DVD cover
Attached: 71F9UqucvcL._SY445_.jpg (312x445, 47K)
Blu Ray cover
Attached: excalibur blu ray.jpg (395x500, 58K)
Got myself the Premium Collection. Kino cover.
Attached: 51Vxs+IEYQL.jpg (387x500, 41K)
Kino
okay
holy crap what the hell were they thinking?
Why is it so hard for them not to use that? I would even take this one, too.
Attached: Excalibur poster.jpg (695x1000, 127K)
The quality is the same as Nigel Terry's acting
I mean, why is it so hard for them to use that one from the Premium Collection instead?
Seeing natural lighting on ads already seems foreign.
there used to be some sort of law requiring that dvd covers look as bad as possible
Attached: 9adcdc73-82eb-4008-b09b-4cfcd7e140a6_1.f5dacdcec2105a5bc1fe85f6c0b89a4b.jpg (450x450, 51K)
I hate that modern posters are now basically just photoshop and actor's faces.
VHS
Attached: 51AZ0TXZK2L.jpg (261x475, 47K)
What the hell why not just use the great poster.
Attached: Excalibur poster_0.jpg (1000x1565, 332K)
DVD
Attached: 51PJX7GZW3L.jpg (354x475, 54K)
why isnt the same cover for theater, vhsz DVD and blu-ray?
Blu-Ray
Attached: 51IIxGfBDtL._SX342_.jpg (342x417, 46K)
Dont explain why or anything.
to demoralize the masses, obv
Attached: 027616901675.jpg (340x462, 33K)
Attached: batteris.jpg (335x475, 38K)
Attached: rebound.jpg (355x500, 57K)