>director uses dutch angle
Director uses dutch angle
>scene has 50 cuts
>director is female
>jewish screenwriter responsible for plot in which 56% creatura misfit or semitic looking nerd steals the heart of GF of aryan chad at the end of the movie.
>Director breaks 180 rule
What does a director even do? They have to be the most useless person on the team.
Rules were made to be broken.
fucking faggot, go learn basics about movies before posting in my thread
>wobbly camera to show character is disoriented
This is unlawful
>dutch uses tahiti angle
What the fuck is a dutch angle?
Brian DePalma is going to hunt you down, op.
Something shot at a canted (titled) angle.
It's like this, a skewed angle, not a straight on thing. Apparently it's "artistic" and "means something"
>director moves the camera at all
Formerly lawful
This man is correct. Having the camera move always destroys the immersion. Until it starts moving it feels like watching through a window in time space but then you suddenly become aware that there is a camera man. Like when someone reminds you that you're breathing.
I associate it with kid shows and shitty 90s movies
It's often awful. Cuaron and Lubezki are particularly bad. But some directors really pull it off like Tarr.
Just watched The Insider and this was done obnoxiously in one scene.
Kurosawapilled
>camera constantly flickering between characters like a strobe light
No it doesn’t that’s just ridiculous. Camera movement timed up with character movement is always better than a stale static shot taken from a distance. Static shots are way more immersive breaking because you can very clearly see the set behind the camera, with more up close shots the set fades into the distance. Cerebral and focused camera work is meditative, static camera work is boring and regressive.
>director uses the dubs angle
nice
checked
cool numbers
So are yours.
indeed, this calls for celebration