Why is this allowed in rotten tomatoes? You just change reviews just like that?
Why is this allowed in rotten tomatoes? You just change reviews just like that?
Other urls found in this thread:
splinternews.com
anyforums.com
twitter.com
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Out of four? That's a weird metric.
You have to remember that Disney's a really strong arm on the press. That's why you rarely see news about accidents on disneyland, and when you do the coverage doesn't last long.
Each critic decideds if their review is fresh or rotten.It's not an automatic system
Should it still count as a "first" if you have to add all those qualifiers
The answer is no but marvel has literally no other way they could market this garbage lol
>it's real
OH NO NO NO
its literally not real
How is it a first? Didn't they already make wonder woman?
And Elektra and Catwoman
How is that weird? 4-star reviews are as old as dirt.
>2/4
>fresh
Someone explain this
>most reviews say its boring and average at best
>85%
The critic decides if it's fresh or rotten.
The mouse got to her
Wtf almost every movie I see with a 2/4 gets a bad review but not Captain Marvel
what about movies from 15+ years ago that go on plebtomatoes? do rt just decide if they're fresh or not?
DCU has tons of female leads
for MCU this is a first
Don't forget this classic one.
It's a joke at this point. RT hasn't been respectable for years.
2.5 out of 4 means mostly good so the splat was undeserved.
Inb4 Armond's review has a line like "serviceable performances" and they change it to a "positive" review like they did for his Silver Surfer review
She literally changed her whole heading just so it'll suit the masses and the studio.
You can't tell me this shit isn't a little bit suspicious?
Why does every “critic” tries to write some witty synopsis? Just put down:
“Acting sucked, cinematography was bland, plot was okay, score...etc etc” you know something that is actually useful.