Bros is speilberg the bad guy?

Bros is speilberg the bad guy?

Attached: Untitled.png (510x277, 17K)

Other urls found in this thread:

collider.com/jj-abrams-steven-spielberg-peter-jackson-screening-room-sean-parker/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Eat shit Netflix. Cant virtue signal your way outta this

>rich Hollywood jew wants to suppress any change in the system in order to maintain money and control
nah he's the good guy

out of what? one jew who has never made an interesting movie and feels threatened by basically direct to video shit?

Both of them are, considering Netflix solely releases absolute trash content.

He is a hollywood big name, of course he is
those people eat babies as lunch

SHUT IT DOWN

>we do it because we love people!

here's things we also love: propaganda and censorship

>Access for people who can't always afford, or live in towns without, theaters
but if you live in a place with shitty internet and are too poor for expensive devices then get fucked lol

>but saving private ryan was g-
oh sorry, almost forgot we're not on reddit

Spielberg wanted to launch something like Netflix a few years ago collider.com/jj-abrams-steven-spielberg-peter-jackson-screening-room-sean-parker/

So here you have it.

>get fucked lol
i'll bet you thought you had a point with that
people who are too poor for a roku or a smart phone don't watch movies anyway

Out of what?

No one who made Ready Player One can be good

No speilberg is not the bad guy.

Netflix can do all of those things while winning Emmys instead of oscars.

Lol at that faggy virtue signaling. Give it a rest already you trashmen.

Attached: tduid2391_017.jpg (1387x1197, 415K)

Quick rundown?

ok now what do you do if you can't pay $70 for internet monthly?

honestly fuck netflix. speilberg might be a jew and i dont have any interest in seeing any of his films, but at least he's trying to make good films. meanwhile netflix just cares about datamining to get to the lowest common denominator of what people will watch, which ends up being basically straight to dvd trash. i'd have a little more respect for them if they focused more on getting good content and making 2-3 very good movies of their own instead of 40 dogshit movies a year.

If spielberg is so threatened by Netflix than maybe he should work harder to make his movies better?

>and are too poor for expensive devices
This is not how poor people work

I know that they can't say it but they should add

>Keeping the large corporation TV and Film studios honest and actually committed to trying to produce high quality Kino

>we have to wait Spielberg death before knowing the truth about the death of Heather O'Rourke

We will spit on your grave Steven. Know this while you're still alive.

Attached: MV5BNDU3Mzc3MjMyNl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwOTkwOTkxOA@@._V1_SY1000_CR0,0,683,1000_AL_.jpg (683x1000, 89K)

>basically direct to video
so you agree that Netflix shouldn't run for Oscars

Reminder that zoomers want a world where you can't buy groceries if you can't afford a smartphone

He isnt personally threatened. It's the principle of tv movies being eligible for Oscars. It has never been allowed before and all of a sudden theres a major change and it's like hes the only one who noticed.

When Speilberg started his career his tv movies were not eligible for Oscar's. Now that has changed without any official declaration or announcement or approval from any board or oversight group.

Or maybe direct to video movies should be allowed to submit for the oscars

>which ends up being basically straight to dvd trash
Wanna know how I know you never streamed netflix before 2010?

>why is there a monthly sub fee then?
>why do you have region specific libraries then?
>you're providing one way to do so and it's heavily censored
Why does anyone swallow this shit?

The Oscar's also didn't used to decide winners based on politics.

Attached: hitller.jpg (513x510, 59K)

That was never actually true, but that's a different argument.

YouTube videos too. When is Pewdiepie getting his award?

>you don't pay to watch films in any other format
>every film in the world is played at your local cinema
>MUH CONSERVATIVE IDEALS
Pathetic.

spielberg wants the academy to stop considering netflix films for awards.

White people are stupid.

>ok now what do you do if you can't pay $70 for internet monthly?
why are you acting like streaming movies is a basic human right? in shitbox towns where everyone is poor they still have movie rental stores. that's what you do if you really dont have money. you watch basic television 5 nights a week and rent a movie on saturday.

weird, huh? not having the choice of every piece of entertainment ever made readily accessible in 60 seconds. it's what you have to do though.

Netflix zoomer SEETHING

>but at least he's trying to make good films
too bad hes not successful in that since the duel, but im sure he's trying

how are tv movies at all comparable to netflix shit? More comparable to direct to vhs stuff.

>Wanna know how I know you never streamed netflix before 2010?
that's pretty good, m8. i probably got it around 2010.

>but at least he's trying to make good films
kek
>meanwhile netflix just cares about datamining to get to the lowest common denominator of what people will watch
That's exactly what hollywood is doing too. Their dataminig tools are just worse

His first movie was a TV movie that won awards and later was shown in theaters. Fuck off jew boy.

Attached: 1519104796673.gif (300x200, 1022K)

I thought they just really wanted money

>why are you acting like streaming movies is a basic human right?
i'm not i'm saying netflix is retarded for trying to act like something they're not

>old man mad that society is progressing and leaving him behind
and in other news, water is wet

the oscars is a trash award full with political propaganda, dumb blockbusters and capeshit." tv movies" won't ruin its prestige

Thanks. Seems reasonable.

The Oscars choose movies without having to watch them, you fucking pseud. Any opinion which flows from ignoring that is worthless

Your mum's cunt

Netflix is fucking garbage though.

>muh oscars must be respected, its an importnat award

how do i know you are 50 years old

>not having the choice of every piece of entertainment ever made readily accessible in 60 seconds
Jesus marketer, cool it with the slogans

Why shouldn't a tv movie be nominated if it's good enough?

>other providers don't preach about "how good they are for providing movies to people"
>they literally said "EVERYONE EVERYWHERE". pull your head out of your ass.
>politic-baiting
gg ez

Oscars and Netflix are both utter trash.
They should be banned outside of the US for the sake of humanity.

i'm definitely not referring to netflix here. i'm just talking about a good internet connection.

If Pewdiepie uploaded a feature film that became critically acclaimed, why not?

>access for people without cinema
what about people who don’t have access to Netflix? Their desire for profit disproportionately affects PoC. Netflix should be free for PoC, homosexuals, and other down trodden members of society.

Why does it have to be a feature film? I think his 10 minute videos have more merit than most films.
NEXT
MEME

thinking the oscars is a serious award is the most basic pleb filter

He's a jew, so yes.

>is the pedo jew trying to halt progress for the sake of his (((industry))) the bad guy?

Y E S
E
S

*old white man

Netflix hasn't produced a single thing worth shit in their five+ years in the game. That doesn't mean the distribution model is bad or flawed but this company specifically is too shitty to be supported. Spielbergstein is going senile and yelling at clouds. He's also the type of person who'd say "This is for the six million" when accepting an movie award.

There's no good guys

would be a good argument if they had more than 20 movies on there

They forgot
>put a forced white female-black male relationship in everything we make

How do you do fellow whites

Oy Gevalt why none reads these posts

>white

My dad once said Spielberg is irrelevant now because his mindset is forever stuck in the 90's

Is he right?

Attached: 1547857411729.jpg (882x640, 87K)

But neflix movies still have to get a theater release to be elegible for Oscars, right? What would be the difference if they're not available for streaming at the time of the release, like they do now, that magically would stop them from being TV movies?
Also, I read that Netflix is considering a traditional wide release for The Irishman, something about Scorsese being jealous of the campaign behind Roma, and wants something bigger now.

They are right and Spielberg hasn't made a good movie in decades. He can fuck right off.

The movie theatre experience is pure shit.

the vast majority of Netflix movies already can't be submitted for Oscars. They only cheat the system and release the ones that could win Oscars on a very limited number of theaters, but were they going to be released in theaters if not for that rule? Of course not.
The kike is right. Leave Netflix to the Golden Globes.

yes, but your dad also faps the thai traps

Because before that, the only thing you could stream was direct to video dreck for the most part when they still plugged the dvd-by-mail service the hardest. You took what you got and appreciated the diamonds in the rough. We've come full circle, only they scaled back dvd-by-mail to put their logo on the direct to video dreck.

>create blockbusters
>which ended the age of new hollywood
>top grossing movies went from being serious films to literally proto-capeshit
>create pg-13 rating which put dumb limitations on films
>create with bay bayformers which started the trend of hollywood pandering to chinks
>do this for 40 years
>hollywood changes so much there's not a single original film at the top box office anymore
>nobody goes to movie theater to watch serious films, only capeshit
>filmmakers flock to netflix to make actual good movies, with no limitations, to create an actual films and not chink pandering crap
>wtf roma can't be nominated for best picture, it's not a real movie!

is this fucking jew serious? reap what you sow faggot.

Attached: 1551639947605.jpg (540x433, 33K)

>kike frightened for his racket

Attached: 1467745287099.jpg (251x242, 12K)

So does your mom.

lmao fucking this. hilarious to see hollywood clutching pearls like this.

Who the fuck goes on Yea Forums and defends pedokike and tries to claim the Oscars are "prestigious"? Are there literal 60-year old boomers ITT?

Attached: 531d51eeb3fef8499372ecaf280db5b86c70fcb8386bba28d0a7f10fe6213e13.jpg (800x450, 42K)

Literally this.

They're not. I say burn it all down.

>other providers don't preach about "how good they are for providing movies to people"
Neither did they. Can you source this argument or are you just gonna continue to pull shit from your ass?
>>they literally said "EVERYONE EVERYWHERE". pull your head out of your ass.
And I can watch a Turkish netflix series from America, what's your point? Movies that aren't theirs are subject to all sorts of legal hoops, which is why you can't go watch the latest Hong Kong cinema at the local AMC, but I bet every region on the planet could watch Roma.
>>politic-baiting
NOU
gb2ffcb

Spielberg is based, Netshits will be btfo, next up Spielberg will take down capeshit

this, fuck this guy. he is partly responsible for the age of capeshit

who the fuck goes on Yea Forums and defend Blackedflicks?

pretty sure Netflix is the only place with multiple Drag Kid shows but yeah fuck that pedo for making Ready Player One

Its not serious but straight to streaming movies probably shouldn't win them

>filmmakers flock to netflix to make actual good movies
name 3

>kid dies of hereditary diseases
>jews did it

>hereditary diseases
He doesn't know.

Attached: d.jpg (480x360, 18K)

Yes, they should. If the platform it's released on truly is inferior then "real movies" won't ever actually be threatened, and the "not real movies" won't ever get a chance to shine. They'll be recognized for quality instead of join in on the rigged awards

OY MOSHE SOMEONE IS SLANDERING THE TRIBE ON Yea Forums

Attached: d5c.jpg (297x365, 36K)

i cant afford to go to the kinoplex all the time. give me money. i accept paypal, patreon, and cash donations mailed to me.

>You can't afford movie tickets? Oh, that's so sad! But good news, here at Netflix, we want to help you out now CHOOSE A SERVICE PLAN

Attached: Capture.png (960x636, 21K)

Third worlders dont get money

>major corporation pretends to care about poor people
What fucking cunts.

Fuck off

>Is *insert jew here* the bad gu-
Yes. Always yes.

70$ monthly for a fucking internet connection? People in the FED are sleeping?

i wont give you money, you'll just spend it on capeshit

>$70 a month for an internet connection
this is what amerifats britbongs and ausfailians have to pay for a shitty ADSL+2 connection
laugh at them

The Ballad of Buster Scruggs
To All the Boys I've Loved Before
Desire

he said good

All those are less than the price of a single movie ticket.

He's right though. Most Netflix exclusives are shit.

>(((Speilberg)))
mhhh..... You tell me user

This. Actually the whole USA pop culture is becoming unbearable day after day.

OY VEY

>paying for Netflix
Everyone in this thread is a moron.

Is that the girl they fucked anally to death with a broom pole?

>access for people who can't afford
Didn't Netflix just raise the price of it's subscriptions recently?

Attached: 1516311064328.jpg (236x235, 14K)

Shouldn't they spend money on books instead of fucking trash?

A movie like Roma being eligible for awards is a non-issue the year we had Black Panther and Bohemian Rhapsody up for Best Picture

>becoming

Probably be better to spend that on food and other necessities if we're gonna go there.

Netflix needs to fire whoever is in charge of their social media shit.

The Academy has been biased towards socially progressive films since at least the 60s, it's just a lot more obvious nowadays because the bias is stronger and the films less deserving.

Why can't people realize that going to the cinema is a social event? It has nothing to do with movies anymore. It's a way for people to get together and do something. An excuse to have a date.

>Yea Forums
>having a date

Yes, he directed ready player one and is only a money hungry kook at this point in his life, he doesn't care about films being art. That being said fuck Netflix

Stop acting like Oscars are anything prestigious faggot. It's a fucking joke, who gives a shit.

This year's show felt like the Affirmative Action Awards, lots of dumb nominations based on blatant pandering to minorities

what is the possible logic for blocking netflix shit from the oscars?

if they aren't as good then they won't win awards

>Can't afford "theatres"
"Yes goy, don't pay $10 twice, maybe thrice a year. Pay $12 monthly for my streaming service."

>and we give shitty propaganda content

Attached: 1548878148401.png (192x190, 50K)

None of those things are relevant to wether Netflix movies should be considered for Academy Awards

Hollywood protectionism. Prestige. The idea being that only the most premium movies are made by Hollywood, which is essentially the case because Hollywood still has the biggest budgets and talents.

What Spielberg fails to realize is this isn’t the 80’s anymore. I’m not watching low production direct-to-TV crap on an 18” CRT. It’s pretty cheap these days to get a 60” 4K TV with surround sound and theatre lighting at home. Little is compromised. In many ways the at-home experience is better than your average theatre.

He just wants all the money for movies to be centralized in Hollywood, he doesn't care about anything else.

there are longstanding rules about requiring theatrical distribution. Spielberg is right about most Netflix originals but not in the case of the movies that have actually gotten nominations, like Roma which did get a limited release.

Why he's salty about a streaming company playing by the rules for the sake of awards is beyond me.

This. Steven is out of touch. I would rather not deal with screaming kids, kicked seats, assholes answering their cellphones, people shouting at the screen, being seated next to a fat ass, etc.; etc.

>2-3 movies
>all the movies Shitflix has

>Good goy, you can either watch movies in the cinemas 2-3 times per year and spend ~$30 bucks total, or you can spend $12 a month on my Netflix (TM) streaming service where you will spend all day everyday binge watching piles of shit and saying sayonara to having a fruitful life (recommended).
Netflix is a multi-layered psyop.

>paying money AT ALL, to watch shit on ANY FORMAT
Oh you silly buffoons. When will you realise that video games are the future?

Attached: No, I'm really not who you think I am.png (428x488, 338K)

>Spending your day watching movies is bad!
>panicking about what is and isn’t a Jewish psyop all day is good!
You might want to consider therapy, dude

>Get crohn's disease
>die of the exact symptoms a year later
wow speilberg sure plans ahead

this doesn't debunk her having Crohn's disease

Seething netflix drone shills

Stevey's coming for your BBC propaganda

>Stevey's coming for your BBC propaganda
not gonna lie i can already say that the 2005 version is better than the upcoming bbc one.

Yes he made blockbusters, but you're a nigger if you think this is accurate

>implying you need to work hard to surpass Shitflix films

Why does netflix sound like a hardcore tumblerette

>buy cheap 40 dollar chinkphone
>connect to mcdonalds wifi
>install torrent client and vpn
>pirate movies and shows
>?????
>Profit

>30 day premium plan allows you and your entire family to watch a new movie every night for a month for less than the price of two tickets and a large popcorn at the local kinoplex.

spielberg is one of the most boomer things I can think of

Yeah I'm tired of nigger propaganda. We could use more kike propaganda for a bit

yes but then how will I get my crab legs? also Robert might miss me

>shitty discount smartphone
>expensive device

Attached: index.jpg (252x200, 14K)

>one jew who has never made an interesting movie
Dat nigga makes good movies for real doe.

Attached: datnigga.jpg (870x570, 80K)

this 100%

>is the king jew trying to use his leverage to push out of relevance a next-gen media service that bypasses the jew-ridden Hollywood studio-distribution model that lines his tribe's pockets and gives them immense cultural influence the bad guy
yes! you fucking idiot!

he was only a good producer, the indiana movies were good because he was on his edgy phase but literally everything else was dull boring schlock that stole thunder from much better films that were unfortunate to comeout on the same week, let alone the same year. He could've put his name on a dripping cold rancid trash bag and it would have been a box office hit.

Speilberg is definitely being a huge fag about the whole thing. He should shut the fuck up and stop trying to hold on to antequated ways when the rest of the world is moving on.

>bypasses the jew-ridden Hollywood studio-distribution model
But it doesn't bypass the jew-ridden Hollywood studio-PRODUCTION model. Why should I care about Netflix if all they produce is the same shit as Hollywood - race baiting 3/10 movies that aren't even worth paying the subscription fee to watch.

If you fix how they produce their shit, I'd be far more inclined to agree with you, and many others would too, but as it stands - the Big Jew has made more movies I enjoy than Netflix has.

Attached: frt.png (1201x901, 1.76M)

I genuinely can't figure out your point here?
Netflix can't provide their services to everyone, so nevertheless increasing accessibility is a bad thing?

>Jaws
>Close encounters
>E.T.
>The Goonies
>Empire of the Sun
>Hook
>Jurassic Park
>Saving Private Ryan
>Catch me if you Can
nigga, fuck off.

>Spielberg not phoning it in for an easy paycheck
I'm offended on Steve's behalf

I'm still salty about Beasts of No Nation's snub. I find it hard to take sides considering that

Is there a difference between cinema and movies? Yeah. The simplest way that I can describe it is that a movie is something you see, and cinema is something that’s made. It has nothing to do with the captured medium, it doesn’t have anything to do with where the screen is, if it’s in your bedroom, your iPad, it doesn’t even really have to be a movie. It could be a commercial, it could be something on YouTube. Cinema is a specificity of vision. It’s an approach in which everything matters. It’s the polar opposite of generic or arbitrary and the result is as unique as a signature or a fingerprint. It isn’t made by a committee, and it isn’t made by a company, and it isn’t made by the audience. It means that if this filmmaker didn’t do it, it either wouldn’t exist at all, or it wouldn’t exist in anything like this form.

So, that means you can take a perfectly solid, successful and acclaimed movie and it may not qualify as cinema. It also means you can take a piece of cinema and it may not qualify as a movie, and it may actually be an unwatchable piece of shit. But as long as you have filmmakers out there who have that specific point of view, then cinema is never going to disappear completely. Because it’s not about money, it’s about good ideas followed up by a well-developed aesthetic.

I love all this new technology, it’s great. It’s smaller, lighter, faster. You can make a really good-looking movie for not a lot of money, and when people start to get weepy about celluloid, I think of this quote by Orson Welles when somebody was talking to him about new technology, which he tended to embrace, and he said, “I don’t want to wait on the tool, I want the tool to wait for me”, which I thought was a good way to put it. But the problem is that cinema as I define it, and as something that inspired me, is under assault by the studios and, from what I can tell, with the full support of the audience. The reasons for this, in my opinion, are more economic than philosophical, but when you add an ample amount of fear and a lack of vision, and a lack of leadership, you’ve got a trajectory that I think is pretty difficult to reverse.

- Steven Soderbergh

I'm with Soderbergh and Netflix.

yes. What's the difference if a movie is released on Netflix vs Sundance? They dont get to stroke their egos?

Because Emmys are for TV and Oscars are for theatrical motion pictures

I agree with the sentiment but fucking hell, he said it in the most pretentious way possible.
Why can't Soderbergh just say
"I think there's something really important about films that are personal expressions of the filmmaker and aren't made by committees. This says nothing about the actual quality of the film, just that there's a marked difference between the two and I think the former is worth protecting."?

you forgot to mention that you can't pause the movie if you need to hit the shitter either

Read "Easy Riders, Raging Bulls". The "auteur" directors like Friedkin, Cimino, Ashby etc. ended the New Hollywood era because the power they had went to their heads and they made expensive, pretentious art films that nobody went to see. Also, most of them were drugged out of their minds, doing coke, LSD, heroin, you name it. Even Scorsese almost died, made 4 flops in a row and was only saved by Newman and Cruise throwing him a bone.

The two filmmakers that didn't do drugs, focused on their work and made entertaining films that the masses loved? Spielberg and Lucas.

THE DIRTIES

Netflix is all about social engineering and propaganda all of their shows promote negative things for humanity, and them giving artists complete control over their projects is obviously a lie, if you intended to make something optimistic netflix wouldn't let you.

I just can't decide who to hate more in this issue but it does look like Spielberg is REEEEing just because he's butthurt about streaming.

Munich was a pretty good anti-nationalism/anti-Zionism flick. Good action, too.

Hilda is optimistic af you heathen

Bright
Hold the Dark
Birdbox

Can’t always afford a ticket, but they’re raising their monthly prices? Here in Puerto Rico is cheaper to go to the movies. $5.25-$6.25 matinee showing or discounts for student day (on Tuesdays, doesn’t apply for movies released by Sony)

Haven't seen it but i have tried over 30 netflix series, typically the show will pretend to attempt optimistic writing but subtly all the characters will constantly disagree on things or the 'moral' is some engineered garbage. More than likely this show does promote something negative and you just haven't realized it yet.

>The Oscar's also didn't used to decide winners based on politics.
Lmao I bet you think journalism used to be objective and honest too

It's gonna $14 a month in Canada come April. Still a bargain considering you get access to more hours of entertainment vs one ticket price. I think $15 is gonna be the maximum.

Spielberg is not asking to ban Netflix from showing or distribution, he just doesn’t want them to participate in the oscars. The whole access and affordability is irrelevant

Maybe someday people will learn the truth.
Today is not one of them.

i just love to watch the world burn

thats all garbage unironically

spielberg's biggest mistake was making Yea Forums trash

The user is calling out Netflix arguments, not asking for affordable, accessible inclusive media like libs do.

The guy who made Jaws and Raiders of the Lost Ark has never made an interesting movie?

Attached: B92C43DF-12FA-4BF3-85DA-103F2AC36C9D.gif (500x199, 442K)

>old guard hollywood kikes
vs
>new age technocentric FAANG kikes

never thought i'd die fighting side by side with harvey weinstein

He’s not saying streaming must be purged. He’s saying they should not be nominated for Oscars, instead they should receive emmy’s or Golden Globes.

But why? What is a film to you?

zoomers will never understand spieldberg

What exactly is Spielberg's beef with Netflix anyway? It's literally still film, just provided through a delivery method that circumvents theaters.

>worshipping some jew's pedo fantasy films when you could be literally indulging in other superior films released that got jewed out of their attention because of that hack spielberg
So many fucking studios,partnerships and distribution companies filed for chapter 11 because 1982 was apparently the year ET was the only film that made money while everything else got sacked.

>at least he's trying to make good films.

I would argue that the last truly great thing he's done is Saving Private Ryan.

Wish I could leave movies and TV behind because of the politics, but what else is there for mindless entertainment? Vidya is overrun with political BS, new release books are 95% trashy female-focused romance novels and 5% women writing love stories about WWII, music is overrun with garbage plastic country / overproduced highly commercial pop, and god awful trap shit hip hop. Everything fucking sucks lately.

Attached: shits fucked.jpg (550x512, 35K)

This is just the academy spreading their cheeks in light of the "Oscars So White" thing a few years ago.

the only other way is backwards

It's time you start indulging in silent movies made when people thought WW1 was going to be the last war people would have the displeasure of partaking in so the next best thing is to make disaster epics where you kill your extras for real because you think that dumping tanks of water on them with nothing to support on is a good idea

Oscar viewership is at an all time low, they couldn't even find a host this year. Netflix will probably have their own annual awards show within 5 years

theres almost endless classical music, alot of great old games rpgs for example, hundreds of art house kino and books? i dont even have to mention that there are endless amount of truly great books out there. the sad truth is youre a pleb and brainlet who cant appreciate them so you need mindless entertainment, and because of that you're stuck with american white liberal politics and capeshit. enjoy

>By the time Spielberg was the age I am right now, he had made (among other things) Jaws, Close Encounters, and Raiders.

Attached: Artie No Nose.jpg (600x450, 35K)

damn I wish I was a jew too

Netflix films are still films. If they're good enough, there's no reason why they shouldn't be nominated for Oscars.

do people still remember that time Ebert pleaded with the board to not give best movie to Gladiator?

You're 35? Christ man, hope you at least have a masters, a wife, and a couple kids. I'm 20 and I'm probably older than the average person on this board.

I mean, I'm not doing bad for myself, but I certainly haven't made some of the most successful movies of all time.

>I'm 20 and I'm probably older than the average person on this board.

You'd be surprised.

>Munich was a pretty good anti-nationalism/anti-Zionism flick. Good action, too.
I was going to say this. Never have I been so pleasantly surprised by a Spielberg movie.

I haven't been to the cinema in 10 years, nothing interests me anymore, Hollywood is literally at its lowest point ever.

...

He killed Heather O'Rourke, so yeah. And he's a Jew so even if he wasn't a murderer (he is), he would still be the bad guy.

>I'm 20 and I'm probably older than the average person on this board.
A comment like this shows your arrogance and immaturity.

>filmmakers flock to netflix to make actual good movies
>actual good movies

Still waiting on those

Attached: 1550608350585.jpg (400x396, 28K)

...

>everyone, everywhere, at the same time
sounds like communism to me

JUST A TYPICAL J** PROTECTING THE J** CARTELS AND THEIR J***** PROFITS.

Roma had a theatrical run alongside its streaming release and people actually went, but they know if they were expected to release Black Panther as streaming alongside theatrical, most people would just watch it on their phones while eating and shitting.

this whole decade has been shockingly bad, and this is because zoomers used to screech at ''old film good'' people saying that if this was there was about as many bad movies in the 50s and 70s as there are now, I'm sorry but the good movies of those decades are some of the best stuff ever, what are some good 2010's movies? I literally only liked Hansel and Gretel Witch Hunters, The Martian and Noah, and they're pretty bottom of the barrel entertainment, the 50s were the height of sword and sandal epics, 60s musicals, 70s science fiction, what the fuck is the 2010's gonna be known for? remakes, reboots, capeshit and ruining Star Wars/everything with sjw shit. Just trash everything. Fuck movies.

>Bros is speilberg the bad guy?
Yes? Ask Heather. Oh wait...

Attached: 1543159491146.jpg (236x354, 20K)

Netflix is utter shit. Cannot fathom their customers defending it - without recompense - when 100% of them will have said at one point or another 'there's absolutely nothing on here worth watching'.

He mostly lost what he once had around 2001 or so. He was great in the 80s, decent in the 90's but after Minority Report, he just sort of lost the skill. By Munich it was obvious he was past his prime and actually making unwatchable crap. He just burned out and is now an angry old man yelling at the kids on his lawn.

Attached: 408.jpg (770x1024, 78K)

>Literally two of them are original stories not based on other work
>One of those two he shares credit with (just like those darkies who shared writing credit with the Jews who owned the label, but totally played a part in the song writing too because Jews are creative people)

The other poster is right though. You want me to be surprised that Jews promote other Jews as being the best in their class and then they confirm this by awarding them Jewish prizes, the winner of which is picked by Jews.
Having said that, I also hate Netflix, I hope they go bankrupt. It's impossible to have a dog in fight when you're either cheering for cancer or AIDS. I would rather sit back with neither and just torrent everything. But I'm neither zooomer nor goy.

Nothing Netflix is going to go that far anyway. Oscar movies only have like 3 categories

>Holocaust
>triumph over racial diversity in the early 20th century
>Tear-jerker lovable animal that dies at the end

Sorry but I don't want to chose between Netflix and Spielberg. Both are shlock making machines

...

Spielberg hasn't directed a good film since the 90s.

>lately
It's always been the case that 99.9% of all media is trash, people only remember the 0.1%.

>I would rather sit back with neither and just torrent everything

What would you torrent without Hollywood AND streaming companies? No-budget films made by Youtubers?

Fuck Netflix.

>Giving filmmakers more ways to share art
>Art
Film isn't art you faggots, it's MK Ultra programming.

Attached: 1551681707004.jpg (480x446, 59K)

quality films made by anyone that doesn't live in california

you do realize that this hypothetical scenario is literally the best thing that could happen to humanity, if hollywood just got SUCKED into a wormhole and vaporized

Nuke that place for the love of God. So much of the world's brainwashing could be undone if that shithole just got nuked.

Where are the makers of those "quality films" going to get financing and profits if everyone just torrents everything?

yes

all art is programming

Attached: 1293471284.jpg (750x480, 37K)

Wasn't this just the era of this shit happening? Music did this too, they decided to be weirdly "artistic" and made horrible shit nobody ever wanted to hear and things died for a while.

Black Panther was nominated for best picture, the oscars are a meme now there is no more prestige in getting one.

There's literally no rule the Oscars could add that Netflix couldn't game

>jew dies of typhus
>nazis did it

when you turn 18

this, btw Spielberg already ruinded the film industry once and aims to do it again.

Fuck off, /pol/tards

Attached: 1498148514602.jpg (1024x683, 64K)

Attached: 1407420005270.png (476x477, 258K)