Who has better taste in film, men or women?

it's clearly imdb you nigger

this

yeah sure cunt how do you know the image isnt faked as shit?
this

IMDB is for third-worlders and failed filmmakers aka whiny losers. It's literally the worst indicator.

>Hidden Figures that high
kek what the fuck, was this a black survey?
>Brokeback Mountain
holy shit, since when did so many fucking fujos exist?

HAHAHAHAH holy fuck women are an embarrassment

Attached: 1552087291282.jpg (300x250, 79K)

this
>women don't self insert into their movies
>women watch movies purely for escapism from the shit in their regular lives
>men watch movies to find meaning and take it so seriously
>let's go and watch raging bull honey it's about a guy who ruins his own life with violence, based on a true story
>no thanks love

>Das Boot
>ranked 603rd
Women aren't human.

>Replying to yourself twice

t. sub human women

>he thinks he's robert de niro in taxi driver

>Thinking Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix isn't the best movie of all time is an embarrasment

Attached: big.jpg (8384x5310, 1.73M)

I would have to see the actual top 20s for each group, this just shows which films are the most divisive.

Ah yes, mubi or whatever shitty site you use is a better indicator to show the tastes of your average moviegoer

no but youre mom does when i fuck her pusy

my mum's a mad old lady user you don't wanna do that

this is double wrong

>not even the best harry potter is on there

you underestimate my power

Yikes..

Don't worry too much sweetie, you'll find love and happiness in your life some day.

Attached: 1552163977610.jpg (1278x960, 221K)

guess what nerd im a volcel

Is this the small penis cope thread?

Have sex.

it's Yea Forums every thread is like this more or less

>2003+17
>not using Letterboxd

>Using letterboxd
Lmao

women will rate "political" movies highly and then never watch them.

Putting Harry Potter on a best of list pretty much disqualifies it.

It's not a best of list you retard

>women don't self insert into their movies

lol yes they do... these are all idealized works of fiction like the male ones dumb shit

This

i'm mostly talking about these dumb threads in general
women aren't posting film comparison lists online saying men's taste in films are juvenile ergo they are dumb cunts
i really don't give a fuck what people watch

Doesn't matter, they still rank them highly

The men shitstomp

Not dreadfully surprised that women would love the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 1518441730509.jpg (1616x2864, 547K)

Based