Would you watch a biopic about the life of Kaiser Wilhelm II?

>challenge our global dominance
The Germans violated the soverignty of Belgium that's why the Brits entered. If the Germans didn't have a stone cold autist as the kaiser perhaps their foreign policy would've been better

Are you familiar with the Naval Defense Act of 1889?

>The Naval Defence Act 1889 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It received the Royal Assent on 31 May 1889 and formally adopted "two-power standard" and increased the United Kingdom's naval strength. The standard called for the Royal Navy to maintain a number of battleships at least equal to the combined strength of the next two largest navies in the world, which then were France and Russia. An extra £20 million over the following four years were provided for ten new battleships, thirty-eight new cruisers, eighteen new torpedo boats and four new fast gunboats

I can't believe social democrats got away with this lie

Attached: sozialdemokraten.jpg (400x488, 119K)

what is cause and effect, wouldnt it be belgium it would have been something else
there would have always been war between the two in the circumstances around ww1

>wouldnt it be belgium it would have been something else
Actually the British Government was leaning towards neutrality as was the public until the invasion of Belgium. The Germans have to be held accountable for their own actions as well they must've known the repercussions of violating their sovereignty.

the brits jump to their "allies" defense as soon as they see an actual self-service in it, same shit as in ww2. Let poland go to shit but attack as soon as germany gets too strong (and consider attacking russia as well afterwards)
They just cannot tollerate another big player in the game, especially germans and the french because albiontism

>5'3''
Why would I watch a movie about a literal midget?

You can't just remove all responsibility from the Germans like that. They antagonized Britain during the lead up to WW1 and WW2 these things don't happen in a vacuum. Germans had awful foreign policy throughout the early 20th century.

just cast tom cruise

*deformed midget

You like Tom Cruise films don't you?

I mean yeah, how dare the continentals challenge British supremacy, only Britain is allowed to build giant floating shits

He could still BTFO you both with one hand. This man was a one man deforestation machine.

REEEEEE: The Movie

The man single-handily set the German Empire into a suicide

>britain conquers and backstabs everyone they come into contact with and has a complete monopoly on the high seas with its royal navy
>up and coming empire wants a couple colonies from the last bits of clay that haven't already been gobbled up by anglos and wants to be a self-sufficient power as well
>HURR THE PROBLEM IS THE GERMANS!!!

>being entitled to colonies
gotta win them loser

I didn't, it's just pretty clear that brits handled in the war out of sheer fear of losing the topdog position and it's laughable that they try to claim otherwise when you point that out to them even as just a consideration

No one said that but the Germans knew they were antagonizing the Brits with their Naval build up. I think it was silly it served no real purpose and alienated the Anglos.

That's a pretext. The real reason the british got involved was because Germany was a rising power and the bongs feared competition to their global hegemony. Just like how every great power in the 1800s was doing everything they could to prevent Germany from unifying in the first place.

it's the same bullshit reasons they do things like side with ottomans against russians during one war, and then the next war they side with russians against ottomans. They're called perfidious albion for a reason.

No. He's the worst kind of German, the kind that expects other countries to obey him.

German foreign policy in the 1930s was to oppose the spread of communism wherever and reassert control over Central Europe
British foreign policy was to for some reason think Central Europe was in their sphere of influence and be angry at the Germans for taking back land that had been theirs for hundreds of years

VWilhelm's most damaging personal blunder cost him much of his prestige and power and had a far greater impact in Germany than overseas.[48] The Daily Telegraph Affair of 1908 involved the publication in Germany of an interview with a British daily newspaper that included wild statements and diplomatically damaging remarks. Wilhelm had seen the interview as an opportunity to promote his views and ideas on Anglo-German friendship, but due to his emotional outbursts during the course of the interview, he ended up further alienating not only the British, but also the French, Russians, and Japanese. He implied, among other things, that the Germans cared nothing for the British; that the French and Russians had attempted to incite Germany to intervene in the Second Boer War; and that the German naval buildup was targeted against the Japanese, not Britain. One memorable quotation from the interview was, "You English are mad, mad, mad as March hares."[49] The effect in Germany was quite significant, with serious calls for his abdication. Wilhelm kept a very low profile for many months after the Daily Telegraph fiasco, but later exacted his revenge by forcing the resignation of the chancellor, Prince Bülow, who had abandoned the Emperor to public scorn by not having the transcript edited before its German publication.[50][51] The Daily Telegraph crisis deeply wounded Wilhelm's previously unimpaired self-confidence, and he soon suffered a severe bout of depression from which he never fully recovered. He lost much of the influence he had previously exercised in domestic and foreign policy.[52]

Attached: 1521718133315.gif (150x150, 1.22M)

The point I'm making is that bongs act all high and mighty with their phony piety, when they've been the most warmongering and aggressive people over the entire world for quite some time beforehand. It's hypocritical

I don't think the Brits are innocent either self interest fueled all the powers. WW1 was just a 'tism fit of enormous scale

Saying it had no purpose is just wrong. You could definitely argue in hindsight the benefits weren't there, but Germany had the problem that it had colonies in Africa and the Pacific that other nations had afterwords claimed ownership of. Germany therefore had to have a fleet or the other powers would just grab what they could without having to fear any consequences

A lot of these wars during the 19th and 20th centuries were autism fits. Look back rationally during the times of these wars (and not whatever 20/20 hindsight narratives were made about them afterwards) and you'll see all sorts of ridiculous bullshit reasons given to the public for these wars. I always find the british propaganda against germany to be especially amusing. "we're fighting against these barbaric huns who want to destroy all of europe and make us all eat sauerkraut!!!!!" Yeah, okay bud.

>German foreign policy in the 1930s was to oppose the spread of communism wherever and reassert control over Central Europe
How was invading the most staunch bulwark against communism in Poland and splitting it with Russia opposing communism exactly?

JUDGEMENT IS CAST

Attached: Judgement.jpg (1496x2044, 659K)

>Germany therefore had to have a fleet or the other powers would just grab what they could
How do you figure? You think the agreed upon boarders in Africa meant nothing?

>the Germans cared nothing for the British; that the French and Russians had attempted to incite Germany to intervene in the Second Boer War; and that the German naval buildup was targeted against the Japanese, not Britain. One memorable quotation from the interview was, "You English are mad, mad, mad as March hares."
All of this was true though, and the leadership in all the nations realized this as well, Wilhelm was just the one autistic enough to blurt it out. But in the end this was a fact for all the leaders of Europe long before the interview and it ultimately had no effect on how the nations behaved

kinda hard to encourage your nation with "alright we're doing this because we don't want to risk being less, lets win for power"
shallow righteousness works better

Judging from WW1, yes. They had an agreement to keep the african colonies out of the war, but the anglos ignored this and invaded them anyway.

>They had an agreement to keep the african colonies out of the war
source?

Imagine not being a monarchist

Attached: D932D8CE-925B-4B4D-89F0-22BFCB201C48.png (733x739, 702K)

I know, but it's just all so tiresome that retards buy into this bullshit, whether 100 years ago or modern times with iraq war, syrian war, this new warmongering against venezuela, etc.

Absolute monarchies are for cucks. Constitutional monarchies are alright.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berlin_Conference

When they carved up africa, they all made an agreement that african colonies would remain neutral in any wars. Britain broke this when they invaded tanzania.

During 1938 and 1939 it became obvious through trade embargoes that Germany was going to have a shortage of raw materials. This led to them pivoting towards the Soviets even though they were political rivals in east and central europe. Germany needed resources and a safe eastern front of Britain declared war, the Soviet Union likewise could not afford a war with Germany and the British at the same time.
In the end Germany decided a short term peace treaty with the communists was worth the opportunity to reestablish German control over Central Europe and give a fighting chance in Western Europe

The problem with monarchies is that the separation between normal peoples and royals/nobles results in a complete disconnect.

That and political marriages between the various kingdoms of europe just resulted in everyone's monarchies not even being of the same blood as the people they ruled. Like how Wilhelm I George, and Nicholas were all cousins and Victoria was mother/grandmother of pretty much every single royal in every single country. They had more loyalty to other nobilities than they did to their own people, and wars between them were seen like some sort of game of chess with the commoners just being their pawns.

Of course we still have this problem nowadays with elites, career politicians, political families, jews, etc. I'm not saying the corrupt democracies we have right now are good, but it's still important to make this point.

kikes were on both sides, The Hohenzollerns were major funders of Freemasonry

They were on both sides. Ultimately they decided to side with the entente completely. Mainly because carving up the ottoman empire would result in britain giving them their jewish state in palestine vis a vis balfour declaration, and because they wanted to support their jewish communist tribesmen in russia.

No, cause I'm not German. You ever been interested in watching a biopic about Raymond Poincaré, WWI's president of France?

Not interested. Not because I'm not french, but because there's nothing interesting at all about the french since napoleon.

France, Britain & Russia got dragged into WW1 because the Germans backed the Austrians and then lost control of them. All on the Germans. They backed the Austrians thinking it would scare off the Russians and it didn’t, then France got dragged in, then Britain. Ultimately Germany is reponsible for the whole shitshow.

what sort of talmudic logic is this. It's just as much russia's fault for escalating a local conflict between AH and Serbia. It's just as much France's fault for using Russia's entry as justification to attempt to gangbang Germany from both sides.

fuck willy
i want luther kino

Germans have always been the problem and always will be the problem

geiler schnubba

erzähl

weed and hookers

>A German soldier tries to determine if the Dutch resistance has planted a spy to infiltrate the home of Kaiser Wilhelm in Holland during the onset of World War II, but falls for a young Jewish Dutch woman during his investigation.
His mistake was having a weird Oedipal relationship with his British mother, an inferiority complex with his British uncle, and thinking everyone of his relatives from Britain and Russia was plotting against him because every year they'd holiday in Denmark and he couldn't go because of the Second Schleswig War, and so he felt left out.

Attached: MV5BZmM2YjZhN2ItNTczZS00MDc1LTg0MTktODcyMjIyZmM5YjkwXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMjQ3NzUxOTM@._V1_SY1000_SX675_AL (675x1000, 107K)