Is Twitter really this fucking stupid?

Shes a lawyer thats what they do. But we are all aware that they deflected and didnt answer anything. Dosnt mean baldfuck got BTFO...

>I think they're in an echo chamber. They really have no perspective

Attached: 1546321130772.png (645x773, 11K)

>t. poo who didn't even watch the podcast

I typically support free markets but yes, since Twitter is a public space, it needs to be regulated by the government.

Attached: 1507509179032.jpg (184x184, 8K)

She came across like a condescending, jobsworth middle manager. The way she prefixed every response with "Tim" really pissed me off.

>he didn't make a single point and couldn't even make his opponent look silly
>that doesn't mean he lost....

h1b high caste bitch comes to US to subvert us for no reason than personal gain

Its called addressing people stupid, its how everyone in corporate is supposed to talk

You're naive for falling for their lawyer speak designed to cover their ass. They definitely have an agenda and they actively went after Alex Jones after CNN told them to. When there's a user that has made tens of thousands of tweets you can EASILY find 3 examples of that user breaking any of the Twitter rules. Then all you have to do is selectively enforce those rules to only apply to the dissidents. And when you're called out for double standard you just claim that you don't have enough personnel to do everything perfectly. This is one of the most basic techniques of censorship.

So why is it twitter's job to ensure people's physical safety, or protect them from death threats, or protection from organized harassment, or whatever? Isn't that the police's job? Why does twitter want to police the world?

Attached: 1551411587341.png (1290x716, 171K)

Yes. It's world's worst run company after Microsoft.

>Yea Forums
>everyone knows it isn't serious

>twitter
>everyone thinks they're doing important virtue signaling charity work

He brought up multiple examples, articles, FACTS and they didnt answer anything. Just cause you can dodge a question dosnt mean your saying anything at all. Has nothing to do with winning or losing, thats whats what wrong with your lot, you think its a game to be won.

Attached: 1531349353902.jpg (720x540, 67K)

>The way she prefixed every response with "Tim" really pissed me off.
Was it autism?

give three (3) examples (podcast timestamps) of him being emotional and/or hysterical

This

do you know what greentext is newfag?

no, it's a power move dude.

if you try it on a girl she'll either drop and suck your dick right there or catch on and tell you to fuck off

She was good at avoiding answering questions, I'll give her that.

nice moving goalposts. I hope they find a home someday!
Do you?

How do I make my text green?

Why did Jared Taylor get banned from Twitter, but David Duke and Richard Spencer did not? Isn't that a little suspicious? They banned the most reasonable and well mannered white advocate and kept the people who are likely to never convince anybody because of their reputation?

Attached: Jared Taylor.jpg (500x578, 43K)

I've had hysterical SJW tell me using their first name is insulting since it's patronizing

This is ultimately why going full libertarian is the same as going full retard. There is no fucking regulation without the government.

>no, it's a power move dude.
Imagine being this insecure

Not him, but it's absolutely a factor in personal dynamics, from a psychological perspective.

no one knows what even means, deflect more like your poo wife fagit

Attached: fagitpoo.jpg (494x359, 55K)

>constantly avoiding questions
>attempting to see "caring" by constantly saying "Tim"
>Tim calmly called out the bullshit over and over again
I'm not even a fan of occupy Tim, but was well prepared, and continually called out the hypocrisy

Based opinion.

Attached: 1516357439104.jpg (400x400, 27K)

Tim is centrist on most issues and right wing on others but he pretends to be a leftist.

>Tim is centrist
Center left is still left

Maybe. But people get insulated by their peer group. Not saying they're right, it needs fixing, but it's easy enough to lose your perspective.

^ plus look at those bobs.

I think you're missing the point - it's not the regulation that people have an issue with, it's Twitter's unending campaign to paint themselves pro free speech, and anti-censorship. It's the hypocrisy that pisses the masses off. For example:
>advocating violence against the Covington minors by a leftist
"That's a really complex issue." - Pajeet on JRE
>post "learn to code" to buzzfeed ex-employee
Account banned.

also, why can't people use the BLOCK feature to block people who are harassing them?

twitter lets up countless far left accounts that post shit about killing capitalists and they're still allowed on twitter

What did he mean by this?

Attached: tim pool podcast.png (1280x803, 1.06M)

>imagine getting btfo by a balding, stuttering manlet

It shows how propped up these people are by MSM, corporations and money. In direct confrontation, not behind a corporate firewall, they get shit on.

It's pretty obvious Duke and Spencer are controlled opposition.

Who the fuck is Nathan Bernard?

Put the poo, in the loo.

I agree, but I'd add the addendum that he was pretty left a few years back, and it seems the more he witnesses quantitative data and the insanity of the modern left, the more he moves right. I.e. occupy days he was obviously left (albeit Occupy Wall Street started as a liberterian movement to end financial loopholes, etc before the left infected it), and now I'd argue he's modern right-wing (not neocon, evan-con, etc).

>defending the baldlet
twitter.com/VicBergerIV/status/1101208956230356994

It's a legit technique which feels weird to hear as an observer, but absolutely works when you're the person being addressed, and a big part of it is precisely because it pisses you off. Try not being an autist.

As the original /timposter/ I hope you enjoy the light I've brought to this board. Tim is like our very own frodo, using his centrist-leaning-pol politics he will fight the dark gids that encrouch on our decaying realm.

Attached: original_result (34).png (512x512, 479K)

I'm sorry but if a tweet endangers your safety you need to be put down.

Attached: original_result (35).png (512x512, 476K)

So if Twitter admitted to having a political bias, how many people would care? Especially if their press release was phrased in a way such as

>Twitter does have a bias. A bias against racists, white nationalists, conspiracy theorists, and bigotry. Because this needs to be said in 2019.

Social media butterflies don't fucking care if Alex Jones is banned. Him having a platform isn't important to them. Twitter won't magically deregulate their platform because there's no return on investment for them except being considered enablers of controversial right-wing content creators.

Government regulation of Twitter wouldn't be a bad thing. Corporations like Twitter that achieve such enormous size that they become public commodities shouldn't still be at the mercy of one CEO with an agenda and only his own interests in mind rather than supporting public discourse.

Leftist consider mean words to be the same as physical violence.

>So if Twitter admitted to having a political bias
they admitted their employees do, so they have already

> why can't people use the BLOCK feature to block people who are harassing them?
i think the issue is more when harassers become mobs

no, they're not - but if they act like they are they're absolved of responsibility

Looking forward to mass flagging Tim pool and every rightwing puppet ;^)

Attached: 577231736.png (1280x720, 638K)

No, actually he wiped the floor with her. She looked pretty uncomfortable and got slammed with a lot of facts. Stuttering bitch. They underestimated Pool. Fuck Dorsey and his little punjab mutt.

Who's this faggot and why should I listen to him?

>posting Vic Berger

Are you being ironic?

Some fag, you don't need to listen to him

Stay mad gavin

Only jack, he thinks people disliking him is some misunderstanding he can clear up and make things well again. Or maybe he got envious of Musk doing whatever he wants and coming out unscathed, who knows.
Zucc/cook/bezos know well enough nothing good will come out of going out of secure access journo territory like that.

You don't have to check replies and mentions you know. Literally no one can get at you on Twitter unless you engage with them.

Attached: original_result (20).png (512x512, 586K)

I hate Vic, i sincerely believe he harbors more hate than gavin and obviously more than tim.

Only applies to protected classes.
Everyone else can suffer.

>High caste
Those are only the people that look fair enough to be in their films, though. This bitch looks like a slave. The richest Indians have no reason to move out west user.

I'm pretty sure Twitter has a function in which you protect your tweets and only people you follow can contact you.

Yes ive seen that when he encouraged violence oh wait that was Gavin on multiple occasions

Attached: 182707348.jpg (700x574, 63K)

Embrace the beanie Yea Forums

Attached: original_result (25).png (512x512, 491K)

What did Dorsey think he could achieve by bringing a lawyer to a stoner podcast?

Why don't republicans just make their own twitter?
The website can't be that complicated to design.

>>everyone knows it isn't serious

Attached: 25739340f6c38e98d17616bc7fdd8464.jpg (736x414, 34K)

they tried and it failed miserably lol

Attached: bald.jpg (3088x2320, 1.07M)

>He's all alt righter!
Even though he talked shit about /pol/, cernovich, and other alt righters.
Yeah, I'm thinking this random blue check mark twitterer is based!

Not just any lawyer, head council of the trust and safety commission. She protects their political efforts under the guise of "helping" people.

Attached: original_result (3).png (512x512, 589K)

Phone companies can't turn off your service for saying you hate niggers on a call. Electric companies can't do the same. So why are banks and Twitter allowed to do that?
I know that it's fun to jerk off about libertarian autism, but we already have precedent for this stuff.

based

Attached: 3678767.png (641x480, 518K)

it's called gab and it's fucking boring. I don't know why liberals love echochambers so much. it's fucking boring to talk to people you agree with.

Lmao this cuck faggot was so scared he brought his lawyer

Did we watch the same podcast? all I saw was her handwaving and avoiding questions like mad.

what did gavin do? i actually don't know, i'm basing off of vics vid

Just dont say nigger on twitter is that so hard sweetie? its a private company they can do what they want

it's not a private company, it has received billions in government money.

They need as many users as possible, as those users need to feel "safe" so they upload as much shit about themselves as possible for datamining. Also helps if they feel safe enough to use their real name and shit.

Lol just get off social media bro. Why even bother.

>just let a bunch of ANTIFA faggots hit you with bike locks bro don't even defend yourself because if you defend yourself, they win!

Attached: 1551863543891.png (452x467, 8K)

These people just lie and lie and lie, holy fucking shit they're sociopaths.

youtube.com/watch?v=EbTXqrS9l5E
>12:59
>thank you for your feedback
Literal automated response.

Didn't /pol/ call him a mutt, causing him to flip out on them?

Vic made a good video summarizing it
youtube.com/watch?v=_J_1Wqzqt4I

Encouraged proud boys members of violents acts to earn rank, also generally called for political violence.

>Vic Berger
OH NO NO NO NO NO NO

He said himself that he felt he was coming across as angry/emotional

Based

Most things people stress over online are completely irrelevant to their day to day life and completely voluntary.

>its a private company they can do what they want

Funny how this is now a thing when literally two years ago you were all sperging about bakeries refusing to make cakes for gays.

fuck off tranny freak

Attached: 1530485266748.webm (988x548, 2.84M)

>muh antifa

Attached: 1259283819.png (1280x720, 602K)

It shouldn't be up to an oppressed class to unoppress themselves.

Attached: 03D388B2-7264-4F0B-A511-917461A1F9CD.jpg (1052x2009, 275K)

ah yes, where do we draw the line, should i refuse service to someone because they are homosexual or because they say kill jews and fuck niggers, quite the dilemma.

Attached: 913389926.jpg (640x699, 89K)

kek, completely accurate

Not that user but I thought most of their responses were pretty reasonable.

I think the issue these days is that you can get balls deep in sjw shit or any niche political circle in the way that a lawyer probably doesn't have time to do.
You see leftists who see nazis everywhere because they lurk /pol/ and right wing twitter accounts
Then you see you right wingers seeing sjws everywhere because they lurk lefty youtube and leftist twitter accounts
Not to be a fence sitter though, everyone to a certain extent isn't getting the whole picture these days because most information is consumed online and most online sites do their best to only show you shit that you'll click on.

Basically, I can legit see why someone could look a twitter's actions and not think they're all lefty fucktards trying to ban every republican and I can also see why people can look at alex jones getting banned and think that free speech as we know it is doomed.

>literally Vic's entire job is to take clips out of context and make them look bad
>BUT THIS ONE'S FOR REAL YOU GUYS

Gavin is not blameless, but anyone who says he's leading a white nationalist hate gang is lying.

>Learn to code was banned because it was coded language for a death threat
what? it literally wasn't

why is gavin so retarded? if he stayed out of this shit he'd have been fine

I did a little something with last weeks Alex Jones Joe Rogan Podcast you guys over here on Yea Forums might appreciate.

youtu.be/vcvKpH4ZJcg

ALEX' DREAM

Attached: alex.jpg (1920x1080, 709K)

Fuck off libcuck
Oppressed people should absolutely take responsibility for their situation and work hard to get out of it.

however will a faggot survive without having his aids-ridden cake? quite the dilemma

He is leading a group that gets into trouble constantly, encouraged violence

I gotta say, he makes the right decision wearing the cap. It's kinda dopey, but compared to this...

We're working on it, thankfully outbreeding whitey is easier than expected

Attached: 1531605167000.jpg (1080x1080, 187K)

And what group is that?

based niggers, tying-down weak white men so the seed remains pure in those incorruptible

Remember when the common thought about profit and capitalism would be private companies allowing as much freedom as possible in order to increase their client numbers?
What happened?

Attached: 1541028430124.gif (280x358, 2.53M)

He's said some things he shouldn't have, but the point of the group was to be a security team for conservative speakers so they don't get shut down by Antifa. Some of the individuals have gone too far, and the violence does attract people who are just looking to brawl, but Proud Boys have never showed up at a left wing rally to cause violence. Antifa routinely comes to right wing events with the intention of causing violence, and the Proud Boys are there to fight back. You can disagree with the methods, and they are not guiltless by any means, but between them and Antifa, it's clear who is worse.

see
CNN literally pushed Twitter to ban Alex Jones over some petty bullshit.
Also they're teamed up with ADL, a Jewish organization to take down hate speech. And ADL isn't just innocent group either, they go out of their way to silence any legitimate criticisms of Jews or Israel.
cnet.com/news/adl-anti-defamation-league-facebook-twitter-google-hate-speech/

Protection of the republic supercedes a company with a monopoly and their right to silence voices in favor of preferred politics. The village square has gone digital and Skinner boxes and lock in prevent new wquares from attracting the citizens or interacting between the walled gardens.

Free speech will prevail tranny bootlickers. On /ourguy/ will make it happen.

Attached: original_result.png (512x512, 393K)

twitter obviously has a lefty bias, I would be more content if they just owned that instead of denying it rabidly. Also, left and right wingers rarely venture into the each others turf, they just share screencaps and circlejerk over it

I unironically believe the proud boys should beat antifa into a pulp in the streets. You can not go too far against those lunatics. Just murder them, world' be a better place. Americans need to start bringing the army in to shoot students again. Fuck 'em.

Attached: kent-state.jpg (1597x1200, 375K)

>>muh antifa
I'm sorry, we're you trying to make an argument.

Dorsey admitted the bias on the podcast. Pool back them up in a corner so bad he was forced to

Actually, no.
They want to get rid of conservatives.
youtu.be/WLx9MucU4CI?t=277

This guy learned from the samurai. Jews fear him

>twitter
>unregulated
>platform
>how to reveal yourself as a fucking retard in three simple steps

I give you points for not mentioning 'private company' that would make me laugh at you even harder.

She was there only to cover Jack Dorsey by using doublespeak leganese to cover their asses. There was a point in the interview, when Tim brought up that feminazi who won't use pronouns, where they looked truly unprepared. The lawyer and Jack looked at each other cautiously but she definitely gave him a look like "I think I got this". They knew what was about to happen when they agreed to the show given the backlash against Joe Rogan after the last time Jack was on.

>I unironically believe the proud boys should beat antifa into a pulp in the streets. You can not go too far against those lunatics. Just murder them, world' be a better place. Americans need to start bringing the army in to shoot students again. Fuck 'em.

Attached: 1533835289039.jpg (900x675, 128K)

The problem was when trans-animals was brought up, they’re not prepared for the concept of people who claim to be animals trapped in human bodies.

I also like how they simply played dumb to a lot of shit, especially many terms Tim used that have been in the public discourse for years now. They are dishonest to the bone. These people have an agenda.

>trans-animals
yeah this podcast sounds retarded, time to give it a watch

>i think the issue is more when harassers become mobs
Lol. Ever since the 2014, the leftists are sharing the Twitter automatic blocklist that to this day contains over 300 000 people. You tweet at PewDiePie and the blockbot will automatically ban you from engaging with nearly half a million people.
The 'Twitter mob' is a bullshit talking point when you are on the left.

>>I unironically believe the proud boys should beat antifa into a pulp in the streets.
They should though.
Give me one reason why they shouldn't.

>Just murder them, world' be a better place.
Nobody said to go this far dude.

>podcasts aren't Television & Film
>still allowed on the Television & Film board

Attached: come on.jpg (132x231, 16K)

>Nobody said to go this far dude.
No, I did. Just kill 'em.

Attached: were just gonna kill em.jpg (824x965, 88K)

lol Jack bringing a fucking lawyer with him is him admitting Tim is right about everything.

Why'd you post a picture of yourself, incel?

Nice shitskin. How fucking dumb are you to post a socialist swine in the same post where you mock the 'muh antifa'?

Attached: 1544889868932.jpg (1054x1198, 459K)

It should really be renamed Television and Film and Entertainment at this point. It would be a lot more fun and cut down on capeshit.

>>everyone knows it isn't serious

Attached: HolyGrail027.jpg (800x441, 39K)

I thought that this headline was fake first.

This truly is the best and funniest timeline

>haha you don't go outside so why are you worried about minorities causing crime and muslim rape gangs that only target underage white women and women being unsafe despite living in a first world country
nice pic

Twitter is something like 86% far left progressives, so of course application of the rules will be asymmetrical. If all your community managers are ideologues you don't even need discrete rules because they'll discriminate according to their own internal prejudices.

>vic berger

doesnt this guy fuck kids?

Attached: ''''meta humor''''.jpg (592x1804, 131K)

Are you that butthurt over one little post that you decided to make a second reply to it nearly an hour later?

Attached: 1524108933603.jpg (317x291, 26K)

BRAVE

>all those comments: "I never watched Tim's videos, but he's an alt right MRA white supremacist"
NPCs are real
And when someone replies to them with "but have you really watch his videos" they answer with a: "shut up incel white supremacist". Too funny.

ayo FUCK same hide

Not being able to recognize humor is a sign of autism my dear user.

you have to be absolutely stupid if you think people on Yea Forums, an anonymous internet image board, take themselves more seriously than people on twitter. the proof is simply in having to show your identity or not. further, even the most tryhard board, /pol/, gets shit on constantly by a large number of people on the rest of the website. on twitter you can see some people arguing against these delusional people, but they are always shouted down by more people from the opposition. finally, nobody fucking reports or cites Yea Forums posts or threads in actual publications, while twitter is constantly refered to and cited, giving those morons a sense of importance

when people think "the internet has decided" they think of twitter, not Yea Forums

Gab could have been cool but yeah again libshitfucks had to put the power moves in and wreck that too, why can't they just get a life they are such cyberbullies all the time.

This basically covers it but I guess Gab is supposed monitizable now so: theverge.com/2018/11/5/18049132/gab-social-network-online-synagogue-shooting-deplatforming-return-godaddy-paypal-stripe-ban

Honestly, this post is pretty good, if I am going to be real with you I thought some of those quotes the lady gave were absolutely mad about hanging or beatings, what Sargon of Akkad said was just reprehensible even if completely satirical.

The problem is really just liberals getting so much leeway to being able to make various types of death threats more than conservatives being bastions of purity that are being unfairly abused. If everyone was banned who said a threat then it would be okay.

Pim Tool is disingenuous reactionary alt right hack masquerading as a "bernie bro'

fuck that hack pos & he got owned by the Twitter gal

Just to give some context, the Twitter lady (Vija Gadde) is a regular donor to the Democratic Party so she's not really a neutral judge of political content. Also Tim Pool is bald, we all know it, he is fooling nobody with that beanie.

>/pol/, gets shit on constantly by a large number of people on the rest of the website
you and your tranny friends are not "a large number of people" faggot

>Doesnt answer any question Tim presents
>BUT TIM
>B-B-BUT TIM
kys

back to pol you stupid fucking nigger, i hate trannies and the left but you faggots are fucking insufferable with how deluded you are and how you infect other boards. slit your fucking wrists

that isn't even twitter, that's just the UK being cucked as usual

You know the reason most people come here is to discuss stuff because everywhere else there's no place for such simple and trivial activity, right?
Yea Forums used to be just a dumb place for retardposting with pictures and autism, but now it's a place where you can talk to people without having to endure trigger warnings and force using pronouns.

But there are some anons who are so stupid that they do take this shit seriously, hence my attempt at lampooning of them in the Holy Grail peasants image you quoted. A joke I now realise did not land at all.

because tim is a low grade journalist hack not worth addressing. he wasent really prepared for the interview

No, for the most part he was clearly overexcited/angry and struggled to put his argument together. Meanwhile he was facing someone who spins Twitter's actions to the media for a living, as well as a CEO who's been doing the rounds on major tv shows and podcasts for months now. He did get in one really good shot though, that moment there . She had absolutely no response, it was one of the few parts of the podcast where everyone shut up for a few seconds.

Fuck you.

Attached: aae44361-e66c-40d9-af9e-e296721b091c.jpg (2028x1140, 402K)

yeah i got that, my point was the percentage of Yea Forums posters that take Yea Forums seriously is much less than the percentage of twitter posters that take twitter seriously

All his points were valid, how was he not prepared to the interview?

>wtf why is this journalist not beating up the people he disagrees with on sight!?

that was the point tho

police is already doing it, twitter doesn't need to do anything

It's weird how he looks totally white from some angles and totally asian from others. He's like Schrodinger's Hapa.

They organized to remove conservative influencers after trump won the election. Same as the rest of silicon hell.

personally i think all forms of social media should be nationalized and strictly censored to the point where they're unusable to force people onto more sincere platforms

give me one good reason why this shouldnt happen. "muh private corporations muh free market" is NOT an argument.

He was trying way to hard to make it seem like there is massive sweep of conservative censorship on social media at the moment which just is false

circular retarded jibberish... holy shit

nah

>twitter is a public space
>weeb reaction image
Lmao, quintessential poltard.

triggered

offer a concise reply or fuck off right back to whatever incel subreddit you crawled from you impudent human cumstain

Yea Forums is the furthest thing from an echo chambe, anyone can post almost anything because no one cares about being banned or jannies.
Thats why you have /poltards/ and el chapo trannies battling it out on here.

False because you said so? Doesn't work this way kiddo. Watch it again.

People get what they deserve.

stay mad incel

Why not just delete the internet? Skip the fucking middleman.

Wrong. You should stay in discord.

Conservashits are such snowflake whiny cunts who unironically vote against their own economic interests

because you cant

I hope we're getting that civil war we all deserve soon.

Imagine being this asshurt because twitter banned your right wing hentai account.

yeah, people should support the green new deal... which hasnt been voted on at all in congress....for some reason

>I don't understand how humans think
at least you're in the right place user. one of us

Attached: 61qSTddN4UL.jpg (648x1000, 85K)

If he'd just shave his head he'd look fine, honestly.

It would be better than the fucking hat. God every time i watch his videos or interviews it's like the giant pink elephant in the room. Imagine the smell.

Attached: 1551464842163.png (483x470, 184K)

I'm far right and I like Tim because he takes a big shit on the far left from a centrist position.
The only reason to hate him is being a butthurt leftist who thinks arguing with spergs on an anonymous carp Mongolian fishing forum is activism, that and his stupid hat which hides his baldness plus is basic bitch political beliefs.

archive.li/JWcHg

Whoa Nelly!

Attached: pR6d7hk.png.jpg (783x799, 233K)

Dont know, dont care, entirely possibly

you will NEVER be a real woman

Does the notion of free market applies here? Twitter is clearly a monopoly. So is facebook, google, and all this garbage. Should we give them the right to do whatever they want because they're private property when they clearly have way too much political influence on public opinion shifts?
Libertarians are going to lose their heads over this.

Attached: 1545609062702.jpg (300x168, 7K)

Nice projecting, what is your blog? Unless you can't see the actual reporters posting that he is the best reporter on the internet and he's Joe Rogans favorite reporter even though they disagree on everything.

China has this social media and they have some room for disagreement but everyone doesn't hate each other, I sometimes think it would be nice to stop it with this either/or dichotomy and move more towards debating singular issues at a granular level.

Like we all agree we need UBI but is it 1000, 500, 2000, and why?

Rather than just being like ANYONE WHO LIKES UBI IS A FAGGOT
OH YEAH YOUR ASS IS DOXXED GO AFTER THIS GUY MY TRANNY HORDE HAHAHAHHA

He isn't leading it anymore though. He founded it.

Also it's pretty understandable to engage in violence for fun when you're fighting antifa. Fuck those clowns.

Okay this is epic

totalbiscuit reincarnated

I've never had a Twitter account. But I'll be the first one to support the regulation of silicon valley. In fact, let's just nuke California.

Who the fuck are those people and why should I care

I thought Vidya Game, or Vagina Gall, or whatever her name was, did great.

>"Twitter always considers context"
>"Some of the people who used the hashtag learn to code also sent death threats to journalists" therefore ban everyone who uses it, even public figures
Five minutes didn't pass between each time she put her foot in her mouth

I'm replying to a bot, aren't I?

>still replying

>he says, completely oblivious to the fact that his post disproves this
This place is hardly an echo chamber when fags like you are always there to go "ACKSHEWALLY"

who the fuck is this guy . Is he relevant at all? Also I assume he's obsessing about Sam Hyde like a creepy vengeful stalker.

this. bald guys always look worse when they try to hide it.

As eastern European who had 'antifascists' forcefeeding us their equality and social justice horseshit at the gunpoint for more than half a century, I wholeheartedly agree.

>Youtube actively prevents conservatives from being recommended
>Facebook has a "deboost" list that artificially prevents conservative pages from being pushed to peoples accounts
>Youtube has a list termed "contraversial query list" which actively reduces the visibility of non progressive talking points (like anti abortion videos or climate change denial videos)
>Google leaks talk about reducing the visibility of conservative search results
>Google head talks about trumps election as a failure of progressivism that should be fixed
>Twitter "de-emphasises" viewpoints critical of the DNC and shadowbans certain commentators preventing their reach
>Reddit modifies how upvotes behave and places limits on upvotes in order to prevent certain subs from reaching the front page
There isn't a crisis of free speech online though, these corporate entities that make up the vast majority of internet communication are entirely benevolent.

Attached: Youtube Conservative Censorship.png (728x727, 87K)

>joe rogans favorite interviewer

Joe rogan is a pseudo-hack trying toe a false propganda that conservatives are being massively censored and the blanket term "left" is for censoring free speech. joe is a fucking rightwing coward cuck, he invited all of these rabid racists and and nazis and and stuff but never once does he ever say, invite someone from BLM and the one time like a complete scumbag him and sam harris ambushed a black-out drunk hannibal burres to argue against BLM. He's a fucking Nazi Sympathizer and it's pointless at this point to think otherwise, fuck joe rogan.

Joe Rogan had a podcast with the CEO of Twitter, and he got a lot of backlash from viewers because he didn't go after him for censoring far-right users. Then he had a podcast with a journalist who has been really critical of twitter. Now he did an episode with that journalist and with Twitter's CEO in the same room, but the Twitter guy got to bring his lawyer with him.

incels SEETHING

A lot of bald guys go through their "hat" phase. Even Rogan wore a hat indoors for years until Bill Burr roasted him for it in front of a huge crowd.

nice reddit spacing leftie

there's already a precedent too. we need to break silicon valley up for one and for all.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft_Corp.

absolute le chapo cringe

>store refuses to sell cake to gay couple
>its a private business they should be allowed to do whatever they want!

>twitter refuses to provide their free service to white supremacists
>wtf you can't do that nazis have rights!

Never change America

Holy shit. Go cut your dick off tranny

What would the discussion even be with a BLM head. It’s a movement that runs off hysteria and emotion. All the facts and stats are stacked against them

>censoring far-right users
I think you mean the alt-right

Attached: fk6ZU0t.png (1080x1080, 56K)

>Twitter is a public space
no

>i hate trannies and the left
nobody buys it pal

>mfw americans will constantly shit on euros for not having a 'silicon valley'
>mfw with the same breath they support regulating or even removing said 'silicon valley' from the map

Attached: 1346261360470.jpg (339x351, 84K)

tim is /pol/-lite at least, he just hides his power level at first and slowly moves further to the right as the conversation goes on - that's the proper way to convince normies.

morally twitter can't deflect all criticism with just "muh private company", while at the same time being protected by the state from people's retaliation. lynching is the libertarian answer to seeing cancer spread, and also lynching is the highest form of democracy.

yea i thought conservashits were for private business rights

cake shops aren't a communications platform like twitter.
banning someone from twitter is becoming like banning someone from using the telephone.

watch out there
these people are my frens

Attached: 1495167804070.png (1360x832, 567K)

>mom and pop store is an equivalent to a multinAtional megacorp that has control over election results and information flow for hundreds of millions of people

>So why is it twitter's job to ensure people's physical safety
throughout the podcast they kept repeating:
- the health of conversation
- keeping people on the platform for as long as possible
- that twitter is a "platform" (and thus exclude it from being a "public space" ie free speech)
- computer algorithms to police content because "lol only 4k employees versus 100 million posts"
- not enough funding!

Why do conversations need to BE healthy? Twitter wants it to be healthy because (reason not given)
Why can't the twitter user base police itself? Twitter WANTS to use the computer systems to do the job for them because (reason not given)
Why does twitter need to do X couldn't they do Y? (no reason given, subject changed, canned responses) etc

The exact moment that soulless lawyer bitch said "Thank you for your _" and a few other very obvious and robotic email tier replies, i knew twitter was up to no fucking good with any of their shit.
Joe and Tim were trying to wring a stone for water and got nothing for their effort.

You're not supposed to keep people who are disruptive to a conversation in the conversation for as long as possible before banning them. You're supposed to wave a fucking iron first in front of their face and warn them to get back on fucking topic, and if not then you ban them immediately.

Twitter's motivation is wholly and entirely to change people's minds. Twitter isn't regretting that they're building echo chambers, they're regretting that their echo chamber isn't sound proofed enough to the outside so that no one outside doesn't realise what it is, while everyone inside is perfectly happy.

sunlight is not the best disinfectant; a chemical wash is.

Attached: AlphaCentauriTopLalQuote.jpg (655x238, 82K)

no amount of whiny about conservative censorship will get you laid, dyel incel

SHOW BOB AND VAGENE

Lol, imagine saying that when the Covington, VerifiedHate and LearnToCode debacles happened.
Are you getting credits from your bolshoi professor to come sperg here?

Attached: Obunga's Legacy.png (542x688, 87K)

>it's really important to me that I not be stopped from screeching at strangers about nonsense on some horrible website
Why not just do it on some other website?

Jesus I love this webm. That catch and smack gets me every time.

Attached: 1477040587666.jpg (400x558, 29K)

>one small-town bakery refusing to make a cake is the same as a monopolizing platform restricting free expression and fundamentally undermining the republic
If the right wasn't the side with principles they'd unrironically want to censor you from saying this, and they'd be right to do so.

Too bad cuckservatives are too cowed by those principles to actually do anything about this situation.
Sincerely though, you should be shot in the streets.

who are you quoting? fuck silicon valley.

>dumb yuropoor, our rich people are richer than yours

anyone who has ever made this argument gets the gulag or the gas chamber. either one really. it doesnt matter at this point, someone's just gotta take out the trash

>Youtube actively prevents conservatives from being recommended
Bullshit, literally all I get in my recomendations is alt-right propaganda: Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro and now the Captain Marvel incel outrage.
I never watch any of that shit and they still recommend it every day.

>why not shout into a bag in your bathroom?

>I'm going to construct a hypothetical situation in my head where you look silly
>checkmate

I bet you never watch any of that gay porn either huh, fuckboi?

oy fucking vey

Attached: sei_5806521[1].jpg (748x498, 53K)

this. for some reason youtube algothrims insist i always watch BEN SHAPIRO OWNS SJWS compilation shit videos

youtube is a reactionary brainwashing shithole

>Blizzard bans a bunch of people for toxicity
>They're a private company they can ban anyone they want

>Blizzard fires 800 employees who were made redundant
>This is last stage capitalism, communists rise up

Fucking my gf tonight. No incel here

You though, nobody is fucking your fake inverted penis that’s for sure

>WHY ISN'T [PRIVATE COMPANY X] ALLOWING ME TO SPEW MY BULLSHIT ON THEIR PROPRIETARY SOFTWARE?!?!?!!?
>REEEEEEEEEE THIS IS AN ATTACK ON FREE SPEECH REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
every time

Attached: 148568484424695.jpg (1200x1195, 201K)

>Peterson and Shapiro
>alt-right propaganda

based retard

>If the right wasn't the side with principles

Attached: k55GLz8.jpg (251x242, 12K)

duke isn't a threat and they can use him as a boogeyman
spencer is a fed

These posts? I made them both.

>when getting banned from a website obliterates your entire social life
Haha. Pathetic.

>le private corporation argument
>in 2019, the era of late stage neoliberal crony capitalism

yikes!

Attached: 1498082808568.jpg (449x449, 37K)

post yfw the army rolls up on DC and takes over

lol

Attached: 6465435b726c6d877b66083bde616d0c1488d280.png (640x444, 79K)

Am I the only one that thought Tim Pool just sounded like a butthurt alt-right person whining? I felt at least the woman was trying to explain the reasoning behind things, even if she sounded like a human auto-reply email.
She explained clearly the process behind Twitter's rules and enforcement.

I also think both sides missed the point in that the Twitter rules aren't necessarily biased, but the employees that do the casework possibly have a bias.

I don't even use Twitter so maybe I'm not getting it.

Yup. They both capitulate to the far alt right shit heads

>implying I post on twitter
I speak for the normies user. They too deserve a voice, decrepit, misguided creatures though they are.

>Does the notion of free market applies here
Nope.
First - Twitter is not private company, it is publicly traded company
Second - they are heavily tax subsidized, government contracts are norm on big platforms
Third - they are not platforms, because they heavily editorialize their content, that makes them publishers, not platform and makes they liable for lawsuits for the posts on their website.
Only reason why that is not happening is due to their heavy corporatist lobby in US government

>limiting discussion on the information superhighway
>somehow not an attack on free speech

you can't argue the fact that twitter is a private corporation that can literally do whatever the fuck they want. twitter doesn't owe you anything. why are conservatives such children? if you don't like FB, twitter, etc. don't use them. stop crying lmao

Attached: c06ccaadece49982c4284c8b3a7b6136b1827dd5.jpg (1200x753, 205K)

You could argue that a lot of people basically make a living off of twitter, youtube, and to a lesser extent patreon. Getting banned from any one of those can be a massive hit to their income. I think that's why Tim Pool was so hyper-emotional in that conversation/debate/interview. He needs youtube and twitter to live comfortably, the idea that Jack Dorsey or VJ could take that away from him whenever they want scares the shit out of him.

post ten (10) examples

Trump supporters are uneducated baby dick incels who unironically vote against their own economic interests

>implying you don't post on twitter
Nice try, snowflake.

They've both on multiple repeated occasions (if not monthly) have publicly stated they strongly dislike the alt-right, if you watched anything they've put out recently within the past two years you would know this

Don't give a fuck faggot. You set this precedent when you forced us to take in the niggers in the 60s.

It's overrun by niggers and zoomers, of course it is.

if you weren't a brainlet you would know that being a private company doesn't exclude you from government regulation. twitter is already forced by government to pay their workers minimum wage and other regulation. adding one more regulation isn't really end of the world.

you already did that one user

Attached: 1550629283162.png (500x594, 406K)

Yeah, no seriously, fucktards like you need to fuck off back to Guardian comment section where they can wrap you back into a woolen cover of conformity.

Then they should get real jobs. That's like saying they shouldn't toss panhandlers off of a street corner.

As long as there's literally nothing standing in your way of calling someone a faggot, this site won't be an echo chamber

Prove thatI post on twitter.

Attached: wash your dick.jpg (540x960, 146K)

>tim is /pol/-lite at least,
No, not really he holds left-libertarian views to progressive views socially and economically he's anti-monopoly and has a disdain for corporate America.

I would call him an acceptable progressive, meaning he can have positive relations with those who don't share is views, unlike others who get their knickers in a twist.

You talk like a fag, so you post on twitter.

audibly kek'd at this! saved, you magnificent bastard.

companies hire people like her to explain away their wrongdoings. that's what they are paid for, of course she's good at it.

>far alt right
What even is the 'far alt right' lmao

>>>r/thedrumpf
You need to go back

THEY ARE NOT A PRIVATE COMPANY YOU COMMIE SHITSTAIN. They are both tax subsidized and publicly traded. That is not a private company jesusfuckingchrist cocksuckers like you. I BET that you have Bake That Cake banner under your bed, fucking faggot.

Just the fact that people like Tim Pool are allowed to go on youtube and have this discussion means our society is far too soft.

Hitler was right, the only way to prevent fascism is to just shoot them in their tiny little brains.

Attached: Capture.png (741x267, 92K)

You've conflated me with yourself user. Typical of autists with shit theory of mind, I understand.

They're like the alt right, only alter righter.

Lol. Also this The alt-right generally hates Peterson and Shapiro. Shapiro is a hardcore pro-Israel neocon who has no problem with the US getting less white, I can't imagine anything more opposed to the alt-right.

Nah. Pim Tool is not progressive. He is an alt right grifter masqueradin as a progressive.

I legitimately cannot understand that someone would unironically think like that. How far gone do you have to be to look at Tim Poole, with his muh enlightened centrist views, and think it's Nazi propaganda? Like how far left do you have to be?

Thread is going so fast nobody will notice I fap to traps.

Attached: 1525135895685.png (979x731, 954K)

except twitter isn't the internet

not an argument

>wait i want govt regulation now please

>publicly traded means they're not a private company
the absolute state of (You)

someone PLEASE answer this. if conservatives hate mainstream social media, why don't they fuck off elsewhere or create their own? look at pic related. 20 million dollars. you're capable or raising funds for something as retarded as a border wall, why don't you fuck off and create your own right-wing safespace?

no internet website owes you ANYTHING. keep crying. faggot

Attached: wallgfm.png (1223x574, 830K)

>le gateway drug argument
>be me
>watch rogan
>learn about ben shapiro from rogan
>ben shapiro shit shows up my feed because of rogan
>turns out i fucking hate ben shapiro
>le ebin FACTS AND LOGIC man DESTROYS mentally handicapped LIBTARD with CIRCUMCISED COCK of REASON and DEBATE
>literally never bothered to downvote any videos on youtube until youtube started trying to get me to watch shapiroshit
I literally hate the alt-right now more than before I was exposed to them all because of Rogan lmao.

>no u

I agree, journalist should get real jobs.

based yet faggotpilled

lol if you think that then you're a demented david icke tier mong.

low energy

Attached: fountain of wisdom.jpg (299x168, 5K)

They should indeed.

Bullshit, the dude constantly defends bernie and AOC regarding her current shitstorms

so... any person with common sense?

see
this is what happens when you don't have megacorporations and justice system behind your back, supporting you.
I know you like to LARP as an anarchist revolutionary, but have you never thought how everybody seems to give you preferential treatment and never treat you as a threat? what are you resisting against? you're just useful idiots.

>Am I the only one that thought Tim Pool just sounded like a butthurt alt-right person whining
No, that's exactly what he is.

Everyone out here crying about nazis and I'm fucking solid 10s every day LMAO

I know you are.
>checkmate

>it's a 'underage on Yea Forums try to push leftism' episode

>Muh e-celebs

Fuck off

I'd grease her up and rail her street shitting asshole with the full fury of an angry but confusingly aroused Shiva, then maybe go eat pancakes.

Isn't this cocksleeve a commie?

Ironic because he whores himself out on cam for shekels, so he can buy more switch games.

Attached: commiefag.jpg (3456x4608, 1.73M)

This. Rogan is alt light and I’ve had to tune him out since 2016 when he began heavily pandering to the radical centrist and alt right shit heads

1960s
>here take these people you don't want
Present day
>wtf no don't make us take these people we don't want
You reap what you sow nigger.

>be me
>watch rogan
>learn about ben shapiro from rogan
>ben shapiro shit shows up my feed because of rogan
>select not interested
>ben shapiro shit stops showing up
wow hard stuff. guess your mommy wasn't there to hold your hand through the whole thing though so I can understand how you didn't figure it out. if only your dad hadn't left to start another family the next town over after you were born.

no, on his tumblr he said he only had a commie flag cause hes an edgy cunt and would dress up as hitler for halloween

> Twitter
lol who cares
Trump unironically can destroy the site simply by leaving it, also ruin careers of people who do nothing but tweet at him all say

im actually a marxist, twitter needs to be regulated because it harbors all sorts of fascistic shit eaters from all across the spectrum - the worst of all being the neoconservative types shilling for war 24/7

cuckservatives and lolbergs can suck a fat one for all i care

Go back to pleddit you limpdick manlet

This. Pim tool is an alt right hack and it’s ostensibly obivious

>I'm rubber you're glue, whatever you say bounces off of me and sticks to you!

Who is he?

SMASH THE FASH (or anybody who I deem a nazi) that will surely encourage them to stay at home instead or organizing

Go back to r/inceltears faggot incel

>being this much of a ideologue

Attached: 1551328653625.png (2176x1676, 1.22M)

>radical centrist

Attached: 1526582831919.jpg (541x540, 18K)

>hurr i dont like niggers hurr duuur
not an argument. kys

>twitter needs to be regulated because i can't spout my bullshit on it without getting banned
no, it doesn't. twitter is not a government entity and twitter does NOW owe you any guarantee of free speech, or anything else

get it through your thick fucking heads

please twitter regulate X, it says bad thing I dont like.
What do you mean I am being silenced for saying what Y deems a bad thing

he literally calls himself a leftist and that almost all of his friends are leftists in the podcast you dense block. How is calling out one side's bullshit automatically make you apart of the opposing side?

I'm married with kids not a fucking childless manchild who wants gibs from an old kike.

i watch youtube on my tv and i can't select "not interested." but don't take it personally that i downvote videos you like, calm down user lol

some big time e fag with an ugly face

brocuss or somthing

you have to go back

plenty of people spout their bullshit without getting banned, like the warmongering neocons. why are they not getting banned despite spreading decidedly fascistic literal propaganda? because twitter is in fucking bed with the US government. get THAT through your thick skull you corporate shill.

>twitter does NOT owe you any guarantee of free speech
that's fine, I'll just force it to give them to me through the power of regulation

Rogan is a Democrat on pretty much every issue except for gun control and "hate speech". When he had that NY Libertarian candidate for governor on the podcast, he argued against the guy's positions from a Democrat perspective the whole time.

>why don't you fuck off and create your own right-wing safespace?
You have no fucking idea how many startups got cancelled in the past four months by the Mastercard and PayPal when they did exactly that. You do know that there is something called The Chokepoint legislative that enables them to do exactly that you snivelling cocksucker?

Attached: youhavetogokillyourselfyoubolshevikvermin.png (511x668, 360K)

>the leftyshit becomes a corporate shill screeching about muh corporate rights the instant it suits him
lmao

Honestly if twitter applied their rules equally to everyone they would have banned a bunch of government officials and major media personalities by now. Even excluding the obvious, low-hanging fruit like Trump saying shit about mexicans or that NY Times editor saying she hates white people (while dating a white dude, but I don't want to play armchair psychologist), you've got dozens of representatives and senators gleefully advocating the mass murder of innocent women and children in the middle east. Twitter doesn't do shit about it.

>plenty of people spout their bullshit without getting banned
exceptions aren't the rule.

> twitter is in fucking bed with the US government
schizo-tier conspiracy shit. kys

>pls daddy govt please step in and save me!
pathetic. nothing more embarrassing than conservatives crying for government help. it's a private company, they can ban whoever they want

those are private companies as well. weren't you guys screeching about people being able to decide who to do business with back when that gay-cake shit went down? incredible how quick you change your stance once it's against YOU lmao

im not a leftist

again: exceptions aren't the rule

>she tells him exactly the reasons why Sargon was banned
>Tim goes "well he doesn't really mean it"
wow is this really the only defense alt righters have?

"We were only pretending to advocate for genocide!"

Amazing.

>government organ controlling banks decides you don't get to participate in the economy anymore because of your political beliefs
Reminds me of reading about chinese villages during the cultural revolution. If the council didn't like you, they'd just take your food checks away, and since all private business (like farming) was illegal, you literally just starved to death.

Can't believe americans are taking this shit. You should legitimately be bombing government buildings.

Attached: 1550530073411.png (1200x1620, 152K)

You'd think Twitter would applaud the posting of gay interracial porn.

If I say hitlerdidnuffinwrong as a shitpost does it make me a nazi?

tbf, if trump isnt allowed to block anybody because of constitutional laws then twitter should be able to get away with cencorship just because muh private company

>they can ban whoever they want
not for long, kiddo

bump-limit so i'll give you one last reminder:

Twitter is a private company and go do whatever the fuck they want. They're not a government agency and therefore do not owe you free speech or literally ANYTHING else. use them or don't.

now quit fucking crying

>justifying war criminals

yikes! should have just told me you were a retard right from the beginning

see
stop crying isnt
>an arguement

>not being allowed to buy a cake is the exact same as having your bank account frozen without warning

you're a moron my man

>im not a leftist
Who are you even trying to convince?

Attached: wiw4rh121ul11[1].jpg (640x640, 71K)

>alt light

>use "OK" hand sign
>Yea Forums tricks idiots into believing it means white power
>randoms get banned for retroactively being a white supremacist
you're right, context doesn't matter

weird, considering it was all jack could talk about but eh you can't expect consistency or honesty from leftists

Attached: white power.jpg (493x431, 17K)

see
you right wing retard

If you have millions of impressionably young followers that will take it seriously, it doesn't matter if its a shitpost or not.

Attached: 1422016501457.png (680x583, 266K)

>again: exceptions aren't the rule
They're the exceptions that prove the rule. If you have a certain level of government/corporate association, you're untouchable. Even Milo Yianawhatever, with all the absurdly provocative shit he's been saying for years and years, was only banned once Breitbart and CPAC dumped him.

>Context matters!
>But only when we want it to

>trips of satanic glory and truth
HAIL SATAN

>I'm actually a marxist
Well, then you should be on Chapo making another 2000 dollars donation, so that the revolution can finally start and you will get to kill all those fucking working class white male suburban and rural retards, kamarad.

> trump isnt allowed to block anybody
that's cool, except i completely disagree with this

not an argument

>muh liberal capitalism boogeyman

stonetoss draws comics like an underage faggot

lol get dunked on faggot

repeat after me: Twitter is not a government agency and does not owe me anything

I’m glad alt right shitheads are getting ban hammers

>bump-limit so l'll remind you how much of a retard I am
thanks user, I wasn't about to forget tho

Working class whites who vote republican/trump are uneducated retards who ignorantly vote against their own economic interests

Can’t be overstated enough

incel

So we dont have to bake the cake?

based. it's incredible how they fail to realize that literally EVERY universal, global platform will include people of all backgrounds and therefore lean towards inclusion and tolerance rather than hate speech and nonsense

>b.b.but i should be allowed to say "nigger" on t.t.twitter

lol

>literally all public figures, including comedians, should be banned from saying anything even non-PC
well don't reveal that openly man

>"You tratior, remainer, white genocide supporting islamophile jewishslur lover, that should keep you going #HitlerWasRight"
>gets banned
>b-but it was out of context!

I voted for Trump, also I have a Master's degree in my engineering field from a world-renowned university

Stop copypasting your own reply, it's getting sad lmao

>makes a post that according to himself should get him banned
ironic

quick, somebody get this user, context doenst matter

Attached: efwerwr.png (707x15, 3K)

> engineering field

Lol not surprised buddy

>fuck the government
>private companies should have autonomy
>muh free market!
*gets banned from twitter*
>WAIT NOT LIKE THAT!

It is not even the government doing it in this case. It was the ResistHate group putting pressure on the banks to ban that production company. It was a legislative okayed in Obama era, and current legislation is trying to get rid of it, but the process is complex.
These faggy little addendum are what completely circumvent the constitution, and it is an usual tactic - different wording, seemingly unrelated section and poof - Federal reserve backed institution can ban private citizens.
In the UK something similar happened when Labor got into power, in just few years they have passed more than 4 000 laws. You can hide there everything, without changing constitutional rights.

muh private companied dont have to abide to the constitution

Lol right I thought the competition would start kicking in and these alt right dweebcels would get on gab already

let's see your community college degree my man