Thoughts?

How the fuck does Buster Scruggs have an sjw agenda? The film is literally several stories about the concept of death.
SJWs have some shit ideas, but this film isnt one of them, chief.

He would have dies regardless since he was going to throw him out. You can see it as a mercy killing

Not necessarily, it was a critique of the entertainment industry. The cripple, although remarkable, drew less of an audience than a fucking chicken. He was 'thrown out' of the industry (the analogy is a bit too on-the-nose if you ask me).

>chief.
reddit cringe

Kino

Oh look he wasn't actually dead from being shot: The Movie

Never been on reddit in my life, faggot, how about you address the burning question of how Buster Scruggs is an SJW film?

youtu.be/fU1hZr1IM9M
5>4=1>2>6>3

Best movie of 2018

It seemed the tone of the shorts got more serious as they progressed
Could have used more “mythical” western elements throughout like what was used in Ballad

god you are such a seething little cuck

>happy ending
Not on your life

Mr. Pocket is the devil (not a man) and he spreads the burning sands with water.

It was good.

And you're a wannabe intellectual smoothbrain, explain how its an SJW movie, faggot, if you're right I may agree with you.

Incel whitoid

Sucked

Mr Pocket>Doghole>pan shot>buster>torso lad>carriage

fag

Lmao, now tell me how it's an SJW film, you fucking mongoloid queer.

Don't bother, he's on damage control

The joke is, if he's right about it being an SJW film and can articulate his thoughts properly, I may end up agreeing with him. The film tackles an interesting subject but does it in a heavy-handed manner - im by no means a fan of the thing.

You're taking bait, it's just making you look stupid. Now that you have acknowledgement that you're not "losing" an argument, but instead being stupid for thinking you're responding to an argument, you should be able to withdraw from this with your honour intact.

Sure, lmao, I just wanted to hear the fag's opinion, I forgot this place is infested with retarded shills nowadays.

retards

Attached: 1495288088439.png (645x773, 253K)

In simplest terms. But you have to consider that the preceding stories set a precedent for dark turn, cruel endings. It was a happy ending that managed to be subversive and surprising.

What the fuck was Mr. Pockets problem?

I thought it was supposed to be startlingly cold

>In simplest terms.
>But you have to consider
>preceding
>set a precedent for dark turn, cruel endings
>subversive
whole lotta buzzwords, not much content

He's saying: other stories dark and shit, prospector happy and shit, difference make face smile.

Literally the only thing that could be considered a buzzword there is subversive, and it's used so literally you have to be a fucking brainlet.

>s-subver.. sive??

Attached: 2l0ahe.jpg (415x470, 39K)

Attached: 188B074F-8061-4DE3-8281-D1DDF1F42F7E.jpg (526x583, 24K)

Enjoyed it, but it could have used less nihilism.

COOOOOL CLEEEEEAAR WATER

It's nice to have a movie I can love with Boomer dad. It intersects our tastes perfectly.

Its alright, was definitely robbed of best original song at the oscars. The A Star is Born song that beat it is a cliche ridden trashheap without a single memorable hook or moment. But even though I didn't love this film I had When A Cowboy Trades His Spurs for Wings bouncing round my head for weeks after watching.

What a fucking idiot

No, the singing cowboy genre died for a reason. The orchestral score used for the rest of it was perfectly acceptable, however. It hit all the right Aaron (((Copland))) high notes, so to speak.

Gal Who Got Rattled is the best one.

Attached: The-Girl-Who-Got-Rattled-IMDB-1024x533.jpg (1024x533, 110K)

>so to speak.
die

>and shit
ah, the last refuge of the rattled redditor