Why did they turn General Hux into a cartoon villain?
Other urls found in this thread:
m.youtube.com
youtu.be
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Because you touch yourself at night
>From being kylo ren's potential rival in the first order to General cuck
because these movies are meant for children
>N-N-N-NO THEY'RE NOT!
>Why did they turn General Hux into a cartoon villain?
white man bad, orange man even badder.
Because he's a white male.
>nihilistic, defeatist movie is meant for children
Because SW is actualy a cartoon for little kids and retard adults with no life like you
Because, fuck Trump and white men!
You're too young to realize it wasn't always like that.
Why must children suffer through poorly written storytelling?
>bites his gloved hand
>he starts screaming like a pussy
Wow cool villain
They are unable to recognize good storytelling, they watch for spaceships, and glowing sword fights.
Because modern screen writers are incapable of writing good or even consistent characters and these movies are created solely to suck shekels out of chinks and western retards.
>They are unable to recognize good storytelling
Yes they can.
>they watch for spaceships, and glowing sword fights.
Which is why the Disney cartoons have been doing so well, yes? Oh wait... that's not the case at all.
Were you never a kid yourself? Have you never heard a child say, "This sucks!"?
Because Rian was torn by contradictory impulses.
On the one hand, he REALLY wanted to associate the first order with the kind of right-wing politics that he hates.
On the other hand, he REALLY wanted to portray his political enemies as bafoons. (JJ shared in both of these motivations, but with the latter toned down significantly)
One of the biggest reasons TLJ was complete garbage is that, as illustrated above, "Making a good movie" was nowhere near the top priority.
Seriously. General Hux is a General is he not? He acts like he's not, bad writing. He could have decimated everyone and everything.
That's gotta hurt
terrible writing
and
terrible directing
I liked the prequels as a child, watching them as an adult is terrible. Children don't need a high quality of storytelling to engage them in something, they just need a thing or two to pique their interest.
When have you heard a child say "I want to watch the movie with those really interesting themes!" or "I want to watch the movie where the main character gets all those interesting developments!"?
No, they want to watch the movie where the guy flies the thing through the thing. Or the movie with the talking fish. Or the movie that has character X in it because they like that character.
>m.youtube.com
Almost every retarded plot point fixed in one short video
Did you not see this scene?
youtu.be
Was always a shit character
Why do you think there is ANY excuse for making utter shit?
It really is the most nonsensical fanboy argument.
see
He was never a good character, but Rian found a way to ruin a character that wasn't good to begin with.
How could you read what I'm writing and think that I'm a fanboy? Are you literally retarded?
>I liked the prequels as a child, watching them as an adult is terrible.
Nice anecdote that has no bearing on what we are discussing.
>No, they want to watch the movie where the guy flies the thing through the thing. Or the movie with the talking fish. Or the movie that has character X in it because they like that character.
No joke, there are people who believe this thing is actually true, then wonder why the market pool for children's entertainment is shrinking every year.
What action setpieces were in Lion King? Why are there themes of adult fears in Finding Nemo? Why wasn't The Iron Giant and Old Yeller happy-go-lucky films that had no downer moments at all?
Kids can handle more than you can think they can handle. The crux of your argument is feeble, and your position is demonstrably wrong.
To be a star wars fanboy at this point, its basically a prerequisite that you're a habitual liar and double-thinker.
>What action setpieces were in Lion King?
When was the last time you watched the Lion King?
Is this a serious question?
I am neither a fanboy nor am I defending anything.
5 years ago.
List what action actually happened on screen. Not a list of scenes, the actual action that happened in those scenes.
>Brainlets think that all the fucking references and nostalgia bait from the OT is for children
Yikes
I will never understand how this man baby was allowed to direct a major Star Wars film.
Simba getting trapped by the stampeding herd and Scar killing his father is the most memorable action scene in the movie I think.
Children sure but not 4 year olds who'd find this funny, it was meant for 11 year old boys to buy cool action movie toys, nowadays though who the fuck knows
Because burnt skeletons of family members, Intergalactic politics, finding out your father is a murderer, crime lords, slavery, and wars are topics for children...
He was never taken seriously if your argument is he made them bumbling (something ANH and RotJ did to Imps 40 years ago) then you're just looking to bitch about Rian. Hux was always laughably dumb character and TLJ just played him for gags. The SUBTLE nazi imagery was put in by Jew Jew so you can't even say that is something Rian did.
I will never understand how this man baby was allowed to direct a major Star Wars film.
Yes. George literally said he made them for kids
The fuck are you talking bout? I'm 30 and it was always meant for fucking kids, you pathetic sack of numale shit generation
You listed the scens, and not what actually happened. Here, I'll help you.
1 attempt at staying above the heard and 1 case of the villain stabbing through the paws of someone trying to climb up so only a moment or so of action with a lot of framing around it.
If children were like you said they were. Mufasa and Scar would have had a long 15-minute fight trading blow after blow to woo their simple minds.
>Supreme Chancellor, delegates of the Senate, a tragedy has occurred which started right here with the taxation of trade routes and has now engulfed our entire planet in the oppression of the Trade Federation.
He was a cartoon villain in TFA
How many kids movies have on-screen death by immolation, bisection, decapitation, electrocution, falling great heights, racing accidents, strangulation, vore, lazer-induced heartburn and hundreds of generic war deaths by varing degrees of explosion?
You can always tell a flawed ideology by the mere handful of clutch-purse arguments.
>Poorly written dialogue means he made it for adults
YIKES, kiddo. Maybe try reddit. It's got more of those funny frogs :)
Because the Piett ripoff guy was the only interesting addition to the series in TLJ and should probably replace him asap.
>This is outrageous! I object to the senator's statements!
>The chair does not recognize the senator from the Trade Federation at this time.
>To state our allegations, I present Queen Amidala, recently elected ruler of the Naboo, who speaks on our behalf.
>Honorable representatives of the Republic, I come to you under the gravest of circumstances. The Naboo system has been invaded by the droid armies of the Trade--
> I object! There is no proof! This is incredible. We recommend a commission be sent to Naboo to ascertain the truth.
Protip: There's nothing that's actually "Badly written" about this dialog other than its a bit dull.
However, its inclusion will always overrule even Lucas claiming that these movies are "Made for children".
That shit is stupid and you're stupid for saying it.
I like how you singled out that post and artfully dodged and
they didn't reply to me, silly
It is poor writing because he choose to put boring politics in a children's movie.
Growing up and noticing these really made me think differently about the SW universe.
He created it you fucking idiot
>because he choose to put boring politics in a children's movie.
If you're too dumb to recognize your own circular logic, then I think we're done here.
So is it poor writing for children to show burnt skeletons of family members, Intergalactic politics, finding out your father is a murderer, crime lords, slavery, wars, and to have on-screen death by immolation, bisection, decapitation, electrocution, falling great heights, racing accidents, strangulation, vore, lazer-induced heartburn and hundreds of generic war deaths by varing degrees of explosion?
Dismemberment, its for kids!
Nice try well-poisoner, His original concept was a loose idea of a space warfare epic with the aesthetics of this painting Ralph Mcquarrie did for another sci-fi movie. However it was targeted at young adults so you can continue to consider yourself right in a strictly legal sense while heavily implying it was made for kids under 10 because I'm not interested in arguing with you, only revealing to lurkers the foundations poor quality shitposting is built on so they don't ever find themselves needlessly aggravated by low effort bait disguised as some sort of witticism.
youtube.com
One of the reason why the original trilogy worked was precisely because the empire was not a bunch of goofy idiots who joined the alt-right bogieman on the internet. The empirial generals were renown strategists; and even in the case of general
Check out general Needa:
youtube.com
>military strategist
>ambushed and almost killed the main protagonists
>lost position on them over Han Solo's guerrilla tactics by hiding on a radar blind spot; something out of his strategic knowledge
>took full responsibility for the crew, and went to apologize
>killed for committing a single failure
This is how serious and threatening the Empire was. No goofy idios around. General Hux would probably have gotten executed the second he stated sperging out merely because he makes the empire look bad.