I'm talking in a general sense here
Other urls found in this thread:
Who is this guy
a based pacific islander
Samoa Joe
How new are you?
youtube.com
Umaga
and i knew this was gonna happen
this guy is fuckin based
He’s from the islands
who was in the wrong here
He's a based minority who knows his crime statistics.
This was the most honest moment in TV history
>But you're a minority yourself!
Nothing more hilarious than clueless 20 year old blonde retards who seem to think all non-whites are best friends.
The most racist people I knew growing up were Mexicans
I've had the experience that if a minority is redpilled, it's usually overdosed. I.e. they are usually the first to start citing crime statistics, and criticizing the welfare state. Like this guy, they start seeing themselves as part of the larger majority, instead of an isolated minority, which is unironically a good thing for cohesion. Just look at his dress or behavior - well groomed and well spoken, it's easy to overlook his background because it's irrelevant.
these facts is racist
to bad this wasn't more recent she might have gotten some shit for assuming all people of color are bros
Niggers and their enablers
>the colors used for each bar
that has to be on purpose.
When will hate facts be outlawed? Enough is enough.
>blonde girl instantly after the black guy
okay this is kino
I mean the data is correct and cited, but obviously the graph was made by a third party.
Pacific islanders are the white man's greatest ally
Is this the victory thread?
They are a great ally to the West, no doubt. However, there is one greater ally , the greatest of all allies.
Because they live in their mostly white gated neighborhoods.
Stop noticing things, incel!
Asians are a bigger threat to whites niggers will ever be.
than niggers*
Remember when those race and IQ denialists got btfo last thread?
Islanders are the most racists people you'll meet. They call you some variant of 'palagi' to your face.
niggers smell bad
>ywn
You couldn't be more wrong. Maybe the Chinese, and that's a big maybe at this point with where the US is going, and who's running the show - and I don't mean Trump. Everyone else (Japan, SK, etc) are literally /ourallies/.
>"You're like a minority yourself!"
Right wingers win IQ debates liberals win Holocaust debates this has been the rule of this board for years now.
The patrician's opinions are pro-race and IQ and anti-holocaust denial.
There were no gas chambers, they died of starvation and only 900,000 died.
I like Japs since they mostly stay in their Island unlike chinks who are scattered around the world like cockroaches.
correct and anti-NatSoc
Hngggg, muh dick.
niggers
The best ideology is pro-free markets and pro-white nationalism
but anti-neetsoc
prove me wrong
One simple question every denier / revisionist fails to answer conclusively. 5-6 million Jews disappeared from Europe following WW2 if not murdered in the Holocaust where did they go?
A Based and Redpilled Polynesian Chad that tells it like he sees it unlike you virtue signaling betacuck haoles.
>pro-free markets and pro-white nationalism
these two contradict each other tbqh
If you really want muh markets you want Singapore style NRx autism
Don't those kinda contradict each other? In a totally free market immigration is usually inevitable no? How does white nationalism play into that?
Link?
>source: holocaust memorial museum
>these two contradict each other tbqh
holy shit you fell for the /pol/ meme
why do you brainlets believe this?
The fucking United States of America was founded on white nationalism and free market principals and became extremely successful.
>If you really want muh markets you want Singapore style NRx autism
Nah, they're central bank cucks and not as free market as you'd think.
race is a social construct but the holocaust was indeed a hoax.
>race is a social construct
Why don't you believe in evolution?
Do you not trust German sources for German deaths during the war? How about American sources for American deaths? If you have an issue with the source fine but dismissing it without even bothering to look at its validity is just intellectually lazy
>holocaust memorial museum
It's all so tiresome.
refer to
Where's the Asian crime bar?
I'm not a denier, but there's two glaring issues I know of just from your post:
1. Look at the sources cited in the info-graphic: not the most reputable or unbiased, to say the least.
2. Those numbers are easy to skew - if you aren't STEM or have taken a few stats classes in college, then you may not be aware that almost all numbers are not actually counted. That may seem obvious, but to further extrapolate, basically any number in economics, the census, etc is almost unbelievably estimated, using very impressive equations and population tests. To keep it brief, the counting measures of the 40s/50s pale in comparison to those done today. In addition, there aren't 5-6 million names, all who have been confirmed killed. There's developing lists (by a biased source), but I guess you can start to see that over 70+ years, and only now lists are starting to be developed, that it may be an trust issue. Keep in mind as well - the German government still pays reparations to families of the deceased for the Holocaust, thus giving motive for many families immediately following the war to magically have another relative who was seemingly killed in a camp. I'm not saying people do it, but rather there was plenty motivation and enough inconsistencies (by statistical technique) in the counting process to never be sure.
nonexistent
oh good, another "national capitalist"
Reminder that FDR caused the great depression by using massive amounts of government intervention in the economy.
The new deal was the worst thing to happen to the country.
>oh good, another "national capitalist"
exactly
Why wouldn't you want to live in a white ethnostate AND have high living standards?
Would you rather be poor?
Not a denier, but even some of the early statisticians believed the numbers were vastly overinflated.
>Look at the sources cited in the info-graphic: not the most reputable or unbiased, to say the least.
Again refer to >>Do you not trust German sources for German deaths during the war? How about American sources for American deaths? If you have an issue with the source fine but dismissing it without even bothering to look at its validity is just intellectually lazy
>then you may not be aware that almost all numbers are not actually counted
Yea that's generally how estimates work. They don't count every body for WW2 estimates either.
>To keep it brief, the counting measures of the 40s/50s pale in comparison to those done today.
The current estimates are from scholarly research from the 70s-80s though. The Holocaust death toll wasn't even estimated until the mid to late 50s I think
> there aren't 5-6 million names, all who have been confirmed killed.
Not how estimates work
>but I guess you can start to see that over 70+ years, and only now lists are starting to be developed
Lists have been developed for a while bud it's not recent
> thus giving motive for many families immediately following the war to magically have another relative who was seemingly killed in a camp
Do you know any cases of this? I'm curious
whatever nerd lol
It seems like the pic you posted is arguing the non Jew death toll rather than the Jewish death toll. Keep in mind the Holocaust involved the murder of both Jews and non-Jews alike
>but even some of the early statisticians believed the numbers were vastly overinflated.
Such as?
>strawman pic
lmao you actually unironically want to be enslaved by corporations and the state and you want to have low living standards
you get so incredibly mad at free market countries like switzerland and singapore because they prove your leftist narrative wrong
enjoy your central banks lmao
>posts an image of corporations that libertarians have been fighting against
How stupid are you?
didnt ask for your manifesto nerd lmao
Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson
embarrassing
enjoy getting cucked you low iq poorfag
>but, but native born Americans are more violent than immigrants
>reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Gotta love when the liberals pull this one out of their ass then you mention fbi stats and they go crazy
>doesn't understand that rent controls cause the housing crisis in all major US cities (NYC, San Fran, etc)
>doesn't understand the lengthy cues to see a doctor, nor the lack of medical innovation under socialized healthcare
>doesn't understand systematic causation through price incentivization causing the efficiency and superiority of the US economy, that is, before the welfare state took hold
There's a reason socialism never works.
cringe
BIG BLACK BAR
based economic literate poster
>"get the knobs and gauges just right"
That was the breaking point for me with communism, especially studying the USSR. On paper and without a STEM economics background, it's easy to believe that an authority can dictate a set price on paper. I think a great deal of otherwise intelligent people completely misunderstand the role of prices in a market, as the USSR did as it constantly attempted to turn 'the knobs and gauges', and refresh 'market value' of a product/service to what they saw as most beneficial, etc. Obviously, they could never achieve such a feat, again, because that's not what prices are.