Why doesnt this scene trigger Yea Forums?

Had the One Ring not been destroyed, would the Witch King have respawned like he did in the past?

most of her parts were cut out that made this more tolerable so we forgive her

The only thing about this scene is that Jackson should have gotten more takes. It’s just not there performance wise. She needed to dig a little deeper.

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-01-22 at 1.38.12 PM.png (1122x1190, 1.16M)

Why did she take off her helmet before killing the Witch King?

I'm pretty sure Merry's dagger fucked him up for good.

It wasn't blatantly part of an overarching virtue-signaling ring towards non-fans that would go on to take over all of western media yet, nor did it drown out the film it was in like nuGhostbusters or Disney Wars.

The same reason that Samus did.

>a nationalist woman kills some nigger filth for her uncle the King.
explain why it would.

It's not really a big deal. It was not saying how strong women are. The hobbit did most of the work bringing him to his knees. She was a woman that snuck on the battlefield and got really lucky and said a silly one liner.

Eowyn is cool

this. the character was envisioned as english answer to joan d'arc by tolkein, not as feminist icon and that shows. unlike NuWars and NuGhostbusters that are more concerned to create message than engaging characters.

Leave her alone. She couldn't get Aragorn to fuck her, let her have this

because it's in the fucking book you retard hack faggot
you have your (yous), now please just fuck off

the Witch King is on his knees and helpless before Eowyn because of Merry's stab when he was about to kill her before that, I don't know how you can emphasize it more

Disney shill salty about TLJ and Capmrvl.

>some nigger filth
first time i've ever seen a nazgul described this way, my fucking sides have been completely atomized

Attached: 1551250049074.jpg (240x251, 23K)

Based Lorefag

It's in the back and she's a positive, likeable character who wants to protect her family and people.

This scene made me sad, for sure. Her whole desire to ride into battle did. What a sad world. It didn't ruin the movie though

Because it's literally the 1 scene where a female character has any agency in a 10 hours long film.

well, she thought that she would die anyway cause sauron was invincible at the time and his army would have swarmed rohan if the allies failed, which everyone expected to happen. so she figured it would be at least honorable to die in the battle for she'd die anyway.

because, unlike Jazz, she actually isn't a man

This is how it really happened
youtu.be/hWjt6LGhHsI

a woman proving she is strong enough to go against her natural role to defeat evil can be a good narrative in a film if done right. It's the reason why superhero films and comics with central female characters worked for a time. The contrast between a feminine and traditional woman being unnaturally strong can make for good writing. Now however, the focus is not on good narrative but on propaganda. Jews hate God, and they hate the natural order. Women must be seen to be masculine, independent and strong by nature (not by supernatural force or by their own effort working towards inner strength).

Damn those villain voices in old cartoons are so annoying

Because it felt earned. Eowyn wasn't a mary sue and was a genuine character who just wanted to help her friends. Also she got help from Merry. And it was a Shakespearean line.

Do the Ringwraiths actually still have their rings, or does Sauron have them?

For that matter, what do the Nine rings do, that we know of?

GIVE ME THE RING HE-MAN

Because it's in the book you dumb nigger.

Yes, ringwraiths have the 9 rings gifted to mortal men, doomed to die.

because lotr is from an era before clickbait articles about grrl power and white men being pathetic and sad
trust me if Aliens came out today they would market it as a Powerful Independant Woman kicking alien ass and needing no man and every manbaby should tremble in fear if the inpending matriarchy

It triggers me because it totally cut out the fact that the dagger had +10 against Witch King, and it was made a big deal with in the book.

Because back then identity politics was not a thing. People simply made movies and audiences judged it for what it was. Directors didn't try to shove agendas everywhere and critics didn't wank over them either.

You know, films as a form of entertainment. Not as a political propaganda machine.

Give me (You)s.

Attached: 1551679299599.jpg (399x600, 38K)

But she almost verbatim used that line in the book. What triggered me more is they gave the big rejection speach that Aragorn delivered to Eowyn to Grima Wormtongue instead.

I wish we could go back in time to when you could have strong female leads without the whole identity politics bs.

I enjoyed the shit out of warrior princess xena back in the days.

In some sources, it's said that Sauron keeps them. Gandalf at the Council says the Nine keep their rings, but he might be misinformed. It's unclear. Frodo didn't see them wearing their rings at Weathertop though.

Basically Sauron (in disguise) convinced the elves to forge the rings, with the plan to forge the last ring himself and bring the bearers of the nineteen others under his influence.

All of the rings supposedly grant the bearer longer lifespan. They all have some unique power too but it’s insignificant compared to the One Ring.

This lady is built like a brick house. No matter what you think about that person, the Witch King would be fucked.
When they are finished he'll wish he could just die

I remember thinking in that moment, wait what? They mean man as in gender and not the general man as in mankind?

There was so much happening in that film though it barely was memorable.

he got stabbed by a hobbit, which are not men.

To mock him probably.

I NEED TO SPEAK TO YOUR OVERLORD

Because if this was 2019, it would be a dude saying "I am no man."

I don't mind the line, but we needed a line about the dagger Merry used.

It was a combo of woman + the magical dagger.

Without the other, it wouldn't have worked.

Because in the book it was a plot twist. The removal of the helmet revealed it was Eowen to the reader.

>Yea Forums jacking its dick 24/7 to alita
>still trying to play the Yea Forums is sexist card
THE ABSOLUTE STATE OF RETARDS

Eowyn wasn't a feminist psychopath. She just wanted to serve her king in the only way she knew how. Why is it Yea Forums can't into context?

The dagger was given to Merry by Tom (basically libertarian god), and it was enchanted to break the spell.

So, it wasn't a woman that was needed to kill Witch King, unlike the movie presents.

It was all the dagger.

But Samus is hot.

>he couldn't tell who Dernhelm was before that

Attached: 1512326231190.png (1092x1050, 120K)

>libertarian god
Jesus Christ

Attached: ahsoka_barress_laughing.png (500x433, 264K)

A pointless but ultimately inoffensive technicality asspull literally worthy of-
>shakespearean line
-goddamnit you beat me to it. Lol Macbeth.

they built it up to look believable, it wasn't just random and tacky out of nowhere muh wymyn power just because! Context matters

Because even though she was a badass she was still feminine.

If it was made today she would of told her uncle that sending the women and children deeper into helms deep is problematic.
She wouldn't be cooking and serving stew to Aragorn.
Tending to a horse looking at Aragorn with love in her eyes? That's the type of female troupe that keeps women down obviously, that has to go.

Fact is men love a women that if push came to shove she would be able to defend the kids if he died, its in our DNA as a survival mechanism. Or it was until they started fucking with it.

Because LOTR wasn't marketed as a strong female woman bullshit movie. In fact, this scene is cool because she is vulnerable and struggles to keep up with the witch.

The scene makes no sense.
Why was she able to kill the witch king?
If all it takes to kill a Nazgul is to stab him in the face, it doesn't seem like they are that threatening.

I haven't read the books but I imagine they only sent male soldiers to fight them and never a female soldier. I dunno.

She could've probably stabbed the witch anyplace and it would've hurt. Plus a face stab is more dramatic and cooler looking.

it did, retroactively

it always sucked, every character is a fag except for boromir

Because it wasn't some "yaaaas queen" shit but rather a clever ironic remark at the creature who thought himself invincible: being defeated by less than a man.

He was defeated by a halfling, who was also not a man