Why did it get 0 nominations? Is it because liberals don't like movies that make fun of communism?

Why did it get 0 nominations? Is it because liberals don't like movies that make fun of communism?

Attached: DeathStalinPROMOCOVER.jpg.square-false_maxheight-1346_size-1000.jpg (1000x1346, 106K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ObD9OGsh498&t=133
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Mostly, yes.

It came out early in the year.
Movies that get nominated usually are supported by huge marketing campaign targeted to the academy members and come out in a fairly narrow time window before the cerimony.
This just wasn't a movie conceived as oscar bait.

>liberals=communists
Kill yourself amerimutt boomer

Attached: 1548566595054.png (930x1081, 112K)

It was funny as fuck, sure, but it wasn't really Best Picture material. It wasn't pushed as such, either.

Who cares? The Oscars are trash and the awards have no value anymore

it's not their fault you fuckers have lost all control of your political discourse. You've been failing to stand up to commie bullshit for a decade now.

American propaganda should be banned

Shut the fuck up libtard

>it wasn't really Best Picture material
Only 3 or 4 movies this year were Best Picture material anyways

>serious communists in the year 2019
I wish

Attached: 5640614654101.jpg (357x332, 17K)

Its tone should have got more attention. Excellent film making.

It was funny because of america's paranoia with Russia, CIA propaganda being turned into a fucking movie because of russiagate.

But this film is liberal to the core. I think you’re confused OP. Like many conservatives they fail to grasp satire and take everything at face value.

Btw this film was like 6/10 at best and not very funny

They are in everywhere but western countries. Western communism was a mistake.

>Is it because liberals don't like movies that make fun of communism?
You mean the liberals that are now calling for Trump to invade Venezuela to install someone literally no-one in Venezuela knows as dictator? Give me a break, its got nothing to do with Liberals and communism, even among the hardcore American left only a select few are woke as to how based Stalin actually was. Its more to do with the fact the USA doesn't want anyone knowing anything about Stalin, even bad because they might start doing independent research and find out things they're not supposed to know, or god forbid, reading the 12 volumes of work he left behind....

Attached: stalin2.jpg (753x527, 70K)

It was shitty and the style was all over the place, just like all A*erican films.

The west was a mistake, and we wouldn’t have needed communists if it wasn’t for the west

When will the genocide of westerners begin? We're counting on you Arab-bros! Kill the niggers and wh*Toids

No it’s because it’s a comedy. Hell itself will freeze-over before a comedy picture gets nominated for anything.

HOLY FUCKING BASED
youtube.com/watch?v=ObD9OGsh498&t=133

Attached: 5640561657410.gif (420x315, 1.12M)

this movie is too good for the oscars

>death of stalin
>american film

Attached: banzai.jpg (3648x2736, 3.18M)

It had an american cast and production team, only because the director and some of the producers weren't doesn't mean shit. British-American films are almost always dominated by Americans

>it had an American [crew]
Bullshit, no it didn't, and they shot it mostly in England.

Didnt you make the exact same thread before?

It was 90% historically accurate.
CHANGE MY MIND.

>liberals=communists

Modern Liberals not only defend, but outright venerate Communists.

>Why did it get 0 nominations?

Don't you know?
The Academy doesn't ever recognise comedies.

The production company was French.
The only Americans in the cast were Steve Buscemi and Jeffrey Tambor.

there are no historical records of anything that happened in the movie, nothing except anecdotal accounts of traitors and bystanders who were tortured by the CIA dogs

Should have taken best foreign film. I don't even need to watch that dirty gypsy movie

Funnily enough the very liberal country of Russia banned it

You are an idiot.
Even if you will read russian sources they say same things. Even about death of Beria, which was shown same way few years ago on main russian government funded tv channel.

'Modern liberals' respect the ideal of equality and that's about it.

'Communism' is an utterly meaningless term in American political discourse anyway, because any vague shift to the left is called 'communism' and fearmongering against 'communism' has been one of the primary tactics of the right to keep a totally uninhibited free market for decades.

It just wasn't that funny. Zhukov and Stalin Jr. were only consistently funny characters.

>liberal country of Russia
It is oligarchic autocracy.

Hey Jannie you seem to have accidentally removed my post so I'll post it again:

>liberals=communists
Kill yourself amerimutt boomer

Attached: 1548566595054.png (930x1081, 112K)

Less than 0.001% of Western """communists""" are actually communist, though. They're all just lifestylists or LARPing liberals.

In the Loop didnt get any noms either and it was right in the liberal wheelhouse by satirizing the US-UK relationship during the Bush-Blair years

pleb

they were funny, but they were also the biggest most blatantly jokey characters. Beria is the funniest

whatever those pissant jannies get paid, it should be less.

So they should pay to work? Sounds good

I don't know exactly how much they earn now but it's too much

they are low-T fags.

Attached: 1538661260505.jpg (344x512, 23K)