In the end, did he add anything of value to the story?

If Ron could become magically aware of his own existence, I'm sure that he'd wish never to have been born into one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though r-right
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 1542873465259.jpg (1616x2864, 547K)

As far as I remembered all the Weasleys are described as really tall in the books, it just that movie Ron was kind of a manlet

Because he is, according to the books

who knows?
but his sister is cute af

God I hate anime.

Poor intro, doesn't relate to OP's question.
I would've written something like:
"A better question would be, could any of Rowling's vapid characters add value to one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. "

ron's kinda the worst
his greatest desire is to stand out among his family and never does aside from hanging around harry as he does something important. all of his siblings kinda kick ass. bill is indiana jones, charlie hunts dragons, percy is a bootlicker but top of his class, fred and george are popular class clowns/jocks/successful businessmen, and ginny is good at everything and a babe. even arthur becomes a valuable spy and molly kills bellatrix. ron just sat in the right train compartment.

>he says, browsing a board built upon anime shit.

Touché.

Attached: 1389475329265.jpg (320x240, 19K)

to the books, yes. As far as the movies go, who fucking cares? I hate people who dont like Harry Potter and I hate people who do

>watching abortions known as movies instead of getting the superior story from the books
yikes-city

Why is Snape a female? Why is Lucius 8 feet tall?

>dude chess
>dude i'm hungry
>dude i'm mad af why didnt you tell me you put your name on the goblet
>dude i heard you speaking cobra language

basically that, and hermione was in the wrong in the 6th movie

>The films proved you can easily just give his lines to Hermione and nothing is different
>You could write him out of the story easily with little change

Books were the same.

>bill is indiana jones, charlie hunts dragons, percy is a bootlicker but top of his class
Wait, there's another Weasley?? I thought that they were only five brothers plus Ginny. Was he ignored in the movies or did I forgot him?

snape was described as sort of androgynous and since thats anime shit it means he's a trap

If YOU could become magically aware of your own existence, I'm sure that you'd wish you never again posted one of the dullest copy-pastas in the history of copy-pasta. Seriously each copied post of the infamous Harry Potter pasta posted in order to generate (you)s and disregard a random film series is indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the book-tier image, the series' only consistency has been its lack of funny narrative and lackluster openings, all to make memes cringeworthy, to make millhouse seem reasonable.

Perhaps the die was cast when user vetoed the idea of Moot approving the pasta; he made sure the pasta would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously repetitive double-posting for their autism. The Harry Potter series pasta might be anti-reddit (or not), but it's certainly the anti-Yea Forums pasta in it's refusal of originality, capability of distribution and possibility for newfags to fall for it. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the original pasta was good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the OP was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time the user could have said something funny, he wrote instead something stupid and autistic.

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time this tactic was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. user's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that he has no other style of writing. Later, I read a lavish, loving reply of the Harry Potter Pasta by the same user who keeps posting the Wii music meme. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading the Harry Potter Pasta at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to watch the Wii Music meme." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "dullest franchises" you are, in fact, trained to watch the Wii music meme.

Attached: 1550818262160.png (636x1092, 1.42M)

Charlie doesn't have a lot of screentime I think he even got cut from the movies

>Ginny is literally Orihime