160 minutes of artfully shot, well acted romance story that's at worst a tad boring

lmao @ fags who downloaded more than the sex scene

It's a good movie, pleb. I also jacked off several times at several scenes (it's not just this long lesbo one).

Honestly, their argument scene has the most explosive emotions on screen that I have ever seen. That scene is my favorite. They both deserved Oscars.

>Blacked?
Based.

Attached: 2ezoqj.jpg (480x301, 16K)

The writer of the graphic novel this is based on said so as well. That the scenes were for titillation and that lesbians don't have sex that way.

Is Below Her Mouth any good?

Does it worth it tho? Minus the lesbian sex scenes, it looks like a 3hour long lesbian couple fight

the scenes were for controversy to promote the film. if they hadn't been in there we never would have even heard of it, which is a shame because it was actually a well-paced, engaging character study.

why do people pretend that movies like this are artful and worthy of praise when they're just vehicles to push borderline pedophillic pornography

So did they really eat each other's snatch or did they use a merkin

It was just really good acting.

Attached: 1532296120277.webm (1280x538, 1.99M)

WHERE ARE THE WEBMS YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKERS?!

Attached: 1510944975884.png (497x498, 184K)

you too lad?

>borderline pedophillic pornography

Uh? The actresses were 20 and 27 years old at the time.

they had juice on their faces at one point, either the director thought about that detail (unlikely considering how roughshod the technical aspects of the scene are) or they pretty much did it for real but cognitive dissonance'd it away by thinking they were just committed to the role

Rated PG.
No joke.

tranny jannies give out bans everytime i post them.

Apparently one of them has PTSD breakdowns whenether anybody mentions the movie, so it was probably far more real than they want to admit.

source

all you have to do to make an art movie is have many long close ups of peoples faces. its like tricking a dog, the critics will think its art no matter what

Abdelatif Kechich is really hard to work with, nothing new, he always traumatize actress but he always produce kino masterpiece

But they're made up in the story to be high schoolers, similar to Call Me By Your Name.
Hell, even Jennifer Jason Leigh in Fast Times was supposed to be like 14 and her tits are out half the time.
Can't remember the actresses name but Joi from bladerunner is like 30 something but looks like a schoolgirl.
I don't care how old they actually are, they're portraying children.

The director had to be alone in the room and he didn't know how to properly operate a camera. Not even memeing.

>teenagers fucking other teenagers is pedophilic
Fucking mutts, get your shit together.

what did she mean by this?

Attached: 1544275369505.webm (580x720, 2.49M)

Kechiche’s latest film is way better.

>Highschoolers are children
Was that meant to be clever?

can't. My webm is 3.88MB and 4channel doesn't allow files larger than 3MB.

how do they have sex I don't have access to lesbians who'd let me watch

I always figured it was something like this
like either the cinematographer refused to do the scene and the director had to do it or the actresses' contracts had something about minimal crew being on-set during the scene or something
Robert Rodriguez talked about how when it came time to shoot the big sex scene for Desperado, for the entire crew happened to be on time for the first time in the shoot. He ended up doing it with no one but the actors, himself, the cinematographer and a producer on set.
when you faggots do the contrarian "lol it's not pedophilia, because they're past puberty" thing you're technically not wrong but you come off as even more perverted

They did that on purpose, obviously. Appreciate it.

>teenagers fucking teenagers
>only one of these movies features such
Call Me By Your Name explicitly promotes pedophilia, that twink faggot looks about 16 and The Lone Ranger looks like a 40 year old man.

Nobody really cares what the comic writer said because there was nothing noteworthy about the film other than the sex scenes and the actresses involved
>muh "straight" girl who meets a 100% lesbian and realizes shes gay and gets ostracised by her family
That story has been done a million fucking times on film, in books, on television its probably the most cliche LGTB story there is

Whats this about?

>tfw you realize the lesbian romance movies are basically exploitation films with delusions of grandeur

How am I a pervert? I just don't believe that 15 year olds are children anymore. I didn't say anything sexually suggestive about them.

The director had them work in abusive conditions.

>tfw this movie is what caused many discord trannies to want to become lesbians

what did they mean by this?

How abusive are we talking? What was said that made her cry

apparently the director had them shoot the sex scene over an 3 day period, go watch it and then imagine the logistics of shooting nothing but that scene for 3 eight hour days
20+ hours shooting a single location scene you'd think he would have figured out how to use the camera

>muh children

LOL

I'm gonna go to sleep so I have the energy to fuck my 14 year old GF when she visits me tomorrow. Have fun fucking geriatric +30 y/o grannies.

Attached: aoc europe.png (1414x213, 22K)

Had them give like 100 takes of even trivial scenes. The sex especially, since it took 10 days to film.

God damn that's kinda hot

>Vatican City
>18
That is the upper limit, right?

Yes. Spain used to be 13 but then feminists upped it to 16 even though there were no problems before.

>The Lone Ranger looks like a 40 year old man

Attached: 27-call-me-by-your-name-armie-hammer.w710.h473.jpg (710x473, 84K)

kek