THERE WAS A FIREFIGHT

>i used to love this movie as a kid and then i rewatched it recently and was cringing the whole time. sucks becoming a snob
fify

one of the reasons i like it is that the experience i get from watching it is so different from what i assume the filmmaker intended.

kek this

>what are you doing?
>i just wanted to cuddle
>cuddle? what a fag

It's an entertaining movie, but there are a lot of things that make no sense. If the two brothers are militant Catholics why didn't they execute the fag FBI agent? There is no way they would call him "a good man". Also, they're Irish living in Boston. And feel as though they've been commanded to fight evil. WHY THE FUCK DON'T THEY LAUNCH ATTACKS ON THE BLACK GANG MEMBERS ALL OVER THE CITY? Why did the Italian mob boss have a Jewish underboss outside of New York? Why in the sequel did they immediately recruit a Mexican gang member?

Why the fuck did Yakavetta parole a guy whose entire mission in life is slaughtering criminals, particularly mobsters?

same here, it's a shit movie. cut-rate tarantino.

>tfw watched the sequel but I have no recollection of it
There's just an empty void in my brain

It wasn't too bad, was it?

Attached: 02peq[1].jpg (476x356, 20K)

WATTA FUK YOU NEED ROPE FER?

Ya never know why her gonna need it. Ya jus alway need it!

overrated movie loved by redditards and various other forms of goons. It's really an increasingly awful film the older you get. I thought it was so cool when I was 16. When I rewatched it again a few months ago, I spent most of it rolling my eyes, it was cringey shit. Dafoe in drag and as a butch fag is the best thing about this piece of shit by far.

the documentary behind the film about the blow hard retard sabotaging his golden ticket to hollywood is much better

Attached: boondockfaggots.png (1889x729, 353K)

Go get yer fuckin rope then.

Dude same. Musta been shit if i cant recall a single scene

Why don't you get me a cup of coffee?
>Who the hell is this...?
Cafe latte.
>What the fuck...?
Twist of lemon.
>Chief, what the fuck is this?
Sweet'N Low.

The sequel is so awful.

One of the few movies where the behind-the-scenes documentary is better than the film itself.

Attached: 1523731916653.jpg (346x500, 47K)

Oh? Is that right, Rambo? I'll get it! This is rope right here!

the firefight scene is 10/10 but the rest of the movie is absolute shit

>Have you ever experienced sex? No

It shows, Kevin

Incorrect. The only really good scene is the courthouse scene.

at's just your opinion there, innit?

youtube.com/watch?v=dRxvC3nV_ho

I've watched it twice now and can't remember shit. And this is from from somebody who's seen the first literally 20+ times. That shit was awful.

the first time I got laid was after watching this movie

>I decided right there that out of sheer frustration and not being able to afford a psychologist, I was going to write this, think about it. People watching the news sometimes get so disgusted by what they see. Susan Smith drowning her kids... guys going into McDonald's, lighting up the whole place. You hear things that disgust you so much that even if you're Mother Teresa, there comes a breaking point. One day you're gonna watch the news and you're gonna say, 'Whoever did that despicable thing should pay with their life.' You think — for maybe just a minute — that whoever did that should die, without any fuckin' jury. I was going to give everybody that sick fantasy. And tell it as truthfully as I could.[2]

>I wrote [Boondock] in three sections. I wrote the very beginning and then I started thinking of cool shit for the middle. Then somehow between the beginning and the middle, the ending dictated itself.

cringe

Same, Peter?

>I wrote the beginning, the middle and then I came up with the ending!
Isn't that...every script?

>mfw this movie put helped build harvey's empire