4 hour cut incoming

Are you ready for the true 2049 experience?

indiewire.com/2018/09/denis-villeneuves-editor-looks-back-at-that-four-hour-blade-runner-2049-cut-teases-how-hes-approaching-dune-1202007163/?fbclid=IwAR0AH3Yt9BGanhpdYRCs3w0dFwmqdyn408qiK1r9fyw8gY-Kvwqws4r3BXA

Attached: MV5BNzA1Njg4NzYxOV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwODk5NjU3MzI@._V1_.jpg (1382x2048, 1M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=rrZk9sSgRyQ
youtube.com/watch?v=UgsS3nhRRzQ
youtube.com/watch?v=aZ9Os8cP_gg
youtube.com/watch?v=tGyW7gekG3g
youtube.com/watch?v=H9RHWxhdUs0
twitter.com/AnonBabble

no

Based

hell yeah
meanwhile yall should watch this

youtube.com/watch?v=rrZk9sSgRyQ

youtube.com/watch?v=UgsS3nhRRzQ

youtube.com/watch?v=aZ9Os8cP_gg

I'm surprised how many people don't know these short kinos exist

Fuck you op
They never mention even considering releasing a new version.

read your own article brainlet, its not available.

>4 hour cut
No thanks
If Tarkovsky can say a story in less than 3 hours then so can Villeneuve
>implying there was a story in br2049 and wasn't just look I'm directing, symmetrical cinematography, atmospheric, speak slow to sound serious, nothing happens the movie

more like 2049 minute runtime

If it actually develops some of the shit that felt rushed/cut short in the theatrical, I'll give it a shot. If it's just more "hey look at my ludicrously slow approach shot with a dominant color", then fuck no.

I couldn't even get through 40 minutes of the theatrical cut.

Why would you publicly announce that you're a brainlet?

I know someone who worked on the movie and said that there were a number of scenes filmed with Ana de Armas that were cut altogether. One of them had a much more sexually explicit scene with the replicant prostitute played by Mackenzie Davis. Another one had her trying on underwear for K.

I don't know what it is about BR2049, but the film seems to compel brainlets to out themselves. See and I hope this gets released just for the Ana scenes.

It’s not ever coming out.

What do companies have against releasing lenghty cuts on BD anyways? If it's already shot, what is the problem? How will it lose money, it's basically just free money right?

Honestly the autism over run times in hollywood is insane.

I never knew these existed, thanks.

Because you have to reedit it
You have to colour correct it
Some of the cut material is lower quality
Rarely reedited extended versions are better
It costs money and the results are often (always?) underwhelming

What felt rushed/short to you?

The 4 hour cut is never happening you dummies, as Walker said himself all first assemblies or rough cuts of the film are much much longer than the final result, that's how you edit a movie.
It only happened to be that Villeneuve noted how even that rough cut alone was already pretty strong by itself, not that it was an actual legitimate "cut" of the film.

What does Hollywood have against having a single, canonical version of a film? I understand it's a ploy to sell home video, but still.

The theatrical cut is the canonical actual cut, confirmed by Villeneuve multiple times.

Deleted scene

youtube.com/watch?v=tGyW7gekG3g

Another deleted scene from the 4 hour cut.

youtube.com/watch?v=H9RHWxhdUs0