and declared war on the United States no one ganged up on him he invited conflict. Why do people try absolving these autistic Germans of wrong doing?

10/10

Attached: 1544870516899.jpg (470x470, 31K)

Bringing US into it was more Japans fault

Sure but Germany had no obligation to declare war on America after Pearl Harbor

Ah yes the US definitely wasn't giving materiel and volunteer aid to the Allies and Russia before entering the war. And certainly the Soviet Union certainly had no plans for conquering Eastern Europe before being attacked by Germany. Yes yes, these are both true statements.

>costed
It's cost you fucking retard.

>Ah yes the US definitely wasn't giving materiel and volunteer aid to the Allies and Russia before entering the war
Providing material aid is not equivalent to an act of war. By the same logic the Soviet Union had the right to declare war on the U.S when America was supplying mujaheddin with arms

>And certainly the Soviet Union certainly had no plans for conquering Eastern Europe before being attacked by Germany.
Source?

Here's how he could've handled the situation better :

1) Anschluss
2) Install fascist Germany-friendly regimes in the entire region and de facto take over those countries politically

This would give Hitler power over the entirety of middle Europe from the Black Sea up to Norway.
If we include Franco's Spain in this, Mussolini's Italy and other potential puppet states he'd effectively have alliances and pacts that completely isolate France and the UK.

At that point he could even push for a war against Russia and have the "allies" on his side easily.

He lost the war before it even started because he made a pact with a country he was the direct opposite too, making it easier for Britian to neva surrenda long enough for Russia/US to help them. If Hitler was smart, he would have made WW2 a 'everyone vs Russia' conflict

Who said it was an act of war? It's certainly ganging up though. You can't pretend that the US was a neutral power considering it was actively and exclusively supporting the Allies.

this but unironically

>It's certainly ganging up though.
I don't really think you can consider it ganging up as it was one nation which didn't even provide land forces and offered limited aid as public opinion was against another war in Europe.

>you can't pretend that the US was a neutral power
Sure but I don't agree with the narrative that Germany was unfairly ganged up on. Their foreign policy really alienated it from fellow first world nations.

>Their foreign policy really alienated it from (((the people who controlled))) fellow first world nations
Reminder that the war was incredibly unpopular both in Britain and America and the Brits voted Churchill out of office at their first opportunity.

>Already at war with Germany because Allies guaranteed Poland from German aggression
>France is now in the firing line.
>Soviets take half of Poland and it's resources, factories & workers, stopped from being used by the Germans
>Also know at some point they will turn on each other.
>Gee, why didn't Churchill declare war on the Soviets as well, which could have pushed them into an unholy alliance.

>alienated it from (((the people who controlled))) fellow first world nations
No dude it's a bit more complicated than that. German foreign policy was aggressive and expansionist. The Nazis also violated a number of treaties (not just Versailles) making them untrustworthy

>the Brits voted Churchill out of office at their first opportunity.
Yea and then they voted him back in. Churchill was beloved the issue was he was a war time leader and the Brits found out the hard way he can't really govern effectively in peace time.

>anyone who isnt a wehraboo is a tranny

as if one needed more evidence wehrbs are braindead

>German foreign policy was aggressive and expansionist
Against communists. It was revanchist against the Poles and Czechs. It was conciliatory with Britain and France. It was ambitiously amicable with America (due to America having the largest German population outside Germany no doubt).

Hey, I just admire the guy's entrepreneurship. Imagine a broke-ass failed art student with no connections becoming the dictator of a country and taking over most of a continent. That's the American dream in action.

To be fair he was a war hero so he definitely had a head start.

I don't think it was conciliatory with France. What do you base that off? And while Germany may have had good intentions with America their foreign policy alienated the country.

If he crushed USSR which he came close to, the war would be over.
Also Italy turned out to be almost completely worthless as an ally. Japan was not that much better either.

>Also Italy turned out to be almost completely worthless as an ally. Japan was not that much better either.
That's just because German foreign policy was retarded

>just spam paratroopers br0

I always wondered what effect Spain would have had in the war if they joined the Axis. Likely no better than Italy considering its agrarian economy. Still worth considering.

kek

>their foreign policy alienated the country.
Because it wasn't international craptialism and it was anti-Jew.

No because it was aggressive and expansionist.

Such a depressing movie. Most movies follow some hero who ends up winning, and at worst gets a bittersweet ending. This one had so much tension in it; the uselessness of continuing to fight. One of the few true tragedies in recent film.

The USSR was not a typical sovereign national entity, it was an internationalist (arguably imperial) force that directly threatened all European countries west of it. Yes, there needed to be an aggressive way to defeat it.

Screencapped so I can laugh at you when the antarctic UFOs liberate the world.

So is international capitalism. It requires the expansion of markets.

International Capitalism is not an ideology. NatSoc however is with expansionism being a core part of its ideology. You should read Mein Kampf

Except interventionism was a trotskyst idea and trotskysts were purged over a decade before WW2. Stalin had a "singular socialist state" ideology - we help commie bro overseas but no actual war.

>If he crushed USSR which he came close to
Close to? After his initial plan of lightning fast war failed he was completely fucked and it was just a matter of time before he lost the war

No it isn't, Fascism is interested in creating a state that is self sufficient. Lebensraum is for the installation of autarky. I do not agree with Hitler's specific idea of lebensraum and believe it was somehwat misguided but the idea that Naitonal Socialism is any more expansionist than capitalism or communism is just retarded.

>we help commie bro overseas but no actual war.
Are you an idiot? Stalinist Russia is about consolidating power in the nation and then marching into other sovereign nation states to install communist reigms, as happened in the balkans, Romania and East Germany which was a literal rape. "Helping commie bros" is no different than the proxy wars we see on behalf of the United States.

The Nazis lost because they were Nazis.

What do I mean by that? Basically, it was their racial / ideological autism that caused them to alienate any potential sources of help they could've had in order to win the war against the UK / USSR etc.
Instead of genociding some of your most productive, most educated citizens (Jews), have them work for you developing weapons / tech / etc. Instead of genociding potential soldiers because they're more blue-eyed and blonde-haired than you (Slavs), actually liberate them from communism and promise them autonomy and solid work if they fight for you. etc. etc.

I don't entirely by the argument that Germany lost as soon as it declared war on the UK / USSR (although certainly after they declared war on the US.) I think they, in geopolitical terms, had a chance at knocking out the USSR to have them sue for peace had a few different strategic moves had been made, BUT NOT after they started murdering innocent Ukranians / Poles / Russians and the Soviet people began to understand what life under Nazi dominion would actually mean.

So basically, the only way the Nazis could've won would've been to have not been Nazis in the first place, in which the argument becomes pointless.

>III Reich is basically a bunch of incels organising a beta uprising against the entire world
I guess that's why Yea Forums loves nazi Germany.

>Fascism is interested in creating a state that is self sufficient
NatSoc is not Mussolini style Fascism while it took inspiration from it there are a number of differences.

>Lebensraum is for the installation of autarky.
Lebensraum in of itself is expansionist

>the idea that National Socialism is any more expansionist than capitalism or communism
I'll give you communism but you keep referring to capitalism as some sort of coherent ideology. It really wasn't western European nations almost all had a unique implementation of it. Anyway how were capitalist nations just as expansionist as NatSoc? The Allies pursued appeasement after all hardly the mark of a war hungry nation.

This has to be a joke because this is the most laughable "criticism" I've ever seen.

I will never understand why he abused boundaries. To me, this was the biggest upset. Hitler's problem was surrounding himself with vultures who wouldn't even peck out his eye near the end to actually see the state of the war. I watched Downfall, and it was his only friend who left him. That one man was probably the only friend he had who could understand him to a certain degree, at a certain angle.

>Hitler's problem was surrounding himself with vultures who wouldn't even peck out his eye near the end to actually see the state of the war.
As I understand both Goebbels and Goering were very weary about going to war.

>hurr ebil commies invaded East Germany so it's proof they are invaders.
Holy shit

what the hell are you on about? They had allies with every racial background, allied with muslims and had the most advanced team of scientists. The whole "blue-eyed" bullshit was american propaganda, they didn't care a bit about the color of any ones eyes - they really didn't even care that much about jews and more about big banks and companies.

>NatSoc is not Mussolini style Fascism while it took inspiration from it there are a number of differences.
The core ideology is essentially the same, the only difference is that Germany was more industrial and was able to harness more resources. I never said that Lebensraum wasn't expansionist, but I am saying that it's purpose was to expand so that it could install autarky for the German people.

Were they honest about it though? Or did they dishonestly carry out responsibilities that they didn't fully accept? That's the difference. In a way, probably to Hitler, they were dishonest beings.

Nazis were basically IRL "map painter" autists who tried to expand their borders to ridiculously inflated sizes, the same way an EU4 player would

A usual dumb gambler behavior. Win win win raise raise raise aaand casino wins!

But they did, this isn't the epic own you seem to think it is.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Empire

Even Maoists would seem to agree.

I think this is the general problem with the entire World. People do abuse boundaries, maybe they don't seem to see them sometimes but they should know better. So I can't understand Hitler if he already abuses standard courtesy. Nobody is really right in war and even if they are, they had to be wrong to know it.

Economy was in tatters after a civil war. Their contribution to the Axis would have been negligible, all it would have done is given the USA the ability to open up another front to stretch the Germans (who did literally all the hard lifting in WW2 in Europe, the rest were garbage at doing anything but murdering civilians),

>ywn live in a world where old-guard Prussian monarchists despose Hitler, form non-aggression pacts with France and the UK, and form a united, non-ideological front against Soviet aggression

feels bad man

Attached: wojak bismark.jpg (460x617, 68K)

He was already worshipped well before he declared war on Poland.

>he would have made WW2 a 'everyone vs Russia' conflict
He honestly didnt think england and france would declare war if germany and russia were both invading poland. Everyone had as much reason to go to war with Russia as they did Germany.

If you look at the soviet history they actually did not invade anyone outside of WW2/rus civil war where their hand was kinda forced.
Some volunteer squads, some weapons sent here and there, some mil.advisers, some border conflicts maybe. But no wars. Even though they could annex Iran or Finland or piece of China after WW2. It was just not in their ideology. Stalin even advised Mao to make peace with nationalists and have 2 China states.
Sure they put commie governments where they could after WW2. But they already had those nations in their hands. It was pure opportunism.

>UK

Liberated

Attached: 1552411188483.jpg (735x513, 73K)

what a brainlet, one of the major goals of the soviets was having red flags wave from moscow to lissabon

Yes, you fucking retard, and in USA too, without war. Communism was a political movement.

We only worship Hitler ironically in opposition to mentally ill trannies worshipping Stalin, even though any communist country that ever existed would have sent trannies to forced labor camps or experimented on them.

>without war
is the american education I heard so much about?

>the only difference is that Germany was more industrial and was able to harness more resources.
No there are a number of differences like Lebensraum, the fact it was based on race, and its anti-Jewish stance

>I never said that Lebensraum wasn't expansionist, but I am saying that it's purpose was to expand so that it could install autarky for the German people.
Sure I understand that but its justification does not change the fact it was inherently expansionist.

>even though any communist country that ever existed would have sent trannies to forced labor camps or experimented on them.
just like hitler would do with most /pol/fags

>We only worship Hitler ironically

In your case I believe it.

Attached: hipster faggots.jpg (500x618, 113K)

>We only worship Hitler ironically in opposition to mentally ill trannies worshipping Stalin
Might wanna tell /pol/ it's just ironic I think they missed the memo

I still don't understand how the fuck communism in US got mixed up with trannies

same way speed running did

Probably. But it's good you realize you're both degenerates.

LOOK AT ME IM A CENTRIST

>communism in US got mixed up with trannies

The chance is uncertain but I might live to be a hundred and have no expectation of hearing that claim made even once outside the context of Yea Forums.

why zoomers think you have to be a blue haired commie tranny or a NEETSoc sperg. there is such a thing as nuance you know

Attached: 1536159174210.jpg (1024x746, 71K)

Because it's the new edgy to be a communist. SJWs (including trannies) want forced equality at any price. Even though they would soon find out that some people are more equal than others. They think an authoritarian regime enforcing the proper use of pronouns is a utopia to be strived for.

>They think an authoritarian regime enforcing the proper use of pronouns is a utopia to be strived for.
To be fair NEETSoc edgelords believe in a authoritarian regime too only difference is that they think it would fix their shitty life and eliminate "degeneracy"

>it's the new edgy to be a communist

Good luck getting that shit to fly, fucko.

Attached: kekistan.jpg (1080x720, 91K)

>I AM SILLY
you are not a rational thinker you are just a brainlet

how do you figure?

based

Wew boy we got a live one. You don't know shit about communism anyway and I bet you've never even read any Marx or taken an introductory economics class.

Yeah but the difference being nazis are already reviled by society and rightly so, but commies get a free pass and even approval since leftist thought is currently the correct thought.

you are assuming that there are rational people on the left

lol that's just being intellectually lazy. Dismissing an entire political aisle like that is pretty irrational in my opinion

>they really didn't even care that much about jews

Attached: 141_-_benis.jpg (200x200, 12K)

You should read Mein Kampf dude

its true though, atleast here in europe

>International Capitalism is not an ideology
We've got to bring Democracy™ to Vietnam, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Iran, Venezuela, North Korea...

>Jews continue to dominate Weimar Germany
"No!"
youtube.com/watch?v=JxVGNk2Ma-8&bpctr=1514538210

You're dismissing a lot of very varied and in my opinion worthwhile thought. I don't see how you can call other people brainlets or not rational when you do such irrational things yourself

That's just autistic burger foreign policy.

How did Jews dominate Weimar? Which ones specifically?

based

Shame WW2 didn't see a military genious of this calibre

10/10
Releasing the french african colonies should lower world tension too, if you invade them in the current patch you can annex the whole french state while keeping world tension at 0%

Ever since the new patch the axis is constantly raping the allies and I don't know why. Fuel was supposed to nerf them.

fuck you man

Attached: charlie brown gif.gif (500x375, 371K)

Nazis lost because they're pure fucking evil personified.

It frightens me that day by day we are moving closer to this kind of regime

Attached: nazi crimes.webm (304x230, 2.34M)

>wasting good loli pussy
>wasting slave labour instead of testing medicine in them
>not being able to unjam a weapon as an officer

>soviet agression
sure faggot

This.

>killing lolis
Nazis were brainlets.

Anglos are the reason for world conflict

Not an argument

>finland and the baltics weren’t war
You shouldn’t throw stones, brainlet

seriously:

>be britain
>declare war on germany
>germany goes OKAY
>germany wastes its aircraft over and over again

why?

I mean, intercepting bomber squads...okay, but why did they think it was a great idea to waste nearly all their aircrafts over britain(coast)

They knew, without big daddy USA, UK wouldn't do an invasion and would be nearly no real threat

the battle of britain is a meme

germany lost more aircraft in other campaigns. britain just likes to play up an easy victory (tactical bombers being used in a strategic role, wow) like they do with their rout from France in 1940 as being an amazing victory instead of embarrassing

This is mostly correct. It’s all in Shirer and Tolands biographies.

Everyone forgets that Poland didn’t exist until versailles made it so. Molotov and Hitler both resented it’s existence, as it existed solely to weaken the USSR and Germany.

You can bitch about disrespecting Polish sovereignty but the Polish state disrespected USSRs sovereignty all day during its early days and Germany had mostly all the losers of Versailles on its side in WWII.

Anyone saying this post is wrong has never actually read a book.

Germany was running out of fuel to keep the naval blockade of the u boats on Britain, they tried everything to end the war as fast as they could (see Hitler attmepting peace with britain) they invaded the soviet union looking for the caucasus region which is very rich in oil deposits had stalingrad fallen this region would also have fallen to the germans. Germany literally used horse traction in their supply lines, imagine how low their fuel capacity actually was compared to the motorized militaries like the soviets and the US.

Dude you have to fucking read up on this shit. Lebensraum is a meme word that meant everything from Russia to the Urals to the classic German borders to western Poland.

Invading Russia was NOT always part of the plan and Hitler spent a long time attempting to ally with Stalin. Stalin was a cynical bastard and wouldn’t have it

There’s even the Molotov in Berlin story that anyone who’s read a book on the subject knows about. Clearly you haven’t

Just to add to this, i love how brits and americans make movies where they won an ultra heroic victory against all odds despite fighting an army that wasn't motorized, didn't have supply lines, lacked air force, armor support was terrible, lacked industry from being strategically bombing to shit and was fighting on four fronts if you consider air.

yeah...the idea of capturing the oilrich region of russia wasn't that bad, but in the longtrem (it's still russia) it was MEH at best.

>He was genuinely surprised when the UK and France declared war over invading Poland.

>The German invasion of Poland...violated a treaty Germany had signed, so Britain and Frace were entitled to declare war

??? fucking retard please kys