"So... you are proposing to go to war over these islands, they're thousands of miles away, a handful of citizens...

A variety of ranches (the largest ranch in America is in Hawaii), farms (those delicious nuts & pineapples), fishing and lest we forget, tourism.
And the super secret special ingredient that makes all this possible, METHAMPHETAMINE

>a few beachfront properties on a floating puddle of mud are equivalent to the home of the US pacific fleet where 3,000 men died during the attack on the harbor
what

60 billion GDP sounds like a lot but they're in the 39th place as far as state GDP goes. Hawaii's economy is virtually all tourism with being stop for ships importing/exporting goods across the Pacific supplementing their economy.

>Killing civilians isn't as bad as attacking viable military targets
mutts, ladies and gentlemen

Nah, thatcher was based af.

this

but the real important difference between the two is that Hawaii is easily one of the most valuable pieces of land in the Pacific, simply due to its location.

So you're saying that of pearl harbour had not been a large naval base (and assuming that for some reason the japs attacked it anyway) the US wouldent have responded In this way? Nigga u retarded.

and winning a war does wonders for the polls

why did so many people hate her? I don't know much about her aside from all the cheering and bants in the streets once she died or something

>why did so many people hate her?
She BTFO poor people
but shes good anyway
youtube.com/watch?v=RBzAwro8M90

Because she took the British industry off life support. Cue massive unemployment where it happened.

>dude just lie down and take it lmao
So this is your brain on California

Because she's conservative

>They're a weak lot some of them in Europe, you know.
oof

Attached: 1366762132068.gif (160x120, 906K)

Falklands is surrounded by gas and oil you know.

Just saying.

Basically she took all the state owned mines and industry, all of which was running at massive loss and attempted to fix it. When they all went on strike she just said fuck it and shhut em down.

Basically a bunch of old industries, namely mining, were on government welfare and were well past the point of being dead. They were costing the country more than they were profiting. Thatcher made the decision to cut the cord finally. Admittedly she didn't handle it as well as she could have and just left the workers get set to the wind, but to this day brainlet English people treat it as if she did it to be sadistically evil.

youtube.com/watch?v=rQ-M0KEFm9I

She was basically our Trump, the left were against everything she did regardless of how sensible it was. She got into power because he country was very socialist at the time, the state owned many industries outright, the most notable were coal mining and power generation, throughout the 70s their unions were striking so often that country-wide power cuts were commonplace, we even had a 3 day work week because we didn't have enough electricity supply to work 5 days a week. Thatcher's response was to privatise these industries, and lo and behold the lights came back on. This was apparently the most evil thing ever because a bunch of lazy shits got fired and replaced by people who would do their job.

>brainlet english
Scotland literally doent vote tory bc of her and neither does wales.Its only the norf that's still mad

Welsh coal output had not changed since the 30s

post more iron lady bants, she's good at this

>California
>7th largest GDP in the world
>whatever queer europoor hole you crawled out of
>so far down the list I can't be bothered to look
Having a BBQ burger right now and it tastes like winning

youtube.com/watch?v=tVt_1ByddUQ

>Admits he's californian
No lad, what are you doing

>She was basically our Trump
Except, you know, competent.

The Falklands are strategically important, that's what she meant.

fucking hell the US needs to adopt a parliamentary style of doing things because the banter is fucking kino

Started neo-liberalism.

Enjoy It before the make veganism mandatory

Americans are way too pretentious and self-righteous for that type of banter.

The poor hate her for making them pay for school milk

Attached: _81738062_risitas.jpg (1024x576, 36K)

How did she get away with killing 96 Liverpool fans?

you really do
youtube.com/watch?v=BvjwnRQAeoU

Attached: images.jpg (225x225, 9K)

The only good thing she did. Fuck scousers

is beer chugging some kind of poll strategy in aussieland?

Attached: 1531071884160.png (274x184, 22K)

youtube.com/watch?v=bw2LQPzzezo

someone post that Canadian politician who always brings the heat in parliament

>the fuck does hawaii do to make 60 billion
N-O-T-H-I-N-G

That is the value of combined "speculated" real estate holdings.

Attached: 1528427557382.jpg (600x444, 58K)

She was a neo-liberal who had a blatant disregard for the wellbeing of the common man. To her what mattered was "the economy", which she no doubt measured by the wealth of herself, and her cohorts.

>This was apparently the most evil thing ever because a bunch of lazy shits got fired and replaced by people who would do their job.
It's a shame those people were slave workers in Cambodia.

>She was a neo-liberal who had a blatant disregard for the wellbeing of the common man
t. povo

unironically yes

Post your income.

don't have a job, I have rich parents

>not sure if strawman
you've made me kek and sad at the same time. 8/10 fuck you

las malvinas son argentinas

Attached: savile-thatcher_2437786b.jpg (620x387, 69K)

No amigo

>nigger opinions

So if a foreign country (a fascist country, I don't really care about that but maybe you do) invades your country you should just let them have it because of geography?

>tore tha fookin' 'eart outta 'his communinny
youtube.com/watch?v=QOZzFXolGJc

which fascist country, argentina in 1982 or thatcher's britain? if I didn't regard falklanders as a bunch of contemptible drooling inbreds I might even feel sorry for 'em being faced with that choice

>She was basically our Trump, the left were against everything she did regardless of how sensible it was

Can you name an example of something sensible that Trump has done?

North Korea negotiations
Pushing for more NATO involvement
The Wall

been an ally to israel

He has attempted to build The Wall and pull out of Syria, the libs and deep state have been blocking that. He has got North Korea to abandon their nuclear weapons program.

>deep state

Attached: laughter.jpg (640x480, 64K)

Pulling out of INF treaty
and the Iran deal.
Making NATO stronger in Eastern EU and increasing American defense sales by 30%

Putting the West on a path of disentanglement such that we might win a grand conflict with the eternal subhuman East.

Attached: NATO-Flag.png (1373x909, 510K)

>she
>competent

Lawl.

NIGGGGGGGGGGGEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE ||
RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

not putting boots on the ground to find Assad while retards called him a Putin puppet for it

you're a caved in head retard. No, kosher neo-conservatives are not "fascists" you fucking moron

Yea Forums is an anglo board pierre

Trumps budget removed the tax deduction for state taxes, which means rich people living in high tax democratic states like NY and Cali now have to face the consequences of their stupid policies.
smartasset.com/taxes/trumps-plan-to-eliminate-the-state-and-local-tax-deduction-explained

To be fair that whole affair, combined with the petrol deposits being uncovered in the North sea to bail her out while her policies hadn't yet kicked in, got her reelected. The Brits got a hard-on from seeing their military used again, considering they'd be inches away from turning third-world in the years prior (they had such a hard turn running a government that their trash stayed out rotting in the weeks in the street during the 1970s).

Also considering you only needed to slap around the Argentinians to win the war, I don't see why you wouldn't. The Americans literally thought the Brits would try to nuke Buenos Aires if worse came to worse but really they only needed to sink a ship or two.

>but really they only needed to sink a ship or two.

Truth was even funnier than that. It was only needing a ship or two to utterly destroy Argentina's air force. That's like a fire type pokemon losing to a grass one level of humiliation

haha epic thanks for relating it to pokemon! us gamers love pokemon. the bacon narwhals at midnight my good sir.

>He has attempted to build The Wall

Big fucking deal. Do they award Nobel Prizes for *attempted* science?

Attached: bob.jpg (720x406, 32K)

the next pokemon is set in the UK user. Only fitting.

The Falklands is such a kino war
>Dat SLR aesthetic
>Harriers
>Strategically difficult, really interesting if you dig into it
>Elite forces doing cool shit
>Short so it avoids any bad feelin'
>GOTCHA
>Bad guys so bad somehow make Thatcher look nice
Sucks to be Argentinian though

Attached: marines2PNG.png (615x415, 318K)

Falklands has billions of barrels worth of oil in the maritime zone around it. The main reason they went to defend it is because they didn't want to be fucking Argentinian. Thatcher was based; she was willing to nuke Argentina as well.

The funny thing was is that the entire british operation would have collapsed if you sunk one carrier or at least made it inoperable for a few months.

If you're interested, read up about the argentinian air force conducting dangerous death star attack runs on the aptly named Empire navy. They're basically the only competent portion of the argentinian military. It's also a case study of why you should not buy weapons from countries who are allies of your enemies.

There was no way that the UK would have lost the war anyway. The SAS managed to blow up a large number of aircraft in a single raid. Had France not given up Exocet supply, Thatcher was going to nuke Argentina. She didn't care. Furthermore, USA offered Iwo Jima to UK. Finally, had she wanted, she could have initiated NATO Defence Protocol.

>North Korea negotiations
failed
>Pushing for more NATO involvement
yeah, letting potential rivals build up their military instead of keeping them reliant on him sure won't fail
>The Wall
failed
>his tax plan
trickle down economics always (what? You guessed it) fail
Fucking Trump keeps winning this hard and we'll all be speaking brown people in a year

Firstly, I'm not suggesting that the Argentinians could have taken full advantage if they got lucky and took out a carrier. But then the war would drag into a stale mate where the British controlled the seas but would struggle to resupply their position.

NATO would not have joined, especially not in the unlikely event it got nuked. This gets overplayed alot, it was a drafted action plan just in case they needed it. It does not indicate the willingness to follow through.

Now maybe the US could have gotten Chile to fight the Argies to open a land front but I don't know if that is to UK's long term benefit.

yes, actually. Bob Hawke was the world record holder for sculling yard glasses and this is what literally won him the election to be the head of state of our country

Somebody can't into reading comprehension The question was what sensible things he did. Not where he succeeded.

America and the EU are simply natural allies on an ideological level and this isn't going away in our lifetimes. And the Europeans have exploited that situation for way too long.

Attached: 300px-HIMARS_-_missile_launched.jpg (300x225, 10K)

She flexed her actual privilege and killed a lot of babies in doing so

I don't think nato applies to overseas territories, especially ones in south america

They are the opposite, but the reaction to them is the same.

>Thatcher guts a failing mining industry
>Left is mad because muh working class, muh unions

>Trump tries to save a failing mining industry
>Left is mad because muh environment, muh racist rednecks getting welfare

The left has changed quite a bit throughout the years

Falklands significants was simply because at that point British citizens saw decades of Britian losing it's Empire and world status and they needed something to show the world they still at least in name had an Empire.

las Malvinas son uruguayas

based Thatcher

If only we had listened

youtube.com/watch?v=Tetk_ayO1x4

Attached: e2o893wbwz101.png (402x434, 182K)

Trying to compare the two reveals just what a fucking moron you are.

Thatcher shut down plenty of mines that were making money because the unions held too much power. Destroying the industry half your country relies on to assert your political dominance is pretty maniacal.

There's big arguments against american coal, like how the earth is dying, these occupations aren't profitiable and have to be held up by bail outs to the mining companies, and the people that work them have shitty lives full of nothing but addiction and poverty.

Yeah how did that happen? When I was growing up being liberal was all about free speech, being cheeky and overall just caring about people

>Making NATO stronger in Eastern EU
citation needed

ironically became neo-liberals for 40 years following thatchers lead.

More like she had her entire party as sub-queen of England. Trump has to deal with "I agree with your policy HOWEVER" by 4 people in his party that want to not work

Its also a sign of power. Pulling off that military operation so far away was impressive by any standards and showed the world they couldn't just fuck with us like that.

Thank Woodrow Wilson for that. God I wish Teddy won

They're not remotely comparable

>muh environment
Yeah fuck me for wanting my country to stay as beautiful as it is today

i'd blow up some argentinians even if falklands was a deserted 1 square mile island. Fuck em.

Attached: UK-flag-Union-Jack-featured.jpg (1200x801, 43K)

Trump has no policy, it's just repeating whatever the last person said to him.

-Tried to enhance border fortifications
-negotiating Peace with NK to formally end the last cold war "conflict"
-Exposed China's economic growth which is now plateauing
-putting a end to most middle East conflict
-BTFO welfare states with low Taxes and no SALT deductions
-BTFO multi-million dollar media by using the internet as a primary form of communication
-calling out gas price "increases" from OPEC

They award it for being black and killing Arabs, so I guess

America has exploited Europe as their rest stop to the Middle East

>Exposed China's economic growth which is now plateauing
Exposed, how? Did he write an essay?

>THATCHER SHUTTING DOWN THE MINES WAS EVIL
>OBAMA SHUTTING DOWN THE MINES WAS AWESOME
Jesus Christ...

>exploited
I don't think you know what that word means.

FYI there are massive oil and gas reserves in the Falklands territory

This is the only reason argies want it and the bongs can't extract it because they are weak and bankrupt

>Puts high tariffs in place
>China attempts to counter tariffs
>Fails within months
>Trump pits more tariffs in place
>China whines to WTO
>Companies and investors begin to seriously look at China and realize that it has no way of actually stabilizing after period of crazy growth
>Apple CEO himself says that China is slowing down
>China/America now In new trade deal talks because China's entire economy is built on rapid unsustainable growth and speculation

No she removed it from schools completely.
T. Old enough to remember getting my mini bottle of milk with red and white stripey straw,old enough to remember singing 'maggie thatcher milk snatcher' after it was taken away,desu more gutted about not being able to take piss out of the special kid who got a mini carton of semi skinned (your still a faggot seth).

She was protecting British citizens on British territory, hell they should have firebombed Buenos Aires in response

>the earth is dying
Imagine being such a brainlet that you develope policies based on the ideals of the same people who tell you that even if we stop all industrialization and pollution it will take a century for the world to clear up

Ah a soft palmed faggot then.

I like how Thatcher-haters either ignore or don't know that the Falklandians WANTED to remain in the British empire. They didn't want to join Argentina.

and neither do you

She did actually threaten to nuke Buenos Aires if the French didn't give them the Exocet missile codes.

lol he also doesn't know carbon emissions have been going DOWN under Trump despite Trump bringing back the coal industry.

Thatcher and Reagan spoke about the Falklands before and and afterwards he helped supply arms to the British. Most likely he told her to not actually attack Argentina itself because muh Monroe Doctrine

I don't see what Trump has to do with China's slowdown-issue.

>haha it can't possibly be THAT bad!!
If only you knew how bad things really are.

And meanwhile American farmers have been going bankrupt due to Trump's tariff war with China.

Probably because modern fossil fuel burning is ironically more environmentally friendly due to private corporations innovation in technology while renewable energy either requires a shit ton of energy (which comes from nonrenewable reasources kek) or like lithium batteries end up pollution more due to having to essentially salt the earth.

Coal mines closing at a faster rate under Pres. Trump than Obama

nbc4i.com/news/u-s-world/coal-mines-closing-at-a-faster-rate-under-pres-trump-than-obama/1690261093

>how did that happen
Fall of the Soviet Union. Since it fell, American public and politicians lost the constant edge they had against commies and socialists. So these elements slowly infiltrated the Democrats and basically all the ideology that was tailored (possibly with the help of KGB) to unravel the thread of American society came with them.

The Democrats took a lesson from their civil rights success with blacks and started collecting minorities. The calls of oppression were a good rallying call and one they knew quite well.

The working class was abandoned because the unions lost utterly to outsourcing. Gone were the days of masses of unionized workers you could convince that YOU were the ones to provide better working conditions. The lucky ones found jobs in the non-unionized service industry, the unlucky ones were stuck with unemployment. Employee retention in services is low and those who don't leave usually don't need better working conditions. So Democrats just abandoned the working class and concentrated on bringing in more immigrants to vote for them.

That's despite Trump, not because of Trump. Trump's administration is the one going "lol, we should make cars pollute MORE!"

>Onions farmers
Kek, nice try shill

>Trump gets into trade war with China
>DRUMPF IS GONNA CRASH THE ECONOMY AND KILL US ALL
>trade war is actually hurting China really bad while America's economy is booming
>I DON'T SEE WHAT DRUMPF HAD TO DO WITH ANY OF THIS

Who are you quoting?

Are you arguing with me or the imaginary boogeyman in your head?

That's not how carbon emissions work, you retard. Either Trump is killing the environment or he isn't. And guess what? He isn't.

So they haven't been going bankrupt?

>

My country got experience for 50.000 veterans now in our aid to American interventions in the past 20 years. Fucking awesome. I love helping an ideologically-aligned ally to destroy the enemies of the West and of materialistic individualism.

Attached: angelvladref.jpg (881x1200, 99K)

>Litterally no evidence, just some random guy saying "WTF FORMER TRUMP SUPPORTER HERE"
Here is the real truth
spglobal.com/platts/en/market-insights/latest-news/coal/030619-us-coal-exports-have-second-best-year-ever-as-strong-demand-attracts-buyers

>Most Brits don't really care about the Falklands War these days
>Meanwhile Argentinians are STILL seething about it, have literal monkey fits and go full unga bunga when Top Gear showed up
Lmao

>Uses "farmers" as a term for all farmers when it is really just a sub-section of farmers that are hurting

Trump is destroying the West, or as his fanboys like to call it: (((globalism)))

but what was her tax policy?

lol you're the moron who thinks Trump had nothing to do with China's shit economy when his trade war had everything to do with it.

>Uses "farmers" as a term for all farmers
No he didn't, are you illiterate?
>when it is really just a sub-section of farmers that are hurting
Just like it was really just a sub-section of Syrian children that got drone bombed by Obama. Guess that makes it ok!

Leftshits BTFO once again.
>DRUMPF DIDN'T BRING THE COAL INDUSTRY BACK
>W-WHAT DO YOU MEAN COAL EXPORTS ARE HIGHER THAN EVER?

>FARMERS ARE SUFFERING
>"actually it is just onions farmers"
>I DIDNT SAY ALL FARMERS WERE SUFFERING

>>Meanwhile Argentinians are STILL seething about it, have literal monkey fits and go full unga bunga when Top Gear showed up

that was faked for Tv. they did the same fake shit in the US south episode.

He is, local governments like the state of California and other places are moving forward with their cleaner green energy policies despite of Trump's idiotic insistence that climate change is a Chinese hoax.

That's crazy, I somehow recall China's speculation- and unchecked-growth-economy existed before Trump. But maybe I'm wrong and China didn't exist before 2017.

Why can conservatives be BASED!!!! on everything but the one thing that's most important, immigration?

Attached: 1536093728370.jpg (576x768, 80K)

We'd probably be buttmad if we'd lost desu

Yes, that's how the English language works.

Are you a slavnigger? Why are you retarded?

>TRUMP IS KILLING THE ENVIRONMENT
>wait...the environment is getting better
>THAT ISNT BECAUSE OF TRUMP AT ALL
you are as pathetic as the people that said that Obama had nothing to do with Obama's death because he didn't pull the trigger
>Inb4 implying Osama is dead

>Trump is destroying the West,

I can say his administration is making it stronger and sustain that with arguments. Stop believing memes.

His based is comprised of low-IQ simpletons, yes. That doesn't mean they can't be used and co-opted by existing power structures. Even Sunni terrorists can be useful.
What groups actually believe is unimportant.

Attached: 1-4790.jpg (1024x576, 125K)

>Obama had nothing to do with Obama's death

Attached: 1526942871297.jpg (485x443, 88K)

>California
LOL

Why do you shills all sound the same?

Are you posting canned responses?

Also
>carbon emission down
>"the environment is getting better"
Pick one you retard, what are you, twelve?

You used 'farmers' as a ubiquitous term, instead of being accurate and saying that the farmers who are suffering are the onions farmers. Just because you learned to Reddit space before you learned the language doesn't mean you are any less of a nigger

Stop ignoring the narrative the media and leftshits cooked up about how Trump's trade war with China was going to wreck the economy.

I didn't even make that initial post but he clearly didn't say "literally all farmers". When you read about a catastrophe and reporters say "people are dying", do you assume everyone is, or just a number of people?

>Reddit space

Hahaha you're really underage aren't you? Jesus.

>carbon emissions are down
>therefore the Environment isn't getting better
Imagine being a shill and calling others shills

>""""the environment gets better""""
Only children make arguments like this.

So it's completely fine that S O Y farmers are going bankrupt due to Trump's fight with China because... lol only libtards use basedbeans? Or what? You're literally trying to ignore the fact that American jobs are lost due to the tariffs and it hurts the American economy because they were exporting those basedbeans to China.

I guarantee you he's a teenager from some godforsaken shithole who only know söy from internet memes.

>muh unions
guess why you have worker rights

based

I don't think the trade war is going to wreck America. The exploding deficit will eventually.

>libtards use basedbeans
Yes they do. get your subsidized protein from somewhere else since cornchads are were it is at

>not seafood and eggs
faggot

Because it is within the companies self-interest to do so, it is not the 1940's anymore.

murica:world police

IT WAS HER TURN

*ahem*

Attached: oats.jpg (300x168, 13K)

>Getting out of conflicts is bad
Go back to your grave in hell president Wilson

And it's just as often in the company's self-interest to rip off its employees for short term profit. That's why you need regulations and unions to fight against them, you corporate bootlicker.

She left out Hawaii being the center of America's pacific fleet, and the fleet of ships destroyed in port.

I'd say the mere fact, that Trump is keeping up dialogues with NK is an achievement and the world is criminally underestimating how much of an achievement.

Career politicians are by definition unable to sit down with someone like Kim.
A raunchy old money sack however was exactly the right person at the right time to prevent serious bullshit from happening down there, because he was able to move past the international politics and etiquette, which is exactly what you need if you talk to a fat little korean successor of a funky looking korean dictator. The whole situation is retarded and not made for textbook diplomacy.
People not seeing this are delusional and deranged.

Same could be said about the wall.
Politicians are brainwashed to always negotiate and seek consensus.
Even when there is only one solution they mix in parts of ideas that dont work, so they can say, they found a consensus.

Attached: 1538045541007.jpg (221x250, 5K)

Where's the film/vidya about the madmen of the Argentine air force? They flew at the British fleet at 500mph inches above sea level so they couldn't be tracked by AA radar, and dropped dumb iron bombs so that they skipped along the surface and hit the sides of the ships.

They gave the tommies one absolute assraping, but alas, since Argentine was a poor corrupt shithole, that one was all they had ordnance and fuel for. The brits zerg rushed their way ashore and that was the war.

Attached: a-4c_tte_casco.jpg (736x421, 146K)

If the US can call upon NATO to help them bomb goat fuckers in Afghanistan than the UK could have used it to defend clay in South America.

>thread becomes salty burgers bickering about Obama
You guys just can't help yourself can you?

Attached: falkland chile.png (690x406, 599K)

Yes, they wouldn't. They didn't do shit about the Philippines.

Conflict is a fundamental aspect of human existence, and a Western-dominated world would objectively be a better world.

>And it's just as often in the company's self-interest to rip off its employees for short term profit.
And then they immediately get called out on it and if they don't change they fail like what is currently going on in the Vidya industries and Malls. Get you weak non-Adam Smith ideals out of here.

Cause the state enforces those rights.
fuckin neoliberals

Even in Faraway places you can't never forget your Texan pride

>Iran deal
>Trump pulls out because Iran is violating it in spirit
Why the fuck did he even mean, the spirit of past Ayatollahs are refining uranium in the spirit plane?

I wonder what life on Falkland Islands is like. Aren't they in the middle of nowhere?

>got the norks abandon their program
But they didn't. They still have fully functional nukes. Literally nothing has changed. They even restarted the Pyongbong nuclear site.

>Trump is keeping up dialogues with NK is an achievement and the world is criminally underestimating how much of an achievement.

It's not an achievement. It's something that should be done, but it is not an achievement in itself because NK wants it to get itself concessions (which Trump has been making without anything in return) and good international press. If anything, you undermine any prestige from it by repeatedly making stupid public claims, like that you've literally denuclearized North Korea because you signed a nothing agreement that every expert says is completely superfluous and intelligence reports repeatedly say the opposite, that they're in fact rebuilding their nuclear facilities after making a show of blowing them up.

It literally is the middle of nowhere. The entire existence of the island is based solely as a dick measuring contest, which England won because they put a stone on the island saying it was theres

What if they're too big to fail, like Wells Fargo with their repeated financial scandals?

>Trump has totally been making concessions goys
Which is exactly why Korea has gotten absolutely nothing but the promise of not being nuked meanwhile America gets everything we wanted

That is directly because the federal government interferes directly in the banking systems.

As in they continued to be belligerent to US and to US allies. constantly asking for the destruction of America and Israel in their Majlits, constant diplomatic insults, constant funding of Hezbollah through their outposts in Syria, funding of even Hamas and and funding of Houthis.
There was NOTHING they gave in return for the lifting of sanctions, perhaps just behind closed doors. No changing of discourse, no rational policy. Their adversariality has only gotten more insane.

It would be absolute insanity to keep the deal, they want to nuke us and our allies anyway. It's better to just bomb the fucking shit out of them when the inevitable time comes.

Attached: 1510260839904.gif (174x182, 2.44M)

Attached: Falklands timeline.png (800x146, 2K)

Trump cancelled their joint war drills with South Korea, because NK asked for it. It's a big win for NK because they do not like them at all. And Trump got nothing out of it.

This.

Hawaii is a massively important place based solely on location. The entire Pacific depends on it.

>Trump is keeping up dialogues, it's criminally underestimating this achievement
Nigger both Kims has been offering peace talks since Bush's era. All western leaders have unanimously refused until Kim halted his nuclear development programs. Trump doesn't have balls or some ingenious tactic, he just dropped this requirement.

Protip: it's going to go nowhere. Kim has nukes now, he's not going to give this guarantee of his regime and guarantee North Korea won't be invaded for nothing less than a total pull out of US forces in the South.

Actually Trump canceled the joint drills for nothing. It's the other way round.

Nigger it's a nuclear deal, not a do whatever I want deal.
>get nothing
Except verified nuclear disarmament. Now technically Iran can go back to refining as much uranium as they want and it would be America's fault.

>America and South Korean military will implode without drills
They cancelled their drills as well

They were already caught refining uranium under the deal anyway.

>Loses Hong Kong to an 80+ year old Chinese uncle.

""""""Iron"""""""""" Lady.

Attached: Bane Xiaoping.jpg (392x580, 50K)

>Now technically Iran can go back to refining as much uranium as they want and it would be America's fault.

It also makes us easier to engage in offensive operations against them. And their actions past sanctions relief have proven THAT IS INEVITABLE. They want war, they want to attack, they must be destroyed.

Attached: 1503865886902.gif (800x508, 229K)

I remember when Obama tepidly suggested negotiating with Kim. This was sometime early in his first term.

Fox New called him a naive retard and a traitor for even suggesting it.

Funny how things change.

Yeah like how Romney said Russians we're everywhere and the Democrats said he was retarded

North Korea hasn't changed since 2008. Russia changed a lot. Comparing the two just makes you look like a retard.

Imagine teleporting a Britbong from the eighties to show him how a monstrous military industrial complex servant, war criminal and a fearmonger is getting exonorated by Meryl Streep and the Jew media conglomerate solely because she had a cunt.

>Zerg rush
>With tiny elite force vs hordes of starving constricts
But I will agree, Argie pilots were seriously cool, didn't they train with the Bongs and shit? Maybe they knew each other and could have contrived message each other plot, maybe gay romance

trump and pompeo just want them to scrap their ICBMs, trump doesn't care about east asia.

reuters.com/article/us-iran-nuclear-idUSKCN1LF1KR

Iran's compliance with the nuclear deal has been verified by IAEA. Trump has unilaterally pulled out of a deal which was a landmark of working, international cooperation against nuclear proliferation.

>makes us easier to engage in offensive operations which their actions past sanctions relief have proven is inevitable
Are you one of those retarded neocon war hawks lining up to fall on the sword for Israel?

Absolutely true.

The Argentinians waited until the Royal Navy was at its weakest. Previously, the British didn't care, and were willing to settle the matter in the UN. Argentina never went to the UN because their citizens were a minority on the islands.

>The North canceled their drills
With who? Or are you saying North Korea has suspended all their military training?

I’m an international relations major and this is one of the dumbest posts I’ve seen in literal years

I don't get why the Argentinians are so obsessed with it.

Like the last fucking time they "owned" it was in fucking 1832. How was/is that wound still open?
The Brits more or less colonized the island when it had no population, every town and city on the island was built by the Brits, and everyone on the island are more or less ancestrally Brits. It's not like they went in and grabbed a bunch of uncivilized but already settled land like in Africa, they made the damn Island from scratch pretty much.

dey took our miiiiilks.

Just like how Iraq's WMDs we're verified?

I've been in the Maidan in 2014 and your post makes me retch.

Nothing coming out of Obama's mouth could be trusted anyway.

Which no one cares about and is impossible to achieve. ICBMs don't violate any international rule, treaty or even disposition. They're basically low earth orbit rockets.

Aside; Royal Navy was so skint it bodged a bunch of container ships to move Harriers and Helicopters in, very kino
Shame what happened really

Attached: Atlantic-Conveyor-embarking-a-Sea-Harrier-in-the-UK-03.jpg (800x636, 69K)

But the guy who thinks vaccines cause autism is trustworthy?

Bongs have chavs who lust after the empire and get hard over images of Spitfires and Lancaster Bombers
Argies get all worked up over some shitty islands off the coast of Chili
Normies really are scum

>dude just give up your sovereign territory
Why are yanks such massive cucks?

OK fine explain how Russia is actually still the same

>they want war
Yeah on the ME where want to be the big kahuna and where they aim to slaughter the sunni heretics and then the kikes. Even assuming the nuclear deal was a piece of American grand strategy, you still sound like a fucking kike.

Their compliance is irrelevant. Sanctions relief has only made them more brazen in their actions - funding and arming of Houthis in Yemen, attacking Israel in the Golan Heights through their proxies AND THE CONSTANT DIPLOMATIC INSULTS which cannot be ignored.
Their economy must not be allowed to develop, and we have to do everything in our power to back them into a corner until they give us a casus belli. Right now, their Shia Crescent Empire is spreading like a disease.

You can't make good, flexible policy burdened by excessive legalism. It was a bad deal for American, Israeli, Saudi, Emirati and Kuwaiti interests.

> retarded neocon war hawks lining up to fall on the sword for Israel?

There's lower class people to do that for me. I'm a risk management consultant for a defense manufacturer.

Attached: 1507284067840.jpg (352x395, 45K)

Remember what happened to the First Nations

No, legit just autistic. Her whole run was solely economics with a disregard for the social well being of her society. It’s a common criticism for some British Conservatives that don’t suck her dick.

It has litterally been in a recession for the past 30 years. The only difference is that now they are finding a way to get their ass kicked by Ukraine

>There's lower class people to do that for me.
Have you ever paid two hobos two stab each other

>he's a war kike
true if big

If you're referring to Saddam not having WMDs, the UN inspectors actually withdrew before they could sufficiently establish Saddam had disabled his WMD program. Ritter, who headed the team, later said Saddm does not have a capacity to meaningfully make WMDs. It was the intelligence agencies, under pressure from the government, which stated that they did.

Iraq's WMDs were lies made up by, surprise surprise, the US government who wanted an excuse to invade Iraq. None of the other countries had any evidence that wasn't from US's own fake intelligence sources.

I hope tuition is free in your country because an international relations major bringing up Russia's economic slump as argument that Russia-US/EU relations haven't changed is the most retarded thing I've read all day.

>let's disband a nuclear treaty and push closer to war because they insulted us and funded anti Israeli people
Don't you have some speeches to write denouncing anti Semitism?

The government at the time used extensive propaganda to make it a big issue so it could invade them and look god in front of the people
Of course nobody gives a fuck about islands that were briefly “colonised” for 5 years 200 years ago

I tend to like and get along well with most hobos. There's a soup kitchen next to a ''bar'' in the area, in the shittiest neighbourhood. Made a lot of friends and my stimulants dealer is homeless (though has a lot of cash).

There's lower class people to do that for him.

I feel like hobos are total bastards to each other, but really nice to everyone else. When a hobo asks me for money I just offer them a cigarette instead and they're always friendly and love to chat.

Many British industral industries were well past dead and she had the decision to sell them off. Many people were put out of a job and a job that they most likely inherited from their forefathers. She was terrified of any form of social welfare, as she felt it led to serfdom. Entire parts of Northern England are now desolate, with the only jobs available are fragile high street chains from other seas corporations.

It’s kinda sad really.

Their anti-Israeli policies are comparatively toothless to the clusterfuck they caused in Yemen and what their Hormuz threats do for my portfolio. That's my main gripe with Iran.

Even though I like Israel personally, I fantasize about a large scale attack on them every day. It would be so perfect in so many ways.

The working class hated her for making them poor. Miners and such were making a lot of money.

If you get to know a bunch of hobos, you'll see that at least half of them are LARPing the lifestyle and they're not always cash-deprived. It's next to impossible to be truly homeless in America or Western EU.

Attached: 1506969966652.jpg (185x192, 18K)

It's an exchange. They protect us and we let them build bases here. It's a fair deal, not exploitative.

>Thinking US/Russia relations have changed because of some actual reason instead of desprate neolibs trying to hold onto power by literal red-scare tactics
Russia is worthless entity that will never come back as long as Putin is in charge.

Can't they just sign a new treaty solely with the US. I think they can.

Trump wishes to revitalise many American industries. He spoke of helping the car industry at one point. He’s seemingly very pro-worker. More so than The Democrats at this point.

People were taxed on how many washing poles they had in their garden. It was not popular to say the least.

Aren't those Californian policies what caused those fires?

Where did you get that major, user? Is it too late to ask for a refund?

>for some actual reason
Is the Crimea actual enough for you?

Back in 78 she was the education minister and decided, due to neoliberal reforms, that money had to be saved, and one way to do it was to remove milk from kids.

She took milk from fucking kids in an economic context of struggle, all that was worse in 1982. She was pretty hated but she didn't flinched cause she didn't gave a fuck about people, that's why she was called the iron lady. She also let hunger strikers die, because from her point of view they chose that so fuck them (can't really argue with that, it's a PR disaster only if you care about people's life)

>t.setthing argies

Sounds very based

Once gave a sandwich to a "homeless person" once. The cunt threw it in the bin - never again.

Russia is extraordinarily powerful and a core component of Eurasianist ideology that threatens the entire free world. They are the greatest security threat.
I couldn't care less about their consumer economy when their entire state apparatus is unified behind their expansionist and subversive plans.

Attached: 1504020364967.jpg (468x599, 37K)

Do you know what the term actually means?

I believe it's a lot like those stories of ex-prisoners who couldn't handle living outside prison. The lifestyle is addictive to the point where you don't want to get out even when you're offered the chance to.

Quite easy in the UK if you are a man

The Argies want the taxes from it, and their gov is corrupt and need ways to distract their populace.

can you live in the tubes

As I said "finding a way to get it's ass kicked by Ukraine"
>More red-scare tactics

Russia is shit, their military is a paper tiger and the rest of the country is a complete joke.

The Crimea situation isn't really an ass-kicking, not even close

That paper tiger bit Ukraine in half.

Why shouldn't you be scared of threats ?

Also, by the way, the Red Scare worked. Do you see an USSR around ? Never mind that recently declassified documents prove that communist infiltration from the 40s through the 60s was much deeper than thought even by the anti-communist public.

Attached: 1504125248991.png (808x805, 446K)

Which proves nothing, since ukrainians are exactly the same shit.

It's difficult to know about Russia as you cannot rely on the news to be factual when they talk about them.

>"Major superpower" vs chain-smoking slav sub-group
>Superpower gets bogged down as Slavs drink vodka and squat on APCs
Russia in Crimea has been an embarrassment to Russia. It's almost as bad as the Vietnam war or the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan

Until pic related people didn't cared, after that they saw british troops being BTFO and everyone got rustled.

The falklands war proved several things: Aerospatiale with the exocet missile was OP as fuck so everyone decided to buy them, warships were extremely vulnerable to air attacks so CIWS got developed, UK was actually weak as fuck, they needed most of their fleet to go to war against literal who's and after only being able to defeat argentina with the US and Chile's help they proved that the north atlantic was extremely weak for a supposed soviet attack, which was a huge heads up and raised many nervous eyebrows

Attached: falklandswarmarinessurrender.jpg (612x448, 80K)

That's my point, Russia may not pose a threat to America but to the ex Eastern Bloc states

Putin isn't going to stop until he's annexed everything up to Poland

>Red-scare worked
>Not the Soviet Union JUSTing itself with shitty planned economies and losing the only leader that everyone could see as a leader

The only ones left are Belarus and Moldova which are complete shitholes anyway, all the rest are beyond their grasp.

Well, if you don't like what someone's saying then I guess it can't be true.

Miners are still butthurt

>literally makes money off of pointless wars
Lmao.

Don't forget it proved all the WWII era surface ships being fielded by Second and Third World countries were useless without modern Anti-Submarine protection.

>It’s kinda sad really
Wow...... really makes you think

Holy fucking buzzwords were you Hillary's campaign manager?

Because some people just can't deal with having a strong independent woman in power :)

If you could have fostered these multinational corps, you would have.

Fun fact: The HMS Conqueror used british Mark VIII torpedoes to sink the Belgrano, they were from WWII as well

>Holy fucking buzzwords
Not memeing here, those were not buzz words. I do see how 'brazen' would seem foreign but damn son, you need to start improving your vocabulary, grab a book, you need it.

Do you think Margret Thatcher effectively utilized girl power by funneling money to illegal paramilitary death squad in Northern Ireland?

probably one of the handful of subhuman israelis who creep around Yea Forums and a few other boards. best to ignore it

A dildo in thatcher's dead arse.

Nice implication, maybe you should actually do your homework?

Deng was a hardcore motherfucker, Thatcher wouldn't have lasted ten seconds in his shoes.

O wow, hollywood attacking a conservative icon.

It simple the Falklands are a British islands in the south Atlantic. Argentina at the time had a good military and the military rulers decided that a war would be a good way to regain support since wars do that.

They invaded the Falklands and south Georgia islands, and expected the UK to cave.

Thatcher just ordered the fleet to sail to get the ball rolling before the people who wanted to surrender could build up support, and there was a nasty little war and the UK captured back the islands and sunk the best Argentine ship, while Argentina showed how deadly Anti-ship missiles are.

Now the falklands is a important fishing area and may have oil, and it kinda stopped the decline of the british empire for a generation as the brits realized they still had a backbone.

Occupying foreign territory is great.
Thanks germoney.

aye but at what cost

youtube.com/watch?v=QOZzFXolGJc

The primary purpose of a government is to protect the citizens it governs from the perfidious foreigner.

Attached: Screen-Shot-2016-06-29-at-9.42.06-AM-620x436.jpg (620x436, 46K)

liberals are just pissed she broke the unions.

For example, there was all sorts of coal mines in wales, but they were mostly played out, but the unions would strike and insist that people be paid for working in mines that were unprofitable.

Tatcher just closed down the mines to break the back of the unions, and then gave away tons of public housing to the people who lived there so suddenly gettos became nice places to live.

Here's an idea: Form your own mining corporation, and set things up as you wish. Stating that mines owned by the government were making money, and that they purposely shut them down is silly.

The mines themselves might have been losing money but the miners were paid a lot of money that flowed back into the economy

I love how they went all badasses on Falklands killing starving 18 year olds to appear like a superpower,and now they're giving Britain for free to muslims

the mines were not making money as a whole, and if you know anything about coal mining under the water table line, each time you shut down a mine and it pumps, it costs more to keep other mines in operation as they have to pump more, and soon those handful of marginal mines are losing money.

Argentina didn't have a good military at the time,they sent mostly kids to die there

>am Californian
>see idiots unironically praising my dysfunctional as fuck state as some great Colossus because muh economy

>Log into TV
>Bunch of Americans describing British politics using muh liberals
If it clarifies anything to the faggots that think of politics in words like socialist or based, the miners got redundancies with nothing new to take its place, Thatcher let the North rot and started what is now a ludicrous housing crisis

Bullshit, they did had a good military, better than now, they had conscripts in the Falklands because the UK secretly had Chile working with them providing Intel and SAS operations. They mobilized their Navy towards the south so Argentina would see it, they were convinced a Chilean invasion was coming so they sent their professional army to defend the continent, which was the goal all along, Chile never attacked and the Falklands were only defended by conscripts and the air force.

Saddam would move things about, deny or delay inspections, and tell the west he had nothing, while suggesting to the Arab world that he did. In any event, he repeatedly violated the cease-fire agreement by repeatedly firing weapons. He could still have been in power if he actually behaved.

Argentinian claims were based on those made by Spain. Are they upset with colonization, except when such colonial powers benefit them?

>Falklands killing starving 18 year olds
>that is somehow a bad thing

They are not hungry anymore.

He actually went to the Rust Belt, and listened to people. He seemed genuinely interested to help, while the Dems made the joke, "They took our jobs!" Suggesting that your base is too stupid if some illegal alien, who doesn't even speak English is not very empathic.

That's the uti possidetis international law principle, borders in colonial times will be the same after the country gains independence, it has nothing to do with the stance over colonialism.
Border disputes came because at the time people were actually shit at making maps, no GPS meant mistakes, and also erosion affected, sometimes they used rivers or hills that some maps didn't had or changed due to earthquakes or whatever, fucking up borders

SAS landed on Argentina with the intent of destroying an air force base

Except Argentina did not posses them at the time of independence. The islands had no permanent inhabitants at the time.

Fuck Margret Thatcher, ugly bitch wish I had the chance to slam her fucking face in with an Argos cataloge

>the 60billion gdp hawaii

Attached: 1551479317996.jpg (480x360, 26K)

>protect us from the terrorist threat manufactured by the US and the UK
ebin

Never been to the Falklands but I'm led to believe the inhabitants all speak English and consider themselves English citizens.

Ignoring the invasion of the Falklands would be like ignoring the invasion of the channel islands in WWII.

Saddam did tell his own soldiers that he had chemical weapons and even went as far as to outfit them with protection for it

Good. Fuck em.

Because its better for GDP to have a surplus of labor or outsource jobs for cheap