Looks like a crash and burn. Just because “IT” made money didn’t mean this one needed remaking. Especially if you’re going to alter it so much from the book
Zero hype
Oliver Lee
Nathaniel Mitchell
>John Lithgow as Jud
I am there opening weekend.
Chase Young
Judd no New England accent-fail
Oliver Morgan
These remakes are a disease. Not even pets can die in peace!
Benjamin Green
no idea. I am not a burger and can only tell if someone is from the deep South.
I know Jud has a New England accent in the book but I have no idea what it supposed to sound like.
Carson Moore
m.youtube.com
South Parl even parody it
m.youtube.com
Samuel Rodriguez
There's not really a fixed "New England Accent". There's multiple accents in that region, just like in Britain for example there's a different accent if you go from London to Manchester. Most of King's works are set in Maine. This guy gives a description of the native Maine accent: youtube.com
William Nelson
King was pretty specific on how Jud sounded
Carson Cooper
>Just because “IT” made money didn’t mean this one needed remaking. Especially if you’re going to alter it so much from the book
The new IT movie is an even looser, less accurate adaptation of the novel than the 90s IT miniseries was.
Noah Williams
They spelled cemetery wrong lmao
Cooper Reyes
please be bait
Justin Morris
they also spelled it wrong on the book cover. probably because that fucking hack King was high on coke and drunk all the time back in the 80s lol what a loser
dude i'm not a gramar nazi but that's just plain stupid and fucking retarded sorry man
Alexander Carter
Thel little kids who buried their pets there and made the sign misspelled it.
Anthony Gomez
>falling for that weak bait
Evan Perry
>John Lithgow
Only reason to watch this to be honest. On pretty much all other accounts they pretty much failed it seems.
Brayden Kelly
>it’s the girl who dies and not the little boy
D R O P P E D
If they could still show Georgie dying (and graphically getting his arm bitten off), then there’s no reason they can’t show an infant get hit by a truck and come back as a spooky zombo.
Jeremiah Howard
>If they could still show Georgie dying (and graphically getting his arm bitten off), then there’s no reason they can’t show an infant get hit by a truck and come back as a spooky zombo
if you really don't see the difference between these totally different scenarios and they're outcome, then you're fucking retarded man.
also, i'm pretty sure that's not the only reason. they probably want to take a different approach than both the (silly) '87 movie and the book. just like the guys who made the new IT did. I'm not really excited for the movie, but i'm going to watch it.
Jaxon Gutierrez
The director’s argument is you can’t do what was in the book with a toddler actor.
The original movie did pretty well all things considering, having to use a doll for the more graphic scenes.
Sebastian Sanchez
What I heard was that they couldn't get the toddler actor to do the part right when he comes back, so they gave the part to the girl (too late to recast I guess).
Benjamin Foster
IT shouldn't have made money.
IT was shit.
>lets all beat the invincible shapechanging monster with baseball bats!
wow
so lame
Ryder Phillips
youtube.com
this is pretty much perfect as far as accents go.
Aiden Jackson
In the book, when Gage comes back he’s possessed by The Windigo and starts taunting Jud, calling his dead wife a whore
It was obviously cut out of the movie because you can’t have a toddler saying that
Jeremiah Gutierrez
bullshit. remember when they had that girl pee on the carpet in the exorcist and say all kinds of shit that was way worse than "ur wife's a whore Judd"
also use spoilers next time
Brandon Nelson
>remake
It's an adaptation from the book, actually.
Not that it matter, it'll still be a boring piece of shit.
Also, I'd like to challenge Jason Clarke to participate in an actual good movie for once.
Jaxon Collins
Isn't it adding some sort of pagan forest skull-god? Looks bretty gud
Colton Barnes
They make children say worse things in supposedly lightheated tv commercials.
Jack Brooks
No its not that it was too vulgar, he meant they literally couldn't get the toddler boy to give a convincing performance saying these things
If I recall the exact line mentions how Juds wife let allllll his friends assfuck her and how they aaaaalll laughed at Jud while they did it
You think a 3 year old, any 3 year old, can give a good performance of that scene?
Hudson Gray
>using spoilers
>for the remake of a movie that was made after a book about a hundred or so years ago
user
are you for real right now?
Cameron Turner
i'm actually not sure. like most of the time.
Juan Cooper
god King is a hack
Charles Morgan
will they reuse the Ramones song?
Leo Morris
youtube.com
I hope so, kino vid btw,
Luke White
They will probably have a awful band like Maroon-5 do a cover of it
Benjamin Bennett
i don't know, but they're stupid if not. the biggest mistake Hackson did with the Hobbit trilogy was not using Nimoy's Ballad of Bilbo Baggins.
Caleb White
This is good because the little kid from the original put on what was possibly the worst child acting performance since the beginning of time
Eli Thompson
I bet Nimoy smashed every extra on that set.
Liam Perez
*cough* Jake Lloyd *cough*
Grayson Bailey
The source material is stupid. And there's no way to make toddlers creepy unless you go full CG, so that meant they had to change it to a child who was old enough to act. You can't make toddlers act because they can't think abstractly yet, which is why in the original it looks like they are just constantly trying to trick the toddler into doing what the script says and then adding scary music.
Nolan Miller
They were planning on this remake before IT was even started.
Dominic Morales
I don't mind the change. I always thought that Ellie should have become a zombie like Gage and Church and then have a sequel where three of them kick ass, take names.