Why is this allowed in rotten tomatoes? You just change reviews just like that?

Why is this allowed in rotten tomatoes? You just change reviews just like that?

Attached: 7C8D4A31-1C2E-40F4-BAC0-3D5FA852593E.jpg (1654x105, 61K)

Other urls found in this thread:

splinternews.com/disney-retaliates-against-the-la-times-after-damning-ex-1820120649
anyforums.com/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Out of four? That's a weird metric.

You have to remember that Disney's a really strong arm on the press. That's why you rarely see news about accidents on disneyland, and when you do the coverage doesn't last long.

Each critic decideds if their review is fresh or rotten.It's not an automatic system

Should it still count as a "first" if you have to add all those qualifiers

The answer is no but marvel has literally no other way they could market this garbage lol

>it's real

OH NO NO NO

its literally not real

How is it a first? Didn't they already make wonder woman?

And Elektra and Catwoman

This.

splinternews.com/disney-retaliates-against-the-la-times-after-damning-ex-1820120649

How is that weird? 4-star reviews are as old as dirt.

>2/4
>fresh

Someone explain this

Attached: Screenshot_20190305-155751_Firefox.jpg (1080x1594, 545K)

>most reviews say its boring and average at best
>85%

The critic decides if it's fresh or rotten.

The mouse got to her

Wtf almost every movie I see with a 2/4 gets a bad review but not Captain Marvel

what about movies from 15+ years ago that go on plebtomatoes? do rt just decide if they're fresh or not?

DCU has tons of female leads

for MCU this is a first

Don't forget this classic one.

It's a joke at this point. RT hasn't been respectable for years.

Attached: 7cb097b37e43601c65460fa3422ebb85.png (936x138, 26K)

2.5 out of 4 means mostly good so the splat was undeserved.

Inb4 Armond's review has a line like "serviceable performances" and they change it to a "positive" review like they did for his Silver Surfer review

Attached: 1520285199417.jpg (315x450, 95K)

She literally changed her whole heading just so it'll suit the masses and the studio.

You can't tell me this shit isn't a little bit suspicious?

Why does every “critic” tries to write some witty synopsis? Just put down:
“Acting sucked, cinematography was bland, plot was okay, score...etc etc” you know something that is actually useful.