Why are so many people believing this shitty movie?

Nobody believes in things like facts and proof anymore.

We have fucking flat-earthers in 2019. Think about what that shit means. It's the kind of thing that you can ONLY believe if you think that every scientist ever is just faking it. Yet that's the attitude we see in 2019: science isn't real, facts aren't real, truth isn't real, proof isn't real, only thing that I can trust are my knee-jerk reactions based on instinct and nothing else.

the irony in this post is delicious

The fact is that Jacko was declared innocent of all charges. That is the FACT of things. All we have proof for is that he did nothing illegal, and all accusations were horseshit.

But the knee-jerk instinct says that he's a creep, so he must have done it, he just must have, fuck the facts.

he was declared "not guilty" like OJ, as in they could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he did it, doesn't mean he didn't, like OJ, again.
for example i can't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a rat walked around in my basement, doesn't mean it didn't happen. it is NOT a fact at all that he didn´t do it just because he was found not guilty in court

I don't think what that word you're using means.

No, he was declared not guilty because it was proved the accusers were liars, like having fucking recorded phone calls of them saying they were lying, or them claiming that they had videotapes of him molesting a kid and then bailing out at the moment of presenting the evidence, or being caught on more than 10 contradictory statements, or claiming things that were disproven due to alibi, or implicating two other victims that denied everything you said and defended the accused.
So all of the accusers were proven to be lying. If you're saying that doesn't prove he fucked other kids that weren't this one just because those ones were liars that would be like saying that anyone can be a pedophile because we can't prove that they aren't, it's absolutely retarded.

i'm just saying it doesn't make it a fact. 2+2=4 is a fact. a court verdict isn't, sorry m8. and also you're mixing both cases the 1993 one was settled out of court so nothing was "proved" there.

Who cares why people believe it. The real question everyone needs to figure out is why are jews slandering MJ after ten years.

What is Rosentholsteinberg Inc. up to?

Attached: jewwwwsss.png (822x410, 156K)

Wrong, The DA pushed a statute so that if any case of molestation evidence of prior acts can be used as evidence and so the everything relating to the 1993 was used in the 2005 case. The evidence did not sustain itself (fucking obviously), so he was acquitted of BOTH charges.
The court ruling is irrelevant, the empirical evidence that they were lying is what proves them as facts.

Based and redpilled

It was Sony who was behind the slander. They got what they wanted, the Beatles rights, even though Michael promised they wouldn't get it even after he died.
These are just the remnants of all the strategic disinformation and lies of the media. If you google anything about it you just get straight up lies, like saying he had child porn and torture and even animal porn with children's faces morphed onto the animals in his PC. Absolutely fucking ridiculous.

Have sex

do you guys think that brooke shields is side?

i can't find any info online that this tapes you speak of were used as evidence in the 2005 trials, if you have a link i'll check it out